Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 7, 2025

New York Stock Exchange US Real Estate Diversified REITs earnings 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Philip Mays

executive
#1

Thanks. I want to point out that a number of the remarks we're making today qualify as forward-looking statements according to federal securities law. Results the company actually achieves down the road could vary substantially from what gets covered in those forward-looking statements, and we're not taking on any obligation to revise them. The factors and risks capable of making actual results diverge materially from what we expect get spelled out periodically in more detail within the company's Form 10-Ks, Form 10-Q, and other SEC filings. Our SEC reports, earnings release, and the latest investor presentation, which includes reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures we rely on, are available on our website at www.alpinereit.com. Having said that, I'll hand things over to John.

John Albright

executive
#2

Thank you, Phil. For Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc., the fourth quarter capped off a really strong 2024, and we carried out every part of our business plan effectively. Turning to earnings: for the year, AFFO came in at $0.74 per diluted share, which is growth of 17%. That strong earnings growth, together with free cash flow, let us boost our common dividend yet again, to a new quarterly rate of $0.285, effective the first quarter of 2025. With this new annualized dividend of $1.14, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. has now raised its annual dividend every year since its IPO in November of 2019, all while still offering shareholders an appealing dividend yield with solid coverage. What's fueling our earnings growth is a successful quarter and a year of investment activity. In the fourth quarter, we bought six properties for $50.5 million, at a weighted average cash cap rate of 7.6%. That takes our full-year acquisition activity to twelve, at a weighted average cash cap rate of 8.2%. Our 2024 acquisitions included investment-grade rated Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, and Lowe's, plus three beachfront restaurants, which increased our Walt to 8.7 years from seven years at the start of the year. In addition, we finished the year with 51% of our ABR coming from investment-grade rated tenants. To supplement our 2024 property acquisitions, we originated three commercial loans over the year totaling $31.1 million, at a weighted average yield of 10.7%. If you combine loan originations and property acquisitions, we completed $134.7 million in total investments during 2024, at an average yield of 8.7%. Also, over the year, we successfully pruned the portfolio by selling $62 million of property at an average cap rate of 6.9%; those dispositions were a strategic effort to improve the diverse and reduced risk, and they included three Walgreens, which moved Walgreens from our largest tenant in terms of ABR to our fourth largest tenant. Notably, triple B rated DICK'S Sporting Goods and triple B plus rated Lowe's are now our two largest tenants, each representing 10% of ABR. On top of that, we were able to reinvest net proceeds from those dispositions into new acquisitions at a positive yield spread. Looking ahead to 2025, we're continuing our investment strategy, using a barbell approach when it comes to property acquisitions. On one side, we'll invest in investment-grade rated tenants to deliver consistent and stable cash flows, while on the other side, we'll pursue higher-yielding opportunities that provide growth and diversification. We'll also keep augmenting and complementing our property investments by selectively originating commercial loans. Phil will go over 2025 earnings guidance, but I do want to flag a couple of related items. First, as you know, Party City filed for bankruptcy. Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. does have one Party City lease in its portfolio. That lease is for a property located in Oceanside, New York, on Long Island. This property sits in a highly sought-after, heavily populated area, which gives us several options for either leasing it out or putting it on the market. Also, Cinemark chose not to extend the lease on our Reno theater in late 2024. We saw that coming and even had a contract in place to sell the property. That said, something unexpected came up for the buyer, so the deal never closed. Because of that, our attention is now on getting this asset sold and putting that capital back to work; until it's leased or sold and those proceeds are reinvested, these two items will weigh on near-term earnings. Looking forward, we see a strong and busy set of opportunities throughout the tenant base, and we're staying committed to carrying out our strategy to deliver for clients and investors. With that, I'll hand the call over to Phil.

