Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 3, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Banks conference_presentation 51 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Brian Foran

analyst
#1

Hi, everyone. Good afternoon. This is Brian Foran from Autonomous Research. We're delighted to have Citizens up for the next session. In preparing for this, I went back and read the primer I had written when Citizens was an IPO or a spin out, and it was pretty remarkable. I mean, the crux of the paper was really, can Citizens grow again? It has been a long tale period of deleveraging, and that was really the big strategic question. Just looking at some of the numbers since then, loans are up $30 billion round numbers and deposits are up $60 billion, which is effectively creating a pretty sizable regional bank from scratch organically. So I think they've answered the question at least over the long term. Citizens can grow again. And to talk about the outlook, we're delighted to have Bruce Van Saun, CEO, who, of course, has been leading the bank throughout that period. So Bruce, thanks again for joining us this year. Always a pleasure to have you at the conference.

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#2

Thanks.

Brian Foran

analyst
#3

Maybe to get started, sticking with that theme of growth. Clearly, the past 12, 15 months have almost in a way been a real-life stress test, and you and the bank have come through it in very good shape. We've really proved the benefit of investing in fee-based businesses of the growth in pre-provision earnings power you've put in place as well as coming through with good credit quality. As I talk to investors today, for you, as well as most regional banks, probably the #1 question is can loans grow again and when? You've previously talked about an inflection point as we move through this year, I'd love if we could just start there. What are you hearing when you talk to customers on the ground? What are you seeing when you look through your data? Are you on track on the loan growth side and how do you think that will play out over the next 12 to 24 months?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#4

Sure. So 1 thing I would say to start off, Brian, is that we have probably a more diversified set of lending activities on the consumer side than our peers do. And so that's allowed us to consistently grow our consumer loans. And I think that's another thing that will be a point of distinction this year. So we have a big education refinance business, which is still doing nicely. The student in school business is a seasonal business that really picks up in the summer months. And so I think this will be a big year of kids going back to college. Some people sat out because of the pandemic. So expect to see a seasonal boost there. So student is in good shape. Auto has been strong for us. There's a need for -- as people reconsider how they want to live to more people going out and buying cars and the cost of cars is going up, given some supply shortages. And so the loans are a little bigger, so that's helping. And then our efforts in point-of-sale finance, we've been able to sign a bunch of marquee partners and that book is building and should continue to grow very nicely. So in addition to the typical things you'd see from peer groups like mortgage lending and credit cards, we have, I think, other points of distinction that serve as well. And I think as we looked in over the course of this year, we'll still get some growth in the second quarter, and then that will really pick up even more in the second half of the year. On the commercial side, over time, we've been able to grow a bit faster than peers, largely because we've been scaling up the commercial bank by going out and hiring coverage -- experienced coverage bankers who have pre-existing relationships. We have expanded geographically. We've expanded in industry verticals. And those relationship bankers tend to bring pre-existing relations over in time, which allows us to grow the book. So there's still opportunities from that to maybe grow a little faster than our peers, but we're also subject to many of the same factors that peers are referencing. So line utilization has been kind of near all-time lows. So for a while last year at the peak of the pandemic in the second quarter, they spiked to all-time highs. They've now gone to all-time lows, but they're stabilizing, and we're starting to see some signs that companies are interested in meeting the demand for their products and services and that will mean working capital investment and some CapEx investments. So I think you'll see stability in the second quarter and then starting to see growth in the second half of the year. And then our new origination pipelines where we're tied to either M&A activity or some of the new relationships we're going after, that pipeline is back to very good levels to pre-pandemic levels, whereas in the first quarter we were still at a relatively subdued pace. So how much of that we catch actually in Q2 and maybe not be that perceptible, but certainly as we look at the second half of the year, we would expect that to build. So we're still saying that the second half of the year, in particular, should bode well for good loan growth, which translates into the top line revenue growth, which allows to positive operating leverage, which has been the formula for us to drive up our ROCE over time.

