U.S. Bancorp (USB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 16, 2026

NYSE US Financials Banks conference_presentation 40 min

What were the key takeaways from U.S. Bancorp's September 16, 2026 earnings call?

In the third quarter of fiscal year 2026, U.S. Bancorp (USB) reported strong financial results, with net interest income (NII) expected to be at the high end of the 4% to 6% growth range year-over-year, and fee revenues projected to grow 12% to 14%. Earnings per share (EPS) guidance for the full year has been raised to the higher end of the 7% to 9% range, reflecting positive momentum in both consumer deposits and fee-based services. Management emphasized the importance of expense management and organic growth, while also indicating challenges in the mortgage and auto segments, which have underperformed expectations.

What topics did U.S. Bancorp cover?

  • Revenue Growth Acceleration: U.S. Bancorp's revenue growth has exceeded expectations, driven by strong performance in fee-based services and net interest income. CEO Gunjan Kedia noted, "We are now 4 quarters operating within our medium-term financial guidance," indicating a consistent improvement in financial results.
  • Challenges in Mortgage and Auto Segments: Management acknowledged underperformance in the mortgage and auto businesses, which constitute about 10% of total revenues. Kedia stated, "The demand there is very muted," highlighting the need for improved performance in these areas.
  • Focus on Fee-Based Revenue: U.S. Bancorp is prioritizing fee-based revenue, which constitutes nearly 45% of total revenue. Kedia expressed excitement about the fee complex, stating, "These are attractive, differentiated, and very difficult to replicate," signaling a strategic focus on diversifying revenue sources.
  • Strong Consumer Deposit Growth: The bank reported record consumer deposits, outpacing industry growth. Kedia mentioned, "We have seen some good results there," indicating a successful strategy in enhancing the consumer and small business franchise.
  • Management's Forward Guidance: Management maintained a positive outlook for the remainder of the year, with expectations for NII growth at the high end of the 4% to 6% range and fee revenues potentially exceeding 14%. CFO John Stern stated, "We feel very good about the momentum there on the revenue side," reinforcing confidence in future performance.

What were U.S. Bancorp's September 16, 2026 results?

  • Net Interest Income Growth: 4% to 6% (Expectations for year-over-year growth at the high end of the range)
  • Fee Revenue Growth: 12% to 14% (Guidance indicates potential to exceed 14% depending on capital markets activity)
  • Earnings Per Share Growth: 7% to 9% (Guidance raised to the higher end of the range)
  • Efficiency Ratio Improvement: 5+ points (Reduction over the last 2 years)
  • Consumer Deposits: Record levels (Outpacing industry growth)
  • Loan Growth: 6% to 7% (Expected for the full year)

U.S. Bancorp's strong performance in revenue growth and operational efficiency positions it favorably in the financial sector. The focus on fee-based revenue and consumer deposits, alongside strategic investments in technology, suggests a solid growth trajectory. However, challenges in the mortgage and auto segments warrant close monitoring. Investors should watch for continued execution on management's strategic priorities and the impact of competitive pressures on loan growth.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#1

Next up, if everyone can take their seats. I'm very pleased to have U.S. Bancorp from the company, Gunjan Kedia, Chief Executive Officer; and John Stern, Chief Financial Officer. Welcome back, guys.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#2

Glad to be here.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#3

Good, so, maybe just start with you. You're a little bit more than a year into your job as CEO at this point. Over that spend, we've definitely seen a pickup in revenue growth. I think a pickup in sentiment around the name. Maybe just talk about how the pace of improvement at USB has better than you expected, worse than you expected? And maybe what have been some of the biggest drivers of the success the market is needing to realize?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#4

