DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 10, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Walter Pritchard
analystAll right. Thanks, everybody, for joining us again here continuing the afternoon. I'm Walter Pritchard, software analyst at Citi. And happy to have with us DocuSign and Dan Springer, the CEO of the company representing. Dan, thanks a lot for joining.
Daniel Springer
executiveGreat to be here.
Walter Pritchard
analystThanks. So we're going to -- I'm going to go through some questions I prepared, and there should be -- for everybody that's joining in on the video, there should be a tab off to your left that says question -- questions, and you could click that tab and submit a question if you want to get me a question that I can incorporate into the discussion here. So feel free to do that at any point in the discussion. So Dan, I guess it's been quite a year for DocuSign. Probably not the way you thought the year would proceed, but the company is definitely capitalized on the opportunity and shown some strong growth. Maybe you could just sort of step back and help us understand. I think digital signing is somewhat intuitive as a beneficiary of all this in this environment. But in what areas have you seen the most strength and accelerated adoption of your technology given the COVID environment?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes, absolutely. In fact, it's interesting. At the beginning of the year, our fiscal year starts February 1. Beginning of the year, we were off to a really good start. We were quite pleased. And then about halfway through the quarter, we actually saw a significant increase in demand and acceleration of demand due to COVID. And what we saw is that a lot of companies that were existing customers as well as a lot of folks that are good prospects in discussions with us very quickly wanted to get onboarded with eSignature and the core eSignature use cases, ones that you would expect, where people felt that they were doing things with paper and manual processes that were okay in an office environment but in a work from home weren't going to cut it. Sales contract was a common one. People used to, both from their own standpoint, sending out contracts, routing them around before they sent them. But then they had to send them to an office where maybe 2 or 3 people needed to sign something and normally that get routed around. Now there's no office where the customers are sitting, so they needed to do those things electronically. We also saw a lot of people with internal use cases like -- people are still hiring people. DocuSign, we've hired 1,000 people since COVID. We have to get offer letters out to people, and there wasn't a way to sort of send them someplace, have them get sent back and processed because no one was there to receive them. So those are kind of use cases where people kind of urgently needed them to put in place. And the other big area was there's a lot of COVID-related use cases: health care, small business administration, PP programs where people needed to -- it just didn't have a model for what they would do in that scenario. So we saw quite a good acceleration in the business. That's why we had -- Q1, we had 59% billings growth. Pre-COVID, we'd only once been above 40% billings growth, so it was bigger than Q2. We just announced a 61% billings growth. And some of that is our business is strong, and some of it is definitely because of COVID. And then on the flip side, the only real sort of headwind, I'd say, Walter, is we had this phenomenon where some of our small businesses are really being put into an existential dilemma. Can they survive? And so we could see that on the small business exposure be something -- both today and in the future, could be problematic. And then certain industries. So if you're in the travel hospitality industry, as an example, you're feeling really challenged. And so some folks there that were either existing customers looking to expand or prospects looking to come on, we see some slowness from those verticals. But the net of the kind of tailwinds were significantly stronger than the headwinds, and so we did see acceleration in the business.
