Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 17, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Financial Services conference_presentation 44 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Gary Norcross

executive
#1

[Audio Gap] working in the office full time from working at home full time. I don't want to say it went off without a hitch, but it was very smooth. And so the reality is all of our teams have been able to collaborate very well with our clients. We've seen strong sales engagement. We've seen strong sales engagement. We've seen strong delivery engagement. And if anything, it's really doubled down our efforts on just continuing to focus on modernization and pushing for continued improvement in our tools and processes.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#2

Has there been any disruption because of work from home in terms of your ability to implement or to get customers up and running on the same time line?

Gary Norcross

executive
#3

I think we saw a very little impact. Let me just go across our segments. We saw very little impact in our capital markets business. We did see some. I mean probably it was about a 2- to 3-week impact early on in the pandemic. Frankly, as you know, when you look at what was going on in capital markets at the start of the pandemic, it was so crazy that everybody was just trying to make sure that they got the trading volumes executed, et cetera. So we saw a little delay in our professional services. When we look at our banking business, we really didn't see any impact. I was very proud of the team. A lot of our big implementation projects we have going on there are extremely mission critical for those customers to be successful in the future. So no one really took their foot off the accelerator pedal in those kind of engagements. Now in our merchant business, obviously we did see some impact. We saw a lot of close -- closing of our customers as shelter-in-place was deployed around the world, but we've also seen recovery in that business as shelter-in-place has been lifted.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#4

Okay. Maybe we can drill down on merchant acquiring for a minute. When FIS bought Vantiv -- well, Worldpay, which bought Vantiv...

Gary Norcross

executive
#5

Yes. Exactly.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#6

There was a string of transactions there. So it was our preferred large merchant acquirer among the group. We thought it was the best asset. Now I was hoping you could talk through the exposures at Worldpay. Again, I know that you had provided an update on this earlier in the pandemic. But tell us what exposures Worldpay has that have maybe surprised you in terms of their performance or underperformance.

Gary Norcross

executive
#7

Well, we agree with you. When we looked at across all of the various assets that were -- that ended up trading, we obviously feel like we acquired the right one. I mean let's talk about what we really saw in Worldpay that really attracted us. One, very similar cultures to FIS, very focused on next-generation technology. I think when you look at the overall technology stack, it's clear that Worldpay is a leader on that front, and they've been investing heavily there. Also focused on really global e-commerce. And when we looked at where we felt the acquiring business was going, we felt global e-com was the right answer, right? Being able to play at a global scale, being able to handle very, very large complex e-com clients with that flexibility all was very important. So based on that, as we -- keep in mind, we had owned the company for about 6 or 7 months before the pandemic really hit. Very pleased with what we were seeing, the performance of the assets, the sales engagement, the winning and taking share across the various markets. So our thesis really bore out. So now that we -- when the pandemic hit and shelter-in-place are going into effect, I don't think we were surprised at how the book reacted. I don't think we -- frankly, we knew that we had a large book of business in travel and entertainment. And so the fact that travel pulled back was something that we expected as that occurred. But we've also seen tremendous stream in our other channels, right? Whether it's grocery, whether it's our pharmaceutical channels, all of those have done extremely well. And then when you look at our digital channels, and really when you look at our global e-com channels minus travel, it's really outperformed the market. So we feel really great about the business.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#8

Yes. In terms of that e-com exposure, you actually have some fairly unique capability built into that. And I wanted -- one area that Worldpay actually plays in more than others that came to the attention of investors this week because of a certain IPO is the interest in gaming.

Gary Norcross

executive
#9

Yes.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#10

And talk to me about the opportunity there. Because it's interesting, when we do due diligence on U.S. online gaming, it has the potential to explode by factor of 40 from where it is today. And Vantiv clearly is the leader there in terms of its existing relationships with FanDuel, DraftKings. So curious about that.

Gary Norcross

executive
#11

Yes. No, I think it's a great opportunity for us. Obviously, as you said, we're the leader in the space around the globe. We continue to execute on that. We continue to bring new tools, new processes. We continue to focus on both risk and fraud around the channel as well as our customers can take care -- take advantage of the growth that it presents. But we do see it as a big opportunity. As you pointed out, frankly so, we're the leader in the space. As you look at the complex needs that people are going to need to deal with, even some of the regulatory oversight that could occur in that space certainly plays very well to FIS' future and our ability to meet and take advantage of that growth in that channel.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#12

Do you expect, like we do, that you'll see a significant acceleration in terms of approvals in the U.S. by states to start operating iGaming?

