Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 14, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Discretionary Household Durables conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#1

We'll continue the program. Again, thanks for everyone for being here. We're in the middle of our first day of our morning session, and we have Whirlpool Corporation. CFO, Jim Peters, is to my left. Again, my name is Mike Rehaut. I cover the Homebuilding and Building Product Space for JPMorgan for more years than I'll admit but I've seen a cycle or 2, I guess, you could say.

James Peters

executive
#2

You have.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#3

So as with prior presentations, this will be a fireside chat. I have a bunch of questions that but there will be time at the end for Q&A. And so with that, again, Jim, thanks for being here. Nice to see you in person after 3 years virtual. It's nice to be back. I appreciate your time today.

James Peters

executive
#4

Yes. Well, thanks, Mike. I appreciate the opportunity to be here. And maybe just before we kick it off real quick. I'll just say a few things because I think you guys are having an opportunity to hear from a lot of industries that are either related to ours or industries that are -- as homebuilders that use our product. And what we would say right now is where we are as a company, we're in a space where the demand has been suppressed for a period of time. And many of us know why that especially the increase in mortgage rates is driven down, especially the discretionary demand in our industry. But we are optimistic on the future, and we are optimistic on the housing market in the future, and we do think there's still pent-up demand for housing. We still think there's an undersupply of housing. And so we think we've positioned ourselves well for when that begins to come back, especially with our share in the new home construction space but also with the products that we have available as consumers do begin to upgrade on existing home sales pick up. So just kind of wanted to open with that, that kind of ties into what everybody else does here and then hand it off to Mike to raise the questions.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#5

Great. Thanks, Jim. Appreciate that. And my first question kind of is around demand-oriented question. So kind of working off of those comments, the shipment guidance that you have for North America, you kind of alluded on your last call that you did have a little bit of a -- the phrasing was slower-than-expected start in North America during the first quarter as the promotional environment despite being similar to the back half of '23, maybe didn't produce the volumes you'd expect. So what drives Whirlpool's confidence that volume will improve in the second quarter and the second half to hit the full year guidance?

James Peters

executive
#6

Yes. I think the first thing is part of what we saw in the first quarter is that because the promotional environment didn't drive the consumer sell-through late -- in late 2023, retailers started off with higher inventories. And so part of that in the first quarter was retailers beginning to correct their inventories in line with where demand was. I'd say the second thing, as we said, we did expect it to begin to pick up at some point here. Now we did expect to begin to see some rate cuts that would hopefully impact mortgage rates overall and begin to put more consumers in the marketplace, and we haven't seen that quite yet, but what we are seeing is at least a stabilization within the industry here. Now in terms of what the promotions have done and the incremental demand that they've driven, as we said in the first quarter and the reason why we announced what we'll call promotional program price increase of 5% is that we aren't seeing the uplift from that. That means, listen, the consumer that's in the market right now is either most likely a replacement consumer which we see is close to about 60% of the business today and typically is more 50% to 55%. And they're more impacted by that they need to replace. It's a [ dress ] purchase. Additionally, that we see the new housing market is still a stable part for us, and that's not really affected by the promotional environment. So the segment, that discretionary segment that's impacted the most is the segment that's down the most right now. And so that's why as we step back, we said, listen, we only invest in promotions that create value and create uplift. And what we saw throughout late last year is we weren't -- they weren't creating the value or the lift we thought. So obviously, that's not what's driving the consumer and the elasticity is not what everybody thinks right now.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#7

So looking to the back half, I think when you think about your volumes were down in the first quarter. I think you kind of said roughly in line with the outlook for industry shipments. I believe your full year is flat up 2% for North America. So that would imply shifting to a little bit of growth in the back half of the year. Maybe just walk us through how that progresses? Is it just more of a function of comps? Or are there any kind of demand green shoots that you might see emerging in the first half of this year?