Brian Foran

analyst
#5

And maybe while we're on the topic of balance sheet growth, you announced the HSBC acquisition recently. Maybe talk a little bit about what was attractive to you there, brings on some loans, probably more deposits, some branches, a little bit of market expansion? So what was compelling on that deal? And what do you see for the future of those customers coming in?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#6

Yes. So it really hit the sweet spot in a number of dimensions. So first off, $7 billion of net funding -- net deposit funding at 9 basis points, cost of funds is very attractive. And so I think that allows us to move our LDR more in line with the peer average. So as rates move up, we'll have more flexibility to manage our cost of funding and eliminate any differentials we've had over time. So we're excited about that. Secondly, it also gives us the wherewithal as we think we're going to have good loan growth opportunities to fund that loan growth and make a good spread, given the low-cost nature of those deposits. From a geographic standpoint, we've always had a gap from our New England franchise, kind of absent through Metro New York, and then it picks up in South Jersey, Philly, and then that starts the mid-Atlantic franchise. So starting to fill that in has always been a desire of ours, and the New York market is a very attractive market overall. We also pick up some locations pushing south a little bit in mid-Atlantic into the D.C. area. And then Florida is an important expansion market for us. We opened a wealth center in Palm Beach this year. We have another one opening later this year in Naples and then picking up 5 branches in Miami, 1 of which will turn into a wealth center, gives us access to some of the most important affluent areas in Florida. So excited by all those things. If that's not enough, then you also pick up the online business from HSBC, which has got probably 3x the number of customers on the deposit side that we do in Citizens Access. So it immediately brings more scale to our national banking ambitions, and it will, I think, accelerate some of the development that we have on the drawing board to be able to meet the time frame to bring those HSBC customers straight on to some of the new platforms and new services that we want to offer. So that's also a quite attractive aspect of the transaction.

Brian Foran

analyst
#7

That's great. And maybe turning to your fee-based businesses to round out the growth discussion. And if I could set mortgage aside for a second, obviously that's got some of its own dynamics right now. But in 2020, we really saw the benefits of many years of investing you had been doing, whether it's in capital markets, wealth management, other areas. As you look forward, where are you excited to continue to invest? Where is the incremental investment dollar going? And what do you see as the outlook for those non-mortgage fee-based businesses?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#8

Yes. Probably top of the list, Brian, is capital markets, which has a lot of momentum at this point. So I think pound for pound, we've got as good a group of people in terms of capabilities as anybody in the peer group, hence we go toe to toe with the mega banks in the middle market and mid-corporate space and often win the mandates and do very well. So there, one of the keys has been adding the kind of debt capital markets capabilities and adding M&A capabilities. So if you went back at the time of the IPO, we were pretty much a one-trick pony with loan syndications as the core capability that we had. But we do so much more at this point, which has been great to see. And we're not done. I think there's -- we're building out verticals. And if we find other M&A shops that have the right cultural fit and we think we can plug-in and really leverage the relationships we have, we'd consider doing more there. I think our, what we call global markets, FX and interest rate hedging as well has very strong talent, very good capabilities. That will be a little bit episodic tied to loan originations and tied to market conditions, but we've seen that business grow consistently year after year and, again, compete very effectively against the mega banks in that space. Flipping over to the consumer side, I think the big area of opportunity for us is wealth. We've made a multiyear investment in improving our capabilities and growing the sales force and we've made an acquisition of Clarfeld to go after the ultra-high net worth and high net worth segment of the market. And I think we're on the cusp of really seeing productivity boost and deepening relationships with customers. So I expect an acceleration of revenue growth, given the investments that we've made. And we're also on the hunt there to see if we can find acquisitions that make sense. Pricing has been a stumbling block to some extent since we did Clarfeld, but we have our beat on a couple of the situations, and we'll see how things play out.

Brian Foran

analyst
#9

And then maybe coming back to mortgage, recognizing you probably -- I don't know if this is quite accurate, but you probably made about as much net income in mortgage the past couple of quarters as it took to buy the business. So a deal for the home runs and certainly want to recognize that. But it seems like some of the market data maybe is softening a little faster than I would have anticipated, spreads and purchase apps and refi apps, I don't know if you'd agree with that. But you've been very clear the business is going to normalize. This is no surprise in terms of where we're going. But in terms of the time to get there, what would you say is the state of play right now?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#10

Yes. So I think the backdrop is still pretty good around originations. So if you just kind of look at multiyear trends of originations and the kind of spike that we saw in 2020, we're still going to have the second biggest origination effort in probably the past decade this year. So the market is moving a bit from a refi-oriented market, with a bigger mix of purchase, but it still feels pretty healthy to us. The headwind has really been on the margins in the business. So you've had all the industry participants kind of gear up and add capacity to meet the demand, and that's started to crimp the margins overall in the business. And so I think that's probably come down a little faster than we anticipated coming into the year. We called that out on our first quarter call and said that it's likely that we kind of hit the -- where we think will be the bottom in the second quarter of the year and stabilize. And so that puts a little pressure on things like positive operating leverage through the first half of the year. But then once that stabilizes, the other forces of loan growth and fee growth in the categories that I referenced should kick in. And you know we're going to do a good job of expenses, which gives us confidence that we can deliver positive operating leverage and grow PPNR nicely in the second half of the year.

