Box, Inc. (BOX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2026

NYSE US Information Technology Software conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Steven Enders

analyst
#1

Great. Well, thanks, everybody, for joining us this afternoon for day 2 of the Citi's Global TMT Conference. I'm Steve Enders, part of the software research team here. And with us for this session, very excited to have the team from Box. So Dylan Smith, CFO. I want to thank you so much for being here today.

Dylan Smith

executive
#2

Thanks for having me.

Steven Enders

analyst
#3

Maybe just to start, I think Box, I think you guys have been executing pretty well the past few quarters. I think there's been a continued acceleration. Maybe we can just start with what's been going on there? What's been driving that acceleration? And I guess, what have you done to enable that opportunity there?

Dylan Smith

executive
#4

Yes. So I would say the biggest driver of the acceleration we've seen and just delivered our fifth consecutive quarter of accelerating revenue growth is the momentum and overall impact from Enterprise Advanced, which is kind of the highest tier offering that we have introduced about 1.5 years ago into the market. And that comes with both at the higher end of the 30% to 40% price per user uplift, but also enables a set of new use cases that is driving seat expansion. And that's been a big shift versus what that seat expansion was even 18 months ago. And so that's what we've done to enable that is really just kind of driving Enterprise Advanced, honing in on those use cases, working with our customers to really make sure that we can communicate the value proposition. And if we get that time and opportunity, feel really good about where those conversations lead. And then I'd say the second piece that's kind of indirect dynamic that we're seeing is increasingly with AI becoming a top-down initiative from the Board, the CEO, CIO all the way down is Box is an enabler of not just our capabilities, but broader enterprise AI strategies because you hear it all the time, I don't have an AI technology problem, I have a data problem, or a change management problem as well, but we can help with that. But really on the data side is what we can do is because of the power of the platform is also make sure that we can help and accelerate enterprise readiness for their broader AI strategies.

Steven Enders

analyst
#5

Okay. No, that's great to hear. Maybe we can dig into some of the AI use cases that you enable and what you're doing for clients there. Anything that kind of stands out for what's been a reoccurring use case, what's repeatable and what you can kind of take moving forward and stamp that out across a vast majority of the customer base?

Dylan Smith

executive
#6

Yes. So look, a little bit different kind of industry to industry. But fundamentally, the component of Enterprise Advanced and kind of core of these really high-value kind of AI workflows that we're delivering for customers really starts with data extraction or metadata extraction, which is effectively pulling structured data out of unstructured content. That can show up as part of a contract life cycle management process where you're pulling out all the fields, renewal date, key terms, whatever else from contracts to a loan origination process, a client onboarding process, really just at-scale ingestion of a lot of files and then taking that information and then doing something with it, which is kind of part 2 that we see as kind of front and center in most of the kind of use cases that we're delivering, which is the automation from there. So okay, I have the information, have the insights, that's great, then what? And that might mean sending to compliance or legal, if something is flagged to review or just sending to the business owner to set up a task to sign off on or going back directly and sending a notification to the customer or whatever it might be is really the second piece of that. So it's really extract plus automate really makes the foundation of the use cases that we've seen customers adopting.

Steven Enders

analyst
#7

Okay. And when you think about the opportunity within the customer base, how do you kind of see those kind of use cases expanding? Or maybe you could just kind of like walk through how those -- how the Box Platform just kind of like progresses? And are we at a point where it's expanding wall-to-wall? How much more just opportunity do you feel like there is to capture in the installed base?

Dylan Smith

executive
#8

Yes. So the expansion, while we have some several examples, more than a dozen Fortune 500 customers, companies who are wall-to-wall on Box, in the significant majority of our customers, there's still a significant seat expansion opportunity on average, about 6x based on -- versus today's footprint. And that's where I think a lot of the use cases come in as well as one of the big focus areas is both in terms of moving workloads and kind of freeing up dollars for further Box investment is that kind of legacy displacement opportunity. So legacy enterprise content management tools in particular. which is a big focus, and we see big opportunity for even additional workflows where there are a lot of capabilities around the way that we can handle custom objects that aren't necessarily unstructured files to just some of the more bespoke workflow type capabilities are a couple of areas of the road map that we think will allow us to unlock more and more of that opportunity.