James Peters

executive
#8

Yes. I would say as we look towards the back half of the year, to begin with, like I said, I think the industry came in with some higher inventories across the retailers and all that. So that's part of in the first half of the year or the first quarter just normalizing back to that, so you don't have to deal with that in the back half of the year. I think the second thing, as we look at, as we said, is discretionary demand is probably on a bottom point here. And so at some point, any type of little bits of green shoots or movement from an economic perspective should begin to help our industry. We don't expect significant improvement in the back half of the year, and I'd probably say of that flat to 2%. We're probably closer to the flat as we look at where the industry is and where things are right now. But incrementally, we also have certain new product launches that we have had in the first half of the year here. We do expect those to help us at least from a comp perspective. And I think, Mike, as you mentioned, I do think as you look back on last year, it was a year where demand was suppressed also. So that's why we think at least we've hit the bottom. Now it's a matter of when it just begins to start to come back up. And we were hoping that, as I said, you would start to see some less pressure on interest rates and mortgage rates may be trending in the right direction. But I'd say right now, we're a lot more cautious on that, but that could be something at some point that could help us, but we're being really cautious about that.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#9

Okay. Thank you. So margin guidance also kind of coming out of the first quarter. North American margins being 100 to 150 bps below expectations for some of the reasons already mentioned. You implemented the promotional program price increase. So maybe just kind of give us a sense of -- again, you kind of alluded to this before in terms of replacement versus discretionary demand in the marketplace. But the confidence in realizing this. And if demand does remain more depressed kind of said your -- you have this cautious outlook, maybe you're closer to flat versus up to for the full year. What prevents the competition from getting a little more competitive as well or aggressive in that backdrop?

James Peters

executive
#10

Yes. I think if you kind of step back there and you look at first off, as we said, is we really decided to take the price increase because one margins are under pressure, but two, the promotions aren't driving the incremental demand that everybody had hoped or was really pushing for. And so as we looked at that, we said, okay, we've done this numerous times before. And honestly, we said it just doesn't make sense in this environment to be as aggressive as we were being when it's not driving incremental demand. And so that being one of the biggest levers to impact our margins. We said, you know what, we've got to take that step. It's the right thing to do. To be honest, the inflation, as we've talked about is still sticky out there. So our costs are still higher than we anticipated. Now I think we'll know more as we go through the next couple of months because 2 big promotional periods in our industry are Memorial Day and 4th of July. And that's where we'll begin to see the real impact to this. We'll begin to see what the competitive reaction is in the marketplace and we'll start to understand better. But I think if you just think about the marketplace today, even with the retailers, many of them, as they talk about their earnings and some of their sales recently are just saying that, listen, they're in an environment where they're not seeing the sales growth that they may be looking for either. And some of that is coming due to the fact that the discounting has been so high in some of these major categories. So again, I think that we'll see and we'll know more. We do believe the price increase -- increasing the promotional prices will be successful. Obviously, we fine-tuned something like this as we go through the process, but we do believe it's going to drive the margin lift that we expected. When you do a 5% increase, it's only on a -- think about in our business, we've got a portion that's done by with builders that's under contract, so it doesn't affect that. You've got a portion that's outside of a promotional period. So you can say, does this affect 75% of your business or so? That's probably the right answer. And I would say that even if it has a little impact on our market share, what we would know is that still we do believe it creates more value than the risk is of doing that. But we won't know really the competitive reaction until the next couple of months, and we see what happens in the marketplace.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#11

Fair enough. You hit on market share, but so let me ask a bigger picture question on that. I think it was at your Investor Day earlier this year, you threw out some numbers where today, you're currently around 28% versus low 30s, 33% pre-pandemic. So maybe if you could just kind of review the competitive landscape, what drove that move down and perhaps comment on other participants maybe who took that share and then kind of looking forward as well, you kind of mentioned a goal of 30% by 2026. So the components to get there, if not get back to pre-pandemic share.

