SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

January 5, 2023

NASDAQ US Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 39 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Brian Lee

analyst
#1

All right. Good morning, everyone. I think we'll get started here for our next session. It's my pleasure to host and introduce to my left, CFO of SolarEdge Technologies, Ronen Faier. As many of you probably in the audience know, SolarEdge is a market share leader in solar inverters. But increasingly, over the past several years, has expanded its portfolio to include energy storage as well as EV charging and a few other technologies, which we will touch upon here. But I want to thank everyone for joining and definitely thank Ronen for joining us as well.

Brian Lee

analyst
#2

It's a new year. We have to kick off with some views on kind of the outlook, I'd say. So maybe just Ronen for starters, walk us through your view on broader demand trends heading into 2023, key geos since you're internationally diversified but also key end markets because clearly, you're doing resi, but also very successful in C&I and then there's a venture to move more into utility scale as well.

Ronen Faier

executive
#3

So first of all, good morning. Thank you very much for joining and thank you for having me. So I think that we start 2023 in a very, I would say, different to where we started '22 and even '21, and this is where we see very strong demand in all markets in which we operate. And I think that the biggest difference between '21 and '22 is that if at that time, it was post-COVID and everyone was a little bit insecure because the value of at least photovoltaics was already known and the payback periods were relatively elaborated, 2022 changed the, I would call it, scenery quite dramatically with the war in Ukraine and the results of the energy prices and trends that we see worldwide. So what we see right now is a world that is striving for photovoltaics for solar and for storage. And we see it actually in almost every region in which we operate, which was the case also in 2022. The biggest interest that we see today is actually coming from Europe. Europe is, of course, going through the war in Ukraine and energy crisis. Energy prices hiked dramatically over 2022 and you see now measures taken by the European countries such as Germany to actually cap the energy prices on some of the corporations. But still, the cap is at a very high price compared to what it used to be before. And combining this with a relatively lower interest rate compared to what you see in the United States, creates a situation where photovoltaic energy in Europe is very interesting payback period of 2.5 to 3 years on a system that will live for 25 years. And a lot of government support. For example, starting this week in Germany, VAT was eliminated on installation of PV systems, which is equivalent to 19% discount on the cost of energy or the cost of the system compared to where it used to be. U.S. is also growing but a little bit more interesting. The NEM 3.0 is expected to impact this market. We understand that everything that will be at least certified by the end of April will still be grandfathered in the old plan, but we do understand that there's going to be a little bit more limitation. I think that we see a demand right now, but we see more signs that this could be something that will slow down over 2023. We do not expect to see smaller solar industry, but we expect to see deceleration in the growth of this industry. And we also believe a little bit that the IRA that is stabilizing very much the benefits of the ITC for the next few years do not put a lot of pressure for anyone to do something today when interest rates are relatively high, and there's a little bit of uncertainty. And when it comes to rest of the world and rest of the world for us is everything that is not Europe and U.S., of course, it's very country-by-country specific. But we also continue to see very strong demand in Asia. So it's Taiwan that is becoming a very interesting C&I market for us. And in general, Japan that is very interesting in the smaller C&I space, Australia that is interesting and other countries like Thailand, Korea and Singapore that are interesting. So all in all, it looks like a very good positive beginning of the year.

Brian Lee

analyst
#4

That's great. Maybe just to unpack a few of those moving pieces for you. I guess, big picture, revenue growth for you this year, I think if you hit your guidance, you're going to be somewhere in the 50% range year-on-year. I think consensus has 30% penciled in for you top line for '23. So just at a high level, does that seem reasonable, aggressive? And then as you think about U.S. versus Europe, it sounds like you're more bullish on Europe growth relative to the U.S., but how would you sort of characterize Europe in the context of that 30% overall growth expectation that's out there right now?