Walter Pritchard
analystAnd then you give the -- you give customer metrics and you give metrics around the dollar-based net expansion. And we've seen an uplift in both. I think probably what it's looked like to me is more upside around the customer numbers. And can you talk about sort of how that's played out with -- have you had existing customers who were starting on eSign and dramatically accelerated, and that's just sort of buried in the dollar-based net retention? Or has it really been the new customers that have -- from your purchase of the company, you've seen sort of come in, in a major way?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. It's been both. I think you actually hit the 2 best metrics I like to talk about, Walter, in terms of trying to describe the impact. So put numbers for the folks that are not as familiar with the DocuSign story. But our dollar net retention rate has historically been between about 112% and 119% when we went public. That's what we kind of guided the way we thought we would be and where we have been historically, and you're pretty much right about the middle of that. And then actually, even before COVID, that started inching up a little bit, and then we hit the 119%. We were pleased, this last quarter, we went above that. So outside of that range we'd experienced at 120% and we think that's going to continue to be a strong metric for us going forward. And I think that's indicative of what you described with our existing customer base just growing more with us. But on the new customer add side, you're also right. If you look at the first half of last year, we were adding 3,000, 4,000 customers, new customers for direct customers, not counting the web and mobile. But these are the ones that come and have a relationship directly with the sales rep at DocuSign. That was 3,000, 4,000, and now it's been, in the last 2 quarters, 10,000 each quarter. So that's a fairly substantial impact. But from an impact on our financials today, those net new customers don't add that much of an impact relative to the size of a tripling, more than a doubling, almost the tripling there because we tend to have that land-and-expand model. So they're initial contracts and oftentimes be relatively small. And then with the 120% net retention rate, we grow them over time. So from a dollar impact in the short run metrics, it was very evenly weighted between the new acceleration, the new versus the acceleration in the base.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And then, I guess, relative to the U.S. and international markets, there's been some legal differences in how the systems are set up, and you had seen much stronger business in the U.S. historically than in international markets. But could you talk a little bit about how the impact has differed in those 2 general theaters?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. So I think the answer is not very different. We haven't seen a lot of difference from a COVID impact on our international business versus our domestic business. Our international business has been growing a little faster than the domestic business. I mean domestic is going at quite a clip right now, too, so international is trying to take share. It's hard to take share when the base business is growing as fast as it is. But if you look at this last quarter, our total revenue growth was 45%, and the international was about 60%. So it is growing faster. I don't think that's particularly COVID-related. I think that was already happening prior, and a lot of it is just growing off a smaller number. So it's easier to have the higher rate. 80% -- 81% of our revenue still is domestic, and just the 19% international, which is a big focus area for us, and it's why we obviously announced that Mike Sheridan, our CFO, is going to move into his key role, as the President of International for us to really drive that international growth. We think it is our single biggest growth opportunity on top of all the things we're doing well today, and when we see opportunities to do more, that's the single biggest one I see. So thrilled to have Mike leading that effort to try to accelerate even faster outside of the U.S.
Walter Pritchard
analystAnd on that end, I mean, e-signature in the U.S. is something I think -- it started to become sort of a accepted technology. DocuSign has a brand. There's sort of a network effect. Can you compare sort of how you're thinking about the network effects internationally, how COVID is -- has driven that? Realizing when I say international, it really is country by country, and so wanted to hear you incorporate that in.
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. Well, to your point, there is some global business that does go across border, for sure. When we look at our transactions, the dominant component is within a country, to your point. So I would say that the COVID impact, I don't think, again, has been super strong in driving international disproportionately. But I think what's happening is because the brand, as you said, was so strong in the United States, we were well understood because people are now finding themselves in situations in other countries where they're work from home and they need to find a solution, is driving more people to find us. So we're closing some of that gap on our brand recognition in other countries vis-à-vis where it is in the United States, and so I think, over time, that will help us close that revenue gap I was describing, where our penetration outside of the U.S. is smaller than we'd like to see it. So I do think COVID will probably accelerate a little bit that establishment of the DocuSign brand in additional markets.
