Universal Display Corporation (OLED) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 8, 2020

NASDAQ US Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Atif Malik

analyst
#1

Welcome, everyone. My name is Atif Malik. I cover U.S. semiconductors and equipment stocks here at Citi. It's my pleasure to welcome Sidney Rosenblatt, EVP, CFO of Universal Display; as well as Darice Liu, Director Investor Relations from Universal Display. The format of our discussion is fireside chat. I'll go with my questions first. [Operator Instructions] With that, welcome, Sidney.

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#2

Welcome. Thank you very much for having me.

Atif Malik

analyst
#3

Sir, I'm going to start with some big-picture questions first as we try to understand some of the secular drivers for year-end demand. Where do you think OLED penetration is in smartphones today? And how do you think it evolves with the introduction of 5G?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#4

Well, today, the market for OLED for smartphones is approximately 450 million units out of a TAM of -- was 1.4 billion units. So it's about 1/3 of the smartphone market. And it's expected to grow over the next 3 or to 4 years to almost half of the smartphone market. And I think one of the drivers for that obviously is 5G in that 5G technology is a very power-hungry technology. And the OEMs are looking for ways of extending the battery or keeping the battery at least to where it is while using technology that is a very power-hungry technology. OLED displays the reason that they are where they are today, aside from the picture quality, which has always been rated the best picture of any display, is the fact that it's very power-efficient. Using Universal Display's phosphorescent emissive materials for red and green for mobile devices really extends the battery life. In 2013, when Samsung adopted our green emissive material, they stated that they got a 25% increase in battery life. So the reason that the premium smartphones and particularly now with 5G that you're going to see more and more migration towards OLED displays is the fact that it is a very power-efficient technology. And today, pretty much we use our displays, probably 70% to 80% of the time that our device is on. I kind of laugh because we still call them phones, but nobody ever makes a phone call on them anymore, but they still are phones. But it's -- we literally use our screens all day long. So it is the fact that our technology is power-efficient, is really the driving factor.

Atif Malik

analyst
#5

Got it. And then also on the OLED TV penetration, where do you think we are today? And what are the trends that you're seeing as we get out of the COVID-19 disruption?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#6

Yes. I think that the TAM for TVs is about 240 million units. And OLEDs today are still 1.5% to 2%. Last year, there was 3.3 million OLED TVs sold. Estimates for this year are 4 million to 4.5 million. It has been the -- LG Display is the only manufacturer of OLED TV panels. It maybe have 19 different OEMs that brand OLED to TVs, but LG is the only supplier of panels to that market. And their focus has always been the premium side of the market, which is approximately 10 million TVs is the premium end of that 400 -- I'm sorry, 240 million units. And it's -- somebody wants the best of the best, you walk in, you say "I want the best picture. I'm building a new video room and I want something that looks great." The benefits of OLED TVs is the fact that they have 180-degree viewing angle inherent in the device. You don't have to have any tricks to make it viewable from side to side or up and down because these organic materials emit light in 360 degrees. And the fact that it could be very thin and power-efficient. Even though it's wall-plugged, you still need power efficiency, and you still have heat that gets generated within large area displays, and using phosphorescent materials allows you to save money on heat dissipation. So as expected, I think LG talks about having 10 million units in 2023, 2022. It really depends on whose estimates. Some of the market research folks say 2022. I think LG talked about 2023 -- or I may have it reversed, but that's still not a lot. But for us, approximately 10 million OLED TVs, when you look at panel demand square meters of glass, that's equal to about 700 million smartphones. So for Universal Display, TV growth really drives a part of growth and will drive our growth in the future.

