Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 8, 2026

NYSE US Financials Financial Services conference_presentation 33 min

What were the key takeaways from Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s September 8, 2026 earnings call?

In the Q3 2026 earnings call, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) reported a strong performance with a reaffirmation of guidance for the fiscal year. Revenue growth was supported by a focus on margin expansion and free cash flow, which has been raised to $2.2 billion, representing a 36% year-over-year increase. Management indicated a healthy outlook for recurring revenue, although they expect a slight moderation in growth rates due to the absence of M&A contributions in the second half of the year.

What topics did Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. cover?

  • Free Cash Flow Guidance Raised: FIS raised its free cash flow guidance to $2.2 billion, which is a 36% increase year-over-year. CEO Stephanie Ferris stated, "we're very confident on the 3 billion by 2028," indicating a strong focus on cash generation.
  • Recurring Revenue Growth: Management reaffirmed that both banking and capital markets will deliver mid-single-digit recurring growth for the year. Ferris emphasized the importance of focusing on "selling the right recurring product with the right level of margins."
  • Strategic Review of Capital Markets: FIS is conducting a strategic review of select products within its capital markets portfolio to identify non-core offerings for potential divestiture. This aligns with their goal to pay down debt and focus on high-value segments.
  • AI and Technology Spending: Ferris noted that technology spending among banks continues to grow at 7% to 8%, with a significant focus on AI capabilities for fraud prevention and compliance. This positions FIS well to capture growth in this area.
  • TSYS Acquisition Performance: The TSYS acquisition is performing above expectations, contributing to recurring revenue growth. Ferris stated, "It is tracking above expectations when we originally bought it," indicating strong integration success.

What were Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.'s September 8, 2026 results?

  • Free Cash Flow: $2.2B (raised from previous guidance, +36% YoY)
  • Recurring Revenue Growth: mid-single-digit (expected for both banking and capital markets)
  • Revenue Growth Rate: null (null)
  • TSYS Growth Rate: 6% (tracking above expectations)
  • One-Time Expenses: $730M (down from $800M)
  • Debt Target: high 2s range (targeting reduction from current 3.5 turns)

FIS is positioned for continued growth driven by strong free cash flow and recurring revenue streams. The focus on AI and technology spending among banks presents a significant opportunity. However, the absence of M&A contributions may moderate growth expectations, and investors should monitor the outcomes of the capital markets strategic review as a potential catalyst or risk.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

William Nance

analyst
#1

All right. We're going to kick off the next session. My name is Will Nance. I cover the payments in fintech. The first fireside chat of remember to introduce myself. And I am really delighted to have FIS CEO, Stephanie Ferris as well as CFO, James Kehoe with us today. Really excited to have you guys with the conversation yet again here at the conference.

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks for having us.

William Nance

analyst
#3

All right. Stephanie, thanks for being here. I wanted to start big picture. The stock has had a tough couple of years. When we look at the numbers, yes, there's puts and takes. We talked about capital markets and earnings. So banking has been growing sort of high end of the range. Margins are expanding. Year-to-date, free cash flow is up a lot year-over-year. As you sit here today, how do you assess the health of the franchise in the end market. And when you think about what the market might be missing, what are you most focused on delivering from an execution perspective to help sort of turn that around?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#4

Yes. I think the health of the franchise is good, it's strong. We're focused on what we can control, which is really to the point you made, how do we ensure that the banking business returned to the growth trajectory we expected. As you said, it's performing at the high end. We've been focused on margin expansion. That's been a very big focus for us. We're really pleased with the first half of the year and feel good about the rest of the year, all the way into free cash flow. And as you know, in the last quarter, we raised our free cash flow guide. In addition to that, we've been focused on quality of earnings. We're really looking at our acquisition and integration costs and bringing those down, which obviously shows up in the free cash flow. So for us, it is about execution, and being focused every day on how do we get up and deliver revenue, margin expansion, free cash flow and high quality of earnings. In terms of what the market doesn't understand, it's a tough one, right, in terms of the industry and the sector that we're in with respect to AI. I think we've been really pleased. Banking is definitely in -- has a growth agenda. And we're seeing banks take advantage of M&A, whether they want to be buyers or sellers. We're seeing them focused on building out their digital currency stack. We're focused on them. In general, talking about how do we modernize the bank from a technology standpoint. And then we're all focused on cyber, Mythos Project Glass wing as a general category and really focused on closing any holes that any of us have there. So really highly focused on execution.