Steven Enders

analyst
#9

Okay. I do want to touch on the, I guess, legacy modernization and ECM opportunity in a bit. But maybe before that, I would like to talk about some of the, I guess, opportunities you might see around security right now. I feel like that's been very top of mind and in focus just in the broader tech landscape with everything from Mythos to some of the recent hacks that have been happening on the Agentic side. So I guess maybe kind of where are we in terms of our customers, enterprises, are they coming to you to help kind of deal with some of these security concerns? Or is that driving incremental prioritization for the Box capabilities right now?

Dylan Smith

executive
#10

Yes. For content security, absolutely. And we're very fortunate in the way that things have played out that if you think about what we've been building for more than 2 decades and the focus on security and compliance as a differentiator is just as relevant in a world with agents and actually more relevant than it is for humans. And that's because if you think about it, it's basically the exact same problems you'd be looking to solve or opportunities that we can address. But you think about instead of x employees, you now have an order of magnitude more agents running around and unlike relying on the just EQ and good nature of human beings, not to want to do anything too malicious with the content, sharing with people they shouldn't be sharing with accessing information they shouldn't have access to, et cetera, agents lack that capability or understanding. They just going to want to do whatever you tell them to do in the way that they think is the most efficient, effective way to get there. So having those airtight permissions, access controls as well as kind of monitoring for threat detection, et cetera, just becomes that much more important and relevant. And so absolutely top of mind for any customer we're talking to and increasingly differentiated that's standing out in those conversations.

Steven Enders

analyst
#11

Is it changing, I guess, the prioritization that CIOs and CISOs might have and maybe elevate some of the, I guess, demand environment for you all?

Dylan Smith

executive
#12

I mean, I'd say that ultimately, the demand is still driven by a lot of the use cases and AI and just kind of managing your unstructured content and having a data strategy, that is increasing, I think, in importance, having far more CIO-led conversations or even CEO, COO type conversations because of that. And then security is the reason that Box is further up in the consideration set as a result. I wouldn't say -- I mean, the reason that Box is so strong in terms of security generally still stems from a specific use case or set of use cases. that are kind of top of mind for that organization.

Steven Enders

analyst
#13

Okay. That makes sense. Maybe I'm going to ask a little bit about Box AI and kind of the Agentic strategy that you all have. Just maybe how do you think about the opportunity that agents enable for you all? And how do you think about first-party agents versus third-party agents and how that maybe comes together with the rubber meeting the road in terms of what actually gets put into practice for companies?

Dylan Smith

executive
#14

Yes. I mean, we think about kind of agents and that Agentic opportunity as effectively synonymous with the broader AI opportunity. We think about these kind of high-value and complex workflows, those almost inherently involve an agent or agents who are performing those tasks on a repeatable basis. replacing the work that would have been manual or done by a human, or that you'd ship off to a BPO or something like that. And now it's agents doing it. So those we view as kind of one and the same. And then in terms of first versus third-party agents, I mean, certainly, all else equal, we'd love for every agentic workflow to be initiated on Box for that to be the orchestration layer for Box to be the orchestration layer. But that was never the expectation. The reality is it's going to be a mix, right, where in some cases, it's going to be a Box, especially for content-centric workflows and where the data starts and then ends on Box. In other situations, it's going to make more sense for a customer to be in a different provider's platform or using the direct LLM as the interface. And we love all of those situations. And I think that's kind of naturally how the world is evolving is how does this fit seamlessly into kind of a user's workflow and day and what they're already doing. And I think kind of that interface is probably unless that provider kind of drops the ball is probably going to be the interface that it makes most sense to kick off some of those workflows.

Steven Enders

analyst
#15

Okay. That makes sense. And then how do you kind of think about the, I guess, monetization opportunity for agents? And is there, I guess, a difference in terms of those first-party versus third-party agents in the monetization angle?

