FINEOS Corporation Holdings plc (FCL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 24, 2022

Australian Securities Exchange AU Information Technology Software earnings 64 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the FINEOS Corporation Holdings plc FY 2022 Results Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Michael Kelly, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Michael Kelly

executive
#2

Thank you, Darcy, and welcome, everybody, to our FY '22 results presentation. I'm joined here today by Tom Wall, our CFO, and we will both go through this presentation. I will start off and give an overview of our performance. Tom will go into detail on the financials, and then I'll finish up with some overall comments and commentary in terms of where the business is today. So if you turn to Slide 3 of the presentation that we sent out, I want to start off by saying that we've had another year of very strong growth in FINEOS. Very pleased with the overall revenue of EUR 127.2 million, which is up 17.5% on our previous year. And really pleasing in that result appears the very good growth rate on the subscriptions revenue for our SaaS platform of EUR 53.8 million, up 34.2% on the previous year. Services revenues grew to EUR 71.4 million, up 7.4% on the previous year. And gross profits were EUR 83 million, and gross profit margin 65.3% margin. So that again is up 15.3% on the previous year. EBITDA EUR 6.7 million. And again, EBITDA margin is 5.3%, and it's up 28.8% on the previous year. The annual recurring run rate at the end of the financial year is now running at EUR 56.4 million. So again, showing strong growth of 23.4% on our previous year. If you turn to Slide 4, I'll focus in here in terms of the growth of the revenue over the past 3 years since we did our IPO. So although we've basically -- we've achieved the guidance that we gave a year ago, which was really pleasing in the prevailing environments that we're operating in. The total subscriptions revenue was EUR 53.8 million. So the 34.2% growth, which actually exceeded guidance and overall, I think with the ARR at EUR 56.4 million, we see ourselves in a continuous healthy growth rate on our subscriptions revenue, which is really the focal point of our strategy to grow our product revenues and turn this into very much a product business. And this would be typical above 50% product revenues and growing as we grow over the next few years. In terms of the core revenue, the subscriptions revenue, as I said, is up 33.5%; and ILF revenue, which is the initial license base that are kind of tapering out in our numbers, a small number, but it's up 15.8%. And that's really related to our original partnership with Spraoi, which has become New York Life Group Benefits. And so the total revenue is up EUR 16.6 million in terms of the organic revenue. But when you add the acquisitions, we're up to EUR 17.5 million revenue. If you turn to Slide 5, I want to point out the phenomenal growth rates that we've had in North America. We're really leading our strategy out of the North American market, where cloud and Software-as-a-Service platforms are probably the most advanced in the world. And North America for us and for most companies, I think, is the biggest market in the world, with over 30% of global insurance operating out of the North American market. So we firmly saw North America as our growth opportunity. And indeed, if you're #1 in North America in a software sense, you can usually say you're #1 globally. So again, strategically, our focus is growth in North America. And today, we're doing almost 80% of our total revenues in the North American market. So that has moved up from 45% when we did our IPO and set out our strategy in our prospectus. So again, that's really, really pleasing. And in terms of the North American market, we continue to see a change in the regulatory environment, the competitive landscape, the employment environment as well in terms of employee engagement and retention, great resignation. And everything that is going on in that benefits market in the states, there's actually good news within this on the platform. If you turn to Slide 6, you'll actually see the growth in subscriptions in North America, which really have been phenomenal, very, very pleasing. They have actually multiplied as predicted by over 10x since the IPO based on the deals we've done coming into the IPO and subsequent deals in terms of new sales and cross-sells. So we've achieved a 67.3% growth rate in FY '22 on the previous year. And again, North America is very much the powerhouse in the driver of our growth strategy to date. In terms of research and development on the following page, Page 7, the R&D figures for us in terms of investment leveled off over the past couple of years. So you can see from this diagram that we had a big jump in FY '22 to just the phenomenal asked from some of our larger clients. Those clients have thousands of systems in the back office and front offices, and