Gary Norcross

executive
#13

Yes. When we went -- actually, when we went through due diligence, this was something that we really talked quite a bit about. And we saw it as a real opportunity, and I think we continue to see it as an opportunity. So we do think that the states will start allowing iGaming to occur, and I think we'll be well positioned to take advantage of that.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#14

Okay. Within -- staying on acquiring a little bit longer. Worldpay being global business with a meaningful travel exposure, are you seeing anything different from what we're hearing from others in terms of travel behavior?

Gary Norcross

executive
#15

We're not. We're seeing strengthening -- just like everybody else, we're seeing some strengthening in travel, on domestic travel. The international travel is still very muted, as you would expect. But we're pretty much right on top of where everybody else is with regards to their travel numbers.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#16

Okay. I want to shift over to the core processing business as this is clearly what investors are focusing on right now as they think about acceleration. So first, a question about cloud. It's been our interpretation that FIS has been the leader in cloud implementations and in building in-house cloud capability. How has the investment continued in that capability? And are you seeing an acceleration in terms of banks asking for that capability?

Gary Norcross

executive
#17

The answer quickly on both is yes and yes. I mean we certainly have been a leader in cloud deployment. I actually took over as CEO in January of 2015. And at that point, we realized that we would need to pivot our company away from traditional legacy technologies to where we thought the future was going. And clearly, we thought that future was going to be supported by cloud-based technologies. So we first, Craig, started focusing on consolidating our data centers down and really transforming our data centers from legacy tech to really where we thought the future was. To this day, we're -- we really are a leader in the space. We have well over 70% of our global compute in our private cloud today. If you look by the end of first quarter next year, that'll be more than 80% of our total global compute in private cloud. And so we're seeing tremendous advantages of that in our customer base today, being able to lower our availability times, which -- what used to be a tradition in the industry of 24 hours, if you had an event that we'll cover, we're now down to less than 15 minutes, and many of our applications are down to less than 10 minutes. Our overall cost of how we've been able to deploy our solutions, you've seen us take out more than $250 million in cost in annualized run rate by that move. But it doesn't stop there. That was the foundational element we had delayed. We now have been moving into the application layer. We were very first to market with our open API framework. We launched that a little over 3 years ago with the initiatives of GDPR coming out of Europe. This is truly a micro surfaces layer that allows our customers to bring in FinTechs or bring in alternatives, interact through that platform and gain access to the back-end cores. Been very, very successful. Obviously, it's a way for FIS to monetize that access. We then brought forward our Digital One platform in the regional bank market. That really is an omnichannel deployment of our digital channels. We started in regional banking, and we're now pulling that down into the community, making market and pushing it up into the extremely large Tier 1 clients around the country. And then in Q4 of last year, we launched what we believe to be the very first cloud-native core banking system in our Modern Banking Platform. This is something that we've been building on for almost 4 years. And as you've seen, we've had tremendous success in the last several quarters. And when we look, we think there's been really arguably 10 decisions made for a cloud-native core banking system in the industry to date, and we've been fortunate enough to win every one of those selections. And when we look forward, we would say we're at the very, very early stages, just embarking on what we think will be a 10-year growth strategy for banking as the whole industry is going to have to move from legacy technologies to cloud-based computing and cloud-native applications to take advantage of that.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#18

Yes. Maybe you can give us some insight into how your conversations with bank managements go when they start thinking about things like on-prem versus cloud solutions versus employees that are -- that they have that they're going to have to lay off versus -- they're -- it's a very layered decision that isn't quite as simple as well, the technology is a -- better, right? There's a lot that goes into it.