James Peters

executive
#12

Yes. So maybe if you start at the 33% before the pandemic, the biggest impact for us was our supply chain and disruptions to our supply chain. And a lot of that came through suppliers that we had that were unable to get us in components or other things during that time period. And so that really took us from 33% down closer to 25% throughout the pandemic. Now we were in a marketplace at that time, though, where also the promotional environment was almost nonexistent. And so you weren't dealing with some of those things that we are right now and we haven't seen the rapid inflation of materials. And so we were making significant margins at that time. Now as you roll the clock forward, everybody's supply chains being a lot more healthy than they were back then. We've recovered the market share back close to 27.5%, 28%. And with where we are today, what we've been able to do is really work back into some of those areas that I'll call are more profitable or value creating for us. As we look to go to 30% from the 28% to 30%, that's where we really look to now push is to grow our business more in the premium appliances to grow our business more in the mass premium segment to grow with launches that we've done in the dishwasher space with launches in laundry such as the Maytag Pet's line. These are all products that sell at higher price points, and that's really where we're focusing to try and gain our market share back. As Mike talked about, we said at Investor Day that over the next couple of years, we intend to grow approximately another 2 points. Biggest part of that is going to be new product launches for us. And whether it's new product launches in refrigeration and front-load laundry, it's leveraging the ones we've done in Dish, that's where you should really expect to see us going after the market share to go back to 33%, I would probably say that we would have to venture into some areas that we don't see to be as value creating. And so that's why we're a little bit more cautious and say, listen, we're really targeting to get that 30% and make sure that, that growth comes in very profitable and margin accretive areas. And then if there are possibilities beyond that, that's good, but what we don't want to do is just try and get very aggressive at the bottom end of the market to try and pick up another few points of share because that part of the market is not extremely value creating in our industry. And so that's why we want to hold ourselves to that 30%. And then if we see the opportunity, we definitely go back. But we think the sweet spot is closer to 30% these days.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#13

Okay. On new product development, you're kind of leading me into my next question now for a few questions here. So maybe you could just kind of review the pace of new product development, has it increased or decreased over the last few years. What does Whirlpool spend in R&D? And has this changed? For example, we recently saw an increase in advertising for all-in-one washer dryers, I talked about this a little bit with Scott earlier, and he said it's been out there for a while, but at the same time, it looks pretty new and shiny. So I was just curious around that. But to the extent that I think -- you look at some other industries at points, new product development can become a lot more intense. It can be more capital-intensive, resource-intensive, margin dilutive potentially. So just any thoughts around that? And again, from a cost standpoint, from an investment standpoint, how are things trending?

James Peters

executive
#14

Yes. So we traditionally and going forward, invest 3% in R&D or engineering within our business and another 3% of our sales in capital. And that's -- so that 6% overall product investment or at least investment in products and our factories, et cetera. It has been where we are traditionally, and we do see to continue at that pace. We probably are seeing an increase in the amount of product investment in the marketplace, but also we're increasing our own level of investment. And we're not increasing the absolute dollar amount, but we're increasing our productivity within that space. And that's been a big part of some of the initiatives we've had for a while to simplify and reduce complexity in our space. We also looked at our global engineering organization and really wanted to focus more on having more engineers that are doing the work and less from an oversight and a management perspective, within it. So we really tried to increase the productivity, and we have. And we intend to keep trying to go that direction. Now what has that led to? I think as you've seen recently, we've launched the dishwasher, we launched a couple of years ago, which was the first one to market with a truly usable third rack has been a extreme success for us in the marketplace. The Maytag Pet line actually has done very -- been very successful for us with filters that will take the pet hair out of your laundry. As I mentioned, we're really focusing now on some things in refrigeration and front-load laundry to either refresh product that we have, bring the new SlimTech refrigeration product to the marketplace, which is actually using vacuum sealed panels. And that will allow us to make the walls thinner on refrigeration, and we're starting by launching that, using doors -- using it for doors within certain Jenn-Air models, which will be coming out here in the near future. So that's really where we want to focus is more of that innovation in launching products at what I'll call the mass premium, the premium to super premium space. Mike, on your question on the combo, washer and dryer is to Scott's point, it has been around for a while and especially over within Europe. It is seeing some recognition in the marketplace today, but it is still a relatively small part of the overall market. The technology that you need to use to do it is heat pump technology to be able to put a dryer and a washer together. They have to be a self-contained unit. We actually had a heat pump dryer that we launched into the marketplace around 2013, 2014. And it's very common technology used in Europe for dryers. The issue that we found is that the consumer really didn't like it very much because it's very energy efficient, but the drying time was much longer and the clothes come out and they're not completely perfectly dry, and that's what the consumer here is not used to wear European consumer that's normal. That's how the dryers work over there. So it will be interesting to see how much uptake among the consumer there is because at some point in time, we've also talked about this with energy standards in that. You may see the U.S. have to go to heat pump type of dryers to meet certain energy standards, and that will be a shift in terms of what consumer expectations are today versus how those perform in terms of drying cycles and how dry they get to close. So we do actually understand the technology very well. We've invested in it historically. We've looked at it, but we're also looking at what is the true demand that the consumers want more in a mass type of, but it is a space that we continue to look at. But right now, I'd say that's something that we're more observing and probably investing more, as I said, in refrigeration, in refreshing the aesthetics of our front-load laundry products and dishwashers and things that maybe have a little bit larger segment to the market. But also outside the U.S., the combo washer is one -- the combo washer dryer is one that we do see some pickup. So that's why we continue to look at, at least on a global basis, would there be a platform someday that we might be able to use across all our different locations.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#15