Philip Mays

executive
#3

Thanks, John. To start with the financials, our revenue for the quarter came to $13.8 million in total, which included $11.5 million in lease income plus $2.2 million in interest income from commercial loans. For the quarter, FFO and AFFO each came in at $0.44 per diluted share, which works out to growth of 19% and 16%, respectively, compared with the same quarter a year earlier. On a full-year basis, revenue totaled $52.2 million, comprising $46 million in lease income and $5.8 million in interest income from commercial loans. FFO for the year landed at $1.73 per diluted share, up 18% from the prior year, while AFFO was $1.74 per diluted share, up 17% year over year. The investment activity John walked through, together with sensible and disciplined capital management, drove this earnings growth for both the quarter and the year. In the fourth quarter, we issued roughly 436,000 common shares through our ATM program at a weighted average price of $17.98 per share, which brought in $7.7 million in net proceeds. Across all of 2024, we issued 1.1 million common shares through our ATM program at a weighted average price per share of $18.04, bringing in $18.8 million in net proceeds. Importantly — and just as significant — during 2023 and into the first quarter of 2024, the company took advantage of opportunities to repurchase 0.9 million common shares for $15.4 million, at an average price of $16.26, which sits $1.78 below our weighted average issuance price in 2024. Thanks to our 2024 ATM activity and net issuance of more than 1 million shares, we were able to grow while also bringing leverage down. To be specific, we closed the year at 7.4 times net debt to EBITDA, versus 7.7 times at the start of the year. As a reminder, no debt comes due until 2026, and beyond that our maturities are nicely staggered; we've used a number of rate swaps to lock in the interest rate on over 80% of our debt, leaving us with a weighted average interest rate of 4.1% at year-end. On top of that, we had $95 million of liquidity, made up of about $5 million in available cash and $90 million available under our revolving credit facility. What's more, given current in-place commitments, our revolving credit facility's available capacity can grow by another $50 million as we acquire properties, which means total potential liquidity of roughly $150 million. In the fourth quarter, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share to stockholders of record on December 12, 2024; that reflects a solid AFFO payout ratio of 64%. As was mentioned earlier, our Board of Directors recently gave approval to raise our quarterly dividend to $0.285, starting in the first quarter of 2025. Even after that increase, our dividend stays well covered and supported by free cash flow. Last, let me turn to guidance for 2025. Our initial earnings guidance for the full year of 2025 is a per diluted share range of $1.70 to $1.73 for both FFO and AFFO. Our initial guidance rests on a few key assumptions: somewhere between $50 million and $80 million in investment volume, dispositions ranging from $20 million to $30 million, and weighted average shares outstanding of 16 million to 16.5 million. As for the Party City bankruptcy along with that empty theater in Reno, what we're assuming right now is that those two items will hit 2025 FFO and AFFO per share by roughly $0.08. That said, should the Party City lease get assumed, and should we move promptly on the acquisitions and loan originations we've planned, there's a possibility we land at the top of our range or even push past it. One final item: the external management fee's annual run rate now stands at $4.5 million, which captures the entire effect of the $7.7 million in net equity proceeds we raised during the fourth quarter. With that said, operator, the line is yours for questions.

Catherine Graves

analyst
#4

Thanks; Catherine Graves here, filling in for Michael Goldsmith. I appreciate you fielding my question. First off, during the quarter you lowered your exposure to Walgreens. Should we anticipate additional trimming of that kind of tenant, and broadly speaking, what amount of exposure there do you consider comfortable?

John Albright

executive
#5

Yes. Thank you. Yes. We've got one more that's sort of in the works and being negotiated, though we're truly attempting to align the timing with acquisitions. These assets are, you know, despite being a difficult credit situation and narrative, a market does exist for them, so we're looking to match them with acquisitions. Yet likely one more, you know, potentially emerging during the quarter.

Catherine Graves

analyst
#6

Understood. Thanks. For my follow-up, regarding what you plan to invest in during 2025, could you shed some light on how you’re weighing acquisitions against construction loans? And what would tilt you toward favoring either option next year?

John Albright

executive
#7

Sure. Like I’ve mentioned previously, certain lending possibilities appeal to us a lot, since you end up with stronger credit—for example, these developments anchored by publicly known tenants, in effect, outparcel projects, where there’s an equity cushion below you as the builder, meaning substantial equity is tied up in those ventures; plus the loan-to-value ratios are clearly below what you’d face purchasing those properties outright; and naturally, returns exceed what you’d get from holding them; so that kind of chance looks great to us while capital markets remain tight for builders. Also, I’d note we’re observing quite a busy pipeline when it comes to loans and also on the acquisition front—especially the more core type of acquisitions; thus, strong possibilities are showing up in both areas; so I’d imagine it ends up split evenly, 50-50, for that kind of investment plan.