Dylan Smith

executive
#16

Yes. So things are evolving rapidly. As of now, we think about that monetization of those agents as being in the form of what we call AI units, which is effectively kind of token consumption that those agents are kind of driving. And so whether that's first or third party, that would be the case. I mean, in a lot of cases, that consumption element is heavier for those first-party agents and use cases, but there are often kind of tokens being consumed on the Box side by customers in some of those third-party use cases as well.

Steven Enders

analyst
#17

Okay. I do want to keep those interactive. So if there's any questions in the room, we want to make sure to get to those. I have one in the back right here. We have a mic coming. So give one second. Thank you.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#18

I guess Box has been seen as like an app company. So if we were want to think about Box as infrastructure company, what do you think Box needs to deliver from both product and positioning perspective to be valued as infrastructure software company?

Dylan Smith

executive
#19

Yes. I mean the reality is that we do, I think, already offer the capabilities of kind of that being part of the infrastructure layer. I mean, literally, the place that you're managing, securing all of your unstructured content and then building on top of that, that's what we do. So I would say you are free even today to be thinking of us as an infrastructure company. But at the same time, we are also a core part of the application layer. And so it's a bit of both and don't want to kind of muddy things or do a massive pivot in terms of messaging when fundamentally, what we do is continue to evolve and kind of strengthen our capabilities in both areas. But do think that certainly as an enabler of broader AI initiatives that I was talking about a little while ago, that is much more as an infrastructure provider. But if you think about, okay, we are now have the capabilities to replace a contract life cycle management system, or to kind of orchestrate a lot of those workflows we're talking about, that really is -- we view more on the application side. So long-winded way saying, effectively, I think we do both already. We're going to continue to expand our capabilities at both levels, but do think that the capabilities that we offer as an infrastructure provider are certainly more and more appreciated just given the ways that we can then kind of enable the broader AI workloads that companies are looking to implement.

Steven Enders

analyst
#20

Thanks for that question. I guess maybe similarly, I think there's been a lot of talk about legacy transformation and modernization and customers looking to move off of, let's just call it, the incumbent or legacy ECM vendors and move that to the cloud. I think that's probably been slower than what we would have expected historically. But just, I guess, what unlocks now with AI? And how do you kind of think through that versus the data gravity concerns that have maybe limited that historically?

Dylan Smith

executive
#21

Yes. I mean I think realistically, this is still going to be a multiyear journey and transition. Just given, I mean, to your point, there's data gravity, inertia, a lot of these systems have been in place for literally decades despite not innovating over that entire time period. But you have high-value workflow that's -- or use case that's been sitting there. And it just historically has not been a big priority to change. If you think about because the company was trying to move and capture a mobile opportunity or move to the cloud before that or whatever, maybe an ERP implementation, I mean, whatever it might have been, the reason that it's a lot more top of mind and the reason that kind of unstructured content is actually a strategic initiative for CIOs now more so than it ever been in the past -- than it's ever been in the past 20-plus years is because AI and that fundamentally, if your data is siloed and especially if it's siloed and sitting in fragmented on-premises systems, you just can't access that data and get the capabilities and unlock the use cases that you could with a solution like Box. So we're hearing not from customers that, okay, this thing that -- it's probably time and catalyzing those conversations, but with the SI ecosystem as well who might have put those systems in place and are responsible for that kind of that implementation and that maintenance, and they're hearing from their customers and then reaching out to us to help their clients modernize. I think that's really what's changed is instead of it just being an annoying painful thing that was then offset by inertia, now it's literally a gating factor to be able to actually execute an AI strategy.

Steven Enders

analyst
#22

Okay. Maybe it's a good time to ask about the SI opportunity and the partners. Like I think over the past 1.5 years, 2 years, it feels like you've really started to lean more into that go-to-market motion. I guess 2 questions. What does that unlock for you all in terms of the opportunities that it creates and what it brings incrementally to? And secondly, just where are we in terms of that journey for building out those partnerships and the SIs and partners driving opportunities to you guys at this point?

