Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 15, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Staples Food Products conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#1

[Audio Gap] everyone. I'm Andrew Strelzik. I'm BMO's agribusiness, protein, beverages and restaurants analyst, and I'm delighted to welcome everyone to our 19th Annual Farm to Market Conference. I'm proud to say that this is my 17th Farm to Market. It's truly amazing to see how the conference has grown over that time. Starting as a 1-day event with 11 companies, my first year, we now have the pleasure of hosting over 100 companies, 400 investors and 1,000 total attendees over the course of today and tomorrow. As is the case each year, our goal is to provide a venue to explore key issues and investment opportunities across the food value chain. The conference will highlight fireside chats and presentations from senior executives of leading companies from the farm to the market, including the fertilizer, chemical, agribusiness, protein, food, beverage, distribution and food retail sectors. Before I go any further, I want to take a moment to thank the many people who make the conference the success you see today. The management teams have been unbelievably gracious with their time and insights upon which conference has been built. Our tremendous sales force, devoted editorial staff and tireless conference coordinators are remarkable in their commitment to making this event a success for investors and companies in attendance. Last, but certainly not least, I thank the investors that have joined us from all parts of the world to really make this event special. We expect to explore numerous themes over the next 2 days, including: the outlook for farmers and potential for grower margin expansion; implications across the ag and protein industries from recovering crop supplies and resulting decline in prices; the impact of multiyear inflationary pressures on the U.S. consumer and how companies are responding to pockets of trade down if the page has turned on crop chemicals destocking; company strategies to drive food away from home volumes to generate sales growth in a less inflationary environment and how M&A strategies are evolving to meet consumer preferences. Each year, we seek to keep the conference relevant for the rapidly evolving dynamics across the agriculture and food value chain. We're fortunate to have as our keynote lunch panel today BMO senior commercial ag lenders to discuss the state of the farmer, crop supply demand dynamics and the agriculture operating environment. And tomorrow's keynote panel will explore how private equity firms are managing existing portfolio companies and deploying new capital amidst current market uncertainties. We hope you come away from the conference with incremental insights and a better understanding of company strategies and outlooks, opportunities and challenges, key issues and new ideas. If you have any questions or need any help, please don't hesitate to ask. Thank you, and enjoy the conference. Tyson has been gracious enough to kick off this conference for the last 19 years. As CEO since 2021, Donnie King has led Tyson out of an unprecedented operating environment, leveraged just 4 decades of industry experience to manage through a challenging environment across proteins and once again driven the turnaround in its chicken operations, building on a strong track record of superior performance. Donnie is joined by John R. Tyson, who has been with the company since 2019, and spent the last 2.5 years enhancing the leadership team as CFO. Over that time, John has continued to manage Tyson's balance sheet through the lens of financial discipline, opportunistic capital allocation and cash returns to shareholders against an evolving operating backdrop. Donnie, John, thank you so much both for being here today.

Donnie King

executive
#2

Thank you for having us.

John Tyson

executive
#3

Good morning. Thanks for having us.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#4

So I guess I wanted to start it off this way. The company has been -- has taken a number of actions over the last 12 months or so to improve performance across segments. Can you reflect on those changes that you've made, what those have contributed and where there are additional actions that you're considering?