Walter Pritchard
analystAnd how are you thinking about -- we had Kelly Steckelberg, who's the CFO of Zoom, on earlier today, and we were talking about some of these sort of effects in their business, which I think these are 2 companies that have seen just quite a dramatic impact. From a sales and marketing perspective, marketing and brand awareness and this sort of general sort of overhead, you kind of air cover activity that you've done a lot of in the past. What have you done to reallocate or, if at all, marketing and sales spending, sort of accounting for the fact that you're now getting this sort of uplift and recognition from kind of more organic processes?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. Well, actually, interesting. We see so much extra demand that we're actually looking to double down and pull forward growth spending, whether that's hiring reps, whether that's more online marketing and advertising spend. We're saying we want to do more because we just see that demand has accelerated forward. So we want to meet that demand. And we feel good about how it played out in the first half, and we want to look for that opportunity to do more of that in the second half as well. Talking about Zoom, interestingly, I had a conversation with Eric Yuan about this the other day. And one of the things they're seeing, the same thing we're seeing is more opportunity in that direct business, the digital direct business or e-commerce business because people are seeking us even more than we need to seek them. And some of those things are like Google Search and online advertising, and some of it is around building the brand, as you described. So I think we'll see an opportunity. I don't think we'll get as much of a percentage as Eric has of his business in digital, but I think we see it as an opportunity for us to have a bigger portion of our business. And we are definitely going to double down on that marketing more to people who are, again, out looking for, in this case, an e-signature solution. But it'll be true for the overall DocuSign Agreement Cloud overall. It's just that the entry point most companies have into the DocuSign Agreement Cloud is still eSignature because it's such a high ROI. It's so fast to implement and get value that, in times like these, it's the place that most people will start.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And just as you sort of think about the sales and marketing strategy, you're obviously having a lot of business come to you right now. As you look out a year from now, 2 years from now, how do you expect to adjust sort of the way you're going to market given what you've seen in terms of a massive amount of awareness over the short-term here? Is it just get back to kind of business as usual? Or do you think there's an adjusted playbook that you'll put in place over the long term?
Daniel Springer
executiveWell, I think it's interesting. There's a lot of things. It's funny. When you think about the work-from-home world, I don't think it's ever going to go back to the old normal. I think there'll be a new normal. We don't know exactly what it is. When we look at our own business, we've realized there's a bunch of jobs we thought needed to be 100% in the office that we're saying, wow, they're working pretty well outside of the office. So it's changing our view. So I don't know exactly what the new normal will look like. But my instincts are telling me that we will not be the way we used to be, both the way we operate our company or the way we sell and market, but we'll be somewhere in between where we are today and where we used to be. And I think from a standpoint, again, for us, we look at that increment as an incremental growth opportunity. And so we're looking to spend, quite frankly, more aggressively than we were spending. We're still getting improvement in our margin because the top line is growing faster. But we're not thinking about this as, so do the same thing. We get a onetime bump that falls to the bottom line. We're saying how do we reinvest that surplus to set up many years to come of higher growth than we would have otherwise had.
Walter Pritchard
analystAnd in the customer count, which has been substantially higher than we had modeled at the beginning of the year, you mentioned revenue contributions there are modest at least upfront from those customers. But as we -- and so hopefully, you get to see the benefits of those upsell over the next 12 and so forth months. But as we think about we get into next year and so forth and even the second half of the year, how do you think about any of the dynamics that you've seen so far that's maybe pulled forward some of those customers versus not? And just trying to sort of set expectations around how we should think about modeling that, even though we understand, I think it doesn't drive a lot of in-period revenue.
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. Well, so 2 thoughts. First one is want to get sort of quantitative. Mike put out a guidance for the second half, and the nice thing about this quarter is you end up getting both a third quarter and a fourth quarter number by getting the third -- the next quarter and the end of the year. And now Cynthia, of course, fantastic new CFO that we're so thrilled to have in this role, and it's hard to replace Mike Sheridan, but I think we found someone that can absolutely do that, which I think is awesome for us. I think you're going to see her talking a lot about the same concept that Mike has always spoken about. We're giving guidance to what we can see, where we have visibility. Sometimes that will appear to be conservative because we'll say we're not going to guess, but that's what we can see. We're giving you the visibility we've got. And we got that feedback from this last call. But there's a lot of uncertainty right now in the world. And again, we talked about the headwinds that we'll also get for some of our small businesses, so it's hard to understand how that'll play out. So from a quantitative standpoint, we've put out the guidance in the second half that we see. It's still significant increases from where we were before, not at the same growth level we had at the first half, which is sort of unprecedented levels that we've had. Going forward, I think you're going to see more of the same. I think we're saying that the people that have pulled forward those use cases that they probably would have done anyway, we believe there's plenty more use cases behind them. So it's not a situation that we think they pulled forward and now we're going to have a gap. Next year, we're all -- all the getting that was gotten is done. And one of the reasons we