Western Digital Corporation (WDC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
August 31, 2022
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. Good morning, everyone. I'm Sidney Ho. I cover semiconductors semi cap equipment and IT hardware at Deutsche Bank. The next company we have is Western Digital. Western Digital is a supplier of both hard disk drives and flash memory. And today, we are very pleased to have Dr. Siva Srinivasan here, President and Head of Technology and Strategy at WD. So welcome, Siva.
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveThank you, Sidney. Happy to be here.
Sidney Ho
analystGreat. We'll make this session as interactive as possible for those who are in attendance here. If you have any questions, feel free to raise your hand and we'll run the mic to you. Before we start, I have the honor to read the safe harbor statement, so I'll do it. So Western Digital will be making forward-looking statements, and I ask you to refer to SEC filings for the risks associated with these statements. Western Digital will also be making references to non-GAAP financials and a reconciliation of a GAAP and non-GAAP results can be found on the Digital website.
Sidney Ho
analystSo with that out of the way, why don't I kick it off with some near-term questions. I think inventory adjustment is one thing that everybody is trying to figure out, most of us understand the ongoing [ state ] of spending. But there seems to be more signs of inventory adjustments, broadening price market and [indiscernible]. Can you give us an update on where you are seeing some of these adjustments, how secure they are when compared to past cycles? And more importantly, how long do you [ think it will be ]?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveThank you, Sidney. By the way, you did a great job of reading the safe harbor. I think we should hire you for that. We announced earnings. I'm not here to either update or reiterate guidance, talking about trends going forward. You're absolutely right. Things started deteriorating towards the very end of calendar and that trend has been on. As you said, the China mobile slowdown was clear even at that time and that has persisted even more importantly in client PCs, client SSDs, there was inventory correction. There's truly a demand-driven shortage at that time the inventory correction was happening. Cloud is generally okay. Cloud is not any one company. There are -- of the titans, they are never in sync when one is accelerating, one is digesting. When one is digesting the next one is accelerating. They build out at different times. So they are generally okay, and that trend has persisted.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. Maybe I'll just jump ahead. I'm sure we have a few more questions in point. But if I look at this cycle, why do you think WD is better positioned to weather this cycle than it was the last down cycle?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveYes. As you know, the memory business is a cyclical business. No one can exactly predict when cycle is going to go low or high. But you know it's always going to be happening. We went into this fully planning for this. As you know, we have had a complete management cycle, very, very strong division of focus and responsibility on the hard drive side and flash. We have had a very clear focus on platforms and product lines ready to go take [ it outside ]. Of course, as a corporation, we have paid down debt, over $1.5 billion in the last fiscal year, the time we stopped paying dividend over $2.5 billion of debt taken down in the last approximately 3 to 4 months. So we have been very, very focused on improving our performance through cycles. Cycles are going to happen. But how do we, as a true cycle do it well? And that's where this focus on technology leadership, product platforms, focus on execution, making sure corporate debt is in a better place [ where ] our balance sheet is. Put them together, we are where we are, and we feel very, very confident at the company.