Donnie King

executive
#5

Sure. I will -- let me start off by saying good morning, everyone, and thanks for having us again. I didn't realize it was 19 years, but -- so good morning. One of the comments I make is what a difference a year makes. If I think about, at least the first half of this year, we are fundamentally a stronger company, and fundamentally is -- talking about all the fundamentals of the business, controlling the controllables, operational excellence. We've done things such as made a pretty strategic network moves across our organization. We've closed 6 poultry plants, 2 case-ready beef plants and we announced the closure of one of our more inefficient pork plants. But I would characterize it as back to the basics. And once again, we are seeing the benefits of our diverse portfolio across proteins, channels, categories and eating occasions. And in this particular case, we're seeing tailwinds from chicken offset headwinds in beef. And if I could step into each one of the business, just really top line, they're all doing better than they did a year ago. And so very proud of the execution from our team. Now I would also hurry on to tell you that the mindset is continuous improvement. And we're certainly engaged in that. But from a chicken standpoint, we talked about in November that we were going to make some moves and we were going to make some changes and perform better. And we talked about that in terms of 2/3 of that would come from things like operational execution, it would come from the network optimization. And about 1/3 of that would come from market tailwinds in chicken. We'll update that guidance as we move along. But the way we look at chicken right now, the grains have moderated, still elevated over prepandemic levels. Demand for chicken is solid. And as we think about our Chicken business going forward, in the last quarter, made $325 million improvement. Very proud of that again, but a much, much stronger Chicken business. And I'm most excited about the fact that it's driven by execution and action and those type of things. So that's the story as it relates to Chicken. Prepared Foods. We have 3 of the top 10 protein brands in food. Our brand health is good. Our share is strong. We're seeing some consumer dynamics. This bifurcated consumer is the way we've described it, where those on the lower end are making a, in some cases, move from branded to private label, and then in some cases, moving from foodservice into retail. The good news for Tyson is that we have an assortment across the various price points. So we meet the consumer wherever they are. If I go to Beef, the progression of the cattle cycle continues. I don't know today when heifer retention will resume. What I can tell you is this, what we're looking for, and what we think will be the drivers of that is, one, is pasture conditions. And those are much improved from where they have been. That would be one sign. So it'd be a positive indicator. Interest rates are up. So borrowing power is going to be more expensive and tying up more working capital. So ranchers are looking at that, and I'd say that maybe you put in a headwind category. Grains have moderated, as I mentioned earlier, would be positive. And so we're closer today to heifer retention than we have been, but I can't predict exactly when that's going to occur in a meaningful way. What I can tell you about our Beef business is we continue to value up into things like marinated meats and so forth and then push those products into our Prepared Foods. I can tell you that the fundamentals in our Beef business are very, very good. They continue to improve, a lot more database decision-making. And so we're excited about once this cycle gets kind of looks normal again, I'm excited about what we're going to be able to deliver from a Beef standpoint. Our Pork business is just about driving out inefficiency and waste. And I can tell you, our Pork business is performing better than it has in a long, long time at Tyson. And so very excited about that. Have plenty of hogs around us, and demand for pork is very strong. And then we talked a little bit about our international business on our earnings call, and we're starting to see some scale in our international business in -- I think at the end of our '23, we were $2.5 billion in sales, and we invested in 7 assets over the last 2 or 3 years, which drove a lot of capital allocation. And so from that standpoint, we're in a point now where we're valuing up or we're actually filling up those assets. And so we like our chances. So we're in a better place overall than we were a year ago or 2 years ago.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#6

You talked on the earnings call on the Chicken business about all the work that you've done, but still having more work to do. So can you kind of frame where you still see opportunities in that business to continue to improve performance, maybe where performance is now versus where it's been or historical. Any ways to think about that?

Donnie King

executive
#7

Sure. And John, you add into this, if you'd like. But I'll try to tell you, and it's very simple in terms of the approach that we've had in Chicken, and simple worked really well for us. And so we had essentially 3 or 4 priorities going into the year, which are core in my mind to success in Chicken. Our live operations, we've had issues with our genetics and with our performance in live and capacity utilization and a number of things like that. We made the decision several months ago to move from a no antibiotics ever for the Tyson brand to a no antibiotics in human medicine. So we made that switch. We've seen a number of benefits from that. The livability, the performance of the animal in terms of feed conversion, but probably most importantly, and many of you will understand this, is the uniformity of that flock that we get into a plant and how that works through trying to service customers who need different sizes of product and so forth. And so we really like that. So our live performance has really come a long way. I know industry data talks a lot about hatch and livability and how that is kind of has a lid on or muting supply potential. Our supply -- our genetics, we have -- based on what we see in public data around hatch and livability, we are significantly better than that. And we've not been able to say that in a long time. In terms of our plant operations, it's fundamentals, it's labor, it's yield, it's utilization. There's -- and then with a mindset of always valuing up. We have the -- we've been able to do that. That's been a bit of our legacy as a company through the years, and we're back on track with doing those type of things. You may recall, in 2023, we had some demand signals that created an oversupply for us. And in Q1, Q2 of '23, we had to clean that up and we've done that. But as we're in -- have gone through the first half of our fiscal year, we're seeing the benefits of that supply/demand balance that we have. We've been able to service our customers in a much, much better way. And at the same time, lowering inventory and working capital and that type of thing. So -- and we continue to invest and -- behind our Tyson brand in Chicken. We're the #1 brand in retail, and we're the #1 brand in foodservice, and that's our sweet spot. That's where we want to grow. That's where we choose to play. Anything?

