Everforth, Inc. (ASGN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

December 3, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Information Technology IT Services conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#1

Thank you, everybody, for joining us. My name is Ryan Fenske. I cover high-yield services here at BofA. Here with me today, we've got ASGN and from the company, thrilled to have Ted Hanson, Chief Executive Officer; and Chris Donnini, Vice President and Treasurer. Guys, thanks for taking the time and being with us.

Theodore Hanson

executive
#2

Thank you, Ryan, for having us.

Chris Donnini

executive
#3

Thank you.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#4

All right. Great. So to kick us off, can you just provide a quick overview of the ASGN for anyone less familiar with the story?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#5

Sure. So the best way to think about ASGN is IT services to large enterprise accounts. About 70% of our business is in the commercial marketplace serving clients that are in the Fortune 500 and 1,000. 30% of the business is in the federal government space. There, we provide high-end IT solutions to Department of Defense, Intel and a few key Fed civilian agencies. We grew up as an IT staffing business, which is the heritage of by our service offering, but we have been on a pivot to build off of that and serve the customer at a higher level with more consultative capabilities. And so now that consulting -- total consulting part of our business is about 6% revenues and our traditional legacy IT staffing is about 40% of revenues.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#6

Okay. Great. And as you just mentioned, the business has evolved quite a bit over time to really focus on that long-term higher-margin consulting work. the majority of your revenues are now in IT consulting. I guess can you speak to how this transition has taken place over the years and where you're at in the journey today?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#7

Sure. So one of the things that we saw through these customer relationships that we've had for years and decades is that the customer we had built [ Pascual's ] trust and through our capabilities to provide technical resources through the IT staffing program. But our end customer who is the CIO, CTO or IT directors across large enterprise organizations began to pull on us to do more and said, you've got really rich technical capabilities and resources. Could you step in, put bigger teams together, wrap it with some project management and engagement management and help me get to certain deliverables? And so it was an organic pull from the customer. So 7, 8 years ago, we began to do that. We built a business in commercial that was organically upwards of $500 million in revenues. We began to make a few key small strategic tuck-in acquisitions to put certain solution capabilities in the mix that were better bought versus built over a long period of time. And today, we do about $1.2 billion in revenues in commercial. And along that journey, we also made our entry into the federal government space with our acquisition of ECS in 2018. And so that's really how our consultative capability here has come together.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#8

Okay. Excellent. And then sticking with IT consulting, I guess, can you explain how ASGN's go-to-market strategy differs from the traditional consulting players? And what advantages does the strategy have to both ASGN's operations as well as to your customers?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#9

Yes, I think that's the key. I mean, obviously, there's a lot of traditional consulting firms that have been out there a long time. They run a bench model where all their resources sit on their bench. And as they win work, they begin to unload that bench, if you will, on to the projects that they're performing for the customer. We're differentiated from them and the fact that we really don't carry a bench to speak of. It's very thin. All of our 80% or more of the players on every project team comes from our IT staffing capability, and that means we're building a just-in-time team and we can get started very quickly. The resources on that team are much more custom bit to what the need is because we're not just deploying who's on the bench. We're actually purposely building a custom fit team. And then last, because we're not carrying a bench and the cost of that bench and underutilization, we're not having to charge a customer for that. So our price points come in at an advantage, if you will, be the big traditional consulting firm.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#10

All right. That's excellent. Getting a bit more granular on the go-to-market. I mean, you have customers across 5 key commercial verticals and the sixth vertical being the federal government, I guess, Ted, you often say that your customer base is one of the gold nuggets of the ASGN business model. I guess, can you speak to that topic a bit further and maybe provide a brief update on some of the positive industry vertical trends that you guys saw in the most recent quarter?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#11