they have many very, very complex legacy type environments. So we were asked to step up a couple of years ago and deliver more in terms of dependence implementations and integrations and so on. And therefore, we would have grown our R&D more and also our services more a couple of years ago. In terms of the R&D profile now, we see that steadying off because we're very much focused on a single market, the employee benefits market in North America. And all of our systems are up and running and live. And what we're seeing now is the opportunity that we have to continually grow our subscriptions through the growth of those platforms and also the cross-sell opportunities and the growth opportunities going forward. So in terms of the R&D investment this year or last year, 34% of our revenues went into R&D. I just want to point out that we measure these R&D investment of salary monthly, We don't add the overheads as well. So that's 34% based on salaries, just to point that out. And over the past, I suppose, 5 to 6 years, we've invested about EUR 200 million into our platform. So again, very large investment, which we believe that many of the benefits still have to come in terms of revenue growth. But we also believe firmly that R&D is really important and that we needed to grow the platform, so we could support the large customers on the market that we are chasing in terms of the employee benefits. Geographic mix of revenues on the next page, Page 8, and clearly shows the North American market as the biggest market. And also, what you can see is the other two markets have contracted against the North American market. But in real terms, they've also contracted as well, APAC and Europe. So again, I'll talk about that as we go through the presentation. But the main factor I wanted to point out was the huge growth in North American revenues in the past couple of pages. On the people side, we have our employee diagrams there, which show you how our employees are spread by function and by geographic region. So I won't go through that. But again, you can see that the R&D side of things, we have quite a big team on the R&D function. We have also had very, very high consulting utilization results as we went through last year, 89%. And retention still remains very high. Post-COVID, the great resignation and so on. We put a lot of focus into retention. We've also been putting a lot of focus into growing the Indian operation that FINEOS acquired through Spree, We're building on that, and we have a kind of pro Indian hiring policy in terms of our overall growth strategy. And as part of our retention strategy, I think most companies are following similar lines, apart from maybe some of the very big tech companies. We've implemented a remote-first hybrid model, which our people are very, very comfortable with. And indeed, they really enjoy working from home and having that flexibility and the ability to be measured by the results rather than the hours that they are present in the office or on the systems. So overall, very good in terms of our people. 20% of our resources are contractors, and we'd like to keep that kind of number of contractors. It gives us flex in terms of any increase in demand or decrease in demand. I'll turn now to Page 9. And just to -- sorry, to Page 10. Just to mention on the people side, the ESG focus that we have, we put a lot of efforts into this. And we really try to make sure we're engaging with our people and that there's more definite stand just to work. And there's also the social causes and charitable and so on in terms of the environment. So we look at the holistic relationship we have with our people and the environment. And our principal objective is to drive organizational health to create a great place to work on a competitive advantage. So we have a team of people who focus on ESG all the time and they meet regularly and we get updates from them and we take suggestions from everybody in the business in terms of how you think we can improve in here. We're very pleased with the number of awards that we've won over the past year. So we're getting the recognition. First of all, I guess, we're actually entering [indiscernible] recognition from some of these award bodies. And secondly, we're actually winning awards. So very, very pleasing in terms of last year. And in particular, the Prestigious CIPD Award for our embrace DEI program, which we introduced and I mentioned last year in the results call. We're also using technology and focusing in on social recognition within the teams. Better ways of working and making sure that our teams are fully connected with what we do in terms of purpose, values, vision and our overall mission. And also making sure that we recognize people in terms of the contribution that they're making, and we call that out regularly. So -- that's it in terms of the top line overview from myself for the moment. I'm going to hand over to Tom Wall, who will cover off the detail on the numbers. So over to you, Tom.