John Tyson

executive
#8

I think that was a good summary, Donnie. And if I may just add a couple of things just to put some numbers around what we're talking about. Last Monday, we released earnings. We beat expectations and raised guidance. That was driven principally by our Chicken business. Donnie's talking about live operations. Based on data that we see, we are beating and better than our competition there, which we see as being good for our business. If we think about, from an operational standpoint, we announced last year a bunch of strategic moves, discussed that being well north of $200 million in terms of the year-over-year improvement. I think we've realized that today. And the question we get a lot is, okay, how much more room do you have to go? We haven't broken that out yet, but it's safe to say we feel like there is headroom to continue improving our operations. Why is that relevant? I think the question we get a lot from investors is, hey, what more can chicken do? Or what is going on in the chicken environment that potentially offsets some of what's going on in the beef environment? I think we see today the industry trying to supply more bird, but there's been a little bit of a bump in our heads against the ceiling because of some of the hatch and livability issues. So I think we would see that as being constructive for Chicken margins. And anyone in this room -- actually, there's probably people in this room that could guess better than we can about where things are going to go from a grain standpoint. But safe to say, I think consensus projections now I would say that the environment continues to get better as each week and month goes on. So I think all in all, we're feeling optimistic about the Chicken business.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#9

You talked about some of the productivity issues that have been -- that are certainly constructive for the business. Can you kind of dive into that a little bit more? What's causing that? Is there a path to recovery? It feels like we've been dealing with this now for several years in some shape or form. So how is this different than that? Or the same as that? And what's the pathway forward?

Donnie King

executive
#10

Sure. I think the thing that -- I guess the punchline is that companies are looking and projecting what forecast ahead and weight's going to be. And to your point, we have underdelivered on that. Yes, you see today an environment with more placements and a little bit heavier bird weights, but net, in terms of overall supply in Chicken, it's relatively flat. A number of things from disease to -- in terms of hatchability, mortality of pullets, mortality of hens, hatchability and even with some disease livability issues in the meat birds, the broilers. And so I don't know that anybody has a real answer for that from an industry standpoint. So I'll let someone else try to explain that. I can tell you that from a hatchability perspective, we're -- we said it on the call, we were up 260 basis points in. So we're in pretty good shape from a hatch standpoint. Livability with some of the things that we changed from no antibiotics ever to NAIHM, that protocol. We're seeing greater livability and uniformity as I've talked about before. But it's just always a combination of things that is lurking in that, partly genetics, partly could be husbandry on the farm. I know that we had to go back and do some really basic things in our live production operations and just get back to the blocking and tackling of the business. And we've been able to do that. And so we like our chances relative to that. We have some -- we have more room to go, but we have good plans in place to attack that.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#11

You talked about your expectations for chicken production this year to come in below the 1% growth that the USDA has been -- or at the time was projecting. So obviously, a constrained supply environment. Can you talk a little bit more about what you're seeing in terms of demand shifting between proteins or demand across proteins, I guess? You talked a little bit about bifurcating consumer in Prepared. If I rewind a year ago, I think there was an expectation that we were going to see demand shift from beef to chicken that hadn't quite played out at that time. So how does the environment now compared to where we were and maybe where we're going?