Atif Malik

analyst
#7

Great. And just to finish it off, can you talk about the OLED penetration in IT auto markets?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#8

Yes. In terms of IT, it's really just starting. IT will be glass-based OLEDs as opposed to OLED displays made on flexible substrates, of which most of the smartphones are and mainly because Samsung who makes them long glass has the highest yields. And I think pricing for glass-based OLEDs is lower. And as you get the larger and larger displays, you can't charge the same amount per square meter of glass. That has to come -- the price has -- per square meter -- per square inch, I'm sorry, has to be lower. So there's a few IT products that have. There's a few more that are being introduced, and mainly for gaming because of the picture quality, and you can get a premium price. You are also starting to see automotive applications. You've got Cadillac and Mercedes and a number of others that are putting it into their high-end automobiles. You can make these on plastic. So your dashboard can be conformable. And therefore, you really can't use any other display technology that is curved as OLED can be. These are -- we believe, these are great markets for our customers because they are premium-priced products. And they do show off all the benefits of OLEDs, and the OEMs can talk about the fact that they have OLED technology in their automobiles. To be perfectly honest, there's just not a lot of Cadillacs and BMWs sold when you compare it to 500 million smartphones that would have OLEDs in them this year. But it is a market that we think is very important and it's very important for our customers also.

Atif Malik

analyst
#9

Great. Sir if you look into this year, a bit of a tough first half because of COVID-19 disruption. You guys haven't updated the 2020 guide. Is supply or demand an issue with respect to your visibility? Or is it just that second and third wave of COVID-19 is kind of clouding the visibility of your customers?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#10

It's -- there's a lot of moving parts. When we withdrew our guidance and said that there were a number of uncertainties, to be honest, uncertainties were both on the demand side and on the supply chain side. So when we looked at the demand, you could see that folks were now shopping. I mean literally, when you got to March and things really shut down, you can see that the demand side for our product was a real issue in terms of uncertainty when that would come back. And for us on the supply side, whether it be disruptions in our supply chain. And in addition, whether it be disruptions in our ability to ship product to our customers. And as you may recall, when it first started, a lot of the shipping companies, FedEx and others and customs were quarantining packages. And we were concerned that if something -- we're a just-in-time supplier. We get an order, we ship it within 24 hours. If our customers are keeping their inventory close to the vest, they may not be able to get the material when they need it if things were going to be slowed down in customs and in shipping. That part of it has gone away. And our supply chain on the commercial material side has been uninterrupted. So the demand side is really the -- still the issue. We -- when we talked about Q2, we literally said that we -- Q2 was bad every month. And I think it was a number of factors. One, the demand wasn't there; two, our customers' factories were not running. Obviously, they were running at very low utilization rates. Some of them couldn't get workers into the factories, others just didn't have product to make. So a number of those uncertainties are the -- that's the reason why we have not -- we withdrew guidance. And we talked about on our last call, we just don't know whether or not some of these demand uncertainties will pop up in Q3. And so far, things seem to be moving along. There's no second wave. There's no shutdowns of countries and folks actually seem to be out and about shopping more than they have in the past, whether it's online or whether it's actually shopping in stores. I mean I think I think TV sales probably are help since so many people are trapped at home. They even just get a new TV set because you're looking at your TV all day long or whatever. I think the handset side is one that's still to be determined. You may not need to run out and buy a new phone. If you were out shopping and you saw a new phone that looked really cool, you'd say, "I want to go buy that." But I don't think there's a lot of people that are just out shopping to shop. So I do think that, that's still something that I know a lot of the analysts are talking about things picking up, which we believe they will and continue to hope that they will. But there's still some uncertainty there.

Atif Malik

analyst
#11

Yes, that's very helpful on the demand side, Sid. There was a company-specific item on the China inventory exiting last year. Can you break out the impact from the China inventory that got built because of the trade tensions since late last year versus what you saw on COVID-19? And if I look at your China and Korea customer sales, they are historic lows in the June quarter. So does that mean that their inventory has, to your knowledge, been kind of fleshed out?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#12