Catherine Graves

analyst
#8

Got it. Thanks so much.

John Albright

executive
#9

Thank you.

Gaurav Mehta

analyst
#10

Yeah. Thanks. Morning to you. I'd like to get a bit more detail regarding that commercial lending possibility. There are 4 commercial loans you've got coming due during 2025, so I'm curious to hear your outlook on them.

Philip Mays

executive
#11

Right; 4 are indeed coming due. My guess is that a single one of them ends up being repaid, while the remaining 3 get extended. And as John mentioned, we see no issues at all, since we have a strong loan pipeline that should take the place of the one likely to be paid off; that payoff will most likely happen around the middle of the year, and we feel quite sure we can fill that gap. So the balance shouldn't decline. Our expectation is that it more or less holds steady and possibly increases as we move into the back half of the year.

Gaurav Mehta

analyst
#12

All right. Then my second question is about the guidance for dispositions and acquisitions. Could you give us a bit more detail regarding the timing you expect — when do you plan to sell properties and buy properties during the year?

John Albright

executive
#13

Regarding equity — I'd say the pipeline right now is likely the best we've ever had at this point in the year across the 5 years we've been at this. So we're fairly optimistic; that said, as you're aware, deals can always fall apart. Even so, my expectation would be that a greater share of the activity takes place toward the close of Q1.

Gaurav Mehta

analyst
#14

Okay. Thank you.

John Albright

executive
#15

Thank you.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#16

Morning, everyone. John, after that storm damage, have the beachside group properties regained their maximum operating levels? Also, has their top line returned to the level you underwrote when the deal was first struck?

John Albright

executive
#17

Yes. We actually visited last week, and every one of them is up and running and doing well — a few are even doing better than they did before the hurricane. They've got new equipment and more efficient kitchens, since they had the chance to reconfigure things the way they wanted. I'd say the Sandbar hasn't reached peak capacity yet, because, you know, they handle a huge amount of weddings and similar events, and we're only now entering season. Still, everything is trending either equal to or ahead of where it stood before the hurricane, unfortunately. As for the market, you know, a number of competitors haven't resumed operations, so they're basically the only option around. Anyway, it seems they're quite enthusiastic about how they're positioned.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#18

All right. And at this stage, they carried business interruption coverage that would reimburse you for whatever was missing, is that right?

John Albright

executive
#19

That's right.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#20

All right. Then you and Phil discussed Party City as well as Cinemark. Apart from those 2 properties, are there any additional sites you anticipate being empty at some stage during 2025 or in the early part of 2026?

John Albright

executive
#21

Right now? No. Plus we're taking a proactive stance regarding the ones that, well, you know, the tenants we're keeping an eye on, like, for example, at home, we're very, you know, offloading a few of those; so, you know, the theater deal, clearly, back in the fall, we had it signed up, and, sadly, a health problem came up for the buyer; therefore that truly, you know, threw a wrench into what we'd planned, since it ought to have been divested by the end of last year. As a result, we had to begin again on that. So we currently hold live bids for both Party City and the theater; we're attempting to be, you know, attempting to secure the highest price we can, yet we definitely will realize the upside if we choose to dispose of it sooner and get that capital working through either, you know, reducing the debt or completing an acquisition or an investment. And so we plainly recognize the advantages of turning those into cash sooner instead of later, and so we might proceed with that.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#22

All right. Then you brought up the at-home piece. That was the final thing I had. Earlier you said a market exists for Walgreens right now. Given the size of those at-home assets and their credit rating, does a market truly exist for them at present? And will you try to pair up any sales there with purchases too?