John Tyson

executive
#12

Maybe I can take that one. So a couple of things we've discussed, and maybe some just additional observations that -- we talked a little bit last week about features in retail, driving pork and chicken. I think we see that as being supportive for demand in those proteins. Net-net, overall, I think the total protein mix doesn't change over year-to-year. And I don't think we're meeting to make any bold assertions around the composition of kind of the protein mix. But I think what we do see is as the price gap start to get wider between these proteins, chicken and pork should stand to benefit. And I think we've already started to see that. It should probably continue. And retail features is one area where you can see the kind of activity. Other places that we see it show up is we work -- we have a good foodservice business. We start to project into the summer and in the winter time, customers planning for next year, what's going to be the composition, what are they putting on their menus to drive volume? And I think we see that as being -- as continuing to be positive for chicken and for pork.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#13

I know you said that there are others that maybe have a different or clearer lens, so to speak, on the feed cost outlook, but when you've approached the outlook for your business for this year, and you think about maybe the next 12 months, I know we're kind of early in the planning season here, how do you approach the guidance from a feed cost perspective? And kind of what are your assumptions about feed costs in terms of becoming more of a tailwind, more of a headwind going forward?

John Tyson

executive
#14

I think -- we try to not get into market calls, but typically cast a projection kind of wherever things are at the point in time where we're talking to the markets or building our outlook. I think it's safe to say that if you were to look through some historical norms, and we project where we're going to be from a stock-to-use standpoint, we project -- I mean even though we're still early in the planning season, I think everyone's comfortable and confident about where production is headed this year. So it's possible that we're getting back into those pre-COVID levels, or 10 years ago where corn was trading $4 minus as compared to where we were a year ago, above $6. So I think that's the -- that's probably the consensus opinion. That's kind of how we operate. But I think what I want our investors to take away is that we manage our portfolio from a commercial standpoint in terms of the contracts we have. We try to manage our mix so that we can win no matter if it's high prices or low prices. I think since a year ago, we've made a lot of good moves to get our poultry business in balance specifically. And so we're not betting on the up or down either way, but really focused on what we can do for our customers so that they're able to get chicken at great value for their customers.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#15

And maybe just to wrap up on the chicken side. It seems like between the external environment of tight supplies, tight beef and how that benefits chicken demand, feed cost outlook, your internal dynamics and the ability to continue to improve that on the chicken side, it feels like there's a pretty good runway here. I think investors generally view the chicken cycle as shorter in duration than obviously some of the others given the life cycles. Does it feel like -- without asking you to give '25 guidance or anything like that, does it feel like we are -- your Chicken business is set up for a sustained run here that has a little bit more durability to it just given the sets of external and internal dynamics?

John Tyson

executive
#16

I think the best way we can answer that question today is our -- we raised the outlook for the back half of the year. That implies that we are exiting the year equal to and better -- or better than the first the way we started the year. And so I think if -- it would be reasonable to extrapolate that based on what we know today, but I don't think we mean to make any assertions about 9 months out from now just because we've seen things turn in a short period of time. Even the -- some of the dynamics that we've seen in the first 6 months of this year may have been easy to look back and say, okay, that makes a lot of sense. But I think we had a more cautious outlook when we began the year and just because there's a lot of predictability in the business.

Donnie King

executive
#17

If I could add to that, Andrew. The thing that I'm looking at relative to our Chicken business, we've talked about grains moderating in what they do going forward. I mean everybody here sees all that information, but certainly not pre-COVID levels, but certainly moderated from where it's been. Demand for chicken is solid across our portfolio. And execution is better than it's been in some time. And as I mentioned earlier, we are fundamentally a much better chicken company. And so very proud of that, what that can do not only for the balance of the year, but as we move into '25, '26 and so on.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#18

Okay. That makes a lot of sense. If I shift gears to beef, you've talked about some of the uncertainties in the outlook, not seeing herd rebuilding yet, some of the pros and cons. I guess can you just maybe dig in a little deeper in terms of what it might take to get folks over the hump or get the supply chain over the hump to start to do that and kind of how you think that might play out?