William Nance

analyst
#5

Yes. So let's continue that. You've talked about this as sort of a generational moment in banking, deregulation, record M&A and now the intense focus on AI. What are you hearing from clients today in terms of technology budgets? And when you -- if you could characterize the spending that people have on technology, is it broad-based? Are you seeing prioritization within the budget towards AI-specific dollars? And overall, how does the environment feel for FIS?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#6

Yes. I think in terms of technology spend, in general, it continues to grow at 7% to 8% overall. That's been a trajectory that we've seen, well, I think, for the last 10 or 15 years, where banks are spending continues to evolve. Obviously, CISO's budgets are pretty big. We can participate there in terms of product capabilities with our fraud products, but we don't typically serve in the [indiscernible] world, but we're very linked with [indiscernible] in terms of making sure that our products and services are all closed from a vulnerability standpoint. So we do take advantage of some of that spend with them. They aren't reallocating, I would say, from bank modernization or technology modernization into cyber because generally, they're doing really well. And so they're in an environment where they have an ability to grow. They have an ability to buy or sell. They're really focused on how do they generate net new deposits. So when I think about where our bank CEOs spending their time and how are they talking to us in terms of where they want to grow, they know they want to be and continue to be very competitive around deposit gathering. And when they think about deposit gathering, they think about, do I have the right digital assets to be able to gather deposits? Do I have digital account opening capabilities to gather deposits? Do I have in terms of -- do I have digital currency capabilities if you're a commercial bank and you want to gather deposits from commercial customers or make commercial loans, you have to have capabilities out for those treasurers be able to take advantage of digital currencies like circle. We have products like money movement Hub, where you can plug in any of those capabilities. So banks are really focused on making sure they have the deposits they need to fund their balance sheet. And then they're looking at spend inside the banks in terms of AI, where can they really get after with the regulatory costs of being a bank. And so when you think about things like that, you think about suspicious activity reports, AI, money laundering and fraud are very big places and cost pools that banks spend a lot of human capital on. And so we have been in partnership with Anthropic, building out our first agent that's focused on AML and SAAR filing. And you're seeing -- we're seeing a very large interest in that because it's just trapped costs. that banks have been never able to get after. Now when you talk to banks about that, they're not usually looking to take out those costs and drive margin expansion. They're looking to reallocate those costs again back to how do we grow the franchise. So they're very much focused on how do we take advantage of this point in time where we have a nice balance sheet, and we have nice margins and start to really reinvest in the bank in the capabilities that they need, depending upon where they are. And I think from an FIS standpoint, we feel good about all those categories. We feel good about having a conversation with the CISO on cyber we feel good about having conversations around how to prevent fraud, which is a huge lot cost. We feel good about having an agentic agent going after fraud and money laundering and then we'll go after credit card and debit card disputes. So we feel good about that. And then bank modernization, we have all kinds of stuff. So we feel really good where the spend moves and occurs, but that is something we keep our eye on every year in terms of where our bank's spending.