Ronen Faier

executive
#5

So I think that the biggest issue that we will continue to face in '23, and I believe into the beginning of '24 is actually supply rather than demand. We do see that either component shortages or a little bit of restrictions on our manufacturing capacity will not allow us to deliver all of the demand that we see ahead of us. And therefore, the growth -- and the 30% is actually the higher end that we guided for the next few years in our Analyst Day -- is something that will mostly be achievable based on the availability of components rather than anything else that we see in the market. So we believe that this is something that, yes, it can happen, and we also believe that if you look into the geographies, Europe will take a bigger portion of revenues in the next year. When we look and when we do our plans for the year, we usually do a bottom-up analysis of the markets. We see markets in Europe that can grow potentially more than 100% year-over-year especially around Germany, the German-speaking countries and even countries like the U.K. So I'm not sure that the U.S., I believe that analysts view this is going to be about around 15%, maybe a little bit less. In some European countries, we see a potential of a much, much bigger growth. And I do believe that you will see this impacting us in 2 ways. First of all, that portion of Europe as a percentage of the overall sales will continue to increase. But also from a mix perspective, since Europe is much more C&I inclined than the United States, I think that you'll continue to see growth in our C&I business.

Brian Lee

analyst
#6

Okay. Fair enough. And then just on the U.S., you brought up net metering. There's clearly some clarity, but also some moving pieces heading into the new year with that market. There's, I think, an investor perception that you're going to see a big pull forward given the April implementation time line. First question would be, are you seeing that already or are you anticipating that? And then maybe, again, unpack your comments around slower rest of the year, if you will. Is that due to net metering changes? Is that due to a view on the macro with the consumer? Just sort of where is your maybe caution, if you will, on the U.S. market coming from?

Ronen Faier

executive
#7

So I'm not sure that I know where to put my finger on what's exactly the reason that we have a little bit of a less, I would say, bullish view on the U.S. market right now. Macro is definitely part of it. The fact is that with the U.S. market heavily financed through loans, interest rates that are going up and electricity prices that have not hiked so much in other parts of the world, the payback period is longer. And if you add this to uncertainty around possible recession, and people that may be worried about whether they'll have a job or not, the tendency to go and put a system on your rooftop, where you see a maybe 7.5 to 10 years payback period is doubtful. And to add to this, again, the IRA created the situation because as long as the ITC existed, in every year you used to see a declining income tax credit that will come if you're waiting and this is something that maybe drove people to get a little bit of faster decision-making. Right now due to the fact that everything is stabilized, there is no reason to hurry. If you think that interest rates will go down, if you don't suffer too much from energy prices and you're a little bit worried there is no catalyst for you to go and invest a little bit more. So that's one thing. About the first few quarters of the year, we don't see anything dramatically different in the demand right now compared to where it was before, simply because it was very high before, and it's very high right now. I think that the picture is a little bit more complex because even if there is an ability to source a lot of product during the first quarter, the big issue is going to be in the U.S. is actually working hands. You do not have enough installation capacity. So even if we're able to bring all the inverters and optimizers needed to make installations until April, and I think that there's also a view that as long as you're permitting the plan before April, maybe you can still extend it a little bit, the problem will be around installations. So we don't see anything structurally that will make the U.S. demand very, very large in the first quarter compared to where it is right now. And I'm not sure if I missed anything else on this question.

Brian Lee

analyst
#8

I wanted to just touch on storage. I think a lot of your comments, the geos, the end markets were related to solar. There is a bit of a plateauing in volume growth we've seen across some of your peers in the storage side of the business. Can you kind of specifically talk to some of the trends you're expecting on your storage business into the new year?