Brian Foran

analyst
#11

Maybe turning to expenses, obviously, you've done a great job with the first 5 TOP initiatives, and you're well on your way to delivering on TOP 6. You gave us a lot of information detail on some of the things you're working on within that. If you were to highlight 1 or 2 things that you're really excited about that could really move the needle long-term coming out of those efforts, what are you most excited about in terms of the TOP program right now?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#12

Yes. So I'd say the transformational element of TOP 6. So you may recall, TOP 6, we had a traditional program plus a transformational program and kind of the cornerstone of the transformational effort was called next-gen tech, or NGT, which basically was lifting our technology ecosystem and positioning it into the future. So moving our infrastructure to the cloud, changing the way we develop applications to an agile approach and basically create -- streamlining the architecture, creating more robust platforms that are open architecture, and we can cook into APIs. And so there's a lot of change to make the overall technology complex fit for the future, more adaptable, easy to change and to kind of innovate off of these platforms. And so we're on the path towards getting that right, and I think that unlocks a lot of great things, innovation, responsiveness to customer needs, speed to market and lower costs. So that, to me, is kind of the most salient aspect of the whole program. There's another element we added in last year as we went through the pandemic, which is the world is moving digital very quickly. Customer preference for digital is accelerating. And so how do we make this a digital-first bank? How do we look at end-to-end digitization from the first customer touch point to the back end of a transaction, and can we streamline all of that, digitize it, offer more self-service for our customers. And so that's another effort that I think is really kind of have a lasting impact at a lower cost and improved customer satisfaction, it will take out paper. So excited about that one as well.

Operator

operator
#13

And then going back to the consumer lending businesses, I mean, you hit it upfront that you do have a different tilt, a different mix than most banks, much less credit card, some more on the student lending, the merchant point of sale. That Citizens Pay business in particular, I find, is: one, investors with the growth in buy now pay later with some pretty eye popping market caps from stand-alone companies and competitors are really focusing on your business quite a bit more. Take us through what you've built there and what you see as the growth outlook because you were very early on that trend?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#14

Yes. And I'd say the point-of-sale finance is sometimes seen as equivalent to buy now pay later. It's not really one and the same. And so there's what we focus on is working with our partners in terms of how to help them achieve their sales objectives. And so we have a number of approaches that offer different products and services and twists on different kind of lending arrangements to help the customer meet their goals. And I think that's why we've been successful. We haven't -- we haven't tried to go broad and go mass and to pick up a significant customer base in terms of quantity. What we focused on is the marquee iconic platforms where we can bring our kind of focus on the customer, focus on their customer, client experience, focus on great technology that's scalable that can handle volumes like when Apple does their launch of their new phones, we can keep up with the demand and still not degrade and offer great customer experience. So I think we've built some things that we can take around to some of the bigger players in consumer electronics and retail and home improvement. We're trying to stay focused on a few verticals and really the bigger program opportunities. So BJ's being the latest one, BJ's Wholesale Club that we won. So excited by that, and we take on some of these folks with the big market caps. And I think our approach oftentimes is successful just because of the breadth of our thinking and our capabilities.

Brian Foran

analyst
#15

Let's shift gears a little bit to credit quality. I kind of chuckle myself. It was only 6 months ago, everyone was freaking out about your exposure to 2 malls. So is there a third mall in there and oh my gosh, now we're sitting there at charge-off levels that we haven't seen even pre-pandemic in a long time. I guess, increasingly, the tone of investor questions is prodding around the argument for stronger for longer for charge-offs to remain low in '22, even '23. If the customer came through the pandemic and didn't have a problem, why would they have a problem going forward? How do you think about that? Are there any worry spots left on your list? And when people prod you around stronger for longer on the credit outlook, what are some of the upside and downside risks you'd be watching?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#16

