TE Connectivity plc (TEL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2020

US conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jim Suva

analyst
#1

Hello, everyone, and thank you so much for joining us here. This is Jim Suva. I'm the IT hardware and tech supply chain analyst here at Citigroup Investment Research. I'm very pleased to be introducing our next fireside chat, and that is the company TE Connectivity, stock ticker, TEL. A few housekeeping items. Please refer to TE Connectivity's Investor Relations site for their safe harbor statements as well as their risks and various statements about forward-looking statements. We also do want to note that Citigroup Investment Research has disclosures and there is no media and no press invited on this. If you are media or press, please disconnect or we will go through the list and disconnect you as we see. And this is for institutional investors only. We also note that anyone subject to MiFID II should have those agreements in place. I want to introduce and set the table is joining us here in the room is Chief Financial Officer, Heath Mitts. And also joining him is Head of Investor Relations, Sujal Shah. And so I want to start things up by, first of all, welcoming both of you. It's nice to see that you're actually in the office while everyone here is connected mostly from home. It's quite to -- excited to see you in the office.

Jim Suva

analyst
#2

But maybe to start and kick things off, Heath, can you talk a little bit about demand trends in the next, say, near term, let's call it, 6 to 12 months. And have these changed as we entered in 2020 and then the pandemic started to spread globally, maybe set the stage about where we're sitting right now, Heath.

Heath Mitts

executive
#3

Sure. Well, first of all, Jim, thank you for hosting us today and inviting us to the Citi Conference. I know this conference in the virtual format is a little new to all of us. But I suspect it will be part of the new norm, at least in the medium term. And as you mentioned, Sujal and I are actually in our office, outside of Philly today, which is a bit unusual as we're generally working from home or remote locations as well. So it's nice to see Sujal live and in person, which I don't get to see very often anymore. Listen, I think your question about the demand environment, if you back up a little bit on pre-COVID. So going back to about this time last year, if we were talking at your conference then, I believe we talked about things starting to slow down, particularly in China, we were seeing auto production slow. We were also working our way through some destocking within our distribution channels, which impacts some of our business units. And we anticipated that destocking to take place over a couple of quarters and then from about this time last year until our March quarter earlier this year. And that was playing out about as we thought and then COVID kicks in, in the January, February time frame in China and works its way across the globe to where we sit today. And in some ways, we were fortunate to see some of the market slowing before COVID in hindsight, although it didn't feel good at the time because it wasn't like we were necessarily starting at a high, working our way down. We were already seeing inventory come out of the channel and some of the activity in regions like China slow. What we have seen is, obviously, in a couple of areas, particularly in automotive, which is about 40% of our revenue. We've seen automotive tick down considerably with auto production down this year an estimated 20%, global auto production. And that's had a pretty dramatic impact on our numbers. And then to a lesser extent, but still meaningful, things like commercial aerospace, which is going from about a $500 million business for us, down to probably closer to $300 million as we see the dust settle. And that we would anticipate being a more elongated recovery. On the other side of things, we have seen businesses -- some businesses do well in this environment. Our defense business, within -- defense within our aerospace world has continued to be strong and has helped make up the shortfall versus comm air. Our energy business, which deals with largely the grid and the power grid and how things signals in terms of that, it particularly is doing well, particularly in things that are associated with wind and solar energy and those investments. That energy business has benefited from that. And then probably the biggest piece that's benefited is our data and device business, which is certainly seeing the strength from the markets around cloud computing and data storage and all of the things that are enabling the backbone for why we can have a conference virtually like we can today. So the -- we have seen things as we're exiting our fiscal year begin to improve sequentially. We talked about on our last earnings call that automotive production was improving sequentially. We continue to see that. Certainly, certain things in our general industrial world outside of commercial air, we've seen some improvement in. And so we're encouraged as we go into starting our fiscal year in October where things sit from a demand perspective, but still well behind kind of a pre-COVID with the exception of China.

Jim Suva

analyst
#4

And Heath, due to the pandemic, has anything changed for, say, the growth drivers that are underlining that business? I mean, I'm using technology a lot more. We're doing this virtually. There's a lot of more connectors associated with that. But at the same time, I'm driving my car less, and it's fair to say it might last longer. So how should we think about the underlining drivers with the pandemic in place now?