Sidney Ho
analystGreat. So you mentioned something earlier on the sale side. But really, I just want to drill a little more. That's the positive side of things in general that you see consistent demand from data center customers. What are some of the trends you're seeing in cloud? Especially, I'd love to hear your thoughts between the U.S. cloud versus China cloud. As you look in the second half of 2022 or even 2023, how confident are you that we are not going to see a broad-based inventory digestion in that particular segment?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo cloud, in particular, you need to keep this in mind, it is a secular long-term growth business. Without question, the cloud is growing. Whatever the short-term phenomena, if there is pandemic coming out of it, cloud growth. If there is new technologies, TikTok and volume goes out, cloud goes up. In general, given the data growth, cloud is, in general, going to go. Inside that, clearly, the titans are large. They are very large companies. And though they have an ability to affect demand supply in any one segment substantive. When one is expanding, that will not be in sync. They may be in qualification. The third one may be in digestion of what they like. So this is why we say, in general, we are doing it. Now in China, particularly, both the COVID-related shutdown and the geopolitical issues have had an impact. We talked about the China slowdown in our December quarter. That trend has persisted. And over time, you know they also have to bounce back. Now for us, particularly, our excitement in the cloud business comes from both the HDD and the flash side because in HDD, we have just introduced 22 and 26 terabyte. We are a step ahead of everybody else. 22 is already being qual and 26 is already sample. And 22, you can go into a consumer channel today and buy a 22 terabyte drive. Nobody has even come close to that. On the flash side, our NVMe drives are already qualified. Our market share is going up the big 5, the next-generation based NVMes are getting qualified. We feel a lot more stronger about our position in the cloud than we were in the past. So you put the 2 trends together, we are doing well, it's a secular long-term trend. Not all cloud titans work at the same time. Average it out, I'm going to say, generally okay.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. No, that's helpful. The other topic that I guess I get a lot of questions on is on inventory. So with regards to the inventory on your own balance sheet, it's now sitting at about 105 days, which is not really that far off from the last piece over 110 days in 2019. How are you thinking about your own inventory days in few quarters given you tend to build more inventory? And do you see the risk that at some point you build too much inventory, you have to write something?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo you want to separate flash and HDD in this. And the question you're asking, I guess it's more towards flash than HDD. HDD inventory, we know in places where as our supply constraints have eased up, we are able to truly reflect and meet the end-user demand, which was not the case a couple of quarters ago when we had IC shortages, shipping shortages, those things are affecting. Now we are truly able to meet our customers in demand in a reasonable fashion. In the flash, clearly, customers are correcting their inventory position. We have manufacturing that we continue to do, we work very, very closely with our partner to make sure we are regulating supply both from the fab and into the end market. Given that end demand has gone down and the supply is reasonably -- it's coming down. It's come down substantively from the expectation of mid-30s mid growth to probably mid-20s to high 20s mid growth. Clearly, the supply has come down. But you know there is going to be some inventory buildup. Now let me be clear. Our customers are also listening to this. The last thing I want to tell you is, hey, I want to pile up inventory, you can come in. So we are not holding inventory. We are not trying to hold inventory in this. We will make sure that we balance this.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. That's great. Maybe let's switch over to a little longer term, the different business starting with hard drive. So you had mentioned earlier that, that business probably is more stable and normalized state. Then you started ramping production of 22 and 26 terabytes, which to me, it puts you slightly ahead of the competition. How quickly do you expect those new drives to ramp up in volume? What does that mean for your margins of the business? And which is still below your long-term target, 31% to 34%.
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveClearly, this is the question I was hoping you would ask, right? This is what excites me to talk about technology. We have had a very clearly articulated strategy as to how we want to do this. We are not trying to get home runs. We want to make sure we want to improve it as a whole system. You want to look at heads, media, firmware, system software, mechanicals, drive integration. Each one of them in parallel so that I can have a predictable road map. The result of that is that 20 is ramping, 22 is already shipping and is now in qualification. 26 is sampling and getting into customer sense. We got where we want to be. This is the kind of cadence you want to have. In parallel big enabling technologies, OptiNAND, triple-stage actuator, UltraSMR, these -- ePMR, these are seminal technologies that are now becoming much more mainstream, UltraSMR, in particular. Our ability to get 20% more bits because of the system-wide integration out of the same device. That 20% is a big deal. It's like an x node we are able to get done. We are able to do 22 and 26 at the same time. That gives us that leadership and predictability that I think will stay on. The road map is very, very strong. You can see our road map all the way to with conventional ePMR, UltraSMR and OptiNAND technologies going up to 30 terabytes. That gives us that confidence.