Yes. So I guess if you take a longer-term historical perspective, banks talk about what their through the cycle charge-off rate is going to be. And then maybe 8 years out of 10, you're south of that. So you're better than what that through the cycle average is. And then there's 2 years when you have a recession and your charge-offs spike, and then that results in a higher average than you'd normally see. So I think it's very realistic that we had the spike last year, and we're kind of on the glide path down. We'll be pretty close to probably below through the cycle levels already this year, but back to kind of what we had pre-pandemic, and that could be a sustainable level. If the economy stays healthy, you can see yourself operating at something we called out 35 to 45 basis points this year. But if you went back from the time of the IPO, we were probably in a 25 to low 30s type of basis point charge-off range. So I don't see anything in the consumer portfolios, people coming off forbearance, all the things that people initially worried about hasn't panned out and the charge-offs on the consumer side are lower than they were pre-pandemic, at least for a while with all this stimulation cash floating around. I think that will continue. There's no problem building up that has to correct at some point that we're going to hit a wall. I think we'll just slowly migrate back to charge-off levels over time that are kind of approaching more normal times. And in the commercial side as well, we're seeing the companies weathered the storm of weaker credits. And those most affected by the pandemic, we took our pain on that. But most of the businesses now are playing offense and seeing demand for their products and revenues rise and are thinking about how to shift to offense. So there's not a huge -- we're still monitoring the sectors that were most affected by the pandemic, but even those are showing nice smart improvement. So I think it's a pretty positive picture when you think out the next couple of years for sure.

Brian Foran

analyst
#17

Like this idea that your normalized losses is really 8 years below and 2 years above. I remember my first boss in the business used to put it, you hit normal losses twice. Once on the way up and once on the way down. So you never actually have normal losses at a moment in time. I guess one potential outcrop of that is around competition. If credit is good, if everyone is desperate for loan growth, does competition build in the system, whether it's price or structure or lending terms? What are you seeing there and what's your outlook? Do you think the industry can hold the line a little bit or is that a worry spot in your mind that competition will build, the longer credit stays low?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#18

Yes. So I would say on the consumer side, we're not seeing any particularly excessive competition on spreads. And so we've been able to hold the spreads to a large degree on the consumer side. On the commercial side, I think, year-to-date, we've probably seen a bit more froth and competition on spreads because everybody's scuffling to get some loan growth. I do think that, that abates as the liquidity build on some of these companies receipts and businesses start to play offense and start to need to invest, it will just create a bigger pie and more lending opportunities. And so hopefully, that adjusts as we look out into the second half of the year, but it's been pretty intense in the first half of the year. And I think the antidote to that for folks like us is you got to do a good job on your deposits. So if you're getting squeezed a little bit on your loan yields then you got to go back and be aggressive on your deposit pricing, and the good news there is that we're so flushed with cash and deposits that you can do that.

Brian Foran

analyst
#19

Maybe extending on that, I mean the balance sheet overall is probably in as good a shape as it's ever been. You've got CET1 capital north of 10%. Your loan-to-deposit ratio, I think, will be below 80% once HSBC is folded in. When you look around where are the opportunities to deploy cash and capital and where does it make sense to kind of hold back a little bit of dry powder?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#20

Sure. So I'd say the first thing we do when we think about where a direct capital -- let's put the dividend aside. We've got to make sure we're maintaining a good dividend payout ratio, but supporting the organic growth and positioning of the business is making sure we can fund the loan growth that we see in front of us. And I do think we're going to have some very attractive loan growth levels in the second half of the year. We have plenty of cash to support it on the liquidity side, and we have -- we're operating above our CET1 capital targets. And so we have plenty of capital to do that as well. So that's really job 1. I would say these fee-based acquisitions also are attractive to us. I think we've done a good job of finding things that work. That we're able to lever the relationships that we have and bring additional capabilities to the company. So we're not done there, and we'll continue to look at that. And then the deals like HSBC, which used 24 basis points of our CET1 when it closes, I think those make a lot of sense as well because there is certainly today opportunities to fill in your footprint and strengthen your footprint, which this HSBC opportunity does. I think there's the potential to look beyond that and see are there other little pockets where you can do something smart, but I haven't wanted to get out over our skis on overcommitting any of that to kind of whole bank acquisitions. You've got to walk before you run. You have to earn your stripes and it's a long journey. And so I think the HSBC gives us an opportunity to demonstrate that we have what it takes to execute a transaction like that and be smart about it. And if there's other situations that develop, a lot of the smaller banks are under pressure, given what you see in terms of the need to go to digital business models to upgrade their technology revenue pressure to some extent with low rates. So there might be things that fall in our lap that we can look at that we can do that make strategic sense and the numbers work, but that's not our highest priority. We've got a lot of organic growth to fund it. We have these fee-based bolt-on deals, which would be higher on the list at this point.