feel really strongly about that, as we look at this from a TAM standpoint, kind of if we think about the construct -- we see about a $25 billion global TAM for eSignature alone and then about another $25 billion-ish for the rest of the Agreement Cloud opportunity and you look at where we are, we'll do in the $1.3 million, $1.4 million revenue this year, both of that being eSignature, it's still a tiny penetration. So we're very early days even in our most mature markets, and we feel like the growth potential here within our base is substantial. So from that standpoint, we think we're going to continue to operate at this new, sort of, higher level, and it's not going to be any giveback. And the thing I think some industries in work from home or in a tricky spot right now is if people stop working from home, will people go back to the old system? We don't believe in the signature-centric world or the Agreement Cloud world. People are going to say, "You know what, now that I'm back in the office, I want to start doing paper-based contracts. I want to FedEx some to the people. I want to wait a week to get them back. I want to have all of those other challenges." They're not going back. The savings are significant in time, in money. There's a better customer experience in the process. So we really don't think anyone's going back to paper once they switch, and we think it's just going to empower them to see the benefits they've gotten and the ROI they've gotten to want to do more. So we're pretty bullish on that stand.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. One question that came in that's -- I think the last one for now on eSignature because I want to talk about some other topics, but there's been -- you've seen volume growth. You've -- I just want to understand. You have customers that have certain sort of volumes contracted on an envelope basis that are in their agreements with you. To what extent have you seen customers come back and early sort of upped their volume commitments? And then pricing as well. I guess I'd expect in any market where volumes are exploding, the pricing continues to come down to drive more volume. But what's been the sort of impact of pricing in this environment?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. Yes. So 2 things. One on the first piece around the volume, we have seen dramatic increases in volumes. But remember, we actually price on capacity, so we go to a customer and say you're going to use this level of capacity for 1 year or 2 years or 3 years, whatever the length of their contract is, and they -- we come to an agreement. If they start to go way over, we'll come back to them and say, "Hey, you're using way more than you're contracted to. Let's renew your agreement early and get you the right set of volume." If someone's a slight bit above their volume, we just wait until the contract comes to the end and do it. We don't go back and try to charge overages in most situations. So from that standpoint, if people are going over by a little, it doesn't have any change in the impact. It gives us a nice setup for their renewal because they're very well utilized. We actually love it when people are using all of their volume. Our gross margins are high. The incremental cost of volume is not so high to us. So it's not an overage model when we get that extra [ usage ]. But it is an opportunity then, as you said, if they're dramatically over, to early renew; and if they're a little bit over it, just sets up for a strong renewal. So that's kind of the first piece. In terms of pricing, we have not seen any real changes in our pricing. And we review -- we do it on a quarterly, [ this thing ], right, before our earnings call. So if we get these kind of questions, we can give people a thoughtful answer. And we look at it by geography. We look at it by size of customer. We do very detailed analysis. And frankly, we've seen very little change in our price characteristics. I think the value that we get is high. And I think, quite frankly, we're priced at a place where the ROI is very, very high. The other alternatives are not nearly as good relative to the price point we charge, so we're not getting a lot of price pressure from that standpoint. We do see price pressure in competitive deals because the only thing other people can really do to try to compete with DocuSign is to come in and bundle or if you wait for free sometimes but try to dramatically lower price. And we just see most of our customers look at it and say it's just not an attractive option. And it's not that surprising, Walter, because if you think about software, there are very few companies who have actually been successful saying, "Our software is going to be not as good as someone else's, but we're going to make it cheaper. And then people are going to buy it." People tend not to buy software with that mindset of how do I buy cheaper software. It doesn't mean they don't beat up on their vendors to say they want to pay less, but they don't really make a lot of switching cost for a lower-priced player if they think the higher-priced player has better software because, again, the ROI tends to be pretty high. The value proposition is pretty high. It's not worth giving a 20% lower price, that sounds like a lot, if it degrades the value, the implementation and the software. And then the last piece is even in a SaaS world, people still embed us. They use our APIs to connect in with their processes. They integrate with their other software. They use our integrations with 350 software integrations like SAP with SuccessFactors or Ariba or Salesforce for their CRM tool. So we've built -- Microsoft with their CRM tools. We've built these connectors, and so people get integrated with us. It tends to not be a thing where they want to come back and say, "We're going to threaten to leave if you don't give us 15, 20, 30, whatever, percent cheaper." So our pricing therefore hasn't had to change very much.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And on -- so moving to the Agreement Cloud, which you've mentioned a couple of times. If I go back 1.5 years ago or so, I mean, you had acquired SpringCM. You'd start to roll that out. I think there was a quarter even in the mix where you -- the business overall had slowed down because you pushed pretty hard on the Agreement Cloud. Where are you in terms of sort of trying to push the broader messaging around Agreement Cloud into customers? How are you sort of carving that up into pieces that are easy to consume so they can do it in a more natural way? And you talked about COVID as, for sure, had to focus on eSign for now but help us put into perspective the broader context.