Sidney Ho
analystGot it. Well, maybe just stay on the roadmap side of things. With regards to UltraSMR, you talked about 20% increase, previously, it's only suitable for certain use right? And the adoption wasn't that great. But you seem much more confident about the adoption this time. Is it just the 20% more? Is the possible ownership is much better? Or is there other reasons why it's more broadly adopted?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo I want to start with 1 piece of data that sort of sets this up. When we exit this year, this calendar year, over 20% of our capacity enterprise cloud shipments will be in SMR, both in revenue and in bits. So that's about as strong a statement as we can make on how fast this is ramping. Cloud titans are qualifying. You're absolutely right. When you come back and say, "I have a 14-terabyte drive and with SMR, I can get another 1.4 terabytes", the whole software needs to be changed, they are not that particular. But when you come back and say, I do 20% on a 22-terabyte, I can give you 26 terabytes. There, wow, that is like 2 nodes that I can avoid with that 1 qual, and I'm able to get that now. That requires, obviously, the data manipulation coming in. They are willing to do it. We, by the way, do a lot of enabling work to make that happen whether it is database support, utilities, application nodes. These things we actually develop and we do it for SMR, we do it for the entire industry. We do it in open source and enable our customers. That has allowed our customers how to take that seriously. Multiple cloud titans have now qualified SMR, we are on to the races. And that's why we are so confident on this technology.
Sidney Ho
analystThat's wonderful. Just on the road map. You talked about earlier, you have the 22, you have your 26. How many more generations do you think CMR has before you have to switch to the next technology, which I assume is ePMR?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveYes. To quote Mark Twain, ePMR has been exaggerated for a long time now. We've been talking about this. This is the nicest thing about our road map is, you want to make sure you have a good blend of breakthrough technologies and evolutionary technologies. And we have done -- so we see our path to 30-terabyte CMR with generation ePMR generation 1, ePMR generation 2, ePMR generation 3 and then SMR and OptiNAND on top of it. That is -- now that does not mean we don't believe in HAMR. HAMR will come in its time. It is, again, a revolutionary technology. We will be there when we do it. However, we are not forcing it. You want the lowest TCO to win. And we have these 2 coming in parallel. And right now, the incumbent technologies and their road maps is very strong. Our focus, as you would see, even during these tough times, even as we come out of it and because the cloud is in generally good state is to figure out, as you said earlier, how we get our margins up, how do we get our share of the value into our company. These technologies provide the platform where we can get that.
Sidney Ho
analystGot it. So on HAMR technology, again, I think at the Analyst Day, you talked about launching the technology around 2026, just based on the road map. So we shouldn't be thinking of that as a hard cutoff from CMR to HAMR, is that right?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo even now if you notice, 18 is running in volume, 20 is getting qual, 22 is getting done, 26 is going. Multiple nodes are running in parallel. We are not saying everyone goes immediately gets up. Same thing is going to happen with HAMR. HAMR will be introduced, allowed its time to cook a technology -- you remember when helium came, how long helium took before it became the main stream? We introduced at 8 terabyte. Really, 14 was the big node where helium took over the world. We need to give these technologies time to cook. In parallel, you want to have a strong road map that backs them.
Sidney Ho
analystSo if you take a step back and think about CMR versus HAMR, what are some of the trade-offs that customers should be thinking, is there a long qualification time, testing time, all the stuff on people implementing HAMR?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveYou would expect this, right? First and foremost, these are extraordinarily demanding workloads. This is not the whole client hard drive, where about 10% gets written and most of the time, it sits still. These drives for next 5 years are going to be hit every minute of every day continuously, which means reliability is very important. For us to have the confidence in the reliability where we build enough drives to prove that, the customer developing the confidence, and there are going to be quirks with any technology. The fact that the customer needs to get comfortable with that, that qualification, ensuring that when you put this in a 55-, 60-degree centigrade ambient and you run it for 5 years will I be able to guarantee its reliability as well as they do today with CMR? That's going to be the long haul in the tent.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. Maybe one last question on hard drive. So there has been a lot of emphasis on long-term agreements. I think that's mostly a hard drive comment rather than flash comment. Where do you see the value of LTAs in periods of inventory adjustments? It seems like these are not including pricing.