Donnie King

executive
#19

Sure. And I touched on this earlier. But in terms of what -- I think what ranchers are looking for, feedlots are looking for is going to be better pasture conditions. That's #1 on the list, and that is much improved. So that's very positive in terms of sentiment. In terms of grain costs, as I said earlier, as it relates to chicken, and you could put pork in this as well, feed costs continue to moderate. I mean that's positive. The unknown around -- well, interest rates are known, and that's a bit of a headwind, but we're much closer. There's a lot of people that would speculate in terms of when to do that. We choose to talk about it in terms of what the data says. And we see nothing that has -- that heifer retention is taking place in a meaningful way. Roughly 41% of those heifers are going to a processing plant. Historical levels are somewhere around 35%. So there's still some room there. And so that's what we're looking for. That's what we see from that perspective. But cattle supplies are tight, and compression continues in terms of the spread.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#20

And I guess the context of some of the uncertainties that exist in the beef market, can you maybe frame how you think about getting to the high end and the low of the guidance range for this year? Obviously, pretty divergent back half implications just based on those ranges. So can you talk about some of the sets of circumstances that would drive you to one versus the other?

John Tyson

executive
#21

Yes. I think when we put the guidance together, I mean we do some pretty -- in our Beef business specifically, we make some assumptions around here's the range of outcomes on cattle prices. Here are the range of outcomes in terms of cutout values and drop values. And you just put that, plus minus either way, I think. Where we started the year so far, puts us right roughly year-to-date in the middle of that range. And so in a world where we've -- you've heard us already say today about how we try to project market calls, I think that's the easiest way for us to explain where we sit with the guidance today. But if you follow Tyson, if you follow the beef industry, it's easier to -- there's data out there to track what margins are doing in the -- for the industry. So we do make investments to try to make more stable, the earnings and more resilient in our Beef business, invested pretty significantly in our case-ready business. We're always trying to figure out how to value up to drop and do things in kind of the byproducts business. We haven't -- that is kind of a focus, I think, for us. And so we'll see how things play out. But we're going towards a point in time with tighter cattle supplies, and that will continue to influence the Beef business.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#22

I know that controlling the controllables has been a key focus certainly for the company. In the Beef business specifically, you talked about trying to add value and various things. I mean what are some of the internal actions that are available to try to improve or recover some of the margin in what is a challenging operating environment?

Donnie King

executive
#23

Sure. I think the answer is largely in your question in that it's labor management, it's yield, it's utilization. The uncertainty that we have around here is the volatility in terms of cattle availability. And for example, based on futures we had in Q1, we had a pretty significant headwind in LCNRV. In Q2, it was a bit of a tailwind, and it's -- so it's very fluid in terms of that. But what we do control in terms of our execution, and those things that anyone in here in the beef business would understand is that doing the fundamentals well, executing with excellence, that's where the money can be, and waste can be removed from your operation. Is it going to offset some of the volatility in beef in the cattle cycle? Probably not completely, but we are not missing this opportunity to get to be a better beef company, a better company overall, but just execution. And there's things such as, yes, we are valuing up some of the portfolio, and we're looking for every opportunity to do that across our business. But at the same time, we got a consumer that, in some cases, is moving from muscle meat to grinds, and demand for grind for us in beef is very strong. And so we like that. We're still taking care of the consumer relative to that. But the volatility around the cattle cycle, we really do not control, but there's a whole lot that we do. And our beef team is waking up every day looking to ring out waste from our business.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#24

Maybe along those lines, you've made changes to the footprint in chicken, now in pork as well. Can you maybe compare and contrast why that makes sense versus whether or not you would make a change on the beef side? Are there similarities and differences? I guess, what's the decision set?

Donnie King

executive
#25

Yes. I would say this, from a Beef standpoint, we're well capitalized in Beef. Simply said, our Beef locations, processing plants are in places where cattle is available. So we like that. Our beef plants have scale, they're efficient, they're competitive from a cost structure perspective. And if I contrast that with the locations in which we've made some really tough decisions, I think that the common denominators around those locations are this. They were typically small in scale, in some cases, a single shift. In many cases or all cases, they were uncompetitive from a cost perspective. They may have been out of position from a network geographically from that perspective. And then in every case, in order to try to make them competitive, the capital required to do that was onerous in terms of doing that and getting a return on that versus simply doing what we did where we moved those sales and those supply of animals from a less efficient operation to a more efficient operation. We will virtually move 100% of that -- those sales into different locations with a better cost structure, and in many cases, with a better mix.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#26

So I guess as we wrap up on the Beef side, if I go back historically, there was a point at which you raised the long-term kind of margin guide. I know you're guiding this year on profit dollars. But percent margin guidance, do you feel like that is still an achievable or appropriate kind of long-term margin range? Maybe any puts or takes that would change or not change your view there?