Gary Norcross

executive
#19

There is. There is. And I would tell you where it starts, is let's start on the on-premise and the outsourcing or taking the software as more as a service, so a SaaS model. I would tell you those stories have dramatically changed over the years to the point now where everybody is very interested in a true SaaS deployment. Why? They want to take advantage of the security capabilities we've put in place. They want to take advantage of the technology capabilities we've put in place. They want to offload that capital burden in the future to a company like FIS. And when you look at SaaS deployment and the software, we're truly best in class on that front. And as you get larger and larger, that bears out in just our overall market presence in those markets. And so -- but then, once you get beyond Saas, it really does move into what's the step function I can take in cost out of my enterprise. A number of these early customers that have signed -- I like to talk about we're really entering the fourth-generation software deployment in financial services. Some of these customers that we've signed are coming off literally generation 1 software. I'm talking about things they installed in the '70s, and they've been managing it day in and day out with hundreds and hundreds of programmers trying to keep it in regulatory compliance. So they really want to look then and start talking about how much of the capability is going to be able to meet my needs about customization, how much -- and what is the frequency in which you're going to deploy software to keep me current. So I want to make a decision today, but I also want to future-proof my decision for the future. And then they want to get into just where you were going: How much cost can I truly take out? If I had 400 programmers running my historical environment, does that go to 10? Does that go to 0? Does that go to 50? How much of my infrastructure around my data centers, my IT deployment and keeping my environment up? And so what we're seeing in those environments is a material step in cost reductions. So then you just got to get through the cultural aspects, Craig, of making the decision because it does impact a lot of departments in these large institutions. And what I would tell you, if anything, we've seen the global pandemic be a catalyst for that. So I talked about how well FIS was able to move to work-from-home. A lot of our customers didn't have that experience, right? They're dealing with very old legacy technologies. They didn't have the enterprise tools in place. They didn't have video conferencing they could easily step into. And so that was a much harder deployment for them. And so when they look at all that, that pandemic has helped push as a catalyst now the need to realize that you've got to change. They're going to have to transform these fundamental foundational elements in order to compete in the future.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#20

Okay. And in terms of how quickly you can step in and migrate a customer, how has that changed from the past? And when you give us on a call, say, an announcement that you've won xyz bank, what's the lead time for that bank to start generating revenue for FIS?

Gary Norcross

executive
#21

Well, you actually -- it actually goes through a couple of phases. So what I would tell you is historically, the sales cycle has been about 12 months and the implementation cycle for these enterprise systems have been about 12 months. But when you think about it, we actually start generating a little revenue at the very start of contract signing through the professional services experience. So there is some revenue that starts to flow just through the implementation cycle. But where we really see the significant impact to revenue is once they go live because then we're being paid based on per account, per transaction, per click, if you want to think. So as they grow and take advantage of it, then we grow as well. But there is some revenue that starts flowing early. But relative to the overall contract value, the real revenue starts flowing, which is typically about 12 months from signing, some a little faster, some a little longer but on average.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#22

So it's been said to us that among large institutions, FIS' win rate is about 10x that of its largest competitor being Fiserv. And historically, what's driven that for FIS? And secondly, also, when I think about different institutional sizes that you might have on your platform, there's obviously going to be different pricing based on scale of institution. So if you thought about your own business, how many midsize banks, considering the yield differences, does it take to perhaps offer -- combine to generate the revenue of a single large bank customer?

Gary Norcross

executive
#23

Let's answer your first question and then get to the yield question second. The reality is what differentiates us in the large bank market is last year, we celebrated our 50th anniversary as a company. And if you look back on that, since the start of our company, we always focused and really played in the largest institutions in the country. Now when I joined the company 32 years ago, frankly a $2 billion bank was giant, right? We -- given where regulatory was and the ability to bank across state lines or even across -- outside of counties, et cetera, et cetera, so as that started breaking down, we saw this mass movement of customers. But because we were focused on the largest banks at that given time, as the market grew, our solutions also grew with that market. So we've always been very focused there. The key difference to our largest competitor, as you mentioned, is really flexibility. So our ability to not only bring best-in-class technology but bring it in a way that allows people to add flexibility to meet their needs. When you're dealing with a $100 billion institution or you're dealing with a top 10 financial institution in the U.S., their needs are going to look extremely different than a $10 billion community bank, right? And so being able to drive that flexibility all through a robust SaaS deployment but being able to drive that flexibility and that execution is very important. And that's just the reality. As I look back on it, it's much about our DNA, this is where we grew up, as anything. And then when you lean into all the investments we're making around modernization and technology, it just allows us to be the clear winner in the space. Now when you start looking at -- to your second question around yield, granted the revenue streams are much, much larger the larger the financial institution that we deal with, one of the things that we're fortunate enough, though, based on our profit margins around that individual revenue dollar, is the very first comment I made to open up this session. If you look at what we did over the last 5 years, we have collapsed all of our compute to really 6 environments just in the U.S. alone, 3 production environments. And when we look at that level of concentration and the leverage, whether you're a large institution or a medium-sized institution, we're using the exact same compute. So we're getting maximum contribution margin out of every dollar that's coming in, and that's going to continue to grow as we put more and more in our leveraged environments. But you definitely see a much different revenue stream as you move upmarket because the revenue dollars are just much greater because it's tied to volumes of accounts or assets under management or what other key metrics.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#24