Yes. So look, I mean, I think our belief is and the data supports it, that much IT dollars are spent by large enterprise accounts. So they're the biggest spenders. They are the most consistent spenders over time and adopter of new technologies. And so when you have a customer that's a large enterprise, Fortune 500 or 1,000 accounts, that's not just a customer for this project. That's a customer for life. If you build the right relationship and perform at a high level on all the various work that you do. So that's been critical, if you will, to the critical pillar, if you will, here inside of the company. And I think importantly, if you think about accounts, large enterprise accounts, you want to have them be diverse and spread across multiple industry segments because it gives a portfolio balance. Typically, financial services and big banks are the first and fastest adopters of new technology followed by TMT certain consumer, industrial, health care and then eventually get to the federal government, but it goes in a wave like that. And so again, when one industry or 2 are down, the others are up and so having a balanced portfolio of large enterprise accounts, I think, is a key way to build the business over a period of time. Today, in the commercial marketplace, we're still in a place where the customer has been restraining spending that's not critical. So if it's discretionary, they've been pulling back because they've been worried about the macro. Are we going to have a recession? Is it going to be a harder soft landing? How might the election play in all of this as it relates to the macro for each one of these customers? So there's been a lower level of spend on the IT services part of being here for the last 18 to 24 months. I think now that we have the election behind us, I think customers also see that the macro is probably more stable than how they felt over previous few quarters that as we get into '25 and into '26, we're going to see more normal levels of spending. And we're starting to see certain industry segments emerge back to growth, starting with TMT. That was a double-digit grower for us in the last quarter, and our consumer industrial business was slightly up. So instead of having no industries in commercial growing year-over-year, we now have 2 in the third quarter. And then I think very importantly, we saw our banking industry -- but I'll say, find stability. So for the first time, quarter-over-quarter, it was stable, and we didn't see a further sequential decline. So that was a positive thing. And I think here, as we go forward, we'll see some of these other industries begin to emerge back towards growth year-over-year sequentially.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#12

Okay. Great. And you mentioned some of the industries and verticals where you're seeing growth, I guess, in terms of specific capabilities that you're offering, AI has been very topical this year. I guess what does that opportunity set look like today for ASGN? And how do you see that evolving over time?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#13

Yes. So certainly, AI is the top of a conversation, but it's not an area of big spend yet for the end client. I think most of the spend that you're seeing in the AI area is the explosion of the data center to get compute power and the requirement around chips from NVIDIA and others in order to harness that processing power. And so that's the first part of the cycle, if you will. Now emerging, you're starting to see large software enterprises begin to enable some AI features like virtual assistance into their software. So some native AI capabilities. But none of this has gotten to the customer and the point where they begin to implement any of these either software packages or services with us to really begin to put AI into play inside their organization. That will definitely happen here, but it's -- typically, this technology investment cycle goes in stages, not too dissimilar to this.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#14

Okay. Makes perfect sense. And what are some of the other areas that have been most in demand by your client base? I mean you spoke a lot about data and analytics as well as cybersecurity projects on the most recent earnings call, as you've mentioned a number of key federal government task orders in Q3 that are progressing nicely as well.

Theodore Hanson

executive
#15

I think -- I mean, I think those are the areas. I mean, customers are on the front end of doing data and data modernization activities in order to get ready for AI. It's a growing piece of spend. It's not full throttle yet, but it's definitely starting. Cyber has been very strong for us, both in the government and commercial to areas of application development have been strong. Migration to the cloud has been good and consistent. Our work in ServiceNow, where an elite partner to ServiceNow in North America. That continues to be a growth area for us off of an acquisition that we made in July of 2022. And I think that those -- I would say, both in the commercial marketplace and the federal marketplace or areas where we're kind of gaining strength in growth and traction.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#16

Okay. Great. And you briefly mentioned kind of some post-election activity in one of your prior comments. I guess, do you feel like now that we have election results and that's not an overhang anymore? Are you seeing some customers get the ball rolling on pent-up IT spend? Have you seen that kind of come through yet?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#17

I wouldn't say that we're seeing that come through yet. I think it will kind of manifest itself in 2025 customer budgets. And then we'll begin to see them release those budgets and get into what I call a more normal spending habits here as we go forward. I think in Q4, it's difficult to have an upward trend because it's seasonably the time of the year where customers are wrapping things up, they're thinking about budgets for next year. So what we're seeing is kind of stable demand environment from Q3 to Q4. But I don't think we'll really see a ramp-up until we get into new budgets and understand what customers want to do and when they're ready with the right confidence around their own business to step on the gas pedal harder.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#18

