Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 16, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Marissa Bych
analystAll right. Good morning, and welcome. This is Marissa Bych from Morgan Stanley Equity Research. I work with David Lewis in Medical Devices. I'm very excited this morning to have John Sheridan, the CEO; and Leigh Vosseller, the CFO of Tandem Diabetes with me this morning. And Leigh and John, I hosted you both last year in-person, more fortunately, but we have the opportunity to talk a little bit about the Basal-IQ success that you had, had. And obviously, now we get to talk more about Control-IQ's success. So let's maybe start off with some of the nearer-term dynamics and then work into product specifics and what you have in the pipeline catalysts ahead. But it's great to have you both here.
Marissa Bych
analystThe first thing I want to talk about is just that there were a lot of moving factors in your recent results, right? So Control-IQ momentum most clearly. And COVID-19, obviously, has been a headwind across the board. But you also have had telehealth and virtual adoption now, Germany reimbursement, so all of this kind of obscured some of the COVID-19 impact for you. So I want to talk about -- can you help us understand what COVID-related dynamics you're seeing today, if you can discern them? And if it's differing materially U.S. versus OUS versus the update that you gave us on your 2Q call?
Leigh Vosseller
executiveYes. I believe -- I'm sorry, John, go ahead.
John Sheridan
executiveI would say it's -- go ahead.
Leigh Vosseller
executiveIt's hard to believe it was a year ago we last talked and how much things have changed, since that time, the whole world has turned upside down. But to your point, COVID has made such a big difference this year. But thankfully, with some of the initiatives that we already had in place and our quick pivot to telehealth and supportive telehealth, we've actually been much more successful than we anticipated when the COVID environment started. And so I think one important point is that a patient deciding to move forward with pump therapy isn't necessarily tied to an office visit, and I think that's very key to our success in Q2 as well as what we're experiencing in Q3. We get asked a lot of times about how many people are actually visiting their physicians, how many are we seeing in a telehealth-type environment versus in person. And frankly, that doesn't really [Audio Gap] our business. That decision usually starts with a visit at some point where a physician might recommend pump therapy, but it's up to the patient. And they may think about it for months, quarters, even a year before they decide to move forward. And so while we're still seeing some pressure from COVID, and I think a lot of it has to do with people's thoughts about the economic environment and where this might go and how long this might last, it's been well offset by the fact that we've had great momentum with Control-IQ as well as the fact that now that we have coverage from UnitedHealthcare. So to the point of what the driving factors are for the remainder of the year, we really point to those dynamics for us. It has been very different in the U.S. versus outside the U.S. In the U.S. [Audio Gap] to see some evidence of that first, which we did begin to see in Q2. And then, of course, the United coverage opened a whole new door for us. Again, that has not been there for the last 4 years, and so we were able to factor in some level of benefit from United for the remainder of the year. Outside the U.S., it's a little bit different in that one thing we had to take into consideration in the third quarter in particular was that we still expect to see some level of seasonality associated with the fact that they have that summer holiday season, and it's hard to tease out how much of that is from holidays versus still some pressure from COVID-19. But Control-IQ is just beginning its rollout there at this point, so we are not really focused yet on that being a key driver for the rest of this year, more a momentum driver as we go into next year.
Marissa Bych
analystGot it. Very clear. And that is something I wanted to touch on, too, because I noticed the Street is modeling a pretty significant step-up from 3Q into 4Q pump, whereas 2Q and 3Q look a little more similar. So it sounds like that's a traditional seasonality dynamic for you, it's not necessarily a dynamic where COVID-19 is having ongoing or outsized pressure during the third quarter versus earlier in the year. So I think that's clear. Next, let's talk about renewal dynamics, if that's okay. Your renewals rose, I think, materially in the second quarter versus the first quarter. And this opportunity becomes incrementally more significant, obviously, over time. What do you think guidance assumes for the second half renewals? And should investors think about renewals as something that should kind of increase steadily quarter-to-quarter over time? Or should investors think more of renewals as offsetting the inflections that you actually had in pump sales over the past 4 years and kind of mirroring those more closely?