John Albright

executive
#23

Yes. What I mean is, we'll proceed, and since they're somewhat lumpier, we won't pair them against acquisitions; once a buyer is set to purchase, we'll then work through the steps alongside them. The reason you see, you know, greater activity around these than you might expect, given the size, as you pointed out, is that keep in mind, you know, they sit on big parcels featuring plenty of parking and a sizable configuration. The basis is extremely low, and that simply isn't available anymore. I mean, you know, redeveloping this kind of product is, you know, so for investors, developers, tenants, these represent distinctive chances, and folks get that.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#24

All right, and I suppose that brings us to a final item for Phil. So you provided guidance regarding the figures, the investments, and the dispositions. However, when it comes to the income statement, is there anything in 2025 that appears likely to be either unusually elevated line items, unusually elevated or depressed, not counting revenue and interest expense, which hinge on your buy and sell activity and financing decisions. Is there anything in G&A, or anything else that will end up being uneven or out of the ordinary that you expect for 2025?

Philip Mays

executive
#25

Nope. My expectation is that the majority of items will follow a fairly consistent run rate. On a quarterly basis, throughout the year. There's nothing uneven in G&A, as I mentioned. Right. Because all the equity was distributed during the fourth quarter, our management fee now stands at four and a half on an annual basis; that figure presumes no additional equity issuance, yet that represents the present run rate. Still, I believe the majority of items will be, as you know, broadly a consistent run rate across the year. And simply, as you know, barring, as you know, when acquisitions and dispositions occur, yet there are no strange one-time fees or sorts of uneven items that ought to concern you.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#26

All right. Thanks, everyone. Enjoy the weekend.

John Albright

executive
#27

Appreciate it. Same to you.

Matthew Erdner

analyst
#28

Morning, everyone, and thanks for letting me ask. I want to spend a moment on rates and where pricing sits today, given that the outlook is for them to stay elevated for a while. Pricing, it appears, has remained fairly stable across the last 2 quarters; however, once you take the loans out of the picture, what cap rate are you entering at on the acquisitions made during roughly the last 2 quarters?

John Albright

executive
#29

Essentially, we come out at an average near the 8% cap rate level. As you noticed, that was the case in the most recent period, in Q4; we deliberately moved lower on yield to secure quality, where we acquired a Lowe's, mainly to demonstrate to the market that we are the sole net lease REIT whose top five includes a DICK'S or a Lowe's. Possibly among the top ten credits, even. So the aim is showing the market that, if what you want is some diversification in your investment, we are truly the only net lease REIT through which you can gain exposure to a variety of credits. Everybody else appears to carry the same kinds of credit profiles; therefore, we are genuinely pushing to get that narrative out. That said, generally speaking, apart from moving lower on yield to acquire a quality Lowe's with a long duration, our trajectory is toward the 8 cap range.

Matthew Erdner

analyst
#30

Understood; that's useful. And then, since no guidance was given by you folks, should we anticipate roughly the same approach in 2025 — solid credit, and then the loans clearly, to lift the yield there.

John Albright

executive
#31

Yeah. Without a doubt. I believe, I believe you'll hopefully see a few of these deals get done, and I believe the quality will impress you. As will the yield.

Matthew Erdner

analyst
#32

Awesome. Great. Thank you, guys.

John Albright

executive
#33

Thank you.

Alex Segan

analyst
#34

Hello, and good morning. Thanks for letting me ask a question. You brought up earlier that with Party City and Cinemark, there are possible offers on the table. Do you intend to sell those or let them go, and did you happen to discuss what that could mean for valuation?

John Albright

executive
#35

Yes. There's a leasing opportunity for us too, and the ideal outcome would be to lease first and then sell. However, that process would realistically consume the entire year. Given how unpredictable the investor market is when it comes to stock investors, I believe getting the cash and putting it back to work sooner is likely the wiser move and will benefit our shareholders. So that's sort of the situation — we do have flexibility either way, whether we lease and keep them or sell, but we're leaning toward the monetization.

Alex Segan

analyst
#36

So regarding that purchaser who walked away due to a medical condition, should we anticipate any kind of break fee or a one-off payment coming from that situation?