Ronen Faier

executive
#9

Sure. And I think that maybe as a first note, to my answer, solar and storage should be over time related is one thing. When you see that on 1 hand, utilities are pushing to more net metering based on time of use and a little bit of a bigger difference between the rates that they're buying and the rate that they're selling, storage is becoming much more interesting. The more you see that houses and households are looking for resilience then solar plus storage becomes one thing. If you go today to Germany, 80% of the new systems are installed with storage simply because of the fact that you cannot push electricity into the grid or it's not very worthwhile to do this. And at the same time, people do see a little bit of concerns about whether they'll have electricity once they turn on the light. So I think that over time, it should be the same -- actually, it's the same answer for everything. The plateau that you see, I think, is mostly related to peers that are selling in the U.S. most of the energy storage systems. And I think that it's more related to the U.S. situation rather than anything else. Batteries today in the U.S. are simply too expensive. Payback period is very long. The battery prices are relatively high because of either lack of supply or because of the fact that, by the way, raw materials in storage hiked so much over the last few quarters, I would say, and companies are not willing to sell at a very low margins or it's a loss. And therefore, as long as prices are not going down, we do not see a very clear economic return on these systems. If you take and compare it again to Europe, in Europe, you see today when you put a system with a battery, close to 3.5 years of payback period for the system plus the battery. In the U.S., again, it's about 7.5 to 10 years. It's a very expensive installation that unless you're very worried about resiliency, I'm not sure that the economic benefit is there. So therefore, this is the reason that we see a plateau in the U.S. Our last quarter actually was a record quarter. We shipped 321 megawatt hour in Q3 and this is mostly coming from Europe. More than 75% of our battery sales happened outside of the United States in Q3, at least.

Brian Lee

analyst
#10

So you talked earlier about the outlook for demand is bullish, but you still have a bit of a supply issue. On batteries, it seems like that may be less the case because you've got to sell a 2 ramping and you added a new supplier here recently. So 321-megawatt hours a quarter, I think your capacity moving through this year will be much above that, I think, 500-megawatt hours plus. So do you anticipate, irrespective of all the comments you made around batteries being too expensive, your supply there will allow you to continue to grow even if there's maybe a plateauing that you're seeing elsewhere in the market, especially in the U.S?

Ronen Faier

executive
#11

So I believe that, yes. And again, it's mostly related to our business in Europe that you still have a very high attachment rate of batteries, which we have not yet exhausted the ability to grow. So yes, we see an ability to grow. I also believe that we will start to see battery prices moderating and starting to go down especially once we'll have Sella 2, allowing us to reduce also the cost of our battery cells. So yes, we're very bullish about batteries and their ability to grow.

Brian Lee

analyst
#12

Great. I'm going to shift gears a little bit to the supply side. Obviously, that was a big issue for a lot of the industry last year, but especially for you guys. Where are you still seeing the constraints? I know you've talked about specific chip, chip component and maybe even a time line for when you think that might get back to a normal, if you will?

Ronen Faier

executive
#13

So in general, there is no major change in the last few quarters. And the fact is that the biggest supply constraints that we see today are related to power semiconductors. It's capacitors, MOSFETs. And here, most of the players in the industry are building subs. And until these subs are built, we will not see major change in the supply pattern. The reason is that these are mostly components that are going either to EVs, where we do not see softer demand there. Maybe, by the way, when people think about recession, they believe that less cars will be acquired, but actually, the portion of EVs out of total cars is increasing. So therefore, we do not see any softness there. And when we talk to our suppliers, they do not see any softness there. And since this is the case, we will have to continue and wait for [subs] to come online and start to release new units. This will start to happen at the second quarter of '23, and will prolong into the beginning of 2024, where we believe that we will see enough capacity in the market. What is improving is, on the other hand, the -- I would call it timing of supplies. Sometimes because of COVID there's -- especially last year because of some of the disruptions that we saw in China, even if you go to the entire amount of chips that you were supposed to get them, if you got them at the very last day of the quarter instead of throughout the quarter, you were not able to manufacture. So I think that while we do not see tectonic shift in the amount of components that are there, I think that we start to see a little bit more stabilization in the ability to project when they're going to come and the fact that you will be able to operate your manufacturing lines in an organized manner.