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo LTAs in general, we now have gone from about 5% LTAs and hard drives to now approaching 30-plus percent in LTAs. But what they give you is a better picture of a longer-term trend, what mix that we are going to be taking, qualification slots, qualification times, volumes that gives you a much better idea of when their expansion plans are when their division digestion are going to be, so we can plan better. That's the biggest advantage of LTAs in the hard drive.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. That makes sense. Well, maybe I'll pause here, if there are any questions in the audience, raise your hand, we'll -- I think we'll run the mic to you. Okay. I will keep going. So let's switch over to the flash business. A few weeks ago on your earnings call, you talked about just starting to have discussions with your JV partner cut back on capital spending. Can you give us an update on those conversations? And when should we expect to hear the outcome? When do you think those actions will help reduce the production growth?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveEven though we say we're just -- it's probably not a technically correct statement because we talk to our JV partner 3 times a day, right? It is not that we are in continuous conversation. Is there an externally announceable conversation that we can have, that's probably the more justification. We have been -- we monitor our overall demand together and what capacity we need to be building in an intimate fashion with our partners. We've been together for 22 years. We have run this for a long, long time. We know each of our cadences. Now on a more normal basis, you do see this idea -- that the overall industry bit growth rate has come down. It has come down from where in the last downturn happened in 2019, we went into the downturn shipping 40%, 45% bit growth rate year-over-year. Clearly, we are not there. We have now dropped all the way from low 30s to now mid to high 20s is where the industry is headed. We know these trends well. So we adjust our capital accordingly. Now we want to take extra capital actions. You know very well by the time a tool gets ordered, tool gets installed, material qualified, material goes through and come out, it's a year. So we know how to manage this very well, and that's how we've been thinking about with respect to capital with our partners. We'll be very, very conservative, and we have always been. As you know, in general, I have been accused of this, Hey, you guys are not spending enough capital". We are extraordinarily capital-efficient with respect to our technology. That's a metric we very carefully watched. You've seen me talk about it in various meetings. Our capital intensity, meaning amount of capital dollars needed to produce the next 1% of capacity increase is the lowest in the industry, and we will continue to focus on that.
Sidney Ho
analystSo just to be clear on that point, so even if we adjust CapEx right now, it is not really going to impact production for this year. Do you agree with me?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveI agree with you.
Sidney Ho
analystHow about a year from now?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveThe best case, probably late calendar Q1, calendar Q2 of next year.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. Perfect. So maybe just on the bit growth beyond September quarter. Obviously, September guidance implies a significant decline in volume and pricing. But beyond that, I won't ask you about the pricing. But do you think you'll start seeing a rebound in bit shipment, not production, but shipments in fiscal Q2 and the December quarter? And in terms of margin, if pricing continues to drop, are there factors that will help offset such that your margin won't drop to where it was in the last cycle?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo Sidney, you know typically flash, the second half of the year is -- the second half of the calendar year is the stronger growth, both calendar Q3, calendar Q4. And then calendar Q1 gets to be the low, Q2 comes back. That's sort of the typical seasonality across the industry. We are going into a seasonally strong time with this level of inventory correction. So we watch this carefully. The trends are still continuing. We still see the reduction right now. But what happens during Christmas, what happens during Chinese New Year are important. As those signals come to us, when we ship ahead for those events, we will be watching and adjusting our inventory, incoming bit growth, outgoing bits, we will be carefully shaping it. I'm not at any position to come and tell you that there is a -- predict when this will be changing. You know the seasonality of what is expected.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. That's fair. So let's talk about flash road map. I think you're shipping BiCS5 right now. And BiCS6 is, I think it's -- so it's actually you're shipping BiCS6. Can you remind us the timing of your ramp of BiCS6 and the crossover of BiCS5? Talk about BiCS6, it's more capital-intensive as well. How confident is that you are able to get your 15% year-over-year cost reduction for this node?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveThis is what the technology is to live for. There are lots of factors that help us. When you can come back and say, "Hey, Japanese yen has weakened," So you'll get the cost deduction. That's not what we are talking about. We are talking about truly technology-driven cost election. And we plan this over multiple vectors. You want to get under same wafer more productivity, meaning more bits come out of the same wafer. That helps the cost. You want to make sure that your capital intensity is low, so that, that production of that incremental bit is cheaper than it was the prior time. BiCS5 was an extraordinarily very good capital intensity node because it did not, it was what you would call a tock node. BiCS4 was tick node, BiCS5 is a tock node, BiCS6 is a tick node, meaning it is more capital intensive, but it gives you a lot more bits. So then now you have the question, how much of my line will I convert to BiCS6. Because if I had 1,000 lots coming, I can get the same number of bits now with fewer lots than I had before. We adjust that based on demand, how fast bit growth in the industry. The pure technology is very capable of delivering that 15-plus percent cost reduction. But how much of my line will I convert to BiCS6, depends on what the market is telling me how much do they need. We modulate that continuously. That's what decides our CapEx spending. So right now, we are in that modulation phase. Normally, I'd come and say, sometime in middle of calendar '23, we'll switch over to BiCS6. I can't tell that now because I'm watching the market to make sure when I bring that up to the crossover.