Okay. Got it. Another area of topical lately investors have been focused on has been the impact of the new Department of government efficiency on government contractors. What can you say about the potential impact of this agency on ASGN?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#19

Yes. So it's been quite a conversation, and I think it's the unknown of what those really will be or could be. And there's been a lot of arm waving around well, what will this do to budgets and spending. And I think, look, we -- from what we can hear from our customer and what we see, there'll be a top-down view of where across the federal budgets and agencies, are there opportunities to attack broad and waste and abuse and maybe spending that there's not a real return for. So I think there'll be that top-down view. And then they'll come at it from the bottom up and say, well, where can we reduce head count, where we can reduce spending from the ground up. As it relates to us, most of our services in the federal government are around cybersecurity, AI, machine learning, digital transformation and modernization around data and other things. So I think we're honestly the answer to some of the questions with those because the government is definitely going to have to modernize its systems in order to be more efficient and productive, and we play a critical role there. And the agencies that we serve I think, are less in the crosshairs maybe of the dose effort. I mean most of our work is in Department of Defense, Intel, and Department of Homeland Security, which are all agencies that are serving kind of mission incredible things in the national interest. But there'll be some of the regulatory agencies on the federal civilian side, where I think there'll be an effort to find some savings. And so I think for us, we're in a pretty good place in all this. So that's our take.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#20

Okay. Great. We'll see how it evolves. You've done a great job of protecting margins over the past year in the face of a tougher sales environment. I guess, can you walk us through the variable nature of your cost structure. And I guess what has allowed you guys to flex the cost base so effectively?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#21

Yes. I think, look, the one of the most attractive attributes of this business or it's free cash flow characteristics and the way the P&L will kind of reset itself if we're growing slower or not growing at all, most of our SG&A is variable or variable like. And so if we have less revenue, it kind of resets itself to the gross profit line, so we don't really have some margin there. And that's what we've seen here. Actually, our gross margins have been improving over the last 24 months. And then on the unit by unit. And then on the SG&A side, our model is less fixed compensation, high incentive compensation. And so that regulates itself, if you will. So we do a pretty good job of maintaining EBITDA margin through times like this. And we do a great job on the cash flow side because obviously, when you're financing less receivables in advance, you have a wave of cash that comes in. And so we've been generating 100% free cash flow here. And so again, another attractive attribute of the business model.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#22

Okay. Great. And maybe we can kind of shift kind of some capital allocation and financial policy questions what you guys are going to do with that free cash flow, I guess, maybe starting with, I guess, the balance sheet specifically, just to kind of set the stage. I mean you've done a really strong job maintaining a conservative leverage profile. I guess is there a target that you're managing to or a range in which I guess you guys are comfortable operating the business?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#23

Do you want to take that one?

Chris Donnini

executive
#24

Yes, I can take that. We haven't disclosed a target leverage range. But I think if you look at the way we've handled it over a period of time, we're sitting right now at net leverage just south of 2, 1.9 actually. And so it gives us the flexibility when opportunities arise to lever up for the right strategic M&A. So we like that flexibility and we'll manage that accordingly.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#25

Okay. Great. And then similarly, I guess on the topic of leverage, I guess, how do you think about your credit ratings are investment grade ratings a goal over time? Is that something you guys are interested in?

Chris Donnini

executive
#26

We're comfortable with the flexibility that our current credit rating profile gives us. So we do not have an aspiration at the time to be investment grade. Again, it's tied to -- we maintain a modest leverage profile that allows us to execute on the strategies that we see fit but give us the flexibility and the ability to overdrive with that strong free cash flow in periods of higher leverage following M&A.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#27

Okay. Great. And then back to the M&A team for a second. I guess -- can you give us an update on what you've been seeing in terms of the pipeline? I guess any changes in the quality of opportunities that you guys are seeing out there in the market?