Dylan Smith

executive
#23

Yes. So I think in terms of the -- what it unlocks, it's really a couple of main things. First of which is just customer reach and extending the reach of our direct sales force. because with several hundred kind of quota-carrying AEs, we can't possibly be having the type of conversations and talking to a number of customers where Box is a good fit. And so it helps extend the reach of our sales force and provide some kind of go-to-market, call it, leverage in the process. But also with those SIs, they tend to be very close to that business' challenges, have the technical expertise and the lifeblood of their business is a lot of these pretty complex implementations that require a lot of handholding, a lot of development efforts in many cases as part of broader kind of digital transformation initiatives is just one example. So they can also help go in and customize those solutions, whether it's for specific geographies or verticals or whatever else, and they have that expertise at a scale that's much greater than we have internally. And so it's not just the reach, but also actually the capabilities to customize and make customers successful on Box is really kind of what they bring to the table. And then in terms of -- I don't know how this translates to an inning point of view, but pretty early in that opportunity, and we are starting to see traction starting with some of the regional players, but also now with some of the large global systems integrators. But very early days in terms of the type of kind of impact that can have on our business overall.

Steven Enders

analyst
#24

Do those tend to be more of a, I guess, lift and shift in a legacy modernization? Or are they bringing net new use cases that a customer maybe didn't have before where it makes sense to use Box for that use case?

Dylan Smith

executive
#25

It's a little bit of both, but we see it as really the broader kind of replacement opportunity lift and shift is where a lot of them are coming to us for because, again, they might be like an OpenText shop or have a big practice there and hearing from a lot of those customers that, that's just not going to kind of meet their needs going forward. And so that's where we see a lot of the big work, and that's obviously where these SIs are most motivated versus, oh, we can drive this one use case for Box. That exists too, but that wouldn't necessarily be a dedicated and as impactful from a growth standpoint partner us, that might be part of a Salesforce implementation or some broader kind of digital transformation effort. So that's sort of, again, kind of I would just summarize as both, but with the bigger opportunity being the replacement side.

Steven Enders

analyst
#26

Okay. Maybe this is a good time to kind of talk about the competitive environment and kind of what you're seeing out there. I guess, beyond the legacy replacement cycle, I think we tend to get questions around the shift to AI models and then being able to pull data from anywhere and everywhere and integrate with all these areas. I think there's a question of does that just mean like Box becomes just a storage layer or the capabilities become I guess, less relevant moving forward. Just how do you kind of think about that dynamic and maybe the right to win and kind of change that perception versus some of the model vendors or other AI-focused vendors out there?

Dylan Smith

executive
#27

Yes. So I think there's -- beyond just storage, everything that we've built up around permissions, security access controls is incredibly relevant even in those use cases where the interface might be an LLM. And at the same time, there are just so many things we do within our platform around document generation capabilities, e-signature capabilities, all the stuff we were talking about before that those model providers aren't going to offer anytime soon, which is why you see us regularly, I mean, not just as getting early access to all the models from these players so that we can run those evaluations, have them available with insights to our customers day 1 of when they launch. But when they're giving a keynote talking about these kind of new workflows that they can drive and the future of work and whatever transformative thing they're focused on, Box will be featured as the place that they are kind of pulling that content from and then saving it back to, right? Because they know that it doesn't make sense to try to replicate all of the capabilities that we've built out, and that goes far above and beyond storage, which is why they've been such strong partners for us.

Steven Enders

analyst
#28

Okay. But those relationships that you have and to your point, like I think you've been a launch partner with like Anthropic and OpenAI and many of them, does -- like are they pulling you into opportunities? Or does that, like, recognition that they give you, does that create incremental opportunities that you're able to execute on and monetize?