Brian Foran

analyst
#21

And maybe I want to come back to the consolidation point for you in the industry. But before I do it's striking to me that over the past maybe 5 years, you and a handful of your peers have been able to do acquisitions in the capital markets and wealth space, also team lift out, hires and really execute on it successfully. I mean it felt like for years and years and years, it was almost a truism that if a bank bought a capital markets team, they lose, right? It just wasn't going to work. What in your mind has changed? Why today is that such a successful strategy, whereas maybe 10, 15, 20 years ago, it was less successful, let's call it?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#22

Well, I think banks have a very broad and deep customer base. And so when you think about smaller M&A boutiques to be able to tap into those, it's very competitive out there. And so if they align with a bank that allows them to operate somewhat autonomously and keep their culture, but get enough insight of the company that they can leverage those relationships and see more flow, it's a win-win for them and for us. I think it's similar on the wealth deals to some extent as well that banks have broader capabilities and balance sheets and so they can offer if you're just an RIA shop and you're providing asset allocation advice. If you come on to a bank platform, you can also now offer mortgages or secured loans against portfolios and things. And so having that broader capability and then we also have a big customer base that they can cross-market to and get leads. And so to kind of get going on a faster growth trajectory is something that a bank can offer to those shops. So I think many of these firms -- and the one thing, Brian, that's a truism that I've seen my whole career. Once you do a print in a space, then people take notice and then you start getting the inbounds. And so when we do our first M&A boutique, Citizens is looking at that space, and let's see how that goes. And the first one goes well, and then you start to have other folks say, "Hey, we'd like to have a chat with you because we see that you know how to do this, and it's been a very successful strategy." And so that's what you want to get going. You want the flywheel to be going so you start to see more opportunities.

Brian Foran

analyst
#23

That's great. And maybe broadening out to the consolidation more broadly in the industry. I mean, you gave a very clear answer on what your ambitions are, the fee-based tuck-ins, maybe a couple of tuck-ins on the geography side. But just as you think about the industry, I mean, you mentioned the pressure on smaller banks, maybe not having enough scale to invest in technology. Do you think the industry is consolidating at a slow and steady pace or do you see an acceleration in industry consolidation over the next couple of years?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#24

Yes. I'd say at the smaller end, I think you're going to continue to see a steady deal flow, and it may actually accelerate. So I wouldn't be surprised by that at all. And if you just look back over the last 25 years and whenever we were at 15,000 banks going to 10, going to 7, going to 5, I think, we're just shy of 5,000 in this country, that's still a hell of a lot. So I think you'll continue to see banks looking for opportunities to MOE and scale up or for banks that see other banks in contiguous regions that they can get some synergies from that want to go on the acquisition trail. So I would expect to see that. I wouldn't really make a prediction on the super-regional space at this point. I think most of us have a focus on the organic growth and moving to the digital business model, and we'll be relatively opportunistic when we see chances to gain some scale. But you shouldn't do deals just for scale sake. I think it's important just to focus on carving out spaces where you can grow and where you have a right to win and make that really the centerpiece of your strategy.

Brian Foran

analyst
#25

One question I want to ask you before we go to audience Q&A or 2 actually. And I'd be remiss, but I mentioned if everyone listening in, you should see I believe on the top right of your screen, some resources, including the link to pigeonhole to be able to submit questions as well as other conference resources up there. So feel free to put questions in, and I'll take them as they come through. So what I want to get in is work from home. It's been 15 months now, give or take. What do you think goes back to pre-pandemic ways? And what do you see as something that's as things that have permanently changed from this unexpected experiment we've all lived through over the past 15 months?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#26