Tom Wall

executive
#3

Thanks a million, Michael. Everybody, welcome to the call today. So I'll probably reiterate a good few points that Michael has already made. I suppose one in the context we need to add for the overall performance of the business is that from a marketplace point of view, it's still being tough out there in regards to closing deals. And in line with the strategy and previous focus, we've given. We've outlined the fact that majority of our activity for this FY have been with existing customers. And I know that's something that the marketplace always looks at from a metric perspective, especially with the SaaS-related business on new names. But the majority of our activity in growth has been with existing customers. So from an overall perspective, as Michael has alluded to, the growth and the activity is mainly in North America. We called out the fact check from an APAC perspective and also from EMEA point of view, we've had, I suppose, a retraction on where we've had revenue-wise, but that reflects the marketplace. And again, from an APAC perspective, it's been one of the laggards from an adoption on the SaaS and the cloud-based activity. Going through the main points overall. We would have given message out before around the services revenues and the engagement of SIs across the business. So the growth of 7.4% in revenues from EUR 66.4 million to EUR 71.4 million it's a strong number, and we still managed to retain the overall gross profit margin, which is at 65.3%, which also reflects some of the SI work that we've done and transferred throughout the year. Throughout the year, we've also integrated spree, which came on board in May '21. And another part, obviously, from the impairment and investment perspective on the business, it's still worth being invested in the product, and that lines up with the R&D. If we go down then from an overall EBITDA perspective, it has grown by 28% year-on-year. But again, when you look at the overall results of the numbers, we've had substantial FX impact throughout the year, which has impacted top line but also a cost base for different regions that we deal in. Other part from a deal point of view when we had done our IPO in line with the strategy, we have signed 3 deals at that time in May '19. They're all coming to fruition as well and have generated substantially more revenue than we would have outlined at the time, which again goes in line with the strategy of cross-sell. [Technical Difficulty]

Operator

operator
#4

Please hold while we get the speakers back.

Tom Wall

executive
#5

Apologies for that. I just got cut off from the Chorus guy. So there's always something new coming in for these calls each year. So as I've gone through just on Slide 12 with the key elements from an overall perspective. We still invest with substantially in the AWS elements. We have R&D and one of the changes that I was just alluding to there on the call was the impairment adjustments that we put through, which, again, is we have separate cash-generating units of CGUs. And when we do our validation each year of impairment, which we do every 6 months for the business, we established that in the long run, the original investment required some adjustments on the impairment side. It's a noncash activity, and it's a EUR 12.6 million number, which obviously affects the loss after tax performance number. If I go to Slide 13, and apologies guys for the disruption there that Chorus actually came in and switched the call off. So I'm not quite sure if all the updates have come through but we can probably catch up later on, on the call in that perspective. On Slide 13, it's calling out the key areas. And obviously, from an overall impact on the EBITDA, the logical one to quarter versus the cloud operations and support. That's shown an increase of 48%, and the impact on that was about EUR 5 million from an overall perspective movement year-on-year. That's in line with the focus we've had from an investment perspective, whereby when we have extra subscriptions being generated across the business, extra activity, new product lines been added. We've always had to invest upfront in that activity. Also for this particular FY, we've invested in automation processes and third-party software. The likes of silicon monitoring tools like New Relic, which again allow us to access the systems a lot quickly using the AWS platform. But what we have to do is incur some of those costs upfront. The intention on that is that from a go-forward, that will ease off as in we'll have done the investment cover from an APAC, EMEA and a North American perspective. The other avenue there, obviously, from a delivery perspective, the costs have gone up as well, which would be in light with the headcount changes, the additional revenues that we got in there, but also there's a degree of FX for U.S.-based costs and headcount in there from an overall perspective. Sales and marketing costs have grown by about 12%. And from an overall rationalization point of view, that will steady up for the rest of this year, but obviously, from a go forward, there will be some investment in that as well. R&D costs have leveled out a piece, as Michael called out, to around 34%. The other thing is we would look at comparatives in the marketplace to see what other companies are doing. And we see ranges of 30% to 36% from an overall investment perspective out there. And from the R&D and the existing product perspective, we obviously see the value add in that with the growth in the subscription revenues. The path on the cloud is also its investment in the infrastructure from a go-forward point of view to great economies of scale. And also from that perspective, as Michael alluded to earlier as well, with the event of the purchase of spree is to focus on the Indian cost base and access to lower cost staff in that region as well, which, again, is not just a head count number, but it's the cost per head has an overall impact on that. Going to Slide 14. The main call-out on growth from an overall perspective is what we see around the cash position, which from our overall free cash flow improved substantially in FY '22. And from an overall cash percent perspective, we closed the year at about EUR 44 million. Sufficient cash to run the business going forward, which is a positive for us from an overall point of view. Some of the elements that sometimes [indiscernible] just when we get the payments in, we received a substantial amount of payment in week 1 of the new financial year. And you can see that the trade receivables have risen by 15%, which again was some material billings that took place in May and June time frame. One of the things in here, which obviously doesn't always get a lot of light is the tax losses that we took on board with the likes of Limelight from a U.S. perspective. That has meant from an overall federal tax perspective. We created some tax assets on that, so the deferred tax asset. That gives us benefit down the line and also from a global tax structure. So when we get to the profitability stage from an Irish perspective, that we have substantial losses that we utilize against that, which is also a good benefit from that perspective. We've called out the goodwill from an overall point of view, and the impact of the impairment. Deferred revenue, again, that's increased in line with the billings that are taking place and obviously from the subscription revenues going up -- that would be an expectation that the deferred revenues will go up as we recognize them on a monthly basis. Last slide, from my perspective is Slide 15, on the operating cash flows. So the trend on that is continuing to improve. So we're seeing an increase in the operating cash generated from the operating activities. Closing the year with EUR 44 million in cash is a strong position for us. I mentioned about the July collections and the trends on the free cash flow improving from that perspective. And the cash being sufficient to run the business for a substantial period of time from an overall point of view. They are the key points that I have. Apologies for the disruption on the call. I'm not sure if anything was missed, but we can pick it up later on. They are the main points for me, Michael.