Dylan Smith

executive
#29

Yes. I would say that it's not as much like, hey, they're saying, hey, we have this mass deal like we're meeting with this customer, like come up to our offices for this customer briefing next week. But I mean, it does raise the awareness of all of the things that we can do just kind of given the reach and all the things that they're doing, plus then when they are talking to their customers, they are kind of reiterating those same points. So that's where they might be directly saying, oh, yes, well, we don't do that or we don't do that well. But if you're starting this or putting it on Box, you'd be able to solve that problem. So that's where it is more of like a friendly, they'll refer things, but less of a like formal reseller type relationship where you'd say, yes, a significant percentage of our pipeline is directly attributable to their sales force pushing Box -- and more of the kind of informal kind of lift that we get there.

Steven Enders

analyst
#30

Okay. And then maybe also competitively, I think Microsoft comes up a lot in terms of a coopetition kind of dynamic. Just what have you kind of seen from them lately? And how do you kind of think about the relationship that exists there today?

Dylan Smith

executive
#31

Yes. I mean, the funny thing is that as much as -- we still see Microsoft regularly and still remain a very strong partner and a very viable competitor of ours. But the interesting thing is, as much as the world and the landscape and our respective offerings have evolved over the past several years, the actual competitive dynamic with Microsoft really hasn't changed as much. It's still you use Box for the same reasons and choose Box for the same reasons that you would before. Only I think with our capabilities expanding, there are more and more situations, departments, types of use cases where what Microsoft would be offering as part of their Office 365 bundle is no longer good enough. But the high-level dynamics has actually remained pretty consistent.

Steven Enders

analyst
#32

Okay. I'll pause there and see if there's any questions in the room real quick. I do want to talk about the forward deployed engineer opportunity. I think it's been -- I mean, you've had consulting services historically, but I guess what's different now with what you're doing with FDEs? And how does that maybe transform the kinds of opportunities that you're seeing as a result of that?

Dylan Smith

executive
#33

Yes. So I would say that, yes, the high-level approach of, okay, both presale and postsale, we're going to be as close to our customer, helping them identify use cases, implement those use cases as possible. Again, like you said, that's been part of what we do and what we've kind of invested in for years and years. But FDEs, and we also have several employees on the consulting side and sales engineers or value engineers who are doing effectively that work without an FDE title are really focused on the AI model side of things, which is we know because of just the breadth of our customer base, the depth of our understanding and evaluation with models is we can sit down with the customer and say, okay, you want to do this, run this loan origination process. Great. We have 7 other customers of similar scale who have already done basically the exact same thing. Now let's work together and say, okay, how important is accuracy versus cost? Here are some of the options. You can kind of feed us the budget, and we'll tell you, like, I would probably use this model, you'll spend 35% as much, you'll lose a few basis points of accuracy. Is that a trade-off you're going to make? Or do you want to go here? And we have that depth of understanding and have actually delivered those use cases and seen them in action with customers in a way that can get us closer and be a more valuable partner at the table to them versus the number of times we have now it's just because they're -- it's a very sexy role at this stage where people are like, oh, yes, we can send over FDE, and it's a 22-year-old, very smart, capable, technically strong person who has no idea about our business or the problems or whatever else. And it's just like that doesn't add value to the business. We can actually go and work with our customers and help them reduce, in some cases, costs by hundreds of thousands of dollars for a given use case because of kind of the capabilities that we have.

Steven Enders

analyst
#34

Okay. That makes sense. Maybe we can start translating this a little bit into the financial model. Look at cRPO growth, I think it was, what, 14% this quarter --

Dylan Smith

executive
#35

Constant currency.

Steven Enders

analyst
#36

Growth, yes, in constant currency, which is, again, ahead of the revenue acceleration. I guess, as we think about the durability of the acceleration, is that the right way to think about it looking at cRPO? Or how do you kind of think through what's the right metrics to look at, maybe it's in the pipeline or something that can give confidence in the growth opportunity from here?