John Tyson

executive
#27

So I would say when we've talked about long-term guidance in the past, we talked about a normalized range, so kind of an average over a period of time. I think what we see today is there's a lot of movement in the industry. I think when we project into the future, we'll be trying to understand, hey, what's the next herd size rebuild? What does that do for our Beef business? And what's going on in terms of how's our assets and our performance? So I think today, we don't mean to make any revisions to or adjustments to what we think a normalized number is. But I would expect in the next -- as we go through, call it, maybe '24 or '25, at some point in time, we'll probably relook at -- or we look at it on a pretty regular basis what we think the long-term outlook is. But if we determine we need to make any revisions, we could do that.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#28

Okay. Sure. Moving to Prepared Foods. I think one of the areas of focus coming out of the most recent earnings call was the dynamics that you called out between 3Q and 4Q. And part of that was specific to Prepared, whether it was investments, you made some comments on demand. Can you kind of frame that dynamic over the back half of the year in terms of how you're thinking about the cadence and the drivers there?

John Tyson

executive
#29

So I'm glad you asked this question. We've only -- we spend a lot of time on Chicken and Beef. But when we think about the long-term story here at Tyson, what we're talking about is our Prepared Foods business and parts of our Chicken business where we're evolving to a more stable, higher-margin value-added part of the portfolio. And I'm hopeful that as we go through the next, however many, 2 years, we start to see the power of the investments we've made in our brands and some of our value-added capabilities really come to bear. Your question was about the discussion we had last week. And I think that we did make some comments last week around what's going on from what the consumer's doing. We also talked about the shape of the year. And I think what got lost in that commentary was the most important point we wanted to make about, not just our Prepared Foods business, but about our entire portfolio because there's so much discussion in the consumer and the food environment today around what's going on with consumer behavior. Our portfolio, we play -- if consumers are eating at home or at restaurants, no matter where they are in the value chain, we stand to be profitable, and we don't -- we can make money no matter the consumer backdrop. And I think that, that is what got lost at the kind of the end of the sentence when we were talking last week about what's going on. So just want to make sure we get to emphasize that. About the shape of the year, I think that's the other important question. So typically, our Prepared Foods business has seen a seasonal trend kind of -- the first half of the year, Q3, Q4, and stepping down. We got caught up in some commentary last week, talking about Q3 could be worse than Q4. I think what I would like our investors to take away is that is 2 things. One, it is possible, not just for our total business, and the reason driving that is we talked about Prepared Foods a little bit. In that business, we've got just from a timing standpoint, some start-up costs in our new bacon plant. We get hit by some raw material cost from a timing standpoint. So that could be a little bit counter-seasonal for the back half of the year. But the comment was been about total Tyson, and the other two things influencing that would be pork seasonality, which our Q3 is always the softest quarter for pork or has been historically. And we've talked a lot about chicken already. And so we're talking about chicken. If we continue to see the external environment evolve, it's possible that the mix on that could favor a little bit Q4. So that's what we were talking about when we got the question last week.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#30

Perfect. If we kind of zoom out on Prepared Foods, how do the operational improvement opportunities compare? I mean is there a similar opportunity as you've executed on some of the more commodity businesses? You have new leadership of that business as well. Can you talk about how you see some of those opportunities shaping up over the next couple of years?

Donnie King

executive
#31

Sure. I'll start off with -- across all businesses, we have literally looked at everything. We turned over every rock in every business. And within Prepared Foods, I talked about the fact that we had 3 of the top 10 protein brands in food, and that is true. They're healthy, they're strong. Where we're working today, and we've done some structural changes to put some more emphasis on this in Prepared Foods specifically, but I would say that Prepared is a little bit behind where -- what we've been able to do in Chicken, in Beef and in Pork. But based on the moves that we've made, I would see us catching up really quickly, which none of that means that to imply that we're going to be worse than what we have historically been. What I'm describing to you is a new opportunity and a new waste being eliminated from our system, all through supply chain in terms of where we manufacture, what is the capacity utilization, the yields, the labors, all those things you would see in a typically commodity-oriented business. We're bringing that into our CPG business, which is our Prepared Foods business. And I like what we're going to be able to do there. We are still relatively early in terms of that. I'm not prepared to tell you what the number is, but we're looking to take all the waste and inefficiency out of our prepared business. And there's opportunity there. And so we're excited about that, and we're excited about what that implies for our Prepared Foods business as we move forward.