Well, thank you, Jason. Very nice to be here, and thank you for recognizing the progress in our results. It feels really rewarding to see the banks start to deliver financials that are consent with our potential. When I stepped into my role, April last year, I did inherit a very attractive franchise. Largely, the mix of businesses is, the fee heavy businesses, it's very differentiating. It's very distinctive. The products were good. We had invested a lot in digital, and the customer base was very strong, especially the Union Bank acquisition in California. There was just a very attractive customer base to work on. So the fundamentals were all in place. Our opportunity was just good, consistent execution. So first year we credit a lot of the inflection in the results to just urgency and pace. The first thing we did was to focus our efforts on 3 strategic priorities that was expense management, organic growth and payments transformation and did some meaningful shift in resource allocations to support those priorities. And a lot of organizational changes, we elevated some revenue-facing roles in the structure of the company. There's been a very meaningful refresh of the talent, almost 1/4 of the top 200 roles are new to bank or new to roles, higher aspirations, flatter corporate center processes, a more leveraged compensation plan and all of that collectively picked up more consistent financial results. And that was the first year. We are now 4 quarters operating within our medium-term financial guidance. And the first year has closed the valuation gap with our peers. But of course, a lot more upside, but a good start in the first year.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#5

I guess on the flip side, as everything has not gone quite as well as you have planned so far. And also as you kind of look to year 2 or so under your leadership, just how are your priorities shifting? And are there areas you're more focused on to get them up to speed?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#6

What's not gone to plan or disappointing. I would -- the biggest would be the mortgage and auto businesses. They are almost 10% of our companies, very large businesses for us, and our base case was to see some moderation in rates and pickup in that activity and the demand there is very muted. So those have probably underperformed the base case in the last year. But for the rest, what has gone exceptionally well is expense management. We have taken almost 5-plus points out of our efficiency ratio in the last 2 years and fee growth inflection. We are at double digits over the last quarters and those 2 pillars have surprised on the positive and quite a lot of runway going forward. So going forward, there continue to be very strong parts of the agenda. What gets added on in year 2 and beyond Jason, are 2 other areas. The first is NII growth. We are very focused on our consumer and small business franchise, that improves our funding mix, our deposit mix, and we've seen some good results there. It will be another quarter of record consumer deposits. And on the loan side, we have focused very much on C&I and credit card growth, so that improves the loan mix. And collectively, they create both NII growth and NIM improvement. So that's an important part of the priority this year and beyond. And then the second broadly is making sure we get full leverage out of the twin technology shocks of AI and stable coins. Those are transformative levers for the industry, and we want to be very front-footed and ahead in terms of creating enduring success. And then, I think all of the organizational health things that we started in the first year, as you know, these things take time and they build a real high-performance culture. So as I think about my second year and beyond, keep the momentum with expenses and fees, really inflect NII, just get very front-footed with AI and stable coin and just create a really high-performing bank.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#7

You mentioned fees in that last remark is 1 of the areas I think almost 45% of revenue is the U.S. banks. So kind of certainly differentiates you from some of the other super regionals. Just as you kind of think about the fee complex, maybe which areas you're most excited about over the next year or 2? And maybe which one is a little less so?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#8

So first, I'm most excited that it is a fee complex, and it's a very marquee complex. We categories, payments that we are known for the trust and investments, which is very good for us, capital markets and then the consumer fees, which is that you traditionally seen in most banks. These are attractive. These are differentiated and very difficult to replicate either through organic growth or through acquisitions. So we think it will be a differentiating feature for a long time. And the beauty of these, the fee complexes that they do stabilize your earnings because there's a diversification benefit to them. The underlying growth trends are faster than GDP or population growth, which is really what the banking side gets anchored around. They also create very sticky relationships. So really, that is a strategic focus for us is to keep the diversification of the complex and inch up even beyond the 44% that we see. The big 2 areas, though is capital markets and payments. Capital markets just because we are about 7%, 8% of revenue, we should be 10%, 11%. BTIG was a very strong start and we expect to grow into the balance sheet we are already deploying. So this is not more use of balance sheet that could inflect it even more. But right now, we're just trying to get fair share of the balance sheet that's being deployed. And the second is payments. That was one of my first priorities even in my President's role. And we are beginning to see the results in fleet every quarter, the growth rates are inching up. It is a long game, though. You have to wait for contracts to come to you even on the credit card side, you have to wait for your marketing offers to sort of deplete out of the upfront cost. So we are very pleased with those, and those 2 will create sort of the 3 engines going forward. other categories, too, but they tend to be more ballast like and steady.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#9

