The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 14, 2024
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Bonnie Herzog
analystAll right. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us today. So it's a pleasure to introduce our next speaker. With us today is Vita Coco's Chief Executive Officer, Martin Roper. Martin has served as Chief Executive Officer since May 2022 and has been with the company since 2019. Vita Coco was founded back in 2004. And they are the market leader in the attractive and fast-growing coconut water category. They have a full pipeline of products, including some alcohol innovation, that fuse functional benefits with authentic and better-for-you ingredients, and just recently posted a strong Q1 with a beat and raise. So thank you for joining us today.
Bonnie Herzog
analystSo Martin, hoping you could maybe start with a big picture and talk about the health of your consumers recently. On your last earnings call, you mentioned that some consumers are shifting to channels with a higher private label penetration. So curious to hear what you're seeing. Maybe how have elasticities evolved. And then what are you expecting for the consumer as the year progresses as you think about your business?
Martin Roper
executiveSure. So what we see is obviously based on a small company's view of what's going on and just talking about the coconut water category. The category itself seems very healthy with volume up high single digits. And within the category where our brand is healthy, also up roughly the same, but private label is a little healthier on a volume basis. Not necessarily for us on a reported revenue basis because of price changes year-on-year, but on a volume basis, very healthy. So when we look at what's going on, and obviously, we have a little better visibility to the total category than is visible from the scan data, it looks to us like private label is benefiting from a slightly larger price gap to branded than existed this time last year. And then that the sort of channels where private label over-indexes, which for our category are club, ALDI, little-type discounter, and a couple of the major retailers, the private label business is very healthy, and their business is very healthy. And so our assumption is some are maybe channel shifting, going on to more value channels, which I think is also being reported by the retailers, but we don't have hard data on that. So that, I think, is our reference to point to that. And we just view this as sort of a transition year, whereas the price gaps go back to what they were pre-COVID. And we expect the growth rates tend to normalize with brand and private label growing the same unless we can gain share. So that's how we think about it.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. And then as you look at the coconut water category, in general, over the last few years, it's grown considerably, there's no question. So as the category growth leader, what steps are you taking to drive this continued growth over the next, let's say, 5 or 10 years? And hopefully, we're here to talk about it.
Martin Roper
executiveYes. So maybe separating international from the U.S. I think in the U.S. where we're a 50% share of tracked channels, our #1 priority is to grow the category. We look to do that by both bringing new households into the category through education as to the benefits of coconut water and sort of the reasons to drink, but also to increase the occasions for existing consumers who have coconut water in their households. So it's sort of a dual strategy of grow the category and then grow share within it. On the share side, we're trying to expand our distribution, make sure we're appropriately priced and featured, and obviously spending money on marketing our brand and our brand benefits relative to other products. As we look out on the long term, we think the category has some tailwinds behind it from -- just from demographics. We over-index with ethnic households, so African-American, Hispanic, Asian. We also over-index with the younger households where head of households is in the 20s, 30s and 40s. And I suppose that's not really that surprising because the brand was founded in 2004, so it's only 20 years old, and we probably missed out on those folks in their 50s and 60s. But we do have this sort of in-built trial mechanism where a lot of drinkers discovered Coconut Water on Sunday morning at college, post hangover. And I'm seeing some smiles in the audience from those who went to college and had fun, and then not from those -- or anyway. And so our households are staying -- we're maintaining the age of our households by feeding this young, and then we're trying to convert them into more occasions. So a lot of occasion-based marketing, trying to persuade people to trade up to smoothies or use it as a post-workout beverage, or use it in cocktails. And so a lot of our marketing, you'll see, while it talks about functional benefit, it's also talking about the occasions to increase the velocity per household. Internationally, I think it's a little different. The U.S. market is a little more developed. So I think we talked on our quarterly call a little bit about Europe. In Europe, we have a very strong business in the U.K., where we have over 80% share. But the market from a penetration perspective is behind the U.S. So there, it's all about education, and we're obviously not going to gain share as much. But in the rest of Europe, the category is even less developed. And there, there is a category. Actually private label got in very early, and now they really need a brand to come in and invest in the category. So we're trying to fill that role. And we're having some early success, I think, in Germany, but it's got a little bit more of a long-term play. And that, I think, helps us in our long-term view that this business can double at some period of time.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. That definitely makes sense. And thinking about your guidance, you just reported very strong Q1 results, and early in the year you raised your top line growth guidance to 1 -- or by 1 point to 1% to 3%. And that does include Vita Coconut Water and then the private label Coconut Water volume growth this year. So I know you mentioned there was still some of the private label oil business in your Q1 results. So can you maybe provide some, I don't know, rough numbers for us to help us understand the size of this coconut oil business and how much that will impact the full year results moving forward? Because I know that's weighing a lot on the top line growth that you've laid out.