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. So the last piece, no question, our field organization, as I would expect them to do, is saying people are standing in front of me demanding eSignature. We're a customer success organization. We're going to give them eSignature. And what I always say to our field force is that when you start any conversation with a prospect or existing customer, you say DocuSign is the Agreement Cloud company and we're here to help you prepare, sign, as you know us for, act on and then manage all of your digital agreements. And that's the company we are. Now if that customer says back to us, okay, that's great and I appreciate that vision -- and they do tend to be quite excited about the vision because it's a vision we developed with feedback from the customers. But then if they say I want to get started with eSignature right now or I need to expand my eSignature, we say, yes, ma'am, or yes, sir, we have eSignature for you. We're not going to kind of push them to our vision if they need -- their business needs today are more on signature. But we're passionate about what we believe will be that long-term success is the next big cloud opportunity is in fact going to be the DocuSign Agreement Cloud, and it is going to take all of those components. The way we sort of bite-sized it, to your point, which I think is a good way to think about it, is we have the SpringCM acquisition, which we did, is actually 2 years ago. I know time flies, but 2 years ago this month, we finalized the deal with Spring. And we've now taken their software integrated with some of our work and created DocuSign CLM. And so CLM is that core product that we're selling that came out of that deal. We also closed this last May, the Seal acquisition. Now Seal, we'd already been selling with jointly for the advanced analytics product and for Intelligent Insights. So what we're now trying to do is look at those 2 pieces, the sort of the AI tool, the CLM tool and start to sell those through our channel, our own internal channel of our existing sales force into our customers. And I think what happened -- if you think about the end of last year, we've kind of reported that the CLM progress, DocuSign CLM, became top on the Gartner survey in the upper right quadrant with one other player. And it was going very well, and we were ahead of plan for what our expectations were. And at the same time, we get to the COVID, and this is one of the few areas of our business that was actually not positively impacted. A lot of companies said this is a big purchase, the CLM purchase. I need to get a systems integrator or some professional services help in signing SOW. More people need to be therefore involved in my company and the transaction, and that's elongating some pieces. So we saw that go from being ahead of plan to a little bit behind where we'd like it to be. And I think through this year, we sort of said we'll catch back up. We see that pipeline building now. CIOs and CFOs are starting to say we're still on a remote work environment. But I need to upgrade my contracts management process. And so I still need to do that work, even though it's harder to do it in a work-from-home environment. But we see that, that demand will come out of this year back at where we wanted it to be prior, for the other sort of Agreement Cloud functions, again, focusing on CLM and the advanced analytics.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And as we think about just sort of this furthering the kind of road map around the system of agreement, I think you started out with the sort of upfront part of an agreement where you and I might exchange documents. We might use Dropbox. We might use OneDrive. We might just e-mail it. There's an Adobe Document Cloud for example. How do you see yourselves, especially on that part of it, sort of inserting yourself into what's a landscape that's already, I would say, populated with a number of different mechanisms for us to start our process?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. I think we're thinking about it in 2 pieces. Again, we don't have that prepare versus the sign side, and prepare is where it really gets to the creation of the document. And I think we're still going to see that the bulk of DocuSign agreements will come from someone taking a Microsoft Word document and entering it into the system and then using DocuSign workflow and DocuSign software to send it to someone to sign. But we've built pretty thoughtful integrations like with Salesforce as an example, first one for us on Prepare, and we're extending that. We started off with this model of, hey, if you're in their CRM tool and you effectively say I need to get a sales contract, we can actually have you build that native to DocuSign. So if you get down the sales process and you negotiate a contract and someone wants to change something after you sent it for signature, that you can edit that live and make those changes on both parties and then proceed with the transaction. In the past, we'd say, cancel that envelope. Go back to Microsoft Word. Edit and make that change. Put it back in the system. It's not a terrible system. But if a contract was going to have 3 or 4 times where it got -- that it keeps getting canceled and starting over, there's a little bit