Heath Mitts

executive
#5

Well, a lot of the secular drivers and the trends that were pushing that are continuing. Now did everything take a step back during COVID, I just described, certainly, kind of reset down some things. But if you think about how we frame up and how we view our business over the next several years, the trends towards electronification are continuing to be very strong. You talk about things that are enabling calls like this and the remoteness that we're all dealing with, there's no doubt that, that will be continuing to drive and benefit us. But even in things like automotive that you mentioned. So I mentioned earlier that automotive production globally is going to be down about 20% year-over-year. But within that, the component of that, that is hybrid, electric vehicles is actually up 12% year-over-year, right? So there are things that move, and that has a benefit to us because our content per vehicle is double what it is on traditional combustion engine vehicles. So there are trends that continue to work on our way. Could global -- total auto production level out at some level, it's a little bit lower than what we've seen in the past maybe, but to the extent that the EV component of that continues to increase and become a bigger percentage over time, that has a disproportionate amount of benefit for us. So it feels -- those are things that are -- trends that are really important to us.

Jim Suva

analyst
#6

Got you. And then last year and this year has been a lot of challenging situations, whether it be tariffs related about governments, pandemic-related operational challenges, companies are now being forced to be a lot more nimble or adjustable. How has your company changed its business practices regarding a lot of these variables that we're not used to traditionally seeing.

Heath Mitts

executive
#7

Well, in some cases, whether it was all the tariff, some of it real, some of it's sabre-rattling going on before COVID even kicked in and some of the discussions, whether that was within North America with Mexico and the U.S. or certainly the tariffs and some of the things that were put in place with China and the U.S., one of the things that really benefited us from that time is that we are generally producing -- doing engineering and production locally. So we have plants in China and engineers in China, and our ability to deal with local customers with our local engineers and operations largely made some of those discussions around tariffs and so forth a bit of a nonevent for TE. There was always some noises around the fringes, and we had to look at a few things. But where we manufacture, major manufacturing locations like China, like Eastern Europe, like Mexico, have really paid off for us to be able to stay within region and not have to deal with some of those, I'll say, trade war type of activities. Now we have also used this lull in demand, particularly in parts of Industrial and parts of Transportation, to take some fixed costs off-line permanently. And you've seen those in our -- and some of the restructuring charges that we've taken. Those are very focused in on how do we make sure that where we do have locations that are less strategically important in terms of where they are, albeit some of these are costly to take off-line, we're tackling those now. And I feel good about what that will result in, in terms of when we do see more heightened recovery, what we'll see in terms of what that does to our margins. And so I feel very good about that.

Jim Suva

analyst
#8

And then let's maybe focus on the automotive industry or the automotive segment and look at the demand recovery. Is it different by regions? And if so, can you kind of speak to that a little bit? And we do note another automotive supplier, a company called Sensata, who you're aware of, actually preannounced positive ahead of their presentation today at this same conference. So can you talk about automotive demand, maybe you take it down by regions, Heath?

Heath Mitts

executive
#9

Sure. First of all, it's good to see. I saw the note about Sensata, and it's -- that's encouraging news because they benefit from a lot of the same things that we benefit from in terms of auto production. I can't opine on what was assumed in their guidance versus what they're now saying. So I can't really get into speaking on their behalf for that. But what we indicated on our last call continues to be true. China, which is an important piece for us, is back -- China auto production is back to pre-COVID levels, and that's encouraging for sure. We have seen that North America improve. And certainly, the inventory on dealer lots continues to be at a level that we're comfortable with in North America, and we continue to see that improve sequentially. And EMEA has been a little bit slower to recover, but starting to see a little bit of legs there, too. So we feel good about what was -- what we had assumed in our numbers. And certainly, as we work our way through there, it reinforces the point that our fiscal third quarter, which is the June quarter, was the low point in terms of demand, and we'll continue to see sequential improvement.