Chris Donnini

executive
#28

There's still not a lot of change. There's been a -- we've been in a period here for 18 or 24 months where there's been less quality assets coming to market because of all the reasons we've talked out earlier, and I think really good businesses, whether they're owned by private equity or founders, they've been able to hang on and just say, I'll wait for a better day and the processes that have come out over the last 18 months, many of them have not gotten to a conclusion. So I think that's been a concern for sellers. I do think, again, go back to what we said, I think as we get into 2025 with more certainty about the macro with the election behind us, the M&A markets are going to get more productive, and we're expecting to see a pickup in flow.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#29

Okay. Great. And then when you see that pick up, I guess, are there specific opportunities or priorities that you guys are targeting or looking to address?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#30

Yes. So one of the great things about this business and our client relationships with these large enterprise plans where we're sitting with them, we know what their needs are, and we can position for those needs. We don't have to guess at it. And so most all of those needs that they have, we can position for organically, which is what we've been doing over the history of the business. But every now and then, you run into something that's better done through M&A, you go to buy it versus build it. And the reason may be you need to be at scale in this solution area today. You can't wait 3 or 4 years. It may be a long road to build it because it may require a critical technology partnership that comes with it. And a good example of this would be what we did with ServiceNow. I mean we knew -- 2 years before we bought GlideFast in July 2022, we knew that ServiceNow was a critical piece of our customer strategic road map in and it took us a little while to identify the right opportunity, but we bought GlideFast. It was the -- at the time like a 2-year running Elite Partner of the Year with ServiceNow and had a very strong technology partnership which was critical. They had a wonderful relationship with ServiceNow, we did too. And it kind of gave us immediate credibility in the marketplace, and then we can take that solution capability and we can pull it across our existing account portfolio, which is really what the strategy is here. If we're doing M&A what they bring to the table in terms of solution capability and their own clients is important, but the most important thing is, can we expand on that by pulling it across our commercial and government account portfolio. And that was a great example of something that's probably better done by acquisition than it is organically.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#31

Okay. Got it. And did you guys find an opportunity like that where it makes sense to go into something bigger via M&A to grow versus doing it organically. Is there a how should we think about where you're comfortable taking leverage? Is there kind of a ceiling that you guys would want to stay under?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#32

Multiple times in the past, we've levered up to about 3.8x funded debt-to-EBITDA in order to do a platform acquisition, and they quickly delevered because of the cash flow characteristics of the business down below 2.5. And we'd always say, hey, below the 2.5, we're kind of acquisition ready again. I really don't think it takes that kind of leverage today for us at our size and scale in order to accomplish the M&A things that we have on our list. So we may take on a little bit of leverage to do a piece of M&A. I don't expect it would be near the levels that we've done in the past, our 3.8x, which we did in several instances around platform acquisitions. And what we're generating, not quite but almost $100 million of free cash flow quarter. And so if you take a look at that with just a modest amount of leverage, we can accomplish a lot of things.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#33

Definitely. And then, I guess, so given kind of where the M&A pipeline is today and kind of that you haven't seen really actionable opportunities this year? How should we think about how you guys are allocating that capital in the near term? I mean, obviously, you've been active in terms of share repurchases. But it'd be great to get your thoughts more broadly on.

Theodore Hanson

executive
#34

Well, look, I think -- and Chris can jump in here, but we have always said after a strategic M&A that repurchasing our shares at these valuation levels are super attractive and best use of capital allocation in the moment. And so our Board supported that. We put in place a $750 million authorization, of which we've spent about $250 million. So we still have $500 million out there. And we've been putting to work about 1/4 of free cash flow every quarter and reducing share count. And I think through the third quarter, it's down, share count is down 8% -- 7%, 8%. That's right. Yes.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#35

Okay. And then on that topic is, how do you guys think about the trade-off between deploying that cash, given your view on the attractive equity valuation there. First is building up a war chest to deploy later on for M&A?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#36

So I think the idea of building a war chest sounds on the surface like a good idea, let's -- but I think it's not in the best interest of shareholders because to build cash, to do something where we could leverage our balance sheet in the future and do it in a very efficient way to make an acquisition isn't really required. And two, it kind of misses the short -- near and short-term opportunity here to make really accretive repurchases of shares at what we think is a pretty attractive valuation point. And then the other thing is, by doing this, not only is it the right return of capital to shareholders in the moment, but we're going to create the opportunity for earning searches in the future as we have earnings growth against a lower share. But I think in all those ways, while there might be an idea around building a war chest, it's not really required and not in the best interest of shareholders.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#37