of extra work. So we think that negotiate piece could be really powerful within that system. But I think, I'd say going forward, again, we expect the bulk of these agreements that occur, people will offer them in another system, and we'll continue to look for opportunities. We mentioned the Salesforce CRM. They've also come back to us to say, "Hey, we also do bill presentment through our CPQ product." Could that be an opportunity to use DocuSign to build that kind of a document generation system? I think you'll see us look for more and more of those opportunities, particularly with our key partners, to build up more of a -- just sort of really valuable consumer experience and customer experience, sending it to the end consumer around ease of creation and then management of that workflow of the documents. So I think that will be a growth area for us.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And then on the notary side, you entered that space through an acquisition. And I think we all -- we've always had an interaction with the notary in some transaction that we've done. I think you talked first about the sort of first priority notary market and then the third-party notary market. How do you sort of paint the maybe ultimate future where you participate sort of broadly in that market? And maybe paint the vision first and then would love to hear a little bit about what needs to happen for that vision to be fulfilled.
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. So we already had an electronic notary capability, but it required people to be in the same place. And so while it was a cool thing, if you and your notary were sitting some place, you can do it electronically. It's maybe easier to keep copies and it just was a more modern digital experience. But in a COVID world, we started to realize the real win here is not having that people be in the same place. And so we actually tried to accelerate that and turn our electric -- electronic notary into a remote online notary. And so the purchase of Liveoak, which gave us that online collaboration capability, is really what's going to enable that to happen. And you're right. We're starting off with first-party notary. And for those who aren't as familiar, what that means is if you're a company that has your own notary capability, like you're a big bank and you're opening accounts for somebody like a lot of our big banks do, they say, "I want to do that in my branch. I can't do it in my branch anymore. I need to not do that in a remote way, but I can still be the notary. I just -- internal notary, I just need to do this in a remote way." So that's the first piece we're going after. And that data is -- we already have customers in pre-beta, but beta will be out in a couple of months. And then we think that should be at the beginning of the next year, a live product and our big customers that a lot will be financial services, some health care, where they want to have a notarized agreement, if someone's usually like opening an account or making a big commitment of dollars or something, they have that functionality. And it gives more of a heightened, if you will, legality to the agreement. At the same time, we see that third-party notary opportunity, which is, as you said, it's kind of the mom-and-pop notary business where people are out there. They're traveling around or you're going into a Kinko's. I guess those are now called FedEx. Going to a FedEx center and they have a notary there. We believe that can also go online in notary in a way, and we'll look at building out a network of notaries in each state because most of the notary regulation is state specific. So people -- those notaries can move to a much more efficient way to do their work, and our customers can benefit from that ease of use of getting documents notarized, going up dramatically. So it's kind of a 2 stepper, and that'll probably be like a year away before we get that in a third-party notary after rolling out first-party notary at the beginning of the New Year.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And as it relates to the business model there, I assume this is a sort of a per signature, per envelope type of a model. Could you help us understand sort of how -- is that at a premium price to a basic eSign?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. We're still finalizing some of the pricing even on the third-party piece. But how Liveoak was doing it and how we were thinking about it is exactly what you said. It'll end up being a volumetric piece on the number of notarized documents and not the number of notary because sometimes the document, you might notarize 1 document 3 times for different clauses or different aspects. But we probably do that same we do per envelope here [ to be ] per document. And it will definitely be a higher price point than eSignature because there's a lot more involved in the software and in the process of executing that notary.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. Got it. Wondering just as it relates to -- you've done 3 acquisitions that we've covered here. And when -- as it relates to future M&A, I mean, they've all been similar size, sort of similar sort of playbook, it feels like. But how are you thinking about just potentially larger acquisitions? Are there geographic consolidation type of deals? What are sort of the ways you might use M&A, especially as it relates to the -- what you've done in the past?