Got it. Maybe we'll come back to maybe strategy and longer-term topics in a bit, but maybe kind of pull up for a second? And could you just talk to what you're seeing and hearing from your clients in terms of sentiment, spending trends, et cetera?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#10

It's all favorable, and our outlook is that as we end the year. The commercial clients are particularly vibrant. Loan pipelines continue to be very strong and quite diversified. So it's not just the AI trade. And the consumer is stable. We see some moderation of spend in August relative to the FIFA bump of June, but still very healthy delinquency credit all looks good. So it's a favorable outlook for the rest of the year.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#11

I guess, John, we have to bring you in against that backdrop. You had your slide deck, your slide in July with the outlook for 3Q and the full year. Anything you want to call out or update us on?

John Stern

executive
#12

Yes. Jason, it's going to be another strong quarter for us. We talked about net interest income being in that 4% to 6%. We anticipate being on the high end of that range on a year-over-year basis. Fee revenues, we mentioned to be 12% to 14%. We again expect to be on the high end of the range and maybe even above that, depending on some of the capital markets transactions that may or may not occur, but not in the third quarter, will happen certainly in the fourth. So we feel really good about the momentum there on the revenue side. Expenses are going to come in as expected. We have 8% was what we had anticipated. So we feel like that's a good place for that to be, and charge-offs are very stable. And as Gunjan mentioned, there's a lot of momentum on the client side. So overall, we feel very good about where we're at. And we feel looking at it from a full-year perspective, our outlook was 7% to 9%. We -- as the third quarter is coming into shape that just gives us confidence that we'll be on the higher end of the range. So it's just looking to be a very strong year for us.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#13

Great. Maybe we can kind of maybe double click into some of those components, starting with NII. But one of the things we're hearing about is just a competitive environment. Maybe just talk to how it's evolving for loans of the deposit this quarter and anything you just call out in terms of demand and pricing?

John Stern

executive
#14

Yes. I mean, loans, just looking at that, the market has always as competitive, but I spreads and everything like that have been pretty stable over the last several quarters. And I haven't -- really haven't really seen anything that's unique or different there. Demand is still very strong. So we see just a lot of -- a lot of growth in that particular area. Gunjan mentioned some of the areas that we're paying more attention to from a growth standpoint. The deposit side, I'd say it is -- there is a lot of competition there. We're seeing more of our peers do specials, whether it's CD specials at higher rates or they're asking for funder or they're providing $750 to $500 for our new operating account on the consumer side. That money goes through marketing expense generally, but it's still all the same from a competition standpoint, right? And so we we compete against that. The good news for us is we're competing very well on that space. Gunjan mentioned, record consumer deposits. We feel like we're going to get that again. We've gotten some of the seasonality back on our commercial side. So we're going to have a very strong growth amount in the deposit side this quarter. Actually probably will outpace our loan side of the loan growth this quarter, which is a little bit of a reversal of the second quarter. So all in all, we feel that the markets are -- we're right there in line with where we need to be.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#15

Got it. And maybe one thing that some people talk to when you kind of see in the H8 data, just a slowing of C&I growth so far this quarter. Maybe kind of just elaborate what you're seeing there?

John Stern

executive
#16

Loan growth is -- I'd say the demand is still very strong. I mean, there's a lot of companies that are looking for CapEx. They're looking for additional capital and things like that. I think what we have seen is still very strong growth, but there is some timing. I think there is some time for things to get booked. I also think we are being a little bit more -- we're looking at our levels of -- in terms of return hurdles and things like that, and we're being a little bit more prescriptive on that. The first half, we saw some tremendous growth on the loan side of the equation. I'd say now we're being a little bit more strict about return hurdles and less fewer exceptions, things of that variety. So -- but still beyond that -- I mean, demand is still quite strong.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#17

Yes. I guess all that said on the July call, you mentioned that you expect it to be a little bit better than mid-single-digit growth for loans for the full year? And is that still the case?