So it's interesting you kind of alluded to new product intensity may be increasing and you're trying to get more productivity out of your own resources on that front. What does that mean from a product vitality index, if you have any in terms of -- do you have any type of goals around percent of sales from products introduced over the last 3 or 5 years? And where has that trended?

James Peters

executive
#16

Yes. We do typically look at that, and it's a metric we used to track. I'd say now what we really look at is we look at more growth within. What we do is we go through a process and we look at the different products that we have, and we define how we want to have product leadership, and we define what are those key battlegrounds. So the key countries and product platforms in those countries that we need to win in and then we monitor ourselves against comparing our product to consumer or to competitors comparing, looking at ratings we get on our product and looking at other metrics, looking at our cost versus the competitors on similar products and that's how we evaluate if we're launching successful products into the marketplace, how do they match up against the competition? And do they give us leadership? And then as a result of that, we would expect to see revenue growth and to see share improvement, and that's really where we're looking at is to say, okay, are we seeing the lift in terms of the revenue and are we seeing the increase in share in that specific platform that we would necessarily see? And so sometimes when we used to look at it, Mike, in the way you were describing and all that. It got a little bit cloudy at times in terms of defining how much truly came because it's sometimes you have to define is it just an aesthetic refresh? Or is it a true platform? Are you adding new features or not? And so what we found is the best way for us is to look at are we growing revenue? Are we increasing share? And based on our criteria, do we have product leadership in the marketplace? And we've actually continued to make our criteria tougher and tougher to meet year-over-year as we try and hold our standard [ tire ] -- to try. But that's what we truly believe is true product leadership will get you -- we'll win in the marketplace.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#17

Maybe just shifting to, again, some of the margin goals. 2026, again at your Analyst Day talking about getting North America back to 11% to 12% by 2026 from roughly 9% guidance this year. So obviously, that's at least 100 basis points a year in '25, '26. Maybe just walk us through the drivers of that and your level of confidence.

James Peters

executive
#18

So first thing I'd say is there's 2 drivers. And the drivers within this year, we've talked about is the promotional program price increase we took but then also cost reduction. And we have said, last year, we did significant cost reduction and we had carryover coming into this year on a global basis that gave us about $100 million. And if you just want to take that and apply it across what North America used to be about 50% of our business or so and now it's closer to the 70% or whatever. They're about 2/3, you've got about a comparable portion that goes into North America. Then the new cost actions that we've taken this year will also improve the margins, and it will probably be ratable to North America business just based on that kind of what percentage is of our global business. But we've implemented another $100 million of actions that will benefit us within this year. And you would have seen announcements we made recently about head count changes we were making on a global basis and a big part of that was driven more by the simplification of our business that we're able to do because we're not in EMEA anymore but it does allow us to reduce a lot of our existing cost base now that we don't have that business anymore. The next piece that drives it from a cost perspective is the continuing ongoing productivity we really try and drive within our factories, within our logistics networks. And today, what I would say is a lot of that is still taking some of the inefficiencies out of our factories that we've had just from the industry going up and down and our need to adjust our production levels on a regular basis, and we're looking at more structural ways, not closing any factories or anything. They're just always looking at more structural ways within the factory and how we manage head count and workload to try and make sure we address that. Looking at the routes and the carriers we use in our logistics space and looking to optimize all of that. Then as you go forward, beyond this year, there's still going to be opportunity to take inefficiency out of our factories and reduce complexity and reduce complexity within our product portfolio and we will continue to drive that, and we see that adding more cost benefit as we go forward. You'll have a carryover into next year from many of the cost actions we're taking this year because they're just ramping up probably in the second quarter here. So you're going to have a period of carryover of that. And then also, as we look further at some of the opportunities, especially within our manufacturing environment, we look at things like automation in a different way than we probably did before and with the higher labor cost that we have today, a lot of the projects that we may have utilized and look at before to utilize automation, they make a lot more economic sense today than they did before, just because labor is now becoming more expensive component of our product for us. So -- and with that, as we launch some of our new products in the marketplace, we look to make those changes within our factories, whether it's utilizing automation and manufacturing process, reducing the amount of labor content. And then probably the last piece that I didn't mention there also is we also just have continuing ongoing productivity in our products and in our material costs. One thing in the material cost is steel and resin fluctuate regularly, but one thing we do is we target to try and get at least a percent every year of our material cost out by just looking at can we use different materials? Can we use less of the material? Can we switch suppliers on components? And so those are kind of the big buckets what goes into and those are all opportunities that we have within our North America business to continue to reduce costs on top of the pricing that we're taking this year.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#19