John Albright

executive
#37

Well, we received a small amount, though honestly we had the option to claim more. However, we clearly felt sympathy given what happened, and so we returned a portion of the escrow funds that we weren't actually obligated to give back. Still, considering how serious that medical condition was, that's what we chose to do.

Alex Segan

analyst
#38

Okay. Thanks so much.

John Massocca

analyst
#39

Morning. Perhaps we can go a bit deeper into the acquisition guidance. I mean, what portion of that is things you can actually see in the pipeline right now, or that sit under an LOI, and what portion is just theoretical? I ask that, you know, given that $80 million at the top end of the range is, you know, considerably below what you did last year, yet you were kind of saying the pipeline felt stronger than at any other moment during this time of year. So I'm just sort of trying to square that circle, so to speak.

John Albright

executive
#40

Yeah. No. That's a good point; so since these investments are fairly long, we are in negotiations regarding, you know, a fair amount of the pipeline. But you just never know what's gonna happen. And then as for the theoretical part, it's more that we have identified assets that we're pursuing but we don't know whether we'll win them at the yields that work for us. And so I would say that what we have, where we're negotiating and terms have been agreed upon, accounts for a fair amount of the guidance.

John Massocca

analyst
#41

That's useful. So when we look at what those investments return, is it going to be similar to what we saw 12 months ago? Has there been any shift in cap rates, considering how interest rates have been swinging around or given uncertainty about the macro picture?

John Albright

executive
#42

What I'd say is that returns from structured finance investments, you know, may have dipped a bit. Meanwhile, for acquisitions, yields have either held flat compared with what you've observed previously or perhaps ticked up somewhat, meaning a bit more yield.

John Massocca

analyst
#43

All right. Then, regarding the guidance once more, is there any credit loss incorporated into that figure, apart from the 2 vacancies you specifically mentioned?

Philip Mays

executive
#44

Yes. What I mean is, a modest general reserve is something we always maintain within the forecast; however, nothing significant appears to be on the horizon at this time.

John Massocca

analyst
#45

All right, and then the final granular item for you, Phil. Real estate expense rose somewhat from one quarter to the next. Did that simply mirror what's happening in Reno, or was there another factor at play?

Philip Mays

executive
#46

Yes. The lease for Reno ran out in November, and that's mainly what drove the increase.

John Massocca

analyst
#47

All right, that covers everything on my end. Thanks so much.

Craig Kucera

analyst
#48

Yeah, appreciate it. Morning, everyone. Phil, roughly half of what's on the revolver right now carries a floating rate. Do you have any swaps in mind for that portion, or do you expect to leave it floating?

Philip Mays

executive
#49

Yeah, so roughly $100 million sits outstanding under the revolver. As you pointed out, one half has been swapped, while $50 million remains unswapped. We could look at it, you know, should that balance climb somewhat higher, you know, and it really hinges on how the schedule for acquisitions and dispositions shakes out. You know, there won't always be room for us there, Craig, to bring that line down. Right? And once something is swapped, the cash just sits there generating no return. So you know, if it keeps rising somewhat, we'd likely explore swapping, or we might seize the opportunity to do so. Right? Should rates fall, we could think about acting a bit sooner.

Craig Kucera

analyst
#50

Understood. Allow me one additional question. I suppose your team has demonstrated a strong history of achieving a favorable cap rate spread when buying and selling properties — is that still what you expect for this year, or is it possible that certain assets you intend to divest might require leasing up in order to, you know, get the most value out of them?

John Albright

executive
#51

Yes. I mean, certain assets will certainly exist, such as Walgreens and perhaps at homes, that will carry yields equal to or greater than those on what we're buying; as a result, that accretive recycling won't be visible. However, you know, when it comes to Party City and the theater. I mean, for our small company those represent, you know, a fairly chunky sum of money that's clearly earning negative, and once that gets redeployed, we'll be, you know, very accretive.

Craig Kucera

analyst
#52

Okay. Great. Thanks.

John Albright

executive
#53

Thank you.

Operator

operator
#54

Thanks. That also brings our Q&A portion to an end. Everyone, today's conference call wraps up here as well. We appreciate your participation, and you're welcome to leave the line now. Have a wonderful day, everybody.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.