John Stern

executive
#18

Yes, that is the case. Yes, we -- I expect 6% to 7% loan growth this year on a full year basis, yes.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#19

Got it. SP1 And then maybe a little bit more on deposits. Gunjan, you mentioned before, record consumer deposits, I think, for this quarter. That's certainly, I think, outpacing the industry there. Maybe talk to kind of what have been the primary drivers of the success? And just how do you think about sustaining that growth over time.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#20

Well, we are very intensely focused on strengthening the consumer and small business franchise, not only does it anchor high-quality deposits, it also provides the base that then we deepen quite -- in a quite disciplined manner with credit cards and then wealth. So our fee complexes really benefit from a vibrant consumer and small business franchise. So we have 3 very integrated strategies that we have deployed and are maturing. The first is just the products need to be attractive and differentiated so that you don't just pay up for deposits. We have done just some really good work interconnecting our banking and payments product. This is the smartly suite. It is now 84 billion. So it's like a mini bank in itself and has just been a very attractive value proposition to the customers. Our branch and digital marketing people tell us it's easy to convey the value proposition and get people excited about something different. So we'll continue to lean in on creative value propositions that play to our strengths in terms of breadth. The second is deposit pricing, Jason. We have invested a fair amount in making it highly granular, highly surgical, and it allows us to optimize growth and cost of funds in a way that we were not doing a few years back. And so the micro pricing disciplines have been helpful to us here. And now we are just scaling up the branch side. You might recall that over the last 5-ish years, we've been at about $200 million a year in investment into the branch. And a big portion of that has gone into reformatting service branches and Tier 3 locations into these broad multiproduct hubs. That work is largely concluding at this point. And what we're looking at is the $300 million like investment per year and going far more into new branch formats, our earlier focus is on densifying into -- within our footprint, those areas that have much higher household formation growth rates. And all of that, along with good branch execution and elevation and refreshing of the incentive structure, the tools that we are supporting them with some AI-enabled tools and all of that is just coming together to create a sustainable, better-performing consumer and small business franchise. A lot of that movement coming into the small business side too, but the consumer is a few years ahead there.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#21

Right. And I guess you put out a press release out a couple of weeks ago talking about Florida, Georgia, Texas, new markets that, I guess, we ritually didn't think of you, maybe in a branch standpoint. Just why now? And just will you need branches over time to kind of serve that segment?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#22

Yes. So maybe I'll step back and just explain the context of the press release, we -- we got a lot of interest in our business banking expansion markets press release. So the -- the 3/4 of our businesses. So this is all our institutional businesses, our payments businesses, our belt businesses do operate fully nationally and have been for some time. Approximately 5 years back, we started to be intentional about creating client centers that co-locate our wealth, our commercial real estate, our commercial and our mortgage teams. And these client centers sometimes have branch licenses, but they are cashless branches. They're mostly sort of nonbranches and like office spaces. We have found that the upper end of the small business can also serve clients in that model. So this recent expansion is to co-locate the higher end of the small businesses with these client centers. These are in all the Vanguard markets that is seeing a lot of population and business growth. The smaller end of the small business, which is also very attractive from a deposit side does need branch presence. So it is our expectation that in due course, our retail network will follow these expansion markets or a key some of them. Although right now, our retail focus, as I said, is really on densifying markets. So it's a very long-range strategy that sees ourselves inching out of our traditional places. We are just choosing to do it with Vanguard businesses. For example, Atlanta, we have -- it is a hub for our payments business. That's where Elavon and merchant is. And Dallas, we have a very large technology presence in Dallas and Houston. And Houston is very big for our corporate trust business. So we're also leveraging some of our national presence. It gives you connectivity. It gives you a reason to extend the brand presence. And we be investing a lot in national brands with the NFL with the sense that these are all ingredients you need on top of just a pure branch expansion to truly to sort of create a better national presence.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#23