Leigh Vosseller
executiveSo renewal state has been a story of strong, steady growth. Part of it was getting acquainted with the renewal process from the very beginning and obviously, the opportunities weren't as great in those early years as they are and as they will continue to be as we look forward in the next 3 to 5 years. We did see a nice step-up in Q2 and as we look forward into Q3 and Q4, we have a few other dynamics that will help that renewal trend and one in particular goes back to UnitedHealthcare coverage. If you think about it, we were restricted from access beginning in 2016, so any patient really who's ever come up for renewal who had a Tandem pump did not have the ability to move forward and purchase their next Tandem pump. And so we believe there's a fair portion of people who are waiting for this opportunity before they made their next renewal purchase. So whether or not that's a large population that comes to the table here in the very near term, at least it removes that barrier on the go-forward for anyone new that's coming up for renewal. And we have continued to invest in initiatives to support the renewal, driving those renewals forward, and we refer to it as retention and renewal initiative because it doesn't just start when a person's warranty is expiring, it's really about that first point when they purchase the pump and making sure that they are well adapted to it and becoming acquainted with it and it's providing them the benefit that we expect that they will get over time. And so it's starting from day 1, providing them that great customer experience over the 4 years. So when it comes time to purchase their next pump, it's a natural step for them to move forward for -- to receive our latest and greatest technology.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay. Great. We'll talk more about the latest and greatest technology looking forward here. But just to wrap up on kind of COVID-19 and the dynamics that you're seeing now, I just want to ask if you think that this pandemic has ultimately positioned you maybe more or less favorably into the next year or so ahead and it's going to be compounded by Control-IQ, I'm sure. But if you think about kind of your growth rate between maybe 2020 and 2022, do you think some of these headwinds, like potentially new patient starts, OUS, unemployment or coverage headwinds versus maybe you can say tailwinds of COVID-19 being an accelerant on virtual training, telehealth, awareness of diabetes risk and kind of device management, do you ultimately think that this period is kind of net disruptive or net accelerating to your growth plan?
Leigh Vosseller
executiveYes. That's an interesting question. It's hard to say that it's an accelerator, except that as we come out of this with the pressure we're seeing, that will dissipate over time, so I would say that it could help growth rates just from a comp perspective year-over-year. One thing that you mentioned, which I think is really important, is we have accelerated, for instance, one of our initiatives. We have really started looking at remote trainings probably 12 to 18 months ago as a cost savings opportunity. It would be more efficient. It would reduce travel time. It would allow our reps to see more patients or to talk to more patients, train more in a single day, and so that was something that we had just started. And with COVID-19, we accelerated that to being 100% virtual training. And so that was, if you could say there's a silver lining, that's one thing that really helped us and advanced one of our cost savings initiatives. I think it also built closer relationships with the physicians. As they were adapting to telehealth, we found that we became a great resource for them because we had already implemented some of these virtual-type activities. And so I think that also will help us on the go-forward as we were partners almost, if you will, through this change and this transition. So I think both of those bode well for the future. But I mean, at the end of the day, I can't point anything more really than Control-IQ and the great success it's had just because of the technology itself and the experience the patients are having.
Marissa Bych
analystGot it. I think that's very reasonable. And let's just level set on kind of those future goals while we're talking about them. You have an installed base of around 170,000 today, I think your goal is for 500,000 patients on Tandem pumps in 2024. What kind of type 1 and type 2 assumptions go into that? You've talked more recently about having some interest in the type 2 patient population and how they can benefit, especially obviously, insulin intensive from pump therapy. Should we think about that 500,000 2024 goal as majority-driven by type 1 still with potentially some lighter penetration into type 2? Or could type 2 be maybe upside to that? And then secondly, as you talked about type 2, should we be expecting more commentary on this year from you looking forward? And is it possible you may introduce some data sets on this?
Leigh Vosseller
executiveI'll start with the long-term goals, and I'll let John talk to the type 2 component of it. But when we set that guidance, it was really still focused primarily on the type 1 market. We've seen just under 10% of our business come from the type 2 population. And while it's an area of interest, our primary focus up to now has been on type 1, and some of the initiatives -- the major initiatives we have in place right now from an R&D perspective, clinical perspective have really been focused on still that type 1 opportunity. It's a large and growing market, especially since -- due to the fact that we believe that the MDI population will continue to shift over at a very rapid clip, much like the acceleration we've started to see in the last 12 to 18 months. But I'll let John talk about the type 2 opportunity and how we're thinking about it for the go forward.