Jim Suva

analyst
#10

And then can you talk maybe within -- keeping it to automotive, Heath, about the content growth? I believe it's kind of in the 4% to 6% range, but it seems like there's been an uneven recovery that you talked about globally, different regions and things like that. And I believe different regions do have different purchasing trends. So why is your content growth not higher or lower than the range of typically 4% to 6%? Or am I off on that?

Heath Mitts

executive
#11

Well, the 4% to 6% outperformance over market is really our automotive business. And that -- we've continued to trend that way this year. Albeit we're negative, we're not as negative as the market in terms of our auto numbers versus what the markets have seen in terms of production. And so that has played out this year. In terms of how we think about that 4% to 6% by region, it can be a little different. And to the extent that one region, for instance, is adopting more aggressively EV or hybrid vehicle in terms of their production and their overall demand, that benefits us because that raises our content per vehicle pretty significantly, which helps drive some of this 4% to 6% outperformance. You also can see at times when we're starting to see recoveries, where people are wanting to make sure they have their inventory at hand, you can actually see a couple of quarters in there where you could see on the uptick where we may well outperform. People don't want to be cut short on their supply chain. And then times during a contraction where we could be on the low side of that 4% to 6%. Certainly, what we're seeing right now feels consistent with what we've seen. And it's consistent with all the platforms that we continue to win, both on combustion engine vehicles that have each additional platform. Each model year has more and more content, whether that's around the powertrain, whether that's around safety or infotainment, we continue to benefit from that. And certainly, the hybrid and electric vehicle demand improvement helps our overall growth rates.

Jim Suva

analyst
#12

That's good details. In the past, you mentioned about inventory digestions. Can you maybe update us on that? And maybe how should we think about it this year versus, say, last year? And any changes to content or about inventory digestion?

Heath Mitts

executive
#13

Generally, when we talk about inventory digestion, it has to do a little bit with automotive, but then with also with the channel as well, where our channel partners are. And we've seen that play out pretty well in line with where we had assumed this would come out. We had made some assumptions in prior earnings calls around what we were expecting versus what we saw. And for instance, in the quarter, we didn't -- we saw a little bit of buildup in inventory in our March quarter, we saw not quite as much fleet off in the June, but we continue to see that as we work our way through our fiscal fourth quarter that we're in right now. So we feel pretty good. We're pretty well at par in terms of where, particularly in our channel, where we sell-through distributors in terms of what they're selling versus what they're buying. We feel like that's pretty well in check at this point, and -- which means they're feeling pretty comfortable with what inventory levels they're holding. They're not necessarily growing inventory, but nor are they reducing at this point. So we feel pretty good about that.

Jim Suva

analyst
#14

And when we think about your restructuring efforts this year, especially in automotive, assuming -- if you assume automotive gets back to close to normal levels, does that mean that your automotive margins should be higher than pre-pandemic levels? And if not, why wouldn't that be the case?

Heath Mitts

executive
#15

I think it depends on what you want to assume in terms of global auto production and then, hence, what our growth rate or market growth. Our growth is over and above that. We're not making -- we're assuming the recovery is going to be more gradual than how you describe. But there's no doubt that when we get back to global auto production that's in the 80 -- mid-80s in terms of millions of vehicles produced, our margin profile is going to be significantly enhanced. And a lot of that is just coming from the fact that we're taking so much fixed costs off-line right now as part of that. And so using an opportunity like this, albeit as painful as it is, to tackle some of these more normally restructuring activities, particularly ones in Europe that tend to be more costly, we're going full steam ahead. And we'll see that benefit of -- for future years to come. But we're also not assuming a sharp recovery back. If we're at 70 million vehicles in our fiscal '20 that we're in right now in terms of global auto production, we're not assuming that bounces back to the mid-80s or 90 million next year either. We're expecting that to be a little bit more gradual recovery. And it's easier for us to recover -- to react to the higher demand than it is to get cost out on the downturn. So that's how we've positioned the business.

Jim Suva

analyst
#16

Well, we spent quite a bit of time on automotive, which is very fair and reasonable, given the exposure you have. Maybe if we can switch over and talk, maybe, say, the data communications space. Can you talk about your positioning in that segment and maybe the competition of that market?