You just made a really interesting point about collapsing your computing franchise down into fewer platforms. How is FIS able to do that when we've seen so many other institutions fail at doing that? The poster child for that is First Data. I mean still running 13 different, disparate platforms across their franchise, and they're literally afraid to take one offline at this point.

Gary Norcross

executive
#25

Well, it's an extremely -- I mean, I'm not trivializing this. It's hard to do. This is something that we've been focused on for the last 5 years. And frankly, there's a lot that we had to go through to get to where we are today. But we've been very focused on it. We have a great team that has executed against that challenge. And frankly, we realized that it was going to take multiple years to accomplish. And so we started with our talent evaluation. We made sure that we had the right talent in place that can take us through this journey. We then focused on all of the pieces that we needed to update on the architecture and how to transition that. And then fortunately, we stay focused on it through this period of time. But it is an extremely heavy lift to get through this process.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#26

Okay. With -- so FIS has had a string of wins with large institutions. I believe it's been 7 of the top 30 and recently one top 10, which has been pretty much unheard of in recent years. So what's changing? I mean are these institutions finally realizing that they can't attract talent? It's too expensive to attract talent? It's too expensive to iterate? I mean what's changing?

Gary Norcross

executive
#27

Well, I think it's a combination of things. I think if you look, first, you've got to back up. Some of these languages are -- that some of these languages these legacy applications are written in are 30, 40, 50 years old at this point in time. So as you're hiring talent, you're literally having to train them in a language that's no longer taught in college. So let's start there. So if you -- if there's any catalyst you need to have more than that, I mean, that's a huge catalyst. The challenge, though, is we're all seeing, and this is going to expand very dramatically as we move into 5G, et cetera, the digital platform is taking over. The need to self-serve for financial services is now a requirement to do business today. The challenge is when you're dealing with the older legacy applications, frankly the architecture and the way they were built, the languages they were written in, don't enable you to easily digitally enable something. It can be done. All of us have done it. But then when you think about digital enablement, there's a common factor in that, and that is one of speed, right? And so now, you're right back to those legacy systems don't allow for the speed of deployment. So fast forward to today and fast forward to the pandemic, but we were seeing this demand when we launched in Q4. Just to remind everybody, the reality is a lot of these clients, which I'm going to call are early adopters of cloud, have really almost held on too long. So at this point in time, they've got to really leapfrog where the rest of the competition is and where the rest of the market is to really be able to take advantage of what cloud has to offer, which is speed, agility, availability, digitally-native architectures and mindsets.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#28

So speaking of digitally native, how are you thinking about new potential competitors in the environment, whether it's -- when you think about a company like Finxact, who talks about banking as a service and a different architecture that they claim they have to bring to bear?

Gary Norcross

executive
#29

Yes. Well, look, I mean, I mentioned earlier I've been in this industry for 32 years. Startups aren't a new phenomenon, right? We've had startups for decades. And what I would tell you is we do monitor startups. We realize that this is a competitive market. What I hope you're hearing from us at FIS is we're not going to allow a startup to disrupt us because we're going to disrupt ourselves. I mean we're a leader in cloud-based technologies today. When you look at the architectures, you're exactly right. The new architectures of a cloud-based system does allow you to move faster, does allow you to deliver services in very different and dramatic ways. The whole concepts around systems and how they were built in historical legacy solutions is different. But as I said earlier, I mean, we've had 10 decisions so far and we're 10 for 10. So I feel good about how our solutions stack is standing up against the new companies that are being formed, and we'll compete with them no different than we've competed with other companies historically.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#30

And how has the acquisition of Worldpay changed the selling cycle or the pace of wins in the core processing business? And in terms of Worldpay, they had a core -- they had a -- I'm sorry, an issuer processing suite. And how has that integrated with the offering at FIS?