Brian Lee

analyst
#14

Is there any way to, I guess, quantify that? I mean we could keep tabs on new fabs that are coming up and getting online. But I think industry-wide lead times are pretty closely followed. Historically, I think normal lead times will be 8 to 10 weeks, and they've been out as far as double that, 16-plus weeks. So where are we today? Where do you think that trend line can go to reasonably over the next few quarters?

Ronen Faier

executive
#15

So I think that you need to make -- to separate here between resi and C&I. On resi, I think that this 13 to 16 weeks is still in place. And I think that it's slightly improving but not dramatically, mostly around the fact that ocean freight is becoming a little bit more stable, and the routes are becoming less long than they used to be a few quarters ago. In C&I, there is still relatively high lead times. And this is actually related to the availability of components and availability of supply. We take orders today for Q4 2023. And it's not that some of our customers would not like to get products tomorrow morning, simply this is the time that we can actually commit to deliver these products to them. So here, I can tell you that in some cases, you can see even 4 to 6 months of lead time on C&I, especially on the larger systems. And again, this is something that will moderate, but I believe towards the end of the year and not much before.

Brian Lee

analyst
#16

You mentioned freight. Freight has been in focus, particularly as it relates to your margins. So it seems like Q3 was the first quarter in a long time where you got a little bit of relief. But how much more relief is there? What's a reasonable sort of margin recapture that can happen and over what time frame when it comes to the freight side?

Ronen Faier

executive
#17

So when we ended Q3, the kind of -- or actually ended Q2 and then updated in Q3, we said it from the end of Q2 2022, to the end of Q2 2023, there's about 600 basis points of margin improvement that can come from a combination of freight and actually tariffs that we pay on goods that we brought from China. In Q3, we have basically took about 140 basis points of this 600 basis points. And we said at that time, and we still continue to say that we believe that we can take all of this remaining 460 basis points until the end of Q2, although it will not happen immediately, but we'll be more inclined into Q2 of '23. And the main reason, by the way, is that in Q1, there is Chinese New Year that is still limiting the amount of manufacturing that we can do, and therefore, we need to expedite shipments. But the trend is positive. First of all, our manufacturing capacity is growing all the time. Mexico is ramping as we planned. We are increasing capacity now in Sella 1 in Israel. And in some of our other factories, the other factories are very much stable, the 1 in Hungary, the 1 in Vietnam are much more stable than they used to be. Even in China, the situation is relatively okay despite of the COVID issues that happened there. It's relatively okay. And in general, we see that once we have more capacity, we can move much more to ocean freight. And to that end, the ocean freight costs are going down not to where they used to be at the beginning of '21, but they're getting closer to them. And this is why we see this as a kind of a moderated trend. In addition to this, again, since we have Mexico growing, we have Sella 1 growing, that means that we bring much less products from China to the United States. So the portion of tariffs is going down. So we believe that this trend is on track.

Brian Lee

analyst
#18

Because of a lot of those inflationary issues, which seem to be reversing a little bit, you had multiple price increases last year. Are we through that cycle? Do you anticipate any more price increases this year? Or do you have to, at this point, maybe even consider reducing prices now that some of your input costs are coming down? What's sort of the pricing outlook here?

Ronen Faier

executive
#19

So first of all, it's very geographic dependent one. We are implementing price increases in Europe these days as well because of the various dynamics that we see there. In other areas, we simply look at a competitive environment and of our expected return on the sales of our product, whether we need to adjust prices. We hiked prices last year. This was an industry, and you remember it well that we used to talk all the time about 7.5% to 10% of annual ASP erosion. In the last 3 years -- sorry, up until 2022, it stopped for about 2 years, in '22 prices went up. I don't think that the potential of increasing prices is very big right now. But at the same time, I do not also expect to see major price erosions over the next year or so. So I believe that we're relatively stable with a little bit of an up notch in Europe, at least in Q1.