Heath Mitts

executive
#17

Sure. That's about $1 billion business for us, and about 1/3 of that $1 billion is from what we would consider high-speed connectivity solutions, things that would go into data centers and things that are used in more cloud computing type of activity. And so it's fair to say that, that business has been robust all the way through the last couple of quarters. We'll -- we monitor that quickly because -- or watch those orders quickly because that tends to be one that can swing around in terms of demand. But we feel good about where we continue to play in terms of that. That's an area that is much more -- versus anything else we have at TE, it is much more new product intensive. So where you might have a product cycle in aerospace that lasts for -- a solution that lasts for years and years and years or something in automotive that lasts 5 to 7 years, right, an application that is applicable, in our data space, that tends to be something that has a life of 12 to 24 months. And then you're replacing it and going to either a higher speed or a different type of application that deals with heat transfers or whatever the customer is asking for. So it tends to be one that we have to -- you can't miss a product cycle on it. Our team has done a really good job of being there for our customers, not just with the products that they're asking for, but when they need it. When -- a lot of this business in our data is in China. And it's fair to say that when China went through a downturn in February, we were able to largely keep our factories up and running. And that was a big deal because when the customers did need their products, we weren't keeping them, we weren't causing them to shut down as they recover. And that benefited us as we got disproportionate amount of share from certain things where we're dual sourced as well as showing our customers that we're big enough, have the resources to keep our activities humming, and we're there when they need them. So we feel pretty good about the performance of that business this year.

Jim Suva

analyst
#18

Many people are familiar with this segment, the data networking business and such. But the U.S. versus China has had a lot of political, say, fighting recently. In fact, the U.S. has put down some Entity List companies that you're not supposed to ship to. So Heath and Sujal, can you talk about that Entity List? Do you have any major customers on there, specifically, Huawei has been called out to companies that they can't ship to anymore? Or is it because you mentioned you produce locally, it's not an issue. How should we think about the Entity List and the global trade tensions?

Heath Mitts

executive
#19

Well, it's a complex discussion, and we could probably spend the next hours on this, but it gets into not just where you produce, but also where the intellectual property for those products reside to determine, I'll say, nationality and where the enforcement protocol comes from. I would say we're not super concentrated with any one customer. But there have been things, whether it's Huawei or ZTE and others, that we've had to work our way through because we were -- we did have exposure. But it gets even more complicated from that because those are very large companies and some of the companies that are on that list, it's not all of their products that are impacted. There might be products that are deemed to be closer to some national security and those types of things versus things that they would be buying from us that might be, I'll say, more run of the mill data servers or things like that, that we're providing a product that goes into, a back plane on a data server or something that is deemed to be not -- so not -- doesn't -- is not as applicable to some type of regulatory control. So it's a lot of work. Our team and our government affairs and our regulatory compliance team spend a lot of effort as these things come up with different customers, categorization of part numbers and so forth and going through processes to get our products cleared. Largely, Jim, we have found that we can get our products cleared. We don't do a lot of things that are, right, I'd say, are -- that support activities that are real sensitive from a regulatory perspective. But that doesn't necessarily mean that we're off the hook entirely because even if we get our products cleared, we're only one part on somebody's building materials. And if they can't get all the other products cleared, that causes them headaches in demand, and we've seen demand for that at times tick down. Since COVID, particularly, we haven't seen as much of that activity, but it's something we keep a close eye on and how much of it turns into, say, the rattling and banter versus real sanctions.

Jim Suva

analyst
#20

So, so far, we've talked a lot about the connect -- connector industry. Can we maybe shift over and talk a little bit about sensors. Not everyone may be familiar that you also do sensors. Maybe you can talk about, a little bit about the history, how much is your sensor business? Why it's important? And then we'll kind of go into the sensors a little bit more?