William Nance

analyst
#7

Let's talk a little bit about the anthropic partnership. That was one of the bigger announcements this year. You said the financial crimes agent will land in the back half with BMO and amalgamated nothing in the 2026 guide for that. Where does product development stand today? And how quickly can the revenue road map broaden beyond just financial crime?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#8

Yes. So it's going really well, right on target in terms of having our first agent up and running inside [indiscernible] made at end of the year. So we will be off to the races in terms of selling this capability out to the rest of our financial institutions in 2027. We're having a lot of conversations to figure out how to price it correctly in terms of making sure we get the biggest and fastest adoption we can. It obviously creates a huge amount of value for the bank because it does unlock a bunch of locked costs for them. . We are talking about how do we really launch. One of the reasons we partnered with [indiscernible] we have a very big distribution channel out to financial institutions. So we are working on our go-to-market and our pricing and our product capabilities to launch in 2027, a very material way and start to generate revenue on that agent. Right on the back of that is we are starting to build and work with our next set of banks on credit card and debit card disputes. Another really big capability that is locked inside banks. When you think about calling and you dispute on your credit card or your debit card, there's a lot of manual labor you calling the bank, the bank then has to call the merchant. The merchant has to do something in Visa and Mastercard. A lot of locked costs in there. We think -- and a lot of it is coming off of our systems that we deploy in the banks. We think there's a big opportunity there. So the flywheel on agents should continue to get faster and allow us to really deliver real incremental value to our banks and unlock a different bag for us.

William Nance

analyst
#9

Great. James, I want to get you involved here. Any notable callouts this quarter as it relates to the outlook or anything that you'd flag to investors about the way you're thinking about the second half of the year.

James Kehoe

executive
#10

No, I'd just reiterate what we said before. We reaffirm our guide for Q3 and the full year. And then as we look at the shape of the second half, we mentioned this before, in banking, we had an M&A contribution in the first half of 100 bps. There's no M&A contribution to any great extent in the second half. And then -- so the overall growth rate will moderate slightly in banking. In capital markets, there's only 1 real call out. It is in the third quarter of last year. was exceptionally strong on -- in capital markets at 9%. So that will be a tough comp in the third quarter, but we'll see a strong acceleration from that level in the fourth quarter. I do want to reemphasize one thing. Both businesses will deliver mid-single-digit recurring growth for the year. We're pretty happy about where we are exiting the year on that basis.

William Nance

analyst
#11

Let's stick with that theme about recurring revenue growth. You've been citing this metric around recurring ACV. I think you were up 20% in the fourth quarter, 24% in the first quarter. Maybe if you could help us understand what has fundamentally changed on the sales side to drive that? And how you think about the durability of reoccurring revenue growth in banking as that backlog converts to revenue?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#12

Yes. So as we came into 2023, we really refocused the commercial engine on making sure that we were selling the products that had the right margin to deliver the revenue expectations, but also the margin expansion. And so it's really, really important that we continue to focus on that recurring revenue and the recurring sales because if we get too focused on [indiscernible] we get too focused on license, you don't have a highly recurring, high-margin profitable business that you can bet on that will deliver our expectations. . So we -- I aligned on a Chief Commercial Officer and really focused him on selling the right recurring product with the right level of margins. So -- sorry, the right level of margins so we can deliver the ultimate margin commitment we made. Bringing the [ TSYS ] acquisition on obviously helps that. It is almost all recurring revenue with very high margin, so it gives us a lot of confidence in recurring as we go forward. But that's we've really had our Chief Commercial Officer and all our product leads focused on that versus on every dollar of revenue accrues the same value to the firm because it doesn't. And so we've been really -- that's been really important for us.

William Nance

analyst
#13

Got it. And then just on the nonrecurring side, I think selling higher quality, higher margin recurring business has really been central focus since you took over as CEO. You have seen a meaningful uplift on the nonrecurring side in the first half in banking. I think license activity in the first quarter termination fee, which I think most people understand in a second. But maybe just unpack on the license side, like what drives the net new license activity in the business how you just think about that about the contribution of licenses going forward?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#14