Brian Lee

analyst
#20

Sounds like the manufacturing footprint, you're expanding a little bit. Mexico is going well, which you've articulated since the beginning of really last year. Now this new wrinkle with the Inflation Reduction Act, where are you in that process? It sounds like strategically, you're in the mindset of building something for both optimizers and inverters in the U.S., maybe just level set us as to where you are in that whole planning process and the time line?

Ronen Faier

executive
#21

Sure. So the first thing is, by the way, is that we're still waiting for the treasury notes about how to interpret this legislation. In general, we believe that operationally, we should make optimizers and inverters in the same place. It makes much more sense. And here, again, the clarification of whether we will be allowed for the $0.11 or $0.065, we believe that we can meet the $0.11 criteria. This will be part of our decision whether we make optimizers here in the U.S. or not because still making it -- making optimizers without this legislation outside of the United States is going to be a little bit cheaper. So in general, we would like to do everything here, but we wait for the clarification. The way that we look at it is that we look at 2 routes that can be either separate or combined. The first one is a contract manufacturer, which is supposed to be a relatively quick win, meaning to go to one of our CMs to build the line there. That means that we can have products if this happens at the later part of 2023. I'm not sure that it's going to be all the products that will be needed in the United States. We're also looking at setting our own factory, Sella 3 factory in a way here in the United States. And this is something that we're still investigating. Because one of the things that we do see, and I must say that I've been spending some weeks on the road here in the U.S. for looking for manufacturing sites, is that the art of making electronic manufacturing in the U.S. is a little bit long gone art here in the United States. And we go to places that used to see electronics manufacturing a few years ago to North Carolina and Tennessee and Texas. In some of these places -- in some of these places, you don't see electronics made anymore. And when you go to a contract manufacturer, it seems that they have the knowledge, they have the ability, but actually you find that they also have difficulties in finding the right personnel in order to do this manufacturing in the U.S. In some of the cases, they have lost themselves the ability to do it and returning these arts to the U.S. is something that will take a while. And this is why I'm not sure that the full CM solution is the right one because contract manufacturers by definition, would like to hedge all of their costs. And that means that you're taking the risk instead of them, you pay a lot of the CapEx and cost instead of them, and then you let them benefit from the fact that they simply operate the factory for you. So we need to analyze how it works. Both things will work and we'll have to evaluate. But in any case, I believe that once the interpretation will be out, we'll be able to announce what is the route that we intend to take.

Brian Lee

analyst
#22

And do you have an expectation as to when you'll get better clarity from treasury?

Ronen Faier

executive
#23

I believe it's either end of this month or beginning of February. That's our expectation.

Brian Lee

analyst
#24

And it seems sort of like a nomenclature issue, right? They use the language of microinverter specifically. Would it be as simple as just labeling your optimizer as a microinverter. I mean the name microinverter, I don't think is patented. It's just sort of the functionality that's implied in that, but the optimizer does sort of have similar functionality. Because there is a discussion point out there that it's very unlikely that they'll change language in the bill. They're just going to provide interpretation?

Ronen Faier

executive
#25

So first of all, in the bill itself, there is a definition of what is a microinverter. And the microinverter is basically a device that has MLPE capabilities, module level power electronics that is fitting into a certain voltage range and into various operational methods. We meet this definition without the name microinverter, and this is why we believe that we should be eligible to get this kind of legislation. It's not that you just said microinverters without explaining what is it. We are looking actually for a clarification of whether we fall into this definition. Changing the name, we're a little bit attached to this optimized because this is the nature of technology. And I'm not sure that by just calling something a microinverter will make it a microinverter, but actually have the capabilities there. But I think that we work a lot with [SIA] here, and I believe that it's for the best interest of the U.S. market actually to label our products also as eligible for the $0.11, and we'll see what happens. If the only thing that will be needed will be change the name, we don't have a lot of religions related to it, I just think that it will look a little bit ridiculous, but...