Heath Mitts

executive
#21

Sure. Well, our sensor business, the most meaningful part of our sensor business came in with the acquisition of Measurement Specialties in 2000s -- pretty -- before my time. It came in, in 2014 -- late 2014. And so it's been about 6 years since that was acquired. And Measurement in and of itself was a bit of a roll-up of a series of acquisitions. So as part of this, the thesis at the time and continues to be is that we could use our automotive expertise on the connector side and those relationships with the OEMs to bring some of the sensor business up. And we've grown that pretty considerably now. From almost 0, we've grown our automotive sensor business to about 25% of our total sensor business. Our sensor business last year did about $900 million. So -- and that's grown from very little to something much more meaningful and will double in the next few years because of the platforms that we've won. And our content per vehicle, while it's very large on the connector side, it's very small on the sensor side. And so that's something that we're excited about. And it's driven investment levels ahead of revenue. And we anticipate that revenue to continue to be meaningfully a growth driver within the sensor business. There was also a piece that came in on industrial -- on commercial transportation. So off-road or a 18-wheeler type of activity. That is a good -- very good franchise for us and continues to be very good, and we see common growth rates in that part of sensors as we see in our commercial transportation side on the connector side. So that aligns very well. And then you have about half of sensors that is kind of more general, lots of different applications, we call it our industrial portion of sensors. And that's one -- that's an area that we'll continue to prune certain things that we are less attractive and double down in certain areas that are more attractive. And so that's an area that I think you'll continue to see us invest in. And then most recently, we acquired First Sensor which was a German public company that we largely concluded the transaction over the past couple of quarters. And First Sensor brings -- it's a German-based business that brings in -- that touches markets right on top of ours, industrial, medical, auto, and most of its low-pressure capabilities that we didn't have in our portfolio. And so part of the opportunity there isn't just acquiring good business in and of itself, but they bring capabilities that as we operationally integrate, in some cases, we'll be moving out of our existing sensor business moving into theirs. In some of the cases, maybe moving out a couple of their facilities into ours. So on top of the fact that it fit really well market-by-market with what we do today in markets we understand well, it's also one that provides a lot of cost opportunities in terms of the synergy to ensure the return. So it's not without its challenges, sensors. And the technology can move fast at times. But we're continuing to fine-tune it and prune where we don't want to be and double down in places where we definitely.

Jim Suva

analyst
#22

And it sounds like you're doing a lot of integration with these and going to customers. But it also seems like, if I remember, didn't you recently do an impairment charge. Why would that be the case if sensors are doing so well?

Heath Mitts

executive
#23

Well, the numbers in sensors is -- COVID, there is no doubt that when COVID ticked in and drove auto production down, it throws up the commercial transportation market in a lot of regions. And then the general industrial side was hit hard. So that put a lot of pressure on the fact that our sensor business was, I'll say, in the scheme of our portfolio, more recently acquired and carried a fair amount of goodwill given the premium that was paid for sensors back in 2014. So it was a bit of the accounting math on how that projects. But it does reset a little bit in terms of we're a couple of years behind the original deal model. COVID certainly did not help that, but it did avail the opportunity for us to go ahead and take additional costs out, too. So...

Jim Suva

analyst
#24

Got it. Heath, being Chief Financial Officer, you're in charge of capital and the deployment of it. Sujal -- and then want to use things for expansion or R&D or new ideas. And then you've got shareholders who are listening here who want you to pay a dividend and buy back stock. And then you have a CEO who wants to grow the business organically and then some -- maybe some acquisitions. Can you give us an update on your capital deployment strategy?

Heath Mitts

executive
#25

Yes, there has -- it's largely unchanged. I mean, you've covered the stock a long time, Jim, and I think a lot of the investors on this call know us well. It's largely unchanged. I mean we look at it, our free cash flow is good. And we kind of target over a cycle. Roughly 2/3 of that free cash flow goes back to our shareholders, about half through M&A and half through share repurchase. And about 1/3 is used towards M&A. Now M&A is slow right now. And candidly, probably it will be slow for a little while longer. So there will be times in there where you might be a little bit more than 2/3, 1/3 or maybe more towards acquisitions during times. But that's largely unchanged. The beauty of TE is that we can grow better than market because of where we play and the electronification, everything we touch. I've said that earlier in this discussion. We're not acquisition dependent to get things done. Acquisitions for us are an enhancement. They're an ability to maybe fill in product gaps or get us into a particular market that is easier to acquire our way into versus -- and more quickly than doing it organically. But having said that, our organic revenue growth continues to be fully funded, right? We go through these down cycles. We're largely not touching engineering staffs, right? We're going after and making sure that we're being smart with our CapEx, but we're fortunate to have a very strong balance sheet, and we can continue to make bets well ahead of revenue in terms of where we need to be. So that will continue to always be fully funded because our best return on invested capital is always organic revenue growth. And acquisitions, particularly in a very low interest rate environment, can get pretty pricey. And that for us is something we just always have to keep an eye on in terms of where -- what's the best use of that. But maybe versus some other companies out there, we do have somewhat secular market support in terms of our long term drivers. But I feel pretty good about our ability to not be fully dependent upon M&A, certainly not big platforms of M&A, but continue to enhance it with bolt-ons as it makes sense.