Yes. So one of the benefits of the franchise is that we have a lot of partners in our ecosystem that become vendors of ours. And so -- and they're also [indiscernible] on the other side selling to our banks. So as we look across our ecosystem, we end up paying a lot of our vendors and partners and also see them on the other side of the ecosystem with us. So our Chief Commercial Officer, and I have been really focused on how can we turn these costs cost partners and to revenue partners for us. So we started this year in the first quarter with a couple of big SIs that we thought we could partner with that we have partnered with in our back office capabilities, and they came to us and said, "Hey, we think we could also be a partner with you in terms of distributing your products." So big licenses to sell those, we ultimately think they deliver recurring revenue over time. And we think this is a really interesting opportunity for us. We took our first shot of it with a couple of partners. So that was the first quarter. Do we think that's -- it won't happen every quarter, and we're trying out a model to see if our -- we have our own distribution, can we enable other distributions of our product? Can that create more revenue for us. TBD as you look -- as we look at the opportunities out there. So that's kind of the genesis of that big license in the first quarter. And then to your point, a bit of a termination fee in the second quarter around Huntington Cadence, which kind of is episodic with bank consolidation.

William Nance

analyst
#15

Yes, that makes sense. Okay. I wanted to talk about the LFI focus of the business. I think it's something that you guys have been emphasizing more recently. It's always been a hallmark of FIS' business. 72 out of the top 100 clients are now consuming across banking, payments and capital markets. They have significantly higher ARPU. I think on paper, when you look across the big 3 providers in this space, it looks like everyone has sort of the same products. And as somewhat indistinguishable. Can you talk about what is genuinely different about serving the large FIs versus what it's like in a community bank or credit union?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#16

Yes. I mean, first of all, I would say we serve community banks -- and that is as important of a channel as our large financial institutions. But they are different channels and how you serve them and how they want to consume products is very different. So starting from large financial institutions, they're very sophisticated technology consumers. They're typically looking for best of breed. -- they may or may not want your products to be integrated and you have to have high levels of scale, resiliency in cybersecurity. -- the way they want to be serviced is different than the way community banks. If you think about community banks, their model, they want to make sure that everything is fully integrated. They obviously want best-of-breed if they don't think we're giving it to them, but they would prefer to have a one-stop shop in terms of a provider. The way we provide service to them is very important. They serve their communities. It's a higher touch model than the large financial institutions have. So I think they're very different channels, and we serve them very differently. Also, in the large financial institution part of the market, typically, if you're a large bank, you are serving commercial banking customers, so do the community banks. But if you think about serving commercial banking customers, these are sophisticated corporates. They typically require a pretty sophisticated money movement capabilities and including having digital currency capabilities. We make these capabilities available to all banks regardless of large financial institutions or community banks -- but if you're a larger size or your focus in the community bank market, we have the best-in-class products and services for that commercial bank segment. So whether you're a large or a community bank, we just do hands down. It's been a marquee segment for FIS. And so that's where I'd say we're very differentiated. We also -- so maybe I'll pause there.

William Nance

analyst
#17

Yes. No, I think that's great. One of the other topics that's come up a lot, and it's probably come up more in the context of larger banks has been the idea of core modernization. The idea large banks following out the core. You recently did an aqua hire in the orchestration space. And so I'm just wondering what you're hearing from the largest banks on the modernization road map and where you see the biggest opportunity for FIS to facilitate versus maybe the opposing view that we've heard in the market about this maybe being a disintermediation risk for some of the incumbent providers.

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#18

Yes. we actually call it bank modernization because it's really -- banks are no longer focused on big bang core migrations at the very large. It's just -- it's too big, it's too risky. And so as they look to modernize their bank, and this is of the largest size, a fairly sophisticated, they're looking to hollow out their core typically, which means they want to pull out the customer master. They want to pull out the project -- product master. They want to have an orchestration layer that goes across not just their deposit core, but also their commercial core, their mortgage, core in their consumer core. Remember, there's a lot of cores inside of a bank. And so banks have been moving in a hollow out journey. It's an expensive way to go. It is definitely an evolution we've been seeing in the market. And we did do an aqua hire to your point where we brought a team on with a set of capabilities that is very, very fantastic in this space. And what we think is differentiating is completely AI built, dual-cloud hot, hot, never had that before, and that is also starting to become a requirement in the market. as resiliency continues to become a very big deal, you can also be in the cloud, and you could be in your own data center. So these are cutting-edge capabilities that we're seeing the largest banks want to have and have an orchestration layer to be able to do that. So we brought that team in. They have a fantastic set of assets, and we're looking forward to some pretty exciting announcements in the future.