Brian Lee

analyst
#26

Fair enough. Last question on this, and I'll move on. The -- if you were to move forward with kind of that second route you mentioned the Sella 3, what would be the time frame on that?

Ronen Faier

executive
#27

So that's -- it could be either end of '23 or beginning of '24, but it's usually not for -- it's for start of production or not necessarily to have it fully ramped up because to have your own facility, by the way, just as to have a manufacturer facility will require a lot of labor to be trained. And usually, when you ramp up a factory, and I see it now in Sella 2, you start from 1 shift, then you see the next shift and then the next shift comes and you see the third shift that needs to come. So it's nothing that grows very rapidly. So I believe that start of production can be '23, ramp-up or full ramp-up will take at least another year. And this is why, again, looking at a combined route of CM and own manufacturing, which are not necessarily contradicting each other, is something that can work.

Brian Lee

analyst
#28

So in all this commentary, it does sound like some of your costs are improving. Supply chain, while not out of the woods quite yet. You're starting to see a little bit of improvement there as well, and then pricing is stable. It doesn't sound like we're going to see meaningful erosion, if any, this year. So when we put all of that into the context of your gross margins, that's been a key focus for investors over the past year. Do you feel comfortable in getting back to that sort of 30% to 32% consolidated margin target you put out in previous Analyst Days? And is that more of a first half event, a second half event? Any kind of framework you can provide there?

Ronen Faier

executive
#29

So first of all, yes, we feel comfortable. And I think that with the exception of the exchange rate of the euro that can change a little bit, but now it works back in our favor in the sense, plus the price increases that we have implemented, we believe that we should exit [ second ] quarter of 2023 with the target margins -- gross margins that we've [Technical Difficulty] Analyst Day. And by the way, we should exit the year with the operating profit margin that we set as a long-term target in the Analyst Day. I think our impact will be in 2023 is the mix, especially going to be the mix of batteries within the overall product mix and the mix of C&I. These are 2 products that have usually higher unit cost and lower gross margin. So it does, in a sense, dilute the gross margins but actually have a positive an increasing impact on the operating profit margin, which is at least the area that we're looking. We're looking at how much money we're counting in the stairs, so to say, after we do our business. And I think that we can be there. We feel comfortable.

Brian Lee

analyst
#30

Can you talk specifically about the battery margins? I know you had that framework supply agreement with STI. You've added a new supplier, I think, out of China. And then you've got Sella 2 coming online here in 2023. Where are you with respect to battery margins in the context of your targets? And then how quickly can Sella 2 change that?

Ronen Faier

executive
#31

Sure. So first of all, targets were 25%. In Q2, we said that we were at about 15%, and we said that in Q3, it increased towards the 25%, but was not yet there. We view the 25% gross margin as a target and something that is achievable, but not just because of the fact that we have better supply or having Sella 2. I believe that when it comes to batteries, we are sitting somewhere on the curve of the elasticity of demand to the price. And we truly believe that by being able to reduce battery prices, we can sell and move more volumes that will, in turn, increase our operating profit. And this is why the 25% target is there. I think that it will remain there because whatever we will be able to achieve more in gross margin terms, especially after having Sella 2 and some of the new supply. And also, by the way, again, because of the fact that you do see prices of materials getting moderated over time, I believe that we will try to push this down as also maybe a little bit of ASP declines on battery alone in order to push more units into the market. So 25% is the target.

Brian Lee

analyst
#32

Okay. And then I waited until close til the end of the presentation to ask about FX, even though FX has been sort of the #1 question for 2 straight quarters. It was a headwind in '22. It seems like near term, it's sort of turning into a potential tailwind. Remind us, you had guided 4Q under the assumption of $0.98 and now we're sitting at $105, $106. So how much does each point again matter to the gross margins? And does this kind of put you in a position where now that it's a tailwind, you're almost in a position to sort of beat margin expectations?