Yes. So I'm still a big believer in the benefit of office settings. And so we've put our money where our mouth is and built new facilities around our footprint. As our fortunes improved, we thought it was important to give our folks Class A space to operate from and make it really functional in terms of promoting collaboration, having a lot of rooms where people can work on things together and the agile teams and the way -- new ways of working. So we want to get the benefit from that. So at this point, we're encouraging people to get back in June 1. We just went to a mandatory 1 day a week in the office, and we'll scale that up over the balance of the year. So I think when you get to post Labor Day, it will feel more like it did pre-pandemic, although I would caveat that we've had great success at remote work and hybrid arrangements. And so I think there will be an element of that in the future state. Certainly, it's good for colleagues, the engagement levels are very high. If you say that's what we're going to do, people smile. That's a good thing. And so we just have to kind of see how it plays out and make sure that there's always enough critical mass in the office that there's the benefit of collaboration and that we don't have everybody out on Mondays and Fridays that we kind of stagger that so that the whole thing works. And some of that will depend by group, some of that will depend by location. So I think we'll be fairly flexible, but it will look pretty much like it did with the element of some hybrid and remote work built in.

Brian Foran

analyst
#27

And before I go to the audience Q&A, this conference has always had a high generalist investor component, just given its nature. One, I don't know if complaint is the right word, but 1 comment I hear a lot from general investors is around differentiation. How do you differentiate between the various regional banks? Aren't they all just a macro play type commentary? For an investor who's kind of sitting out there thinking that, what would you highlight? What do you think, in your mind, when you think of the 1 or 2 points that really set Citizens apart from peers in the eyes of investors, what should those be?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#28

Well, I think it starts with -- we have a very strong Board and leadership team, and we've demonstrated an ability to set a course and really execute. So we painted a vision of where we were going to take Citizens after the IPO. We've stayed in balance with building up our consumer bank and our commercial bank in lockstep, and we've made huge gains in terms of capabilities and market share and had a track record of consistent growth and execution. So I would say that's #1. And we've had a very strong commitment to financial and operating discipline being -- if we have this mindset of continuous improvement, if we want to make investments, we have to figure out how to skinny down the expense base to self-fund some of the things that we want to play offense in. So that's kind of one thing. And the second thing that's really big, I would say, is just our focus on the customer. So we're very, very focused on being the trusted adviser to an individual on their launch journey or a trusted adviser to a company as they navigate their business challenges. And that approach stands out in a crowded landscape, and it allows us to gain market share and attract good people who value the fact that our culture is very customer focused. So those would be the 2 things, Brian, that I would say, I'd put at the top of the list.

Brian Foran

analyst
#29

So maybe to jump around a little bit as I kind of sit through the questions that have come in. I guess, one that's topical is on D.C. and regulatory risk broadly, but around overdraft charges specifically. I always struggle to get my head around this issue because I look at overdraft charges as a ratio of deposits. And all they've done is done -- go down, down, down for 10 straight years. Certainly an issue that's kind of captured a little bit of press attention, captured a little bit of the moment in D.C., how do you see that playing out? How tangible a risk do you think that is for you and peers?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#30

Well, again, there's a much richer, deeper story about overdrafts and that being a service that we provide to customers who need cash advances in effect, and it's in a format that they accept that they'd sign up for over drafting. And there's many customers who view that as a way to advance funds that they need ahead of paycheck in a way that's favorable to other alternatives that they have. And so I do think there is a core service that banks should be providing. And what happens, though, is I think there is also the inadvertent overdraft that people trip on that they weren't intending to do that, and then they get irritated if they have to pay $35 for the privilege of not getting their timing just right. And so I think the industry over time has started to take some new approaches, in particular, that element is -- are there to overdraft pass. We have a $5 overdraft pass, for example, that if you go $5 overdrawn, we don't charge you an overdraft fee. That really would gall somebody, if I am $2.37 overdraft, and you have to pay a $35 charge for that. Some of the banks are working on a grace period, so you have 24 hours to cure the overdraft. And so that's another element that we're looking into. We might raise the $5. We might push out that -- so the cure period. So I think you'll see continued evolution here that will be a bit of a dead weight for banks. That fee category is not going to grow. You can't raise the price of it. You're probably going to see volume come down. The new tools to check your balances more frequently mean that people will overdraft less. And so I think that's a good thing overall, but the need for that core product still exists. And so I think it will still continue on even if it's politically attacked, I think, there's still a need for it.