John Sheridan
executiveSure. Well, absolutely. It's a big market. As Leigh said, we currently have approximately -- maybe a little less than 10% of our patient population are type 2 today. We have been really thinking hard about this, we -- I think there's a couple of different areas we're focusing on. There's a clinical component, there's a product and features component and then there's a channel component. And I think that there's a number of companies that have tried to get into type 2 space with pumps but haven't been successful, so we really want to take a measured approach and make sure that we have a good handle on each of those factors as we move forward. We actually presented some very good clinical data at the ADA on a patient population that had not used Control-IQ that were type 2 and actually used it for several months, and we saw a pretty significant improvement in time in range. So I think that there's an opportunity for us to continue to collect clinical data and just understand the benefits that the technology has to this patient population. We think that discretion is very, very important for the type 2 community. It's a group that has had a negative social stigma associated with them because of the perception that the diet and exercise just have led to the type 2 situations they've encountered, which is -- it's not the case. It's really a lot more complicated than that, but because of that, discretion is very important. And so we think that when we come to market next year with t:sport, which has a much smaller form factor and also uses a phone for full control that, that increased level of discretion will be very appealing to that group. Now the pump that we currently have today is -- it's really designed for type 1. It's a little more complicated, I think, than the type 2 community would want to use, but we think that there's opportunities to modify the user interface to simplify it for that group. But I think that the t:sport system enables us to just begin to see how appealing that is to that market. And then the next one is just the channel and currently, we deal primarily with endos, and I think that the type 2 community goes primarily through PCPs, so it's -- we have to explore how do we get access to that channel. We don't want to replicate our sales force that we have for the endos, for the PCPs. Obviously, that's -- that would be too large of an expenditure. But it does mean that the digital health initiatives that we're working on right now might have the ability to access and provide training and support for the PCPs. So it's really trying to get our handle around all of these issues, understand it and then begin to move forward in a more communicated way, what we actually explained to you what we're thinking about doing. I think that's something that's going to happen in the next 6 months to a year.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay. It's very clear. And you mentioned t:sport and the channel as potential drivers. What about CGM? There's obviously a lot of talk about CGM moving into type 2 insulin intensive, which is already somewhat penetrated, and further non-insulin intensive, which may not be so much of a use case for pumps. But how much do you think CGM in the insulin-intensive population of type 2 can be a funnel for pump?
John Sheridan
executiveYes, certainly a tailwind. I think that we definitely benefit from CGM adoption. It's really helped us, I think, with both Basal-IQ and Control-IQ. The ease of use, the lack of fingersticks, that really has been a catalyst for our success. So I think that when you look at the type 2 adoption of CGM, both with Abbott and with Dexcom, it's an opportunity for us to get access to that community as well. So we think it's definitely going to be helpful, very positive for us.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay. Great. Let's shift gears and talk a little bit about kind of the pipeline and the catalyst path. I think your nearer-term catalyst, correct me if you feel differently, but just the Control-IQ rollout in Europe, which I think is still in early stages now. I think you talked about rolling out in the U.K. so far, so I think it's probably early for broader feedback. But have you heard anything different so far from OUS adopters versus the response you've had domestically? And is there any other color you'd share on the rollout so far?
John Sheridan
executiveIt's real early. I think it's just been a few months now. I don't think we anticipate anything different than what we've expected in the United States. We expect there to be a great deal of excitement, significant improvement in their outcomes. So we expect to see similar improvements OUS as we have in the States. So I think that it's just early, it's early as we speak.
Leigh Vosseller
executiveYes. I think I'll add on that scaling rollout. A lot of it is timed by the fact of when the distributors are ready to receive that product into the market, and some of it has to do with regulatory approvals and reimbursement approvals. So you're right, it's still very early stages. But for instance, we recently filed for a submission in Canada where it requires regulatory approval. And so we expect to see more from Control-IQ outside the U.S. through the end of the year and early in 2021. But to John's point, there's been a lot of excitement about its arrival.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay, great. Let's talk about the mobile bolus feature, which I think is the bolus through the smartphone app. I think you've talked about this as somewhat of an underappreciated driver for you. And so maybe start with why is this still important, why do you think it might be harder to appreciate, maybe in the investor community versus the patient community? And if you can just remind us the timing that you have for the bolus-only approval?
John Sheridan
executiveSure. Well, we think that we're making a big pivot right now towards digital health, and we think that's a very important step for the company. We believe that developing an ecosystem of data-driven products and services is really going to help reduce the burden of people using the pump. It's going to help physicians by providing tools to help them become more efficient, and there's also data opportunities to work with payers. So it's a big step for us. And I would say that the mobile app is the first major step in that direction. We currently released the mobile app in the last couple of months, and we're seeing great success with it. Currently, it's only a secondary display. So you can see all of the information that comes off of your pump on your mobile app, which is very beneficial and people really like it. And the real benefit today is that it sends all of that data directly to the cloud. So particularly with COVID-19, there's some difficulty for the physicians to actually get access to the data so they can actually provide therapy management with their patients. So this allows that data to be available in t:connect almost immediately, so it's a big change for us and very beneficial. I think the thing that people don't appreciate is how much discretion matters to people with diabetes. And I think that by integrating the capability of mobile bolus onto the app, you significantly improve discretion because the only thing that people really do with the pump outside of their home is bolus for meals, and so now you can do that directly from your phone. So we think that's a very big feature, and it's a stepping-stone to the point where we will have full mobile control on t:sport when that's introduced later next year. Timing-wise, we are planning to submit the mobile bolus feature for t:slim in the fourth quarter. And just pending the FDA approval, we anticipate commercialization in the first quarter. So we're very excited about it. We think it's going to have a meaningful effect on -- it's all about reducing the burden. And I think that when people are able to interact with the devices that they have in their daily lives, it's going to help us do that.