You can probably guess the next question would a bank acquisition help accelerate that process?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#24

I get asked that question a lot, and I do feel like I have to say I don't have anything ideological philosophical against a bank acquisition. Our organic opportunities are very high. So when we look at any of our inorganic or organic options, we are saying, what's the bar for strategic fit, for execution risk, for financial and cultural fit. And right now, our organic opportunities are very clear and present and that's been our focus.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#25

Fair. I guess, John, maybe back to you, there's this ongoing debate with investors seeing the trade between NII dollar growth and NIM. Banks that can grow both seems to be ideal. There's not all of them to do that, but you've talked before and about a path to like a 3% NIM at some point next year, which I think is up like 20 basis points from where we are. At the same time, a couple of banks have kind of talked about some pressure there. So just how do you think about that 3% number? And can you get there? Or will you get there? And just any updated thoughts around that?

John Stern

executive
#26

Yes. Your first comment there, the debate, which is an interesting way to put it. I mean we have that conversation quite a bit internally. Just is it in net interest income? Is it net interest margin? And I think the answer is yes. You have to look at both. I mean I would lean towards net interest income because at the end of the day, that's going to drive EPS and all that sort of thing. But you can't do that and just completely ignore the metric of net interest margin. I think there's a feel of efficiency there. There is a balance sheet stewardship mindset that you have that goes along with net interest margin. Fortunately, for us, we're -- we expect to grow both interest income and net interest margin here in the third and the fourth quarter. We think that's powered very much by the asset mix. Vince has talked about that a little bit. Fixed ancillary pricing is favorable. So yes, we do see and continue to see a path on 3% net interest margin. And you asked, does it get in any harder. I guess, 18 months ago, I didn't -- we didn't know if the Fed was going to be in a hike cycle, and that's new and different. And so not that the hikes themselves are consequential to net interest income for us, but it's the curve after that, right? What does the curve look like? So that's something that we'll focus on very much in 2027 as we kind of think about our budgeting and all that sort of thing. But we definitely see a path. And -- but at the end of the day, I do lean noninterest income. That's where our clients -- where our clients seem to be is going to be about most importance. We're not going to manage to a metric just for the sake of managing to it, but it's really all about the client growth and where is that coming from?

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#27

Got it. And then on fee income, you guided to the upper end of 12% to 14% for the quarter. I think in the year, you're talking about low teens growth if there's an update there. maybe just kind of drill down and just give us some flavor in terms of what's performing better than expected this quarter on an expected.

John Stern

executive
#28

Yes. Fee revenue is -- has a lot of momentum in a lot of areas. We talked about the fee complex, the 4-legged stool however you want to kind of call it, all these areas are doing quite well. So, maybe just to start, capital markets very strong. This is going to be the first quarter, as you know, where we have DTAG fully loaded. So from a fee growth perspective, that will be not quite, but about half of our fee growth will come from just BTI JV in the -- now in the run rate. But the broader or the legacy capital markets businesses are doing very well. I expect low double digit from a capital market standpoint in the core kind of legacy businesses, whether that's foreign exchange or commodities, loan syndications, they're all doing very well. There's just a lot of activity and market gains that I believe we're making. On the payment side, I expect continued strong growth there, very similar to what we had in the second quarter. Bright spots there include the consumer card. It's doing very well. Gunjan highlighted a couple of points there as well as our corporate payments. A lot of new business being one, a lot of just market tailwinds that are supporting that business. So we feel really good about that. On the merchant processing side, we're likely looking at a flat year-on-year growth. For merchant processing, and that probably will persist for the next 2 or 3 quarters as we're kind of working through our go-to-market strategy and kind of shedding some distribution partners and things like that. And then finally, the investment products and investment services businesses like corporate trusts, fund services and things like that doing very well, just work, taking advantage of the marketplace, taking advantage of their market share. There's a lot of market activity there, and that bodes very well for those businesses. So strong growth there as well.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#29