Martin Roper
executiveYes. I think -- yes, one, we are transitioning out of the oil business. That transition started in Q1 and will complete in Q2. We are fortunately using up a lot of the packaging materials and the other stuff that's in process. Right? I think when we announced that that business was leaving, we sort of said that we expected branded growth and private label Coconut Water to offset that. And that was how we encourage people to model it. We were very uncomfortable giving a dollar amount because it's 1 specific customer and that, we felt, was inappropriate given our relationship with that customer, to actually tell the world how large their oil business was. So I think it's modelable. I think the analysts have done a great job modeling it. Thank you, Bonnie, and everyone else. And so we're not really going to quantify it, but it will be a drag Q2, Q3, Q4 and Q1 next year from a comparison perspective. And we, certainly, in our full year guidance, believe we can overcome that through growth of the rest of our portfolio. But it's certainly a drag and it's a little bit of a downer for us. But it is what it is. And then the other point I'd make about the oil business. So the oil is a little bit more of a commodity private label play, it's a little more competitive, it's a little easier for the suppliers to compete in, and there are more competitors on it. And so it doesn't quite have the moat that our coconut water supply chain has. And because of that, the margins on it were more commodity-type margins. So on the plus side, one of the benefits of -- not that we ever like to lose business, one of the benefits will be the margins will look a little healthier and the profitability a little healthier and it will be a little cleaner portfolio.
Bonnie Herzog
analystYes. No, that makes sense. And then I know you highlighted some new customer wins recently. Maybe touch on how much that's helping to provide some offset. And then I'm curious, why are some of these new customers choosing your company? What have they shared with you?
Martin Roper
executiveYes. So I think in the last 2 years we've added a couple of major new customers in the U.S., and then also added, and maybe more visibly in our P&L and the way what was being reported shows up in international private label where there is solid growth. Taking them differently, we have the retail relationships in the U.S. We're the largest supplier of branded coconut water. And every once in a while, someone will come to us and say, "We want to try private label." And we do supply it. And we will typically say, yes, if it counts as a significant size where it's a meaningful business, because we don't want to get into the complexity of [ some odd KUs ]. So that's sort of what's going on. And there's some business in the U.S. we don't have. We did have a win about 18 months ago on a major private label customer, which was helpful. It doesn't necessarily offset the oil business. So it's going to be just murky because the oil business was, I think, as we indicated, it was one of our largest customers. So it wasn't an immaterial piece of business. But I think the margins on that side will be better. In Europe, we basically built a branded business out of the U.K. and initially tried to build the brand into France, Spain and other countries, and struggled a little bit in those countries, but built a very successful business in the U.K. About 3 years ago, we flipped to "Let's try and build a private label business in Europe and then build the branded business off it." And we've had some wins, particularly in Germany, that have allowed us to establish a German team, a commercial team. Put up a German warehouse and actually start to supply that market in a more effective and efficient manner, which improves the margin of the business and allows us to pitch branded. And we've had some bites, right? And so now branded has some authorizations. We still need to go fill them because that's the way it works. But we're actually pretty excited that the German business could be a nice contribution to growth over the next couple of years. And we're trying to work out how to duplicate that success in Benelux and then in France and Spain. So why we can compete. I think supply chain of these products, obviously, they are sourced from the tropics, so it's a very long supply chain with a lot of ocean freight and logistical challenges. They're also largely produced in factories that are quite remote, so it's somewhat hard for the factories to build their own private label sales forces, or even for retailers to necessarily go visit them. But we have people on the ground. We have a team in Singapore that's about 30, 35 people that basically supports the factories from a quality perspective, from a technological perspective, including advising on CapEx and stuff. And then also does all the logistics of moving these hundreds of containers around the globe. And so we're well-positioned to sort of manage that for a retailer. And our view is if that helps our factories by providing them with more business, whether it be oil or coconut water, that's good. And if we can make margin, then that works. And so we're open to it, and we continue to bid on oil business on a global basis and also on private label business on a global basis, because we feel an obligation to try and take as much of this from our suppliers as we can because of these exclusive contracts that we have with them.