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. What's interesting is we -- 2 things. One is we hadn't done deals for many years. And when I joined almost 4 years ago, my concern was that I didn't think we executed our M&A as well as we could have in the past. So I was a little bit -- let's go really slowly. And I wanted to make sure we figured out a way to ease in and ensure successful integration. So after we did Spring 2 years ago, I said we're not doing another one until we can put hand on heart and say we have successfully integrated this business. Fortunately, that happened. Set up the opportunity to go deeper with Seal software. Now Seal, we closed that in May, and then we announced just a couple of months later the Liveoak deal. The Liveoak is a lot smaller organization than Seal or Spring, but there are certain things that are just sort of the same, right? It's the same amount of work. In some cases even, it's a smaller deal. But we felt so good about the progress on the Seal integration, we're able to very quickly do the third. So I guess, by that, I'm saying, I think we have the capacity to do a higher velocity of deals. But I'm not sure that means we will. I mean just -- I think we now feel comfortable we have the capacity. And now we have added even more firepower in our new CFO because Cynthia, of course, had been the Head of Corp Dev at Twitter, and before that, she was a tech investment banker. So she's got a lot of experience, obviously, there. So I think we've got all the capability to do more. In terms of doing bigger, I'm not really sure. I'm not sure we'll see a lot of that. Our M&A is going to be focused on driving our Agreement Cloud strategy. Seeing those places around the overall Agreement Cloud, where we think instead of building it ourselves, we can accelerate at our pace of innovation for our customers by finding someone who already has domain expertise. Maybe they've built out some really useful software already that we can integrate into our business, and we say let's buy it instead of building it. But I don't think there's a lot of giant companies in the Agreement Cloud, at least not relative to DocuSign's size, that we could purchase because there just aren't that many companies that are a very big scale in that Agreement Cloud space. So that's kind of my perspective on it. We're not -- we're open. We're agnostic to whether we will do more frequent or bigger deals. I just don't think there are likely going to be a lot of much bigger deals sort of game changer about the company size. I just don't think there are those companies out there. But I mean if they were there, if we find them, we'd be open to doing it. We don't see them as much. And then on the velocity, yes, we could probably up the velocity given our confidence that we're now integrating well. But I'm not sure that I think there would be a big increase in velocity because I think we're seeing there about the right number of opportunities to kind of continue at the pace we're at right now.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. Okay. That makes sense. And then 2 other questions I had. One on just on the Fed opportunity. You've kind of gone through that process of getting the right certifications, and I think there's probably almost no other market in the world that pushes more paper around than government organizations. Where are you with the go to -- the certifications of the product, which I assume is the same, and the go-to-market around Fed? And what are your expectations in the coming year there?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. So I think we feel very good about what we've built out. And when we talk -- we tend to talk about government, including state, local and Fed, but I can speak specifically to Fed. Fed has certain characteristics that are different than state and local and certain that are similar. It's easier to be successful in state and local if you're FedRAMP approved as an example. So if the federal government gives you that good housekeeping seal of approval, it does help state and local governments, but they don't require it the same way as certain federal agencies do. So we had a lot more traction historically in state and local than we did in federal before we got the FedRAMP certification. The next big piece we talked about was this IL4. So it's basically a separate data center where the government data is going to reside, not co-mingled with commercial businesses. And we finished the work on that, and we're at our sort of final stages of just being certified by the government. And so we're hopeful that will be done very quickly. But it's up and running and functional. And post certification, we think that will also increase our ability to serve more agencies. I would tell you this, though, about federal. Of all the state and local groups, I think it's going to continue to be the slowest moving. And so we're super excited about the long-term opportunity. And they're very sticky customers, I think, for DocuSign, but it's going to take multiple quarters to get there, to get the full advantage of what we built out with that dedicated IL4 database -- data center.