If you could maybe double click on BTIG. Gunjan, you mentioned you want to take it from 7% of revenues to 10% I imagine that it's a context of the rest of the company continuing to grow. So I guess, how you envision kind of building it to a bigger component?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#30

So we have started off beautifully with BTIG. There's a lot of conversation around culture fits and these executives have been great colleagues of ours have really embraced the bank -- we measure referrals, and they're going both ways very strongly. So we have great hopes of this marriage going forward. The bar from 7% to 11% requires capital markers to grow twice the rest of the franchise. And I hope the rest of the franchise makes it harder and harder for them. But that's -- and we are very comfortable with that path going forward. So the levers are twofold on the fixed income side, which is our legacy business. It's really new product introductions organically. Commodities was a big build-out over the last couple of years that the timing was very right, that has performed very well. We've introduced some macro capabilities, and we'll keep doing that. And on BTIG, it's a very nascent investment bank. It's the equity, and that is leveraging our existing relationships and our existing balance sheet and their product capabilities. I do not expect it to be a meaningful M&A-driven growth rate, although we might -- if we see something unique, that's a small bolt-on. We'll certainly be open to it, but it's a largely organic play, really bringing together the balance sheet that's in play with the new capabilities that we haven't had a fair share there.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#31

Got it. And I guess one area I haven't asked you about in a while, Global Fund Services and Corporate Trust. But just maybe talk to those are businesses that others. Some of your peers actually don't have and just how they give you a competitive advantage when you're talking to new or current clients?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#32

Well, so thank you for asking me about Investment Services. It is, like John said, not a business we talk about very much. But collectively, these 2 businesses are now almost 10% of our revenue. So they matter. They are very fee intensive. The fees are recurring fees. If we lose a business today, it will be 18, 24 months before we lose the revenue. And so very sticky relationships, large, large relationships. These are also producers of very good operating deposits, $70 billion, $80 billion in operating deposits that give us a lending capacity that you wouldn't otherwise have, and they create the most sticky relationships. What has created success for this. And you see these businesses in the trust banks, a fair amount. So you do sort of explore that area just not with the traditional banks, is that our deposits do more just because of our lending capacity. If you're only deploying your deposits into an investment portfolio, your natural NIM is much less then a bank owns these. But the market share gains outside of just the market momentum has come from 2 areas that are very vibrant for us. One is ETF formation. We early on got very good with brand-new ETF start-ups because some of the large families were pretty anchored with the large trust banks. That has turned out to be a very meaningful growth engine for us because so many Act funds are converting to ETF structures and all of the mania around cryptocurrency, AI, has come to the investment market through an ETF structure, which is the low cost -- and we have just a very disproportionate share of brand new ETFs and many of them a become very sizable. So that's been a sort of market share gain strategy. And the second is private credit. Corporate Trust, which is largely a fixed income type of a business. It's a large business for us. And so we have very good waterfall capabilities, private credit capabilities and as that market has taken off in the last 5 or 7 years, our business has grown a lot. So we think very intentionally about connecting that as a way of getting paid for balance sheet usage. The people who really do need a lot more balance sheet. And now with even the BTIG acquisition, there's just so much of the trading volumes from these businesses that was going to third party is now hopefully going to be reverse referrals back to the equity trading businesses. So these businesses are very interconnected with the bank franchise, and that's the biggest point I want to make, not just attractive as a stand-alone thing that we own, but products that we early deepen our client relationships on the institutional side.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#33

Got it. And maybe, John, for you on expenses. A 2-part question. First, when you talk to the high end of the up 7% to 9% revenue growth for the full year. I guess any update to your operating leverage target for the full year? And then just secondly, as you kind of head into the planning season for next year, just how you're balancing investments versus operating leverage and just how you're thinking about target or just how that plays through?