Gary Norcross

executive
#31

It's gone very well. Honestly, one of the things that we do in our playbook when we look at integration of these companies is we'd like to get them integrated very quickly from an operational alignment standpoint. So the Worldpay issuer business naturally collapsed into the FIS issuer business, which was much larger. We looked at -- across our combined issuer base, and it was clear our product pull-through into our issuer base was much higher than what Worldpay had experienced. So we were able to bring real product capability to cross-sell into that base, and that's gone exceptionally well. We obviously collapsed our small acquiring business into Worldpay and saw a similar response. So if you look at our overall sales from -- you mentioned a core banking standpoint. We really haven't seen any impact from the integration. And in fact, what we're seeing is a very full pipeline of new core banking sales and focused on more modern, more cloud-native technologies for all the reasons we've mentioned. When you look at the overall integration, we talk about revenue synergies of $500 million. I'll tell you we're well ahead of that. Woody and I both thought that by the end of this year, we would exit this year with $100 million in revenue synergies. We're well on pace to exceed $200 million this year even with COVID as a backdrop. We've seen tremendous cross-sell throughputs in the very areas that we thought we would. Our debit routing has gone exceptionally well. Our Premium Payback solution has gone very well. We've been pleased, pleasantly surprised, I would say, with our banking referral channel and the success we've had there. We actually thought that would be a little slower than what we're seeing, but we've really had some very nice wins. We just announced another one recently where a bank with more than 500 branches is moving their entire relationship to us. So from a revenue standpoint of cross-sales but also from a revenue standpoint of our existing segments prior to the integration, it's gone very well the last year.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#32

Can you comment on the international market? We focused quite a bit on the U.S. market, but clearly, Worldpay is quite broad globally. What opportunities does that bring to FIS and the complete business?

Gary Norcross

executive
#33

Yes. Look, we've always have believed that being a global company is the absolute right answer, especially when you're competing in such a broad market as financial services that FIS is participating in. So we've always -- we -- both of our companies have had a strong focus on non-U.S. business. What's really interesting is we didn't have as much overlap in our presence. So what we're excited about, and one of the theses that we leaned on in our revenue synergies, was the ability for FIS to accelerate Worldpay's penetration into new global markets, and we've actually seen some early wins on that. We've actually started being able to capture some e-com volume out of India. We've had a couple of really nice signings in Brazil. We've helped enable Worldpay to move into Australia. And so it's been a real nice complement. But the global marketplace is very important to our strategy. Being able to meet and expand the total addressable market around the globe is going to be very important. And you see us focusing on what I like to tell everybody, there's 10 to 12 countries that really matter for us, and we're going deep in each and every one of those countries, whether Worldpay had a deep presence and we can exploit that or FIS had a deep presence and we can exploit that. But that's what's going to be the winning combination for us here over the next couple of years.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#34

Yes. I have a question from an investor. And I was actually planning to ask you this question as well because it was an important thesis for the combinations we've seen in the industry, which is when we think about Worldpay's e-com business, how has the acquisition by FIS been able to enhance the authorization rates and approval rates in e-com for Worldpay, especially on a cross-border basis or where it might be difficult? And have those authorization or approval rates been able to surpass peers like Stripe or Adyen because of the combination?