Walter Pritchard
analystYes. Got it. Got it. And then another question I get around kind of longer term and there's some kind of technology buzzwords and early-stage technologies out there. Blockchain is something that I think has the promise to folks that have never met to sort of share something, come to an agreement and end up -- it's entered in the registry and everything is sort of hunky-dory. How do you think about blockchain as a competitive technology, maybe with others using it? How have you looked at using blockchain technology in your own service potentially into the future?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. Yes. So we look at blockchain as an underlying technology that we think is actually quite intriguing. There's challenges with blockchain to date because it doesn't have the scale to provide attractive economics. So we built a partnership with Ethereum a few years ago, which is an open environment, open source blockchain network and which we think is the best one. We think they're very good. And we've created the opportunity for our customers. They want to want to build sort of engagement with us on the backbone of blockchain because they can store all those agreements in the Ethereum blockchain forever. The challenge is the cost is about an incremental $1 per agreement. And if you think about our total cost to deliver a full -- [ an acquisition ] on the signature component, but everything from the creation to the identity checking to the workflow capability, just soup to nuts down through an agreement, it cost us about $0.07. So to spend $1 just on the storage is a little bit crazy. That's why I always say the few customers we have today that have done blockchain implementations with DocuSign, they are highly correlated, in fact, a 1:1 correlation with the people who have done a press release, internal or external, about doing a blockchain project and they are sort of looking to test the technology, which is also -- it's all good, but it's not economically sort of viable or feasible, rational to use blockchain in the math today. It's going to have to come down an order of magnitude or maybe 2. But I believe that could happen. So I think the answer is a super promising future technology. It's just not economically viable at scale today.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. And one more question here that just came in on the question submission, was just around the competitive angle. We talked a little bit about this, but the question was around which of the competitors have you seen. Have you seen anybody capitalize on the environment similarly to how you have and sort of come up more in competitive situations in the last, say, 4 or 5 months that this has been going on?
Daniel Springer
executiveYes. So 2 things. One, we talked about this a little bit, to your point, on the pricing piece. I think the answer is we haven't seen a different net impact from competitors in terms of pricing. We just haven't seen them in the marketplace in a different way. But I think people who are using e-signature product are competitive to us, are probably also doing well. And so if we look at what Adobe has talked about, what HelloSign or now, pardon, Dropbox and the eSign product that Adobe bought, a signature product as well, 7 or 8 years ago that's called EchoSign, and so those companies are reporting that their e-signature business have been very strong. That doesn't surprise us for the same reasons we're seeing that great demand, they would as well. I think we're still growing faster than they are. From what they've reported, Adobe has actually given numbers when they had specific growth, and it's been way less, almost half as much as our growth. So I feel like we're still taking share, and the competitive threats don't seem to me to be any more significant than they were before. And I think our position is still true that our competition is paper. It's paper and manual processes. It's not someone else, not to us, on the technology side.
Walter Pritchard
analystGot it. Great. Well, Dan, appreciate the time here. We've run out of it, but it has been a good discussion. And I wanted to thank you especially for participating, your support of the conference here. It's helped make the event a success.
Daniel Springer
executiveGood. I'm glad, and it's always great to connect with you, Walter.
Walter Pritchard
analystAll right. Great. Thanks, and have a great afternoon evening, everybody. We'll see you back -- we do have a later -- late night session with Atlassian, so from -- live from Australia. So I'll just put in a plate for that and we'll talk to, everybody, later.
Daniel Springer
executiveWe love Atlassian. Go for it.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete DocuSign, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to DocuSign, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.