Bonnie Herzog
analystDefinitely a competitive advantage, and pretty complex, not so easy to replicate.
Martin Roper
executiveIt's complex and it's hard to get there, and it's a lot of travel.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. Switching gears a bit. I wanted to ask about some of the distribution gains you've seen in some of the opportunities that you foresee in the future. Just any more color on that and how these distribution gains maybe look versus previous years?
Martin Roper
executiveYes. So last year, we had a lot of gains, particularly on the multipacks. And that was a significant driver of growth, as I think you've alluded to in your reports, and we've put in our investor deck. I think this year, we expect to get incremental distribution on those multipacks because they aren't at full distribution, what we call optimized distribution, relative to the singles. But some of the step-change processes seem a little delayed this year with some decision-making delayed, and then the timing of execution of those decisions. So I don't think it's shown up yet, and it's not even necessarily visible to us on exactly what's going to happen. We continue to try and drive distribution in the convenience store channels, pushing the juice product, which is the can product, through those channels. And we also launched juice into fruit and mass. And so that's adding incremental new distribution, but it's a little early to tell how that's going. And then also in North America, we launched Treats, which is a strawberry cream, sweet coconut milk drink that is a Target exclusive. And so that's currently there and we're watching that. Obviously, again, 5 weeks in and hard to tell what's going on. But that -- we're trying to see whether we can take the Vita Coco brand from pure sort of hydration recovery to maybe something a little more, see where we can take it to. And there's certainly an interest among consumers around sweeter, more indulgent type beverages. So it's interesting and we'll see where that goes.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. And as you look at the different channels and maybe where you're under-indexed, is it still within the C store channel? Would you argue, Martin, is that an opportunity still that you foresee?
Martin Roper
executiveYes.
Bonnie Herzog
analystIf so, where are you at in that?
Martin Roper
executiveWell, I think our ACV is 50%. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but that's the number that brings to my mind. And on our can juice product, it's only like 17%. So obviously, that's a big opportunity. Now the convenience store channel is -- it's a subset of the total channel, so I don't know whether it's 15%, 20%. I know that you cover this channel, I don't have expertise in this. So I'm going to guess that's roughly what it is, of grocery, right? So there are obviously opportunities there. As you get into a convenience store and you go down, you hit the large ones like 7-Eleven, for which we have a great relationship with. They just took our 1-liter product, which is exciting, to have a 1 liter convenience store, which we probably would never have imagined. But it's there and it's pulling. But as you go down through all the convenience stores, you get to lots of some cool points. So it is hard work, and as you put it in, some of those, it works, and in some of those that it doesn't, like obviously, there are different demographics and economics of the consumers depending on the marketplace. So I think we're in that period where our first push on convenience has sort of landed and now it's grinded out. Had some, lose some a little bit maybe because of the -- had some, lose some, so that's where we are. And we're trying to push it, but it's a multiyear process to close those gaps. But there's opportunity there, and there's certainly, if it is 15% of grocery, there's another, what, 7 percentage points there to get. And so that would be nice to get over a few years.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAnd then with the spring resets, you touched on this, that they do seem to be happening a little later this year than previous years. Has that been your experience as well with your business?