Sure. Go back to 2019, the end of 2019, the trade-related issues that you referred to was a ban of selling anyone who sold directly to Huawei. We are not a direct seller. We sold to the manufacturers who then sold to Huawei. We had a Chinese customer, which I think we said multiple times, it's the biggest customer in China, come to us and wanted to have safety stock in case the trade-related issues were then extended from direct sales to indirect sales. So that was about $24 million of material at the end of December that was in our customers' hands, but they had a right to return it by March 15. If they didn't, then they would pay for it. So that was about $24 million worth of inventory that was purchased as a hedge against any additional trade-related issues. We also talk, relating to the first quarter that in March, we contacted our customers relating back to my comment of us being able to ship material and said to our customers, if you want to buy some additional reserve inventory just in case things get slowed down, please do so. We have it, and we will ship it so that you have it. Those purchases were across the board. It was pretty much all customers. So it wasn't just Korea, it was Korea and China. And it wasn't just mobile, it was mobile and TV. So those 2 were separate items, but both of them occurred in Q1, which, to some extent, made Q2 look even worse because about $20 million of the purchases, which normally would have been in Q2, were in Q1, which is why Q2 was -- every month was bad.

Atif Malik

analyst
#13

Got it. And Sid, I hosted Magnachip earlier this morning. They are an OLED display driver company based out of Korea. And their comments was that the near term, the demand is kind of outstripping the supply. And when I go back to look at your comments that you made on your earnings call that you saw very strong sales at the start of Q3. Can you just talk about how those trends have kind of progressed since the earnings call?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#14

Yes. Without specifically talking about the quarter, we said at that time, we saw a significant increase. And the question was, is it a sustainable increase? Or will there be some other disruptions? There have been no real outside forces that have impacted what we see in the marketplace. So we think from the demand side, it is continuing. So without specifically talking about the quarter, there's nothing that makes us think that it won't continue with as of today.

Atif Malik

analyst
#15

Got it. And then if I look at the smartphone market. I understand you guys provide your materials to the display makers, like BOE or LG and Samsung. But if there are share shifts in smartphone market where, let's say, Samsung handset share goes up because Huawei is not able to get its semiconductor components and Huawei shares come down, does this really impact Universal Display? Or you guys basically provide it to everyone? I mean is Korea getting larger versus China next year? Is that a tailwind or a headwind or…

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#16

Well, it's -- we don't think it's going to be either one. We -- as you said, I think it is -- if there is demand there, the question is going to be, do they buy -- they can't buy a Huawei phone, then they want to buy a premium smartphone. Do they buy a Samsung phone? Do they buy an Oppo? Do they buy a Vivo phone? But from our standpoint, I don't see a real reduction in the quantity of materials that we're going to sell. Maybe -- will there be some impact? Maybe some. But I think if the demand is there for 500 million or 550 million smartphones, whatever the estimates are for 2021, or I think in part -- so it's -- if it gets impacted slightly, it's not really going to impact us. I think it -- I think the demand is demand. So it just depends who gets the sale.

Atif Malik

analyst
#17

Great. I'm going to take a pause on my questions because I'm getting a fair bit of questions from investors at this point. So let's go to the investor questions. What are you hearing from Chinese customers like BOE, China Star, et cetera, plans to expand their OLED production capacity?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#18

Well, BOE has announced 4 separate facilities. And they just opened their third facility. So they just had a ceremony opening a third facility, of which is a facility for mobile-size screens, can be larger, but all on flexible substrates, all 4 are on flexible substrates. So there's been no changes in the BOE estimates. And I believe each facility can do 48,000 Gen-6 size substrates. So it's a significant amount once all 4 of them are up and running. I think China Star just talked about the fact that they opened up their first OLED facility, and you've got Tianma talking about opening one. So there still is no changes that we have seen, whether things get slowed down or not because of COVID-19 is -- there may be some delays, but I don't think there's any significant delays.

Atif Malik

analyst
#19

Okay. The next one, are China OLED producers reaching yields and quality levels from your vantage point that can position them to compete more effectively with the Korean producers?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#20

Well, today, BOE is the largest one, and they're obviously the largest display maker in China. And they've been making OLED displays for about 3 years. Samsung actually started working on OLED displays in 2007, and first product was 2010. So they -- their learning curves and their yields are better than anybody else. I can't comment on the yield numbers because they're not numbers that are published. And -- but I don't think it's a secret that they've had yield issues. And that I don't think it's a secret that they're trying their best to get rid of those issues and be more efficient. But I think they are committed. And I believe over time, they will get there. And they will get to the yields that they need to be.