Dylan Smith

executive
#37

Yes. So I think that is kind of current RPO is a very good leading indicator of revenue growth generally. The one note why it's not perfect in our case is because at the same time over the last year, which is the measurement period of that growth rate, we've seen a lengthening of customer contract durations, which great thing. But what it means is if all of our customers are on annual contracts, they have some portion of their contract value in current RPO. If everyone is on multiyear contracts, more often than not, they're going to have a full 12 months. And so there's a little bit of a tailwind and impact because of that duration dynamic. So as that normalizes, it will be an even better leading indicator. But right now, I would say it's directionally helpful to understand the underlying momentum in the business, but I wouldn't just take the current RPO growth and say, okay, that's going to be the company's growth over the next 12 months because of that duration factor.

Steven Enders

analyst
#38

Okay. Very clear. And I guess if I'm thinking about your medium-term, longer-term guide, I think it still shows a growth in the 10% to 15% range, which I guess we're now right at the threshold. But just how do you think about the further levers to maybe see that accelerate further and get into like the upper part of that range?

Dylan Smith

executive
#39

Yes. So it's really a combination of just the continued momentum and impact as Enterprise Advanced penetrates more and more of our customer base, particularly because we've seen even in the early cohorts, the net retention rate really driven by seat expansion of our Enterprise Advanced customers is stronger than non-Enterprise Advanced. So the more of our customer base we move to Enterprise Advanced, the better that is for our overall model and growth profile. So that's a kind of a core component. And I think another one is really just of some of the newer initiatives and kind of growth opportunities that we've talked about, just the level of success we can see there, especially over a multiyear period, whether that is the consumption side of the business, which we expect to grow from about 5% where it is today to 10% plus over the next 3 to 5 years to the impact that kind of those SIs and the partner ecosystem can have on the business to kind of success in some of the less mature markets or less penetrated markets, whether that's EMEA or some of the emerging markets as well. So think about a combination of Enterprise Advanced and newer kind of growth initiatives.

Steven Enders

analyst
#40

Okay. Maybe on margin here. I think if we look at where margin has been, yes, I think there's a little bit less expansion this year. I think for the medium-term target, you're still talking high single digit to 10 points of expansion. Just I guess, what needs to change here? Kind of what are you assuming changes that will show that leverage over the next few years?

Dylan Smith

executive
#41

Yes. So I think a lot of it is -- and the rate of margin expansion is largely going to be a function of what is that growth rate, what is the confidence in kind of in investing incremental dollars pouring more fuel on the fire on those go-to-market investments in particular. And so right now, given that those investments are really working, delivering multiple points of acceleration in revenue and billings this year, we're on track to do that versus the prior year, bias to continue to do that and show more metered operating margin expansion. But at the same time, a lot we're doing across the business to drive efficiencies -- so even this year, more than 1 point of kind of OpEx leverage is what we've been delivering and then still a lot more kind of room to run and efficiencies to drive, whether that's from our workforce location strategy to the ways that we're able to free up capacity, drive efficiencies and hard dollar savings through the way that we use AI internally, to a lot of the kind of continued gross margin optimization we've been making for years, even though those are being counterbalanced in this moment by some of the kind of hardware and capacity constraints that we're seeing out there. So still very focused on driving the efficiencies. And I think ultimately, whether we drop that kind of incremental dollar to the bottom line or reinvest in growth is going to be a function of what sort of return we've been getting and think we can get on those growth investments.

Steven Enders

analyst
#42

Okay. Just real quick on gross margins since you brought it up, just with the component costs coming through and I think the AI costs as well, just maybe what does that kind of look like moving forward here? Like, when do you kind of see that abating and starting to see that level off?

Dylan Smith

executive
#43

Yes. I mean, hard to say exactly, think about that sort of pressure, especially on the kind of public cloud provider capacity side as being temporary, but probably not short term. So I would expect that to persist at least probably through next year. But eventually, as those constraints start to ease and we can get access to some of the newer gen hardware to drive those efficiencies, keep doing what we've been doing as we scale, that should sort of pressure should subside.

Steven Enders

analyst
#44

Okay. Perfect. I think we're out of time. We'll leave it there. But Dylan, thank you so much for joining us today.

Dylan Smith

executive
#45

Yes. Thank you.

Steven Enders

analyst
#46

Awesome.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Box, Inc. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Box, Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.