Martin Roper
executiveI think historically pre-COVID, we thought most of the sets happened in March and April. And during COVID, nothing much happened. Frankly, it was who has product, right? So it was everything sort of ground to a halt. Now post-COVID, people are getting back into the swing of things. I think also some beverage retailers are thinking about how they structure their beverage set and does it make any sense? There was a period of time where that bottled water just took over a whole aisle and maybe that's too much, maybe it's too little. Maybe they need more premium products, maybe they should expand the set that we're in. Maybe they should move it back with the beverages, because they got moved away when water expanded. So all of these things, I think, are up in the air a little bit for some of the major retailers. And because of that, I think some of the decisions are taking a little longer, because they may be more complicated. It's not as easy as yes, you should obviously get another multipack in, okay, yes, we all agree. Now is it in this set or is it in that set, and what does it mean? I think those things are delaying things a little bit. And I must admit, I think if we get -- as we get into the summer, I think it's unlikely that maybe some of the sets actually take place because, again, you would know this well, when you get into the summer, the distributors are so busy just trying to get product into the store that no one has time for resets. So we might be moving this year to a September, in which case maybe it sticks at September or maybe it skips a year. I don't know. It's just what we hope to get at the start of the year perhaps isn't what we're currently seeing happening, not because it's not going to happen, but because it's delayed. With all that said, as you said, we raised guidance. So we still feel good about the business. It's just -- it's just messy out there.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAnd so just the visibility that you may have, whether it's indications, you feel good about the space gains being up this year for your business in terms of shelf space versus prior year, right?
Martin Roper
executiveYes. I think when you look at our category deck that we presented to retailers, I think you'd have to be sort of living on a different planet not to believe that you should give us more space, right? You do the same analysis that we do and, obviously, we're in sales mode and you're doing it from an analytical point of view. But we think we have a very good argument for more shelf space, particularly on the multipacks. And sometimes the set decisions don't get made on time frame that you would like. And that's not -- nothing bad about anyone. Everyone's busy, everyone has different priorities. But we think it will happen. It will happen over the next couple of years. And that opportunity is there for us to gain share in the category and also help category growth by having broader availability.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAnd remind everyone, in terms of the category growth expectations you have for Coconut Water, is it high single digit realistically?
Martin Roper
executiveYes, I think we said mid- to high single digits, so we've given ourselves a range, right? I think if you look back at it historically, it seems to be on that growth rate over the last 10 years. There was certainly a period of time when it didn't look like that in scan data, but the growth was happening in non-scan channels. And during that time period, club and the discounters like ALDI and little Trader Joe's built pretty significant coconut water businesses. As we sit, we see it all. So our view is that the category has been growing every year for the last, I don't know, 8 years at that 5% to 10% volume growth rate. And then there was a period of time there was some pricing, too. And so it feels very solid. And it feels driven by underlying consumer growth and household penetration and everything else. And it's happening in a way that is sort of repetitive, predictable, et cetera. Obviously, can't predict the future, so I don't want to get ahead, but it just feels like it's not [ booms flat ]. And it feels like it's part of people's lifestyles and adoption and is fueling off genuine desire for natural product, natural hydration and people incorporating coconut water into their daily lives.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAnd thinking about what you just said, is that one of the barriers is just trying to drive trial also and trying to get your -- thinking about your household penetration, where it's at, where it can go, and is part of the opportunity still to get the consumer to try your product?
Martin Roper
executiveYes, absolutely. I think when we look at household penetration, the last data we've shared was actually from last year, and it was [ Numerated ] data. And at that point in time, [ Numerated ], same category, was around 21%, 22% household penetration, Vita Coco was around 11%, 12%. That was relative to cranberry juice which is in the 50s and orange juice that's in the 80s. So there's obviously opportunity to take a juice product to broader distribution than it currently is. It is largely going to be about education as to why and why these products are better for you than those products, and are more enjoyable and are more flexible in usage. And I think that's a long-term education game that you could expect slow and steady build from because, again, if it happened overnight, it would be [ booms flat ], right? And so that's what we're trying to do in driving occasions and driving education. And yes, our plan is to try and get there.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAnd you touched on something earlier about just in the context of the category and the growth. It's more volume driven. Historically, there was some pricing with what we've seen. But when you look at your guidance this year, I don't believe it takes into account any material price increases, right? And so could you maybe talk through that decision? And I'm asking the context on some of the other [ non-bev ] companies, they're not putting in the similar price increases that they did prior years, but they're still putting in some. So I'm curious with your...