Atif Malik

analyst
#21

Okay. The next one -- again, on Chinese customers. If you can share your view on the subsidies for OLED production capacity, are you concerned that these subsidies will run out or adjust in medium term?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#22

Well, it's not a secret that the capital expenditures by the equipment makers, BOE and others in China, they don't pay for the factories that the government, the local providences spend all the money, whereas whether it's LG or whether it's Samsung and you have to spend $5 billion or $6 billion or $7 billion to build a greenfield fab, they don't have to do that. So that's one reason why they've always been very, very price competitive. So when they enter a market, they normally can enter that marketplace and price their products much lower than anyone else because they don't have $1 billion a year worth of depreciation until it's fully depreciated. We have not heard that any of these providences are pulling back on lending money. Can it change? Sure. I think politics are politics. But as of today, we have not heard anything that will lead us to believe that, that is the case.

Atif Malik

analyst
#23

Okay. You guys made -- well, your customer made a bit of a splash at the SID conference with a paper on blue phosphorescent. The question investor is asking is why is blue so difficult to perfect? What are the technical constraints? And what is the upside if you sort this out?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#24

Well, blue color in the visual spectrum is a very difficult color to replicate. It has a very short wavelength, and it's very high energy. The last laser to be developed was a blue laser. The last LED to be developed was a blue LED. And it's because of the high energy in the molecule that makes it difficult. The way that these molecules actually work is you put current into the molecule, it goes into an excited state. It creates energy. And the energy that's created with using a phosphorescent emitter is almost 100%. Let's call it 100% internal quantum efficiency compared to the old fluorescent technology, which only 25% of the energy is converted into usable light. But it does that 180 times a second, which is 3x faster than video rates, which is why OLEDs don't -- you don't have to do any tricks to get full-motion video because inherently, these material switch on and off 3x faster than video rates. By having a very short wavelength, what happens is with green, wavelength is longer; and red is the longest wavelength, which means this 180 times a second, this molecule goes to its excited state. It has to recombine and do it again and again and again. And over time, when it recombined some of the bonds within the molecule break. And that's really how you increase your lifetime. And our scientists essentially tear these molecules apart atom by atom and say, "This is where this one broke and cause a lifetime not to be what we want. Maybe if we put a double bond here or we do something else here or we add a [ lig ] into one side." It's all magic to me. I am not a scientist, but I'm just telling you what they tell me. But that's how they do that, and they get -- we've got materials that last -- red materials and green materials that last 1 million hours. So it is just a very long, difficult process. And the fluorescent blue that's out there doesn't have significantly long lifetime. They've -- the display manufacturer can actually do tricks with it. Such as if you look at some of the Samsung devices, they have 2 blue pixels. That way you don't have to drive it as hard, but you can make it last longer. So you just need to get to a certain minimum level, which, today, we have said we do not have a blue that meets the commercial specs.

Atif Malik

analyst
#25

Sid, and I remember when I was at SID conference last year, and that was a live conference, you guys talked about a sample of organic vapor jet printing. You showed some sort of sample, a coupon. What's new with organic vapor jet printing this year? You have created a subsidiary, how would that improve the rate of bringing this disruptive technology to the market?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#26