Sidney Ho
analystThat makes sense. So beyond BiCS6, you have announced -- the BiCS+. And BiCS+, from my understanding, is that 200-layer plus. But some of your competitors have already launched 200-plus layers. So I understand layer count is not everything which you told me in the past. But how confident are you that you can stay cost-competitive with BiCS+ and beyond?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveYes. So you're absolutely right. There are at least 2 of our competitors have announced that they are going to be shipping 200-plus layers, either late this year or early next year. We don't know what percentage of their BiCS are going to be in that. But just like you said, that is bad news, not good news. When somebody goes to the next node a little too soon, that means they are spending a lot more in capital and need to get to that for them to be competitive with what we are able to achieve with old nodes. The biggest reason is scale and reuse of equipment. When you go to a new site and go to a new node, you have to spend a lot of capital to make that happen. Some competitors make that choice for the longer term. I'll spend right now so that, over time, I can get that. But we have been in scale for a long time. Because we've been in scale, we are in much more of a steady-state operation where we plan this reuse of equipment extremely carefully to minimize CapEx and still get the cost that we need. The technologies are already there. So we develop ahead the enabling pieces of technology, whether the circuits and the array or 2 tier or 3 tier or bonding, we develop these technologies and keep them ready. You watch the bit growth rate needed, get the 15% cost reduction at the least amount of capital. That's how we achieve it every time, and we have done that over a long time.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. Now that makes sense. That actually ties to my next question. And so you mentioned that a little bit earlier as well about the capital intensity. But if I look at your cash CapEx is 8% to 10% I would think for flash loan, the capital intensity is quite a bit high. Maybe you can talk about what the right numbers to think about going forward. But even if you consider that, you're spending significantly less than your competitors on a capital intensity standpoint, maybe just to answer your question, you're just more efficient. But can you walk us through how you do it versus how you see other competitors being higher?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveYes. So overall gross CapEx for the company, which we come out and say is of the order of 20% to 25% for the company, of revenue. Cash CapEx is different. Because of the JV structure, we do address capital in a couple of -- to what we paid the JV. Separately, what we spend directly in our cash as back-end CapEx and then the corporate CapEx is that go together. We have maintained that our flash between 19.5% and 20%, 25% gross CapEx as a percentage of revenue over the last several notes. Now you never want to look at any one node by itself, you sort of, on a rolling average, you'll see that, that is maintained. So you may get 1 node to be much more efficient. The next node will catch up. So if you average over a couple of nodes, you'll see that the gross CapEx for flash is in that 20%, 25% of revenue.
Sidney Ho
analystOkay. That's helpful. I want to stop here again. Any questions from the audience that want to ask?