John Tyson

executive
#32

I think the way that I would just put some numbers to that is our long term -- we've talked about long-term outlook. Our normalized outlook as being low double-digit return on sales. I think we feel good about that still. That is based on our footprint and the categories that we're in. And we haven't delivered on that in the recent years. So as we get to '25 or start talking about '25, I think we'll start to provide shape as to what that pathway is to having a sustainable low double-digit returns.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#33

So this is not a '25 guidance comment. You haven't put numbers around productivity or the shape of that. Certainly, over time, is that in and of itself enough to get you back to kind of the long-term guidance? Is -- are there other external or other factors that would need to take place for you to bridge back to that level over maybe a multiyear period?

John Tyson

executive
#34

I think taking in a multi -- considering over a multiyear period, the path there is a combination of operational efficiencies and supply chain moves as well as opportunities for growth in our existing footprint.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#35

Okay. We just have a couple of minutes left. So I wanted to talk about capital allocation, and you've been managing the balance sheet very tightly in this environment. You've talked about getting the leverage back to your targets. I guess what is the pathway to getting there? What's the timeline to which you expect the balance sheet to evolve in that way?

Donnie King

executive
#36

Yes. So I think a few things to take away when we think about capital allocation and the balance sheet. First, when we talk about priorities. We've been consistent for a long time. We're focused on being in good financial position for us, that means getting our leverage in shape. That will come from getting our operations back in order, which we've seen the year-over-year improvement. We got asked the question last week, hey, what's your projected leverage number at the end of fiscal '24? I don't think we want to give a number on that specifically, but safe to say we're trending sequentially in the right direction. That's really driven by the performance improvement in the business. And I think the other thing that we said last week is we reaffirmed our confidence that our focus on free cash flow, and being sufficient to cover the dividend, I think we've delivered on that. We've managed our working capital to release some cash, especially inventory in our Chicken and Prepared business. And we have also moderated the CapEx. You asked -- we've talked about this a little bit, Andrew, but the question we've got around CapEx is, hey, what's the long-term normalized number? We feel that is around $1.25 billion, plus or minus, depending on the year. I think if you were to look back historically, we've run just a little bit north of $1 billion, that's probably the average. I think the way that we get to that $1.25 billion, again plus/minus, is looking at our historical norms, looking at our footprint, what's required from an ongoing maintenance standpoint and factoring for some inflation and things like that. But I think overall, the story for us is leverage is trending down. We'll be free cash flow positive to cover the dividend. And we've got momentum in our business.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#37

And maybe just to wrap up, when you get to a position maybe where you can start to be a little bit more selective on growth capital allocation. You've talked about some of the priorities through the conversation through the different business segments. But I guess what gets you excited kind of in rank order, I guess, the biggest opportunities in the medium term as we start to have those conversations, which would, I guess, be incremental to the one?

John Tyson

executive
#38

Yes. I don't want to rank order it, but safe to say, and I think our recent track record has demonstrated this, investing in the most attractive parts of our Prepared Foods business, investing in the value-added parts of our Chicken business and investing in countries where we see great growth opportunity outside the U.S. Those are really the priorities. And that's what we've done in the last few years. We've built new plants in Asia. We built a new bacon facility in Kentucky, a new value-added chicken facility in Danville, Virginia. So I think we feel good about the investments that we've made and I say recent history is probably predictive of where we will continue to invest.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#39

Great. We'll go ahead and end it there. Thank you both so much for being with us today. We really appreciate it.

Donnie King

executive
#40

Thank you. Thank you, everyone.

John Tyson

executive
#41

Thanks so much. We appreciate it.

Andrew Strelzik

analyst
#42

Thank you. Thanks a lot. Great. After you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tyson Foods, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Tyson Foods, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.