Yes. Last year, we actually literally just showed 1 color, and we showed that organic vapor jet printing, which is essentially taking the best of vacuum deposition and inkjet printing and combining them. Vacuum deposition, we know how these materials react. We know the temperatures that you can vaporize them. We know how they work, and they're very efficient and very high-yielding process. Inkjet printing use is a liquid. And making these materials into a liquid to print them and then putting down even 200 dots per inch of droplets that don't -- that can't touch each other is a significant challenge. However, what we've been able to do is deposit these materials not in a liquid form, but using organic vapor jet printing, we have vacuum evaporation. We then take this vapor and use an inner gas and push it through a print head, which sends -- then deposit these materials directly on your substrate. So what we can do is to make red, green and blue side-by-side devices, essentially like you would in a vacuum chamber using a print method. Today, in our facility, we can make a 6-inch square, which is red, green and blue and can demonstrate 4K and 8K resolution for TVs using OVJP. So the R&D work and the tool that we have making 6-inch squares is in our facility. The R&D work will continue in our facility. We formed OVJP Corporation, which has been our strategy all along. We need to go from our lab to get this equipment in Gen-10 size, 10.5-size equipment. And we hired Jeff Hawthorne from Photon Dynamics, and he's going to bring the crew in, whose job it is, one, to work with customers and/or equipment companies; and to look at the scale-up issues that they know from history that will be asked. So when you talk to a customer about this and they say, "Yes, that's great, 6-inch substrate is one thing. But having a Gen-10.5 substrate, you need to do XYZ." Their job is to be able to answer those questions and to prove to the customers or the equipment guys, yes, you can do this because we've already looked at that. So it's going to be a small group that are going to be on the West Coast. Their job is to look at the scale-up issues and to work with customers for OVJP, whether it's equipment or our customers.

Atif Malik

analyst
#27

Okay. And then one question on capital allocation. Given kind of uncertain macro dynamics, would the use of cash primarily be focused on dividend? Or the company is interested in stock repurchase or -- at these levels?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#28

Well, we historically have -- the Board, I'd say, over the last 5 years, has said that we think that returning capital to shareholders in the form of dividend is our preferable method. We don't -- we -- the Board itself does not think buybacks are the right approach for us. We don't have a lot of shares outstanding. I don't think it would impact our EPS that much. And if you're a shareholder and we grow, it's our intent to grow the dividend in proportion to our growth. So the Board is -- has looked at it and believe that this is the best approach today.

Atif Malik

analyst
#29

Okay. I have one more question from the audience about your patents. Will your patent protection prevent all phosphorescent material competitors after the expiration of your core patents?

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#30

We've got some fundamental early core patents that have already expired, and we have somewhat another one that's, I think, 2021. So we have had that in -- we have heard -- we heard for a number of years in 2017, your phosphorescent patents are going to expire. And after 2017, you have no business. And there was an analyst who literally had us selling, I forget what the number was, in 2017 of $200 million; in 2018, 0 because our business was going to go away. We have more than 5,000 patents issued and pending worldwide. Whether or not some of our early core patents expire or not, we will have patents expire all the time. And we are continuing to file patents and have continued to accelerate our filing of patents. However, just we were very, very early. When we started the company in 1990s, when we've filed and got our first patents in 1995, 1996. We were filing patients for 10 years before anybody else was filing patents in OLEDs because nobody knew what they were. Our stock symbol in 1996 was panel. And it was, of course, no one knew what a flat panel display was because there were still CRTs. And we were talking about having a flat panel display before plasma ever got into the market. So we were very, very early, and we continue to file patents around all of our existing patents to build up a matrix of patents, so that it would be very, very difficult for anybody to make a device that doesn't infringe on multiple patents of ours today. And it isn't that -- we've got agreements with customers. When we signed the agreement with Samsung after 2017, the folks said, "Don't never sign another agreement." Well, they did, and they have an option that expires into 2022 and have a 2-year option with that. So we are confident that we will continue to have our IP portfolio be very strong and be able to protect ourselves with our IP. In addition to that, we have the largest phosphorescent material team in the world. We are the R&D farm of our customers. Our customers don't have to do the development of these materials. They tell us what we want and we do it. You get that as part of your license fee. So it isn't just an IP company that says we have a piece of paper, pay me. And you get value for your license with us, and our customers understand that.

Atif Malik

analyst
#31

Well said, Sid. Thank you for coming to the Citi conference. We're almost out of time.

Sidney D. Rosenblatt

executive
#32

Oh, okay. Thank you very much for having me.

Atif Malik

analyst
#33

Yes. Thank you, guys.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Universal Display Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Universal Display Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.