Unknown Analyst
analystWhen do you expect to start seeing NAND really penetrate the nearline market?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo this question gets asked of me all the time. We have had a mental model of one replacing the other in the hard drive business for a long time. In the client space, that is completely true. The client deceleration of HDD and moving into SSD is almost complete, if not in the last legs of it. That's not the case in the enterprise. The enterprise runs very, very differently. Given the enterprise bit demand growth in the 35%, 40% consistently over a long time. And the base numbers, meaning they want units of multi-10 terabytes, these 2 run in parallel for as long as the eye can see. For the next 10 years, we don't see the 2 blending over one with the other. And the workloads are very different, and each of those workloads have strong demand. So fast data, if I'm trying to do a focus on AI, ML, Big Data, B2B analysis, all going into SSDs, even now. And that's growing very rapidly. But on storage intensive applications, video and transmission, those kinds of things, there is no substitute for HDD. Because the HDD strengths are in cost per bit and reliability and an ability to ship that over a long -- a continuous stream of data. For example, if you are on YouTube, by the time the commercial place, the ad plays together, you've already gotten the data out there and you can stream it. Whereas on the SSD side, you want instantaneous. If you get on a web page within 3 seconds, if you are not -- the webpage has not refreshed, you already moved on. I need to get that cashed and ready. That part of it is always going to be SSD. So this idea that somehow these 2 are going to be a replacement for one another, we don't see it. We just -- everywhere we see our customers' qualification demand road maps from the cloud titans, the 2 of them are there running in their parallel tracks. The same procurement guy buys it. The same engineering organization qualifies it. But they are 2 different product lines for the next 10 years.
Unknown Analyst
analystRight. That's very helpful. I understand that the times like [ ethernet ] storage and there are different workloads. But I also have heard that like NAND on a power efficiency and real estate efficiency is starting to just eat in on a TCO basis. Is that...
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveIt's about 5, 6x. So even at the best of best case when NAND is on a down cycle and the ASPs are down and we are still talking 6, 7x. There is a -- we don't see it.
Sidney Ho
analystAny other questions? I'll stick into this one. I kind of know the answer. But if I kind of look at the strategic review with the exit of Elliott, I'm not going to ask you any of the details about it, but can you just remind us what the timing of that whole process is?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSo we had the letter from Elliott now running about 10 weeks ago, just before our Investor Day. Since then, an executive committee of the Board, led by Dave Goeckeler, has been running a process examining all aspects of that letter. The Board is very firmly committed to maximizing shareholder value. And they are running a very thorough process. It would be premature for me to come back and give you either a time line on when they'll be announced. They'll do it thoroughly. And Elliott is under NDA, and they are working constructively with us on the whole process. That's all I can...
Sidney Ho
analystThat's what I expect. Maybe just to wrap up, what are some of the key messages you want investors to take away from today? What are the areas you think investors may have underappreciated with regards to WD?
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveLet me start from the hard drive side. In the hard drive side, the strength and leadership of our technology has been underappreciated. People talk about HAMR and all that, the ability to deliver predictably products into leadership, we have done that very well. We have this 22 and 26 as demonstration points, and we'll continue to do that strong road map. I want to make sure you understand how strongly positioned we are with the cloud. The cloud in general is behaving well. There are multiple titans each in its own timeline and I think they are not all synced up. On the flash side, our ability to get into the enterprise data center market has improved dramatically. We have qualified our NVMe generation 1, generation 2 is already in qual. And we are clearly seeing our overall market share penetration with the titans growing. The flash road map, with our stated goal of better capital intensity, is very strong. It continues to be strong. The management team has very clearly streamlined the company to be an execution engine, to have well-defined business units, paying down debt, watching the balance sheet, making financially prudent decisions to make sure that we are able to take advantage of the technology leadership to improve our own gross margins and better financial performance. That I'm feeling very strongly about the management team that has been put together, that's the message that I like to give.
Sidney Ho
analystGreat. Wonderful. I think we're just out of time. Thank you for spending the morning with us. And everyone, have a productive rest of the day.
Srinivasan Sivaram
executiveSidney, thank you. Thank you for taking the time to talk with me.
Sidney Ho
analystThanks.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Western Digital Corporation transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Western Digital Corporation earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.