John Stern

executive
#34

Yes. I mean, first of all, operating leverage, we feel very comfortable with the at least 200 basis points of operating leverage for the full year, at least 300 if you exclude BTIG. So we're on a really good path there. If I think about the budgeting process that we have right now, and we -- we're very committed to positive operating leverage. That's kind of the starting point that we have. I think it would take us to be in that 55% to 58% range for a long, consistent period of time before we would ever really consider start to move away from that sort of commitment. We are not there yet. As I think about '27, I would think more about we have revenue growth that's -- and a lot of tailwinds that are coming our way. Our mindset is around revenue focus, as Gunjan has laid out in her priorities as well as there's -- we have those commitments to operating leverage. That should give us a very nice high-quality earnings per share growth, and that's what we're focused on for '27. So, as I think about kind of the future and the journey that we're going on though, there will come a time assuming we can and we expect our ranges to be up into the right, so to speak, in our medium-term targets, and we get closer to that mid-55 area that we start to focus less on operating leverage and more on EPS growth, being a high-return bank more so than we even are now as well as just investing in our products and capabilities and making sure we have that sort of investment in doing that. So that's really the focus that we have. We're not there yet, but that's just kind of what our aspirations are at this point.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#35

I'll add one thing. This -- we keep getting asked the expenses versus investing in the franchise. It's not a trade-off. The expense management is coming from what I call crew productivity. We have invested an enormous amount of money over the last 5 years, like $5 billion, $6 billion into just updating every platform, custody platform, loan underwriting platform. the core modernization, the cloud program, and that yields productivity over time. The investments coming outside in, if you lower in technology and marketing because we are really expanding the the sort of revenue side of the equation with both of those. So I just wanted to double just amplify the point that we are not thinking of productivity as a trade-off with investing into growth.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#36

Got it. And maybe shifting to credit quality, benign for you and many of your peers so far, any areas within your portfolio, you're watching more closely in any areas you're seeing cracks what would we pay attention to. And is the Fed starting to hike change anything?

John Stern

executive
#37

Well, I mean our answer is very boring. There's just nothing that is that we see that's really an area of issue right now. As I mentioned, credit metrics are likely going to be stable linked quarter. we are watching for higher -- what is the impact of higher interest rates, what's the higher -- the impact of potential inflation, the AI cycle as we're going through that, if there's anything that derails off of that. Is there any exposure. So those are the kind of the conversations that we're having on credit and just kind of watching in different pockets. So we have our eyes set on areas that we are watching, but I don't see anything that right now that gives us any concern.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#38

Got it. And just maybe on capital deployment. You've kind of been buying back stock $200 million a quarter. you talked about this payout ratio of 70%, 75%. At some point, you're obviously below that now. I don't know, is there a time line? Or how should we be thinking about when you're returning to that level?

John Stern

executive
#39

Yes. So a couple of things. maybe just our framework on capital. We prioritize organic growth, client growth as well as dividend. Those are priorities 1A, 1B, however you want to say it, and then share repurchases, right? And so as I think about the third quarter, we've had a lot of demand on our capital. We've had a lot of strong growth as we've talked about the high demand that we have on capital. We've talked about the Amazon portfolio, and that's coming online. We've also had interest rates move up pretty significantly this quarter. So given our -- just our prudent nature, we actually elected to pause on buybacks for the third quarter. But we're shortly thereafter, we expect to go back right into share repurchases and to increase those and very much committed to that 70% to 75% area. And so that's what we're really focused on. We are still building our capital for a Cat II perspective. We still think 10% on a Cat II basis is the right level for us. And we generate 25, 30 basis points of capital a quarter, and that has been increasing as we've been earning more and more over this time frame. So still feel good about the long-term projections of our share buyback program.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#40

Do you care to guess on what time frame we get back to it?