William Nance

analyst
#19

Very good. Maybe we'll turn to TSYS or total issuing, I think as we're now calling it, the business is growing in the mid-single digits. You've owned it now for a couple of quarters. How do you feel about visibility to the mid-single-digit growth algorithm that we've laid out? How is the cross-sell conversation going? And I think it's growing 6% right now. What would you attribute some of the above trend growth that you're seeing in the business?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#20

Yes. So I think -- it's been a fantastic acquisition for us. It fits exactly into our existing customer set with a product that we did not have. it brings in highly recurring revenue with high margins and a very, very easy view in terms of a mid-single-digit grower there. That being said, it is going very, very well. We're tracking towards our cost synergies. I think we shared that in the last quarter. we're continuing to feel really good about our revenue synergies. We think those take longer, just given these are really big banks with long time frame. So we feel good about it. It is tracking above expectations when we originally bought it. I feel really good about it. I would say it's better management, but to be fair, it's probably from the prior management in terms of why it's tracking better. But we do feel really good about it, and it continues to execute in a really strong way for us.

William Nance

analyst
#21

I think you called out a large account conversion with an existing client this path order, contributing to -- I think you called out one of the largest customer migration in the history of the industry. how impactful is that migration to overall growth? And how do you think about kind of the persistence of that 6% growth in the business?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#22

Yes. so with our -- this is evidence of one of the standout value propositions of total issuing solutions. So if you're a large bank having and migrating a large card portfolio from your existing provider, to total issuing, they are best-in-class. I've never seen so many accounts migrated in my entire life with literally not one issue. That is a core competency of total issuing solutions. So when you think about if you're a large bank anywhere, and you're going to move an entire consumer card portfolio. Remember, that's a revenue to you. That's not core banking, which is a cost structure to you. You want to have a lot of confidence in a team that's been able to do it and proving it at scale over time. So honestly, I've never seen anything that big. I've been in and around the industry and hats off to the total issuing team. They did a fantastic job. That's likely a little bit of why we're accruing at a higher-than-expected number for us. And so we feel really good about it. The client was very happy with it. A little bit more to go, but really great outcome.

William Nance

analyst
#23

That's great. I think one of the topics that sort of dominated conversations about this business year-to-date has been around the competitive environment. I think you said this past quarter, rolled out an all-in-one debit and credit offering with their [indiscernible] DPS platforms. So how are you thinking about just competitive dynamics for this business? And are there any ways that you could frame just how much overlap you actually have with competing solutions in the market on the [indiscernible] side?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#24

Yes, a couple of things. One, we talked about large financial institutions versus community banks, large financial institutions buy best-of-breed. They're never going to move to a debt combined debit credit environment. That's not how they operate. And a lot of large financial institutions run credit issuing and run some of their stuff in-house and run debit. So I don't see a combined debit credit issuing value proposition for large financial institutions. In addition, I do think it's relevant down in community banking credit us, where I think they're seeing some potential traction. I think you've probably heard Ryan, the CEO of [ Visa ] also clearly articulate the large financial institutions is not where he's looking to win in this space. Remember what I just talked about, it would be a really hard decision to migrate it to [indiscernible] portfolio. to a competitor who's never migrated anything of that big size or scale. And the other challenge, I think, for large financial institutions, to the extent that you would decide to migrate, for example, to Visa [indiscernible], you would never have any leverage with Visa Pismo again because you fundamentally you can't change brand. So I think for large financial institutions, it doesn't make sense. I do think for community banks and credit unions, and he's talked about fintech, it could make sense there.