Jim Suva

analyst
#26

And some of other companies have changed their capital allocation, such as suspended dividends, suspended buybacks. Can you talk about your dividend and buyback and how we should think about those in the prioritization?

Heath Mitts

executive
#27

Listen, they both are -- we didn't suspend anything, we didn't reduce anything. We raised our dividend modestly earlier this year. We continue to be aggressive in share repurchase, particularly when we saw major dislocations in the stock price in the middle of COVID, we were very -- we were much more aggressive with our share repurchases at that point. But this is going to continue to be -- we've got a strong balance sheet. We're going to -- we have strong cash flows, like it's going to continue to be the case. And I feel good. We don't have underfunded pension plans or anything that come -- that has hung around us in terms of things we've got to go and fund outside the core business. So unchanged. People should expect to see the dividend where it is and grow with our earnings and cash flows, and our share repurchases being part of our deployment structure.

Jim Suva

analyst
#28

And whether it be Heath or Sujal, for modeling CapEx, this year, I would say with coronavirus, it's been a little bit odd with restructuring, just the way of doing business. How should we think about CapEx and maybe normal expenditures, whether it be dollar amount or percent of sales? How should we think about capital expenditures?

Heath Mitts

executive
#29

I think 5% is probably a good modeling number. There'll be times where it could spike up a little bit and there's times where it will be maybe below that. But they tend to be -- most of our CapEx is tied to new products. So it's generally tooling, generally tooling tied to a specific application. And that's the vast majority of our CapEx. So it's tied to when we see new products coming online. So if we see something that maybe because of COVID a product launch by an end customer has been pushed out a couple of quarters or whatever, you might see, okay, we're going to hold off on that. We don't have to buy that machine quite yet. But our CapEx is generally made up of a lot of things in that 2 -- $1 million to $5 million purchase price -- purchase range, not a lot of things in the $50 million or $100 million price range.

Jim Suva

analyst
#30

And Heath, earlier during the call, you had mentioned, given the government Entity List, that you've found ways to legally still ship things to your customers, especially since you're maybe not in the most sensitive areas of communications. But that being said, assuming if Huawei totally got the goose egg or the 0 from the U.S. government of shipping for everything to them, would that have a material impact to your company? I assume given automotive is such a large portion of your business, the answer is probably not. But can you quantify what that risk would be, if anything, if Huawei was totally not able to ship to them?

Heath Mitts

executive
#31

Well, it would not be material. It'd be meaningful for -- it would be meaningful for our data and device business because it would impact them. At the TE level, it would not be meaningful.

Jim Suva

analyst
#32

Got you. Great. I have a question for Sujal. Sujal, as Investor Relations, you field as many questions as I do about your company, if not even more. Are there a few things, Sujal, that you want to take the opportunity to really clear the air or maybe help right any misperceptions about the company or any questions that you get asked again and again, with this very large audience who are connected here, that you can help them educate the most appropriate answers or understanding?