Brian Foran

analyst
#31

Maybe another one, geographic migration, specifically exodus from the Northeast, got a ton of airtime during the pandemic. As we sit here, hopefully, with the pandemic ending how meaningful, if at all, do you think that was? Did you actually see any meaningful customer migration?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#32

We haven't seen meaningful from kind of the New England footprint and the Mid-Atlantic and kind of Midwest regions. It hasn't been that dramatic. But over time, people retire to Florida. And so we're certainly cognizant of that and so trying to plant some flags in Florida, in particular, as an important state, given the demographic of our customer base is important. So we now are going to have physical locations in Florida. We have our digital capabilities that people can bank with us digitally. And so we'll have to see if it makes sense to go beyond that and start opening de novos. It's pretty crowded down there. But if we're coming on the back of customers who are already familiar with Citizens can move them over to the digital offering, supplemented with well-placed branches, I think that could be a winning formula for us. And I know the question has arisen with respect to the HSBC transaction in particular. So now you're getting to New York region, that's probably where you're seeing more migration out of New York. But I wouldn't bet against New York. It may be kind of at a low point now is at a low point after the Trade Centers went down and the Great Recession, but it always seems to come back. And so there's still plenty of people and businesses and companies who need banking services. And so we're still convinced it's a smart move for us to be there.

Brian Foran

analyst
#33

Well, as a New York City homeowner, I hope you're right. I didn't feel so good for a couple of months there last year. Maybe going back to fintechs, we've kind of touched on a few different areas. The neo banks using overdrafts as a wedge into customers, the buy now pay later. When you look at fintech broadly, where do you think the greatest disruption risk is for banks? And how are you -- how is Citizens kind of working against that right now?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#34

Yes. So I think the place that we've already seen quite a bit of disruption is in the payment space. And so banks, I think, were slow to understand the threat that PayPals and Squares of the world brought to the table. And then there's many other companies that are playing for little slivers of that whole massive payment stream, and some of it is about customer primacy. So I think the banks have now kind of woken up to the challenge, and we're certainly moving aggressively towards offering additional capabilities like real-time payments through the New York clearing house. And we have Zelle as a way to person-to-person payment movement. So there's, I think, some good innovation taking part on the part of the banking industry and then individual banks making investments in new services they can offer to corporates and to individuals. So we, at Citizens, have formed an enterprise payments group. We brought in a senior payments veteran from Citibank recently to head that group, and we're prioritizing the investments that we need to make so that we can differentiate ourselves versus peers. So we're not just kind of in the pack kind of moving with the whole industry, but there are some things that we're doing that will distinguish us with our customer base.

Brian Foran

analyst
#35

I think I inadvertently answered the work-from-home versus work-from-office debate with my dog barking at the mailman in the background there. You don't have to worry about that when you're in the office. You do when you're in the basement. Maybe one thing I wanted to touch on is ESG. As part of this conference, we're running a parallel track, where some companies are extending chief ESG officers, things like that. It's kind of gone from something in the background to, I don't want to say on the front burner, but certainly more important consideration for all banks. When you think about ESG, the key things you're doing now, the key things you want to do over the next 1 to 2 years, what would you highlight right now?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#36

Yes. So I think it's certainly here to stay and something that all companies need to be very much focused on and invested in. So we do have an area inside the company that kind of leads that whole corporate social responsibility effort and reporting. I would say most banks historically always over indexed on the S. And so we're big supporters of the community and big focus on D, E and I agendas, et cetera. So I feel very good about where Citizens is there. G has also been something that as shareholder rights have evolved and increased over time. Since the IPO, we've made a number of steps to actually be right in the sweet spot of where we should be. And so I feel really good about where we are on G. I think the area that's still has the most opportunity where the bar is ratcheting up very quickly is the E, and we just hired a senior person from JPM to lead that effort for us here at the bank. We just did a materiality assessment, and we will have published targets in this June's C, S and R report. And so I think we probably, as a relatively new company, had a little ground to make up on the E, but I think we're closing fast. And hopefully, by the end of the year, we'll be and are right in line with where our peers are.