Okay. Got it. And maybe taking a step back, I guess, as we look out to next year, obviously, I guess you haven't provided guidance yet, but as you think about 2025. I guess what are you most excited about in the business? Like what are you viewing as the biggest opportunities to capitalize on?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#38

Yes. Look, I'm more excited than ever about the underpinnings of growth for the future. Set AI aside for a minute, the customer is only part of the way to the cloud. Cybersecurity is a more important pressing need all of the time. Our nearshore capability in Mexico is on a huge upswing. So ServiceNow is another area where we can do a lot of bigger things in the future. So there are all these areas that are on customer road maps and we're sitting at the intersection, knowing that, meeting those needs, bringing the talent to bear on all of those opportunities, that is an underpinning of growth for the future, which is very strong. And I think now, layer on top of that what's going on with AI, and while the investment from the end client is not all the way there or really started today. It's very clear to us that there's a return in this for clients and that this is going to be, again, another underpinning of growth for a long time and it's all going to start with data. And there's going to be some big spending on data to get ready for AI use cases. And then the AI will run across this data and provide productive outcomes for customers, whatever those use cases might be. And we're going to be right there a part of that as they begin to implement those things.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#39

Awesome. I guess maybe we've got a few minutes left, we'll see if there are any questions in the room before I keep going. Okay. I just love to follow up on your point to ServiceNow. I guess you mentioned how getting into the ServiceNow ecosystem was key motivator for the GlideFast acquisition. I guess what are you viewing as how would you frame that opportunity set with ServiceNow specifically going forward?

Theodore Hanson

executive
#40

Yes. So -- like I said, we could see in all of our customer environments, they were either using ServiceNow already and trying to proliferate it further across the organization or they were trying to implement it for the first time. So it's clearly a place that we thought we could be differentiate ourselves and meet whatever the customers need was. ServiceNow started as IT service management. So it was a pretty focused product in streamlining IT operations inside of the CIO shop. But it's really proliferated now into the digital layer that can lay across all enterprise applications and give you a single point of entry, and it can give you a better user outcome as you navigate through various systems and it can provide really strong workflow optimization across those individual systems. So that's all in front of us with ServiceNow. And you can see the adoption of it vis-a-vis the performance of the ServiceNow business as they're selling more and more licenses to their product, and we're seeing customers continue, that's one area where customers continue to spend and invest because there's a real productive return, if you will, on -- in the short run on automating and optimizing all of those activities so they can be that much more productive.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#41

Okay. Great. And you also -- when you're looking out to 2025, you mentioned some further opportunities in terms of nearshoring. Can we think of that a little bit deeper and what you guys are seeing there? I know I think Mexico has been a big focus in that strategy.

Theodore Hanson

executive
#42

Yes. I think that clients have always had an offshoring capabilities and the big traditional consulting firms or the India outsourced firms have been there with tens and hundreds of thousands of workers to kind of meet those needs. That's not really us. And while that's a part of the marketplace, within IT, it's not growing quickly. The wins kind of shift back and forth onshore and offshore to India. But the most exciting thing going on is nearshore because you get a lot of the advantages that you're looking for, which might be a lower price point and really good technical skills and you get it right here in our own time zone where there's really rich technical talent and clients can even go there for the day. If you live in the central part of the country, you can go to step with our teams in Guadalajara and work on a project and be back for dinner sometimes. And so I think that you get a lot of the advantages that you're shooting for with offshore but you don't have to deal with kind of all the baggage that comes with it and you get it right here in our local time zone and communication and all those things are really rich.

Ryan Fenske

analyst
#43

That's great. Well, Ted, Chris, thank you so much for joining us today. Really appreciate you guys making time and attending the conference.

Theodore Hanson

executive
#44

Yes. Thanks, Ryan. Yes. It's been our pleasure. Thank you.

Chris Donnini

executive
#45

Thank you, Ryan.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Everforth, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Everforth, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.