Sujal Shah

executive
#33

Yes, sure. Thank you, Jim. And I think we covered a lot of ground with your questions in the businesses. I think kicking it up one level. I think given the COVID environment, I'm asked at times whether that has changed anything with respect to the business model or if it's changed anything with respect to our segment margin targets or if we've seen any change to the secular dynamics that we have been benefiting from as a company. And the short answer is, no, our views have not changed. We continue to target about 4% to 6% organic growth over a cycle. The secular dynamics that have been in place pre-COVID, they remain in place. So we continue to benefit from trends such as the electrification of the powertrain in auto, increased production of hybrid and electric vehicles, which Heath covered earlier. We benefit from growth in our medical business, where we focus on interventional medical applications. And in Communications, we're seeing benefit from increased hyperscale CapEx. So the Googles and Amazons, Facebooks of the world, as they're increasing spending and building out their data centers, we're benefiting from those secular trends. And on the segment margin side, we're targeting 20% adjusted operating margins in Transportation. That is unchanged. From this point forward, it's going to be a combination of volume growth plus execution of restructuring actions that Heath talked about earlier. In Industrial, we're targeting high teens in terms of operating margins. We've expanded those margins from the low teens to the mid-teens, pre-COVID. About 2/3 of that expansion is based on what we control and the fact that we've had restructuring plans that we were executing on already as we entered the COVID downturn. So we're certainly not flat-footed. And we still have a couple of years to go until we're consistently running in the high teens. And the Communications segment is already running at target margins in the mid-teens, even in the COVID environment. So I'd say we get those questions, and I think the -- that's the response, that nothing has changed with respect to the business model or the trends that we benefit from, and our operating margin targets remain the same.

Jim Suva

analyst
#34

Great. As we kind of wrap things up here in the next 5 or 6 minutes, Heath, can we think about you as Chief Financial Officer, you've been through a lot of this pandemic. What gets you so excited to be CFO of TE Connectivity. And maybe a few bullet points about why you think investors on this conference call should be buying and owning TE Connectivity stock?

Heath Mitts

executive
#35

Well, sure. And I appreciate the opportunity, Jim. I mean, listen, this is -- like everybody on this call, we've weathered through the last 6 months of remote work environment and all the things that have caused lifestyle and professional style changes, right, and all of us in terms of personal and professional environment. One of the things that I would say, we use the term resiliency a lot around the company, is that the company's resiliency through this environment, particularly on the operating front. Our ability to stay in business, really a couple of days of shutdown in China in February and keep our European factories running when they went through and our North American factories working through the dynamics, Mexico was coming on and off-line, different by states and different by industry, all of those things, our teams powered through that. And we didn't miss -- disrupt anything in the supply chain. Our on-time delivery was fantastic through this period. And so not only am I proud of how we operated in this environment. And then our employees who are not in the manufacturing environment to continue to operate remotely, even gets me more excited for the future of where this is going because we weren't caught flat-footed in this, right? And those of you who have followed us, we were in the process of taking some of these more expensive cost structures offline going into this. So COVID did avail the opportunity to accelerate some of those moves, and we have done so. There are some things that we're going to continue to do into next year. And I feel very good that when we get by 2000 -- into '21, '22, we're going to have a cost structure that's different than what we had going into this. And that was always in the plans for things like Industrial segment. And Sujal mentioned the target margins there that were trending towards this. Transportation, we were starting to look at some of these plans that, again, if they were easy to do, we would have done a long time ago. So we weren't caught flat-footed. It wasn't like we had to draw team -- pull team together and say what we got to do, we simply were able to accelerate some of the things on the cost side. And then more importantly, on the growth side, as I mentioned earlier, I don't lose sleep about the balance sheet. We're in a very good place. Our cash flows are very strong. They continue to be very strong. I'm excited about our ability to grow coming out of this. We talked a lot about auto, we talked about sensors today. We talked about data and devices. We have a lot of pieces of this business that helped cushion us on the downtick because of the diversity of our portfolio, and it will benefit us on the uptick. So I feel very good the next several years are going to be great for TE. I feel good about that. The team has shown we can execute in rough environments and better environments coming forward, I feel. And I think as customers value us and with whatever metric they use, I tend to focus on cash flows the most, that's one that I think they're going to be impressed by. So again, I appreciate you having us on today, Jim, and look forward at some point being able to see live soon.

Jim Suva

analyst
#36

Correct. Ladies and gentlemen, we thank you so much for joining us here today with the Chief Financial Officer, Heath Mitts; and Head of Investor Relations, Sujal Shah. This is Jim Suva signing off, wishing everybody safe and happiness. And we certainly hope next year, we can do this live and in person. Thank you so much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete TE Connectivity plc transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to TE Connectivity plc earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.