Martin Roper
executiveSo I think the starting point would be like over the last 3 years, I think our price at retail has maybe moved like 6% to 8%. And that's in total, not per year. And that compares to the other beverage categories, which I think are moving high single digits per year to double digits per year. And many of our sort of other public company compatriots have reported revenue growth based on pricing. Our revenue growth has been driven by volume and continues to be so. So why is that? Well, a couple of reasons. One is when ocean -- our cost issues were largely ocean freight and transportation issues over the last 3, 4 years. Our cost of goods, absent transportation, historically has been flat to down. And that's what we hope to continue. And the reason for that is that we're sourcing in the tropics where we're driving efficiencies. We have an engineering team in Singapore that drives that, a technical team that improves yields and reduces waste. And we're growing so we can leverage the investments that the suppliers have made. And coconut water is a byproduct. Coconut water is an offshoot of other coconut processing. And for those suppliers, they are happy that we are growing and taking more coconut water and they are making significantly more money as we make -- take significantly more coconut water. And they're buying the coconuts for the other things. So we're not so attached to the coconut water supply and demand situation, particularly in Asia. So because our cost of goods is largely flat, that also applies to the private label supply situation. So it sort of anchors private label pricing to be flat. And if private label is flat, then you have less room for maneuver for year-on-year price increases. During COVID, we had a $65 million cost absorption on the transportation side. I think that's a number plus or minus a couple of million, just a little mind-blowing in the context of a $400 million revenue company. And we chose to keep our pricing -- our branded pricing constant for the first year because we thought it was transitory. I remember talking to you, it's transitory, it's going away. Anyway. So it didn't go away. And so then we eventually decided to take 8%, which was the first price increase that we've taken 10 years. That price increase is stuck and it's taken and we haven't rolled it back. And it's covering other costs in our system. But beyond that, we don't feel a need to take price and to change the private label price gaps. And some of what we're seeing today is that some private label went down a little bit when the cost of goods went down last year. And so the price gaps were a little larger and you're seeing a little healthier private label volume growth. So we like the gaps as they are where they are, and we're going to monitor it. I think if we think there's an opportunity to take the price, we will. But equally, if we need to promote, we will. And we'll just play by ear depending on what our inventory availability is.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. That makes sense. And then gross margin expansion in Q1 especially was very impressive. It was up nearly 12 points. And you did raise your '24 gross margin guidance. Now in the context of that, you also called out some ocean freight pressures. Recently, they are supposed to be most acute in the second quarter. Curious to hear how freight rates have trended more recently, and any upside or downside risk to ultimately your gross margin guidance for the year?
Martin Roper
executiveSo we provided guidance for the earnings time, and what I would just say on the guidance is, obviously, it's our best guess of what's going to happen for the year at the time we make it and are not planning on updating that today. And so we basically look at what we thought the outcomes were going to be based on what we knew at the time, and we go from there. The gross margin improvement that you saw in Q1 was a function -- largely a function of a little bit of pricing, but mainly the dissipation of the transportation cost pressures, which still existed in Q1 of last year. And so that was the driver. And then also a little bit of branded growth relative to private label growth and the mix of the business and the start of the oil business going away, which I mentioned was lower gross margin. I think as we look out on the balance of the year, we -- there's a fair amount of uncertainty on what ocean freight could be. I think you asked specifically what's happened since 2 weeks ago, which just feels like yesterday.
Bonnie Herzog
analystYes, it really does.
Martin Roper
executiveSo if you look at the indexes, which is what I typically refer investors to, and we talk about the Drewry Index, which is D-R-E-W-R-Y, that spiked last week, and it was up a little bit the week before. So it appears to have declined since January, February, and then to have flat-lined, and then to maybe come up a little bit. And by spike, it's all pretty marginal. And so we're looking at it and going, okay, and that certainly somewhat represents the prices were being asked in the marketplace, but we don't necessarily play what we're asked. We bid it out. And we bid it out competitively, and we build long-term relationships with carriers that will work with us. And the indexes tend to, we believe, reflect more spot prices for small shipments than actual prices for large shipments. So we don't necessarily pay spot rates. Even if we're not contracted, we are bidding on a monthly basis, as, "Hey, I have 200 containers to go to Port B? Do you want them?" And then I call another carrier. So that's sort of how we think about it, and we're currently happy operating that way. We would be happy to enter into a long-term contract with a carrier if they offered us a rate we thought was advantageous for a 12-month commitment. But we still believe long -- in the short term that there's excess capacity relative to demand and there's more downward pressure on pricing. So yes, we're seeing what's going on in the indexes, but we're currently playing -- staying the course.