So just to be -- to clarify, when you talk about price, that was more referring to the actions just announced. But is it something that we should expect or that the company bakes into on an annual go-forward basis? Or is that not part of the margin expansion bridge?

James Peters

executive
#20

I think what we bake in is we bake an improvement from mix from new product introductions. We typically don't bake in assumptions around pricing so much because that's a lot of the marketplace and the dynamics out there and what material costs may do. We do bake in at least looking at promotional spend and where might be opportunities to -- so you could say is that price or not, but are there opportunities to optimize that better? And that's something that when we look at mix and price we do bake in, but it's not a big component for us, but we're always trying to look to at least optimize our promotional support structure.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#21

Okay. Another area of focus by investors remains free cash flow generation, balance sheet, dividend, so maybe if you could just kind of review the drivers of the free cash flow guidance this year, if there's any areas of challenge that you see currently in achieving that guidance? And also just how to think about balance sheet leverage over the next 2 or 3 years?

James Peters

executive
#22

Yes. So here's what I would say on free cash flow is we started the year in what was like a typical seasonality pre-COVID. And if you really look back to some of the prior years, 2019, 2018, 2017, we do consume a significant amount of working capital and other things in the first quarter. We typically build inventories in the first quarter. It's the lowest from a sales perspective for us. And that's what we're seeing kind of a return to that. Now with that, this year, I would say, are included in that, we had -- as we divested of our EMEA business, the EMEA business typically did consume a significant amount of cash early in the year. We did expect that we would have a negative cash flow impact of around $250 million to $300 million due to EMEA in the beginning of the year. Part of that comes from cash they consumed. Part of it comes from as we unwound the business in certain working capital programs in that we had there. We had to unwind all of that as we hand it off to the new owner. And some of it came with settling legal -- legacy liabilities that we had within Europe. The good thing is, we thought some of that would spread into later in the year, and we actually took care of it all in the first quarter of this year with how we executed the transaction in the end. So we have that all behind us and that's the good thing is now you can take that out when you look towards next year and the first quarter of next year that we won't have to do with that. The second part is working capital, as we said, sales were a little bit lower than we thought in the first quarter as retailers wound up with higher inventories than they had anticipated. So it worked its way through. We wound up with higher working capital than we had anticipated. We see that working out throughout the year. And in fact, right now, we're being very aggressive to take that out of our system and getting our inventories in line. And as we've said, by mid-year, we really expect our working capital to be on track to deliver at least $100 million reduction in working capital levels year-over-year, which will help our cash flow. Additionally, as you start to look forward then, the seasonality of our business picks up throughout the back half of the year, our majors business, but also especially our small domestic appliance business. And that is a very seasonal business driven around starts with Mother's Day goes through the wedding season throughout the summer and then heads into the holiday season late in the year. And so it drives -- that drives a lot of profit and cash that is generated by that business later in the year. And that's why we really have confidence as we look forward to the back half of the year that we can get to our guided range of $550 million to $650 million of free cash flow despite the slower start in the year. And it wasn't unusual from some of those periods of time pre-COVID where our cash flow would be more $800 million, 900 million, even with a start of being significantly down. In terms of how that affects our balance sheet and all that, again, our intention is still to focus on paying down debt as we generate cash this year. We did complete the sale of 24% of our India business. And then in the second quarter here, we did use that cash to pay down some of our debt as we had intended to. We do intend to have that same focus through year-end and into next year. But then we believe as we head towards late next year, we should get back into the range of where we normally are from a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio. And so that will still be our focus, but we are at least confident that we should be able to get to that space by the end of next year.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#23

Great. Thanks, Jim. So we have about 5 minutes left, open it up for any questions from the audience.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#24

Could you just double back and talk about the dividend a bit and the target payout ratio that you guys outlined at the Investor Day relative to where it is now and in the next couple of years?