William Nance

analyst
#25

Got it. That makes sense. All right. Let's pivot a little bit over to Capital Markets. You announced the strategic review of select products within the capital markets portfolio. Can you talk about just the parameters that you're putting around that process? How are you defining strategic fit in the business -- are there financial requirements around dilution, stranded costs, capital return that we should be thinking about as this plays out?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#26

Yes. And I'll ask James to pipe in if he thinks I'm missing something, especially around the financial criteria. So we are looking inside capital markets in terms of, is there a set of products and solutions that don't overlap with our existing clients. and don't make sense for us to be an owner and could be a potential sale. When we think about the sale and the requirements on the returns, we obviously have to think about we are committed to pay down our debt. So can we get a value for the product or the solution that allows us to continue to pay down debt either and pay down debt and get back to share repurchase faster or pay down debt to a period in an amount such that we could ultimately then incrementally do more share repurchase. But it all does depend on the returns. Do you have anything you might want to add?

James Kehoe

executive
#27

I'd just add, we're staring at the ones that have at least fit with the client base. And then secondarily, could it be accretive to top line growth over time? Yes. And I think we'll manage through the accretion dilution impact. It depends on the share price at the time. with lots of pieces to work through. Our goal would be to get back the share repurchases sooner broader than later.

William Nance

analyst
#28

All right. So sticking with Capital Markets. The other aspect last quarter that came up was around guidance. I think you pointed at the low end of the range, the quarter before, reduced the full year guide this past quarter. Do you feel like the trajectory of that business has stabilized. Any changes in expectations around what that looks like, not just for the remainder of this year, but over the next couple of years. And then just big picture, how are you thinking about the growth algorithm going forward and the mix between recurring revenue growth versus license and professional services?

James Kehoe

executive
#29

[indiscernible] Lot of questions As I said, we reaffirmed the full year guide. What we said last quarter was looking out into 2027, we expect a modest deceleration on both adjusted and on recurring. And as I said earlier, we'll exit the year on a 5% recurring. So let's take that as a base. It's got about one point of M&A in there. So obviously, we're not doing M&A next year. However, the last point of M&A will be more than offset by 2 factors. One is the attrition that Stephanie talked about on the last call, clearly, the UBS Credit Suisse doesn't repeat. So that's a point accretive on Q2 lower attrition. And then better conversion of the ACV already sold, we'll probably give you another point. So we see, as I said, a modest deceleration from the 5% despite losing M&A contribution. What we do see in the business pipeline is pretty healthy across the products to hunt the ACV sales and recurring are solid on a year-to-date basis. So we're cautiously optimistic. But we -- this is a business that's still doing a mid-single-digit recurring and expected to do so longer term.

William Nance

analyst
#30

Got it. And we talked a lot in the banking discussion about reoccurring revenue versus licenses. Is that a different conversation in capital markets? And how do you think about driving growth on the recurring side in that business?

James Kehoe

executive
#31

Yes. I think that's potentially an opportunity versus the long-term growth rate on recurring we would -- we have a strong preference for less license episodic license activity and more recurring, but it needs to be managed over time. So we would expect in general, accelerating recurring and declining license activity.

William Nance

analyst
#32

Got it. Okay. James, I'm going to keep you involved here. The company has pivoted towards focusing more on GAAP free cash flow as kind of the primary metric. You changed that around guidance. I think that's been a big focus for investors as well. You raised the guide on free cash flow in the most recent quarter. And then you've laid out this path to $3 billion plus by 2028. The big topic of conversation, I think, revolves around onetime expenses. So I'm hoping you could talk about a breakdown of the onetime expenses. How do they break down today and your line of sight to getting those -- managing those numbers down over time?