Ronen Faier

executive
#33

So given where we are on the fourth quarter, I'll be very careful in my answer here. But in general, the 2 things that we need to take into account is the fact that when we guided, it was already in the middle of the quarter, and at that time, still the $0.98 prevailed. So in a sense, it is sometimes not just where we are ending the quarter with what exchange rate, it’s actually what prevailed during the time that we shipped our product. And again, at least half of the quarter was at $0.98. We said it -- at the end of Q3, we said that in Q4, the impact of every again, even every cent will be around 40 basis [ points ] and mix both of Europe and C&I. And again, this has had -- had you had the exchange rate changing in the very first day of the quarter. So in general, yes, it was less restrictive than it used to be before. We cannot enjoy all of the benefits, but we do enjoy some of it right now. And also and this is something that will head into more into '23 and less related to '22 is the fact that we have implemented price increases on mostly on new orders all over Q3, Q4 and now in Q1. So basically, we will also enjoy these ones throughout the year. So I think that this is something that adds to our confidence that we can meet the previously guided gross margins that we have said in the Analyst Day that at that time, by the way, it was $114 when we gave this projection. It was $114 per euro.

Brian Lee

analyst
#34

Maybe just to wrap up the discussion here because we're running up on time. I wanted to give you a chance to talk about some of the newer products. So utility-scale inverters. That’s something that's sort of newer in the portfolio. You've already had a little bit of traction, but maybe can you speak to whether you see any inflections in '23, the markets that matter for you when it comes to that product opportunity? And then you also announced just this week some new M&A around the IoT side of the business. Maybe speak to that a little bit as well.

Ronen Faier

executive
#35

Sure. So first of all, from inverter point of view, yes, our 330-kilowatt inverter that we have been testing for the last 1.5 years will be commercially available in 2023, and it's something that's supposed to start pushing us into the small utility. We will not do the 500 megawatts, feels it will be most likely to the smaller, I would say, up to 100-megawatt field. But this is a product that we do expect to see some traction. And we already see a lot of utility installations that we do with our smaller products. So we feel very comfortable with this. And I add to this the fact that today, again, not only we come with the utility inverter, we come with offering of our own trackers through the SolarGik acquisition that we did last year and through storage capabilities. So definitely, utility becomes very interesting. We start to see floating -- C&I and floating utility systems. We've just commissioned another one of those recently, which is a huge one, and we see it as something that will very much advance us. As for the acquisition, I think that that's part of what we've been saying for a period of time that everyone talks about energy transition, and we say that we want to be an energy transition or energy technology company, and this is exactly hits. The acquisition of Hark that we're still waiting for some of the regulatory approvals to conclude it will allow us to go into C&I facilities and not only to generate electricity using PV, but actually look at the consumption in a very easy manner to get connected to the legacy energy management systems of C&I facilities to analyze them to give a very clear visibility to the owners about what is the energy that is used, where is it going, what elements can be improved. And just by the way, testing the Hark system on our Sella 1 factory, we saw a very nice amount of energy savings that we can do in a relatively new factory. And this is something that very much increases our C&I capabilities because not only now we can come with a solar system on the rooftop to increase the green production and also decrease costs, we can give a lot of insight about what is happening inside of the facility and how energy is being consumed and how can it be better utilized in order to better plan for the future. What is the PV needs? What are the storage needs and how this can play into a situation where you see utilities changing rates throughout the day and to make sure that we're also increasing the efficiency of these. So it is -- if everyone talks about energy transformation, this is part of what we take as energy transformation capability.

Brian Lee

analyst
#36

Okay. That's great. I think on that note, we'll wrap up this first session. I want to thank Ronen for joining us.

Ronen Faier

executive
#37

Thank you. And Happy New Year for everyone and have a wonderful year.

Brian Lee

analyst
#38

Thanks for the next session as well. Thank you.

Ronen Faier

executive
#39

Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.