Bonnie Herzog
analystBut it's interesting. I'm not sure that's always as understood just given your size and scale, your ability to negotiate. And you are under -- or significantly under-contracted, right?
Martin Roper
executiveYes. Prior to COVID, we were typically contracted for 70%, 80% of our need. And we used to contract in April and in September on a 12-month basis in sort of layered stacks. Post COVID, we've stayed under contract. We do enter into agreements with carriers to service certain ports. So we are shipping from, I describe the factories, they're in rural locations, we're shipping from small ports, we need the feeder vessels to visit. And so we do on some lanes negotiate 3-month commitments to say, "Will you service us weekly? If so, we will do this." But for the most part, we're negotiating with the big carriers, "Hey, we have 200 containers for Asia to LA. Do you want them, do you not want them?" And because it's a sort of marginal revenue business where they've got capacity and they want the containers, there's some opportunity to negotiate those.
Bonnie Herzog
analystWhat about any increased transit times for some of these ocean lines that, I think, led to some delayed product arrivals and maybe less than perfect inventory levels or service levels? Where are you at with your service levels currently versus, I don't know, historically?
Martin Roper
executiveSo I think there's a number of things going into our current stuff, so I'll start off by saying that our service levels aren't as good as they were this time last year, and they're not where we want them to be. Right? We have less inventory, that's apparent from our balance sheet. And so then the question would be, okay, why do you guys have less inventory, what happened? Right? And it's a little complicated. I think on the one hand, just as we indicated, by raising guidance, the demand is slightly ahead of what we forecasted or what we thought it would be. There was a period of time last year when we thought we were losing a major private label coconut water business. And we downed tools, we stopped production. As it happened, we weren't asked to stop supplying and, therefore, we still had the demand, but we didn't produce. And that shows up on our balance sheet as lower inventory levels, but it also shows up as service issues. I think the growth of private label has been a little stronger than many of our customers thought it would be. So we have some service issues there, but I think they're manageable, but it will take a little while to work our way through. So it's just complicated and there's a number of things going on. The transit times you referred to are largely the Asia to East Coast and Asia to Europe. So both those markets have lost 2 weeks' worth of inventory on the East Coast of America and in Europe. And we would typically run with 4 weeks on core SKUs and up to 6 to 8 weeks on non-core SKUs. So that will affect the service levels on the core SKUs, and that's what we're seeing. And so, okay, so we will adjust promotional cadence and price promotion where we can, like some retailers insist on it and others are more flexible, if you don't have the product, they don't want to persuade people to come in to get product they can't get. So we'll adjust that on the balance of the year, but it's going to be suboptimal this summer, probably through the fall.
Bonnie Herzog
analystSo yes, that's what I was going to ask, just thinking about the peak summer selling season. Is there some risk then that you foresee being able to supply? Or is it not to that extent?
Martin Roper
executiveI think we baked into our guidance the risks we saw. But I don't think what we -- clearly saw the signaling, was we don't expect our service levels to be perfect and we expect it to be somewhat constrained. But we're still raising guidance. So okay, this is the problem we have, and it's, in the big scheme of things, it's a good problem to have.
Bonnie Herzog
analystOkay. All right. Kind of back a little bit to the gross margin topic because of how strong they've been. And you have indicated that long-term gross margin outlook, really would be the high 30% range. And you got there pretty quickly, as I think back -- I know. I know. A few quarters ago. And you're still guiding, right, gross margins to 37% to 39%. But as I think about the next, I don't know, 3, 5 years, how do I think about peak gross margin levels, if I dare to put that out there? What will be the drivers of margin expansion above that high 30%?