Marissa Bych
analystYes. And I think you made an interesting point about digital where you're very focused. And that brings up one of the debates I think we're having with clients this year, is just kind of how much does data in time in range really matter anymore for pumps. You kind of set the standard last year with early- to mid-70s time in range of the Control-IQ at ADA 2019. Other pumps have come out this year at ADA and shown 70-plus percent time in range from here. So do you think that time in range at this point is kind of good enough? And outcomes and efficacy have reached a point that have kind of passed the threshold where the focus now shifts more towards ease of use, feature sets, form factors? And if that's the case, what do you have in the pipeline? We can talk about t:sport, certainly. And I don't know if you've given us any hints on what may be coming after t:sport, but what are some of these other personalization or digital enhancements that you think you could make longer term that would be valuable?
John Sheridan
executiveSure. Let me just talk about time in range first then. Our data back in the 2019 ADA was -- our pivotal data at time in range of about 70%. There was a little bit of a disappointment when that first came -- was made available, and I think that's because people didn't really understand the way that the study was designed. And that study really represents -- it was very representative of diabetes in the United States, so it's a very broad population of people who had varying levels of controls, people who had very good control to people who didn't have good control at all. So I think it's very representative. If you look at the data that we're seeing today from Control-IQ, we're seeing time in range in the high 80s and low 90s. And this patient population is people who are careful, they manage their disease, they're very careful about bolusing and as a result, they get fantastic outcomes. But that's not everybody, and so I think that we still have an opportunity to make improvements in the way the algorithm works so that we -- it's more aggressive, and you do get increased time in range by reducing hyperglycemia. And I think that's -- we really don't have hypoglycemia today with either Basal-IQ or Control-IQ. And with Control-IQ, the issue really is that the cause of the time in range is hyperglycemia. So more aggressive auto-correction boluses, potentially being more aggressive in the sleep mode. We think those things are going to continue to improve the time in range. And I think that -- my thoughts are we need to get the whole population. We saw that in the clinical study for the pivotal trial, we had people who essentially didn't bolus at all. And they had time in range just before the study started in the 40s, and they went up to 60. So they saw a substantial improvement, but there's still an opportunity, I think, to get that higher by working on various features in the algorithm.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay. Great. So I'm hearing that the algorithm and the data still matters.
John Sheridan
executiveAbsolutely, yes.
Marissa Bych
analystGood. That makes a lot of sense. Okay. Great. The t:sport, obviously, your first shift to a smaller form factor. Is there anything early you've learned about t:sport during human factor testing that you'd want to share today? And my second question is, given this is kind of a first step toward a different form factor for you, as I mentioned, some would say that patch pumps are the ultimate flexible form factor. Do you think that patch pumps fit in Tandem's pipeline in the future? Or is that something you're less interested in pursuing at this time?
John Sheridan
executiveThe human factor studies are going along very well. We're very pleased with what we're seeing. It's an iterative process. We're still in the development mode. So we're going to take feedback and iterate the design, the user interface to improve the experience. And so that's what's going on right now. I think that the -- as far as a patch pump goes, we're always evaluating various opportunities. We haven't really spoken about what's coming out after t:sport. We're very focused on getting t:sport to market to commercialize it, but I think we're always evaluating other form factors. And yes, we will continue to innovate. We want to maintain our leadership position in pump therapy, and we know that we can't stop today, and so we expect that there will be future generations of new technology that Tandem introduces over time.
Marissa Bych
analystGreat. And we talked for a minute about CGM as a driver earlier. Maybe we can just talk about Libre 2 versus G7 together or separately. Libre 2, I know Abbott has mentioned that they're looking forward to this partnership they have with Tandem, and maybe this could be the first AID-approved partnered products that they have on the market. Are you actively working with Libre as we speak towards this AID system? We know that you're partnered, but as Libre awaits potential FDA approval of AID integration, are you kind of on the sidelines as Abbott is going through that process? Or is that something that you can continue to build your 2 products together and potentially bring that to market some time in, I don't know, maybe late 2021?