James Peters

executive
#25

Yes. So the dividend at $7 per share. As we look at it and what we talked about is, listen, we don't make while we do approve the dividend on a quarterly basis, and our Board does approve it on a quarterly basis, we really look at it more on a long-term lens. And we've started to realize with the cyclicality of our industry that you need to look at it over a multiyear period of time. And we think that's what's more important and so we don't want to overreact to what we might say is some short-term industry dynamics that are suppressing demand and have kind of put some pressure on our earnings. And so historically, we've always said around 30% to 35% of our ongoing earnings per share was more the range we'd like to be. And now we look at what a lot of the market is, and they actually pay out a little bit higher dividend than we do. So we're also comfortable with the percentage being a little bit higher as it is right now. But we do believe, as I said, in the U.S. housing industry, we do believe there will be growth here. We do believe that, that will give us a significant tailwind at some point, which will flow through to our earnings. And so that's why I said we don't want to really touch or adjust the dividend, and we've always paid a dividend in the last 69 years, and we've only raised it. We don't want to do -- make any rash decisions when we do believe that the earnings will come back in line to support that and put that within a reasonable range of where our guidance is. We don't technically have a dividend policy. So I'd say that's why right now, we haven't changed anything and we still focus on and continue to intend the dividend at its current level because we do believe that right now, what we're seeing in the U.S. is not necessarily representative of a long-term structural change but more of a temporary macroeconomic driver and change that at some point, we think we'll begin to see the trend turn.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#26

And then maybe one more about the discretionary market. How much of the decline there do you attribute to existing home sales being down versus pull forward through the pandemic? I don't know how you kind of break those apart, but...

James Peters

executive
#27

I think -- and it's a good question. I've had it a few times, and there's no perfect way to break it apart, but what I will say is I do think it is more due to the downturn existing home sales right now. And the reason I say that is you did have accelerated replacement of purchases within COVID, but you also had accelerated usage. And appliances, we've always said typically lasted 10 years. But the 10 years is not based on just an age, it's based on an amount of usage. And if you think about during the pandemic, people wash clothes more often. They use their dishwashers more often because they stay at home more often and they use their cooking appliances more often, turning them off, turn them on, opening doors, closing doors. Refrigerators were open and closed more, what drives refrigeration to eventually wear out. It's the opening and closing of the doors, not on the hinges on the compressor because it's got to now keep recooling the [ refrig ]. So yes, we did see some acceleration of demand, which I think has worked its way through the system now, but we're seeing -- we saw an accelerated level of usage. That has continued to a certain extent. We still, with connected cooking appliances, see higher levels of usage than consumers did pre-COVID. So I truly do believe that the bigger driver is mortgage rates where they are existing home sales at an extremely low level because also where we see it, and we can see is when consumers buy an existing home, they replace all the appliances. So you'll see sweet sales. And we're seeing a lower level of suites where they buy an entire suite of appliances. We're just not seeing the level of that, that we would see when that market is healthy. So I think all of that's behind us. And even if you look in our small domestic appliance area, also, I think that, that's got a big benefit or spike during COVID, but now we're seeing normalized demand and normalized demand patterns within that business. And as we've talked about, we didn't spend much time on it here today. We're really excited about that business. And we hope you guys all are too now that we're showing you how it can grow, but the margins and the profitability of it. So that is one we didn't spend much time on it, but it's a business we're very, very excited and excited about the products we just launched in there, especially the new espresso makers.

Michael Rehaut

analyst
#28

Great. Well, I think that kind of does it for this session. I think I need an espresso myself. So not that it was at riveting, of course, but I am up a little bit earlier than I normally was. In any case, we are going to continue in a few minutes with AZEK and then break for lunch. So thanks again, Jim. Great to see you.

James Peters

executive
#29

Thanks, Mike. Appreciate it, everybody.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Whirlpool Corporation transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Whirlpool Corporation earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.