Gary Norcross

executive
#35

Well, I would tell you we already had very strong authorization and approval rates. We being Worldpay already had very strong rates and was actually a leader in the space when you look at that. I think where the investor is coming from is something that we're very focused on, is now how do we take the data FIS has to provide around the issuer base and our core banking base and everything we know about the end consumer? And how do we leverage that data to further take our auth rates and our approval rates even higher? And so we're actually working on that a lot. If you remember, when we made the announcement, we told everybody that would be in more year 2, year 3 of the transaction. And we're starting to see some of that come online. But we do believe and have got a lot of internal work that's going on that we're going to be able to raise our authorization rates very significantly across the e-com market. And we're even working on some things of -- that we even guarantee the transaction. So there's a lot going on by us leveraging our rich data capabilities in concert with what Worldpay already had, and the teams are actively working on that.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#36

Okay. Just got another question through the platform, maybe inspired by our earlier conversation, which is, how long does it take to realistically integrate, replace, upgrade a legacy platform? And what's the hardest thing that a legacy platform faces when it moves into online processing?

Gary Norcross

executive
#37

Yes. No, it's a great question. So the real -- the quick answer for that at an individual account basis, it takes about 12 months to go through that implementation cycle and conversion cycle and data conversion. Now we are working a lot of things with artificial intelligence and machine learning to accelerate that time. But the long pole in the tent is still you've got data that resides in a legacy platform, and you have to get it to the future-state technology, and that takes time. And you have to go through training, you have to go through setup. And so there's a lot of pieces. But AI certainly provides a lot of opportunities to accelerate that and more to come on that in the future. You also have the issue even in Modern Banking Platform, and I've talked about this a lot over the last several months. Keep in mind Modern Banking Platform today only has deposit functionality. So if you were a bank and you wanted to bring your lending capabilities to Modern Banking Platform, today that feature set is not available. We're actually doing our first lending drop in Q4, right, bringing in unsecured lending, then we'll bring in secured lending, then we'll bring in syndicated lending, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, as we build out the various asset classes across that. So that's going to give us an opportunity to go back to our existing wins, and now some of the benefits of bringing their lending portfolios on the -- something like Modern Banking Platform. So there's a functionality parity issue that you have to get to. But clearly, the big move of where legacy can't keep up is just the way the architecture was configured. So if you think about the design principles that existed 10 and 20 years ago, it was not designed for digital enablement, for self-service capability. Concepts around open frameworks or microservices or even components and being able to package those components to be able to offer solutions are just dramatically different in a cloud-based technology, not to mention you've got full real-time capabilities, which then allow you to really accelerate your defense against fraud. So there's just a lot of benefits that come out of a more cloud-native-type technology and the way the architecture is designed for the future.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#38

So I want to ask you about a comment that was made a little while back in terms of revenue acceleration. Are you still expecting that the -- with the wins that we discussed in the top 30, that we could see acceleration of Banking Solutions revenue into the high single digits by the back half of '21?

Gary Norcross

executive
#39

Yes. I think when you look at -- well, I think when you look at FIS, I would not say for banking we're seeing that. But when you look at FIS, what I would tell you is when Woody and I announced the Worldpay acquisition, we announced a true pivot towards growth, and we announced that we thought FIS overall could get to a 7% to 9% grower. What people did not realize in that was the strength of what banking and capital markets, what we were seeing it was doing. So it wasn't we were going to take Worldpay, a 10% grower, and make it grow 18%, right? Our whole thesis is -- granted we've got revenue synergies in Worldpay. So if we can maintain that strong double digit, that 10% growth, move it to 11%. But really the secret was moving banking from 3% to mid- to upper single digits. So if we can move banking from a 3% to a 5% to a 7% and then we can move capital markets from a 1% to a 3% to a 5%, that then propels all of FIS into that 7% to 9% range. And I think at this point in time, we're not talking about 2021 yet, but we feel very good in the thesis of FIS growing in that 7% to 9% range over the horizon. And so that's going to be very important for obviously us to deliver on, but it's going to be as much enabled by capital markets and banking to continue to accelerate from their current position based on their sales success all while Worldpay after -- post-COVID being able to return back to its more normalized growth rate. And if that combination occurs, this company will be a 7% to 9% growth company.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#40

Can you talk about the contribution from capital markets for a minute? Because that's been a surprising area when looking at how that's performed over the last 6 to 9 months. What's driven that? And what's the sustainability of that?