James Kehoe

executive
#33

Yes. but I still want to go back to what you said first, which is the cash flow story on a GAAP basis. we called up $100 million to $2.2 billion. That's a 36% growth year-on-year. And it's coming from numerous factors, and we have a long pipeline to get to the -- a huge pipeline to get to the $3 billion. but we're very confident on the 3 billion by 2028. Onetime expense is one of the levers. The biggest lever is actually EBITDA. The second biggest is onetime expense. You saw in the most recent call, we did reduce the total onetime cash expense from $800 million to $730 million. If you take that $730 million, what's in there, what do we spend on around $275 million is on the thesis integration. Another 90 is on other M&A activity. So that can be taking Worldpay out of our systems or integrating those tack-on acquisitions. So 50% of the total onetime cash spend is on M&A or integration activity. And by the time we get out to 2028, that number will be substantially lower just because pieces will be for all intents and purposes integrated by the end of call it, change on change, that's well over $300 million. The other big spend item on the current year sales, that's around any given around $200 million, big spend item. That will, over time, moderate more over the period. We've taken a strong commitment on this. And what we've said in past forums is we expect the original 800 to be below to reduce by at least 50% over the next 2 years. And we're well on the path to that. You saw in the current year, taking out 7. [indiscernible] it was, I think, a 15% reduction in the core FIS spend. So we're going to be dogmatic about this and look on reducing this. And it is a key driver of the continued improvement in free cash flow.

William Nance

analyst
#34

Yes. Makes sense. Okay. Last question here just on capital allocation. Deleveraging has been a big priority in the aftermath of the TSYS acquisition. You're at around 3.5 turns with the target to get back to high 2s range. Buybacks have been paused, targeted to get back to buying back stock middle of next year. How are you thinking about the capital allocation framework, I guess, into 2028 when things are more normalized once you're through that deleveraging? And what would make you consider something other than share repurchases as a use of cash?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#35

I mean, at our current stock level, nothing. I mean, we would do all share repurchase. There's really nothing that we could do beyond that, that would have any incremental value. So I mean, I wish we were in the market right now. I think we'd love to be, but that's the plan. So just can't even imagine anything that would accrue any kind of value besides the share repurchase. Very much look forward to getting back in the market.

William Nance

analyst
#36

Yes. Makes sense. And I guess any opportunities for accelerating the time line to get there? We talked about the capital market strategic review. What are some of the frame -- what are some of the guidelines around that?

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#37

No, I think that's exactly it. And it's not limited necessarily to capital markets, and we've been actively pruning the portfolio, but we will look at, to James' point, the construct of is there something that doesn't fit with the existing portfolio might be dragging the revenue growth down. It does have an EPS dilution accretion effect. But given where the share price is, if we can get back to repurchasing shares faster, that may go away on us. So that's our focus.

William Nance

analyst
#38

And just for the long term at the risk of doing math on stage, $3 billion plus of GAAP free cash flow in 2028, your leverage constraints in the business. Obviously, you've got a healthy dividend. What governs the payout ratio beyond that?

James Kehoe

executive
#39

Say that again, the last piece.

William Nance

analyst
#40

What governs how much of the remaining after dividends that you would consider allocating towards share repurchases, I guess, a different way...

James Kehoe

executive
#41

Essentially, that's what Stephanie said. I think the first thing is to fully fund internally the capital expenditures and ensure resiliency, cyber fiber investments, investments in growth. And then left over, we will continue to increase the dividend in line with EPS. And we have a large investor base that places a high premium on the dividend. And then simplistically, all the rest goes back to share repurchase. Could there be a situation 3 years from now or a small tack-on comes along and you do something, yes, but our primary goal is our share price is way too cheap and it would be a tragedy to not buy back the stock as quickly as we can. And the same goals, if we divest something of any magnitude, we will have a discussion with the agencies as to the deployment of some of those proceeds against share repurchases. But what's important is we need to exit this year [indiscernible] commitment with the rating agencies and we're well on track with that. And then they will obviously give us much more leeway when we get into 2027 on the deployment of any divestiture proceeds.

William Nance

analyst
#42

Makes sense. Okay. Well, I think with that, we're just about out of time. But thanks for being here again. Really enjoyed the conversation.

Stephanie Ferris

executive
#43

Yes. Thanks, Will.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.