John Stern

executive
#41

We think right away. I think it's shortly. So it's just -- this is a quarter where we had a lot of demand. There was a lot of unique things going on. Amazon was a big amount for RWA. We had the interest rate movement, which affects the AFS portfolio. So those are kind of the big factors that sway us here. That's just a temporary thing.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#42

Right. So 70%, 75% is still the right way to think about it?

John Stern

executive
#43

That is absolutely the right way to think about it.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#44

Got it. And then you mentioned Cat 2, is there anything around that we need to know in terms of that impacts liquidity, NIM expenses that will change things?

John Stern

executive
#45

No, our Cat II, we're just -- we continue to grow. As you know, from our seat, what we anticipate getting to that CAT II effective date would be either the second or the third quarter is likely when that would occur. There's like a 2-quarter lag between when you go over the $700 billion to when you actually become that. So second, third quarter is probably the right way to think about it. And we have the appropriate amount of liquidity. We have all the expense and the reporting kind of built in. We've already been kind of ramping up our discussions with regulators on it. So we feel like it's kind of as expected.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#46

Got it. And then Gujan, earlier, you kind of touched on stable coins and digital currencies. And maybe talk to new use cases, tangible benefits.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#47

On the AI programs, both

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#48

Yes, on the AI and economy.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#49

So there's a lot of focus on it internally. On the AI side, we are seeing very real measurable benefits on the productivity use cases. the revenue use cases are gearing up more. And so we expect them to contribute the bigger contributor going forward. A lot of conversation in the industry around the slowdown. We don't -- our use cases don't require the most complex frontier model. So we don't think the slowdown of model upgrades, impacts our program. If anything, it helps us. It's a little difficult to keep up with all those model upgrades when you don't need most of the capacity. So maybe just a little bleeding room to use the stuff that we already have. So, it's a very powerful technology. And we think it has the potential to really elevate and differentiate and personalize the customer experience and shred the productivities with we are implementing it in a very methodical straightforward way, and it's a big contributor to our expense management program and we don't see that changing with all of the debates that we're hearing. The stable points was new. We introduced U.S. Bank digital coin and did the first transaction with our own Dublin Bank. The thesis there is the numbers are very large, they're on stable point transactions. The majority of them are cryptocurrency trading with each other. The real payments use cases are still nascent, but what has shifted in the last few quarters is many of our clients are engaging with us to really see if there's something there. So the use case that is most real for us is the 24/7 gap with the banking system. And is there some way to tokenized deposits on a Friday and we bring it back to the balance sheet on Monday, but have some transaction capabilities with stable coin. So that's the use case that we announced. We are not going to compete on the actual stable coin infrastructure. This one was stellar. We are part of many consortiums. What we are building, which we think could be differentiating is what we call digital assets platform, DAP. So clearly, our marketing people didn't have anything to do with the naming. It's called digital asset platform. But we are building into that the compliance and controls of a bank. So the clawback capability with stable coins, the ability to block air dropping, these are things that are quite important to our commercial clients, and we think that could be a differentiator -- but I will say that the supply side is far more active than real demand. So excited to take this step. We'll have tokenized deposits early in the year and still exploring the revenue models.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#50

Makes sense. We've got 2 minutes left. Maybe Gunjan, as you kind of look to build on your success after your first plus year as CEO, just how would you define what the next looks like as you look out over the next couple of years?

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#51

Well, thank you. We talked about many of the ingredients, just to put it together. The first year was helpful in bringing back the confidence externally and internally creating momentum. As we look forward, our focus is on EPS growth within tight guardrails of return and prudent risk management. Strategically, we are very committed to being a very attractive fee heavy complex and then increasingly delivering scale and national presence. And that, along with just rebringing back the high performance consistency that many of you expect out of U.S. Bank's name, we think is a franchise that brings back the premium valuation and more. So that in a nutshell is the plan looking forward.

Jason Goldberg

analyst
#52

Great place to end it. Gunjan and John, thank you for your time today.

Gunjan Kedia

executive
#53

Thank you.

John Stern

executive
#54

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete U.S. Bancorp transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to U.S. Bancorp earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.