Brian Foran

analyst
#37

I'll try to hit 2 or 3 final ones here that have come through. One on capital. Can you go back to the discussion around buybacks, in particular? What do you see as the right long-term mix between dividend and buybacks for banks? And how do you see valuation beating into buybacks? Does it make sense to keep buying back stock as the stock price hopefully continues to go higher?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#38

Yes. So I think you start with what's your dividend payout policy, and we've stated that, that range is 35% to 40%. And even when you get in a downturn, that leaves you reasonably safe that you never have to take a dividend reduction or would be extremely unlikely that you would. And so I think banks have always traded well with a good dividend yield. And so that's kind of the first thing. And then I think the rest of the capital from there, you have the need to support your loan growth to do acquisitions and to buy back your stock. And so for a long time, when we were going through the fix the bank phase, we weren't doing acquisitions. And so -- and we had a capital surplus that we're coming down at glide path. So we kind of had our cake We didn't stop at 100%. We were probably running -- if you looked at the significant loan growth we had, putting a dividend on the stock and then buying back a lot of stock, we were probably at 200% all-in usage rate of what we were making and the capital ratio was coming down. I think now it's -- we're back more close to a targeted range. And so you have those trade-offs between buying back your stock, finding deals and supporting loan growth. And so to me, the kind of -- you should have a steady commitment and not build up capital. If you have the opportunity, you should be buying back stock. And I like to be in the -- anything we do, I like to be kind of a dollar average or so maybe you buy a little less if you think the stock has run a bit, but you're still in the market. And it's the same thing like when we're investing our securities portfolio, you can't just try to time the market. And so you're needing to reinvest your cash flows off your mortgage-backed securities. And so you buy a little more on dips and you buy a little less when things run, that would be kind of the philosophy around the timing of the buyback, but you shouldn't completely sit out the market.

Brian Foran

analyst
#39

And then maybe lastly, some follow-ups on your comments on commercial loan growth. I guess, one is the spirit of the comments you made earlier, is it kind of the ramp in commercial loan growth, maybe you literally anticipated is still expected, but kind of pushed out a little bit or are things tracking would you say more as you originally expected, just in terms of the timing?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#40

I think relative to kind of what we said on the first quarter call, there's not a material difference on the commercial side. So we thought that things would be stabilizing to starting to tick up in the second quarter, but then certainly growing in the second half of the year. And so I don't -- I'm not calling out a significant change from that view.

Brian Foran

analyst
#41

And I think you mentioned the ability to grow a little faster than the industry. I think as time has gone by, it's better appreciated that you're doing that, as you mentioned, with geographic and industry expansion rather than taking more risk per se. I think for a long time, that was a concern, but less so today. But as you think about some of the lessons learned as you've moved into places like Texas, like California, what's gone well? What's maybe been a learning experience that you can apply? And are there opportunities to continue to add either geographies or verticals going forward?

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#42

Yes. I'll just -- let me handle the first part of your observation, though, is that as we were growing, we actually maintained a very tight credit risk discipline. And so on the commercial side, one of the objectives we had was to play more upmarket and go after mid corporates, which are companies with $500 million revenues to $3 billion in revenues. Those are better credits. And so we grew that part of the book faster than the middle market, which is 25 to 500, which are lesser credits. And so if you looked at the average credit rating on the commercial side of the house it actually improved over that time period since the IPO. Similarly, the same thing on the consumer side. I think people said, "Wow, you're growing so fast. But we were growing in things like education refinance loans. And the point-of-sale financing where we had loss sharing arrangements with our partners. And so again, very safe lending. And so the proof of the pudding is in the eating, as they say. And so when we came through this recession, I think, you'll see when the final tallies come in that our credit performance was just as good as anybody else's. And when we look at the fed stress test, we tend to be slightly better than the peer median of the super-regional. So anyway, I would -- sometimes, you just got to prove it. And I think we've proved it reasonably well coming through this period. Lessons learned in terms of the geographies, it really starts with people and client selection. And so what's been really important for us is to get really good talent. People typically with a little gray hair who've been around the block who've been through cycles and are credit wise, who we can count on to fill the place up with the right kind of people and do the right kind of business. And so it starts with people you're vesting the authority and to grow the business. And then it's client selection, making sure that you're going after business that you have total respect for, if it's a sponsor, for example, or if it's CRE developer, it's people that you've known for a long period of time, they treat their banks well. They're good operators, et cetera. And so that's been another key to making sure that as we expand. We're not adversely selected by being a new boy into an industry or a vertical, but we're kind of focusing on the right opportunities.

Brian Foran

analyst
#43

That's great. Bruce, I want to thank you for participating. I think this is the third year in a row now. We always appreciate having you, your insights on Citizens, but also the industry. So thank you for taking the time today. Thank you, everyone, for listening in. And with that, we'll wrap up the session.

Bruce Van Saun

executive
#44

All right. Thank you, Brian. Always a pleasure.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Citizens Financial Group, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Citizens Financial Group, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.