Martin Roper
executiveSo I think on a quarterly basis, you'll see some noise just basically on timing of promotions and everything else. So I'm going to talk full year gross margins. I think when we went public, and since we've alluded to a desire to get gross margins to the high 30s, approaching 40s, I think we obviously had a couple of quarters in the 40s. So certainly, we're looking at that and going, okay, this is good as our long-term guidance. So right. I think we're benefiting a little bit right now from the decline in the oil business and some sort of lack of pricing and promotion that's associated with the inventory situation. So in those environments, I think aspiring to high 30s to low 40s is fine. But in a normal promotional cadence, maybe not. So that still needs to be worked out. So for what goes into where it actually ends up, I think the mix of business is important. So as we grow branded business in Europe, and it's possible that will help our gross margins relative to private label margins, and we'll have to see how that bakes in as to whether that helps the high 30% margin number. And also in the U.S., the private label margin is significantly lower than that, so the mix changes. So as long as that mix stabilizes and then we start growing branded faster than private label, which is what we did for 3, 4 years there, then that will help that margin. So is it feasible to dream of margins that start with a 4? Yes, we can all dream. And is there a path to get there? I think the other thing I would say is, we haven't talked about it, but part of our strategy is grow the coconut water, maybe double the coconut water, whatever, and not lose sight of that. But at the same time, innovate off that platform with other products. And the nature of innovation and startups of other products, like something like this, the margin on something like this won't be 40% early on. But certainly, when we think about what categories we want to go into, we want to go into categories that are premium priced, that consumers will pay for functionality, and where there is a margin. So that if it does reach scale, we have more branded business with margins in the 40s. And so playing that out, if we are successful at unlocking one of those wins, then the margin should be in the 40s. But that's a series of ifs, not a commitment.
Bonnie Herzog
analystYes. So it's a lot to think through, and I know we're getting close to time, but I did want to ask about the innovation and the portfolio because you have come out with some impressive innovation recently. And think about balancing all of that, and are you kind of trying to focus on maybe is it bigger bets or is it more of this approach at this point kind of seeing what could work? I mean you're in coconut juice, coconut milk, alcohol, sports drink, et cetera.
Martin Roper
executiveYes. So we always prioritize it with what we want to do with the Vita Coco brand, which is a coconut water brand, and can go places that are coconut associated. And we're trying to work out how far we can take that. So for instance, our coconut -- our Vita Coco Treats is, can we take this to sweet decker, dessert, while still being a beverage? Our second priority is sort of organic innovation of new brands. And there we're outside of coconut water. And when I think about it, I look for categories that are maybe fragmenting or about to fragment, the large categories that are about to fragment where we can play in a niche of 1% or 2% of that, where that would be meaningful to us, like $100 million to $200 million in revenue, but not meaningful enough that the big players who exist in those categories are going to come squash us before we get there. Because the last thing you want to do is launch stuff into -- and then be squashed immediately because it's such a great idea and you had a great execution, but you don't have necessarily the muscle to get there. You want to start -- go for categories that maybe look small to other people, but you can prove they win. So that's how we think about it. And so PWR LIFT, which I have here, is an example of that, is protein-infused isotonic, and we think there's an opportunity for that play within the isotonics, which I think is close to a $10 billion business. And if we got $100 million, that for us is life-changing. And if we can do that once or twice over the next 5 years, then we probably double our business just with that initiative, quite apart from the fact that the core is healthy and growing. So that's how we think about it, make sure it has positive margins, that we like the product, it is better for you, charges a premium, delivers margin, and there's an opportunity maybe to win if you move smartly, quickly, but maybe with the caution and patience so you don't -- we're not in the business of spending a lot of money to blow something up and have it fell on us. We'd rather spend money slowly and build something from the base.
Bonnie Herzog
analystMakes a lot of sense. And on that point, organic and/or via acquisitions, something about your balance sheet, you're still continuing to look opportunistically, I imagine, for potential M&A and tuck-in?
Martin Roper
executiveYes. I think we think that we have the commercial capabilities, particularly in North America, to basically tuck in a beverage type business or a [ complement ] type business and leverage both synergies but also help with scale. So we continue to -- we look, when the opportunity is right, we will probably do something. But the opportunity needs to be right both in the value we can create and the price we have to pay for it, and whether or not it dilutes our focus on the core business. Right? So we will pursue all the path of organic innovation and M&A as ways to try and diversify our platform within the natural beverage space, and to build on the commercial capabilities, and excellent team that I'm so fortunate to be part of.
Bonnie Herzog
analystAll right. Well, this was great. Thank you so much for your time. Thank you, everyone, for joining us.
Martin Roper
executiveThank you very much.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete The Vita Coco Company, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.