John Sheridan
executiveYes. I mean I think it's a parallel activity. And we're clearly -- we've been working with them for a few months now. We have a good relationship. It's a great team. We're excited about the product, and I think that the activities that we're engaged in today really are just about integration of the sensor into our pump system. I mean, I think in parallel, they're working on addressing the issues with ascorbic acid. And they have a lot of confidence, I think, they're going to be successful. And so we're hoping that we sort of are done in parallel, and we've done it around the same time. But we're probably talking about a product that's going to be available in the late 2021 or 2022 time frame, so it's -- I think it's going to have a meaningful impact in 2022, and that's really, I think, what we should be planning on.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay. Great. And Dexcom, we spoke with yesterday, is still pretty confident in G7 coming to market, likely in around the mid-2021 time frame. How do you integrate G7? And how easy is that for you relative to this newer partnership that you have with Abbott?
John Sheridan
executiveI mean we've been working with Dexcom now for several years. We've integrated 3 generations of their technology. Our engineering teams have a great relationship. We talk frequently. So I don't want to suggest it's easy, it's -- there's definitely a technology challenge. But our teams work well together, and we feel that we can get there with them, and we're very excited about their product. I think that the fact that it's iCGM and that it's going to be implemented on an ACE pump and we're already using the Dexcom sensors with Control-IQ, I think it's going to be straightforward from a technology point of view. And obviously, we'll have the benefit of interoperability in reducing the regulatory burdens. And so we're hoping to get to market with that device shortly after they do. I mean I think that would be desirable for us.
Marissa Bych
analystGreat. And when you say shortly after, I'm thinking weeks to months as opposed to quarters.
John Sheridan
executiveWell, that's pretty aggressive. I think that it's really a matter of when we have access to their technology to see and begin to actually work on meaningful engineering conversations.
Marissa Bych
analystOkay, great. And I also want to touch on smart pens. We've been talking a lot about Medtronic's acquisition of InPen, obviously. How do you think that transaction and how do you think smart pens, in general, as these come to market, change the decision process for an MDI user and potentially transition to a pump? I think you've talked about pens as kind of training wheels for a pump, so in one sense, it's a funnel. But do you also think there's risk to patients wanting to stay on a pen longer if it's better suited to their management? And if pens are a natural funnel to pump, why wouldn't owning a smart pen complement Tandem?
John Sheridan
executiveWell, I think that there's a lot into that question. I think that -- I mean, initially, I think -- we do think that smart pens are, as you said, training wheels to get to a pump therapy. It's still early. There's not a whole lot of clinical data on smart pens at this point in time. We believe there's going to be meaningful competition when the insulin companies come to market with their devices. So we've chosen to kind of sit back and wait and see what happens and make sure that this -- it gets worked out. And I think that if, in fact, we do see that smart pens are an opportunity for us to increase our MDI conversions towards pump therapy, I think we'd reevaluate our position at that point in time. The thing I'll say about smart pens, though, is they don't close the loop. I mean it's -- we think that the automated insulin delivery therapy that we have provide a superior diabetes management, and we expect that people will get comfortable with a smart pen, they'll be comfortable with the data, and they'll want to take the next step towards meaningful improvements to their therapy management with -- using pump therapy.
Marissa Bych
analystGreat. Okay. Got it. And John and Leigh, we are coming up on time here, but I want to give you an opportunity to share maybe anything else that you're learning throughout this COVID-19 dynamic, about Control-IQ rolling out, something you're most excited about for 2021 or just any parting words that you have today.
John Sheridan
executiveYes. I mean I think there was definitely turbulence in the March -- early -- in the second quarter as we began to see the effects of COVID-19. But we have great relationships with our physicians, we are well prepared for virtual training. And so we've really gotten through that right now. It's clearly a headwind, but I think that we were well prepared, and we're continuing to see a lot of excitement about our products and great enthusiasm going forward. We're very excited about the mobile technology, the digital transition we're making, and we're also very excited about sport. And I mean the good news is that the factors that have made us successful in the past are still there today. We believe that by maintaining our leading position in insulin pump therapy, that we will benefit from the competitive conversions that we've experienced, but also from the MDI conversions. And then renewals are also going to be an increasingly important part of our growth going forward. So we're very excited about our growth, and we have high confidence that we can achieve the numbers that you and Leigh spoke about a moment ago.
Marissa Bych
analystGreat. Well, we're excited as well. And hopefully, we'll have some more news to talk about next year at the Morgan Stanley 19th Annual Healthcare Conference. Thank you both so much for joining us today, and hope you have great meetings throughout the day.
John Sheridan
executiveThanks, Marissa.
Leigh Vosseller
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.