Gary Norcross

executive
#41

Yes. Look, I can't tell you how proud I am of the team in capital markets that we have and what they've accomplished. I mean if you look, when we acquired SunGard in 2015, as everybody knows, that was a very broken company, right? It was very fragmented. The way they thought about going to market was broken. The way they packaged individual bespoke products was a problem. In fact, they only sold at the individual product level. They were an extremely federated organization structure, so they were getting no lift or no scale-out of the environment. And they were heavy dependent on license fees. And so what we did was when we bought the company, what we saw the opportunity was, was capital market was going to have to move from on-premise to SaaS. And when you start moving from on-premise and Saas, the one thing that's going to be driven by that is the need to package solutions in a SaaS model. One of the misnomers is people think I'm going to enter the issuer business and all I'm going to do is sell issuer. Well, the problem is, on a SaaS model, you can't just do issue, right? You've got to do fraud. You got to do case management. You got to do card management. You got to produce cards. You've got to be able to mail those cards. It's a much more packaged 8, 9, 10 products, and we're deploying it. Capital markets is no different. So what we saw was -- when we were doing our due diligence, going through the thesis, is, one, we were just about to start to move from on-prem to SaaS. So we wanted to take advantage of it. But what we really saw was that the whole front, middle and back office, the individual products were going to need to come together in solutions. And many of those solutions, we're going to have to span both buy and sell sides. So what we did was when we brought the company together, and the team responded very well, we -- first, we brought all of the products together in a commonality of solution-led leaders, and then we pulled the development organizations together in order to start developing within those solutions more end-to-end capabilities. We started leveraging FIS' expertise in SaaS deployment, and then we started leaning into that as well. The final thing we did was we pulled all of the go-to-market out, informed the Chief Revenue Officer reporting to the leader of that segment. And the results of all that has been a really transformed organization. And so we do believe that it's highly sustainable. If you look at the sales success quarter in and quarter out, the movement towards SaaS deployment, our SaaS sales continue to rise as we hold our license business flat year-over-year. And so what you're going to -- what you've seen just since 2015 is reoccurring revenue moved from low 60s to now about 72% of the revenues reoccurring, gives you a much higher, predictable model. You fast forward 3 to 5 years and you're going to see that business with reoccurring revenues that look just like our banking business. It's going to be in the 80%. And you're going to see a very strong mid-single-digit to perhaps even upper mid-single-digit grower because clearly, the solutioning of the product, the investment in product, the modernization of the product, all leveraged by our SaaS deployment capabilities, has been a winning combination.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#42

Okay. With the minute or 2, we have left, I wanted to ask you just about the overall company margin. I believe in 2019, you had an adjusted EBITDA margin of just under 41%. Skipping 2020, which is an unusual year for about 1 million reasons.

Gary Norcross

executive
#43

Exactly.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#44

Looking forward, how much upside is there to that margin over the long term, especially knowing what you know now about how well expense synergies have progressed in the Worldpay acquisition?

Gary Norcross

executive
#45

Yes. I think Woody and I have talked a lot about this. We really -- even with a backdrop of how successful we've been on the Worldpay integration, I mean, when you look at the -- our costs well exceeding over $700 million at this point of takeout between OpEx and also the below-the-line savings, we think there's tremendous opportunity for us to maintain margin expansion for the next 3 to 5 years. We're still in the early stages of leveraging a lot of our functional organizations. So we're pulling now -- well, I talked about pulling development together within capital markets. The future is now. We pull all of our engineers together in one common infrastructure. We've got a lot of opportunity as we move our legacy to our next-generation capabilities that we'll be able to get a lot of cost benefits from that as our legacy technologies will no longer need to be maintained. You've got -- we're a leader in the industry with our global delivery organization that we leverage out of India and the Philippines. So long story short, there's a lot of levers left that we're going to be pulling as we continue to push this organization, which makes us very confident that you'll continue to see good, solid margin expansion in the coming years at FIS.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#46

With that, I think we're out of time. Gary, Woody, I appreciate you joining us today, very much so. Woody, hopefully, we'll hear from you next time. But...

James Woodall

executive
#47

Yes. But I'm playing a supporting role here, as you know. Absolutely.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#48

I really appreciate it. And gentlemen, please enjoy the last few days of summer.

Gary Norcross

executive
#49

All right. Thanks, Craig. Talk to you later. Bye.

Craig Maurer

analyst
#50

Thanks. We'll see everybody in 5 minutes for 3dcart. Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.