Michael Kelly

executive
#6

Thank you, Tom. So summing things up in terms of the go forward. We're in a very good position to continue the healthy growth rates that we have. And even though we're looking at an uncertain prevailing environment. Obviously, we've come through the COVID period that we've made into this new situation with the various issues around supply chain, the war in Ukraine and Brexit and so on. So effectively, we have most of our revenues and most of our growth rates in North America, which obviously is extremely important in terms of staying strong and the growth rate that we've set ourselves up to do strategically. We also want to call out that a few weeks ago, we finally got our New York Life case study released in terms of the time it took to do that probably over a year. So If you could go on our website, you can actually get a copy of the case study. But we believe this puts us into a very strong situation in terms of having a fully implemented digital transformation for a large employee benefits carried in North America, where we've eliminated legacy systems as well as obviously putting in a brand new system, which the New York Life people called the unified platform. So we're hoping that, that's going to be really good in terms of the go forward. We've also been really pleased with the Spraoi acquisition we made last year. And in those teams -- very, very quickly and very effectively into the business. And indeed, the products are very, very complementary. So we're excited about what we're doing there. We've been investing heavily in the Limelight product. And we both run like 2 years ago as an insurer tech in the West Coast of America and so that we could fill the gap that we had around new business underwriting. And so what we've been doing is very much turning that product into another component of portfolio end-to-end famous as well as obviously having it as a stand-alone product that we can sell independently. And we're quite pleased with the [indiscernible], so we sold that product to them and that system has been implemented jointly with EY, and we've put some really good accolades from that client in terms of their satisfaction. In terms of the IDAM product, which continues to be a big, big part of the employee benefits requirements in terms of the industry, which is the integrated visibility and absence management component and around claims and options, we've basically been driving that program and that product across our business in North America. And there's more and more change coming in that environment. It continues to get a high degree of focus from our clients. We're also looking at areas outside the pure carrier market. So we're looking at the employer-based market where we can sell the software directly to employers who will not buy from the carriers or outsource to the lead management, they'll actually in-source it. So we're looking at that market as well. And it's a very, very strong fit for the product that we've already got. So a key strategic rationale in terms of looking back last year. As I said that in the early part of the presentation, overall, North America being the key market for us, and we're definitely executing on that. I will say as well that we are seeing the kind of the change up in the likes of ANZ where core systems are now seen as -- cloud-based core systems are now seen as the way to go. And indeed, the regulators very much on site. And indeed, we've seen a settling down of the Australian market, in particular, after COVID and also the M&A that took part before COVID. So quite optimistic about that as well in terms of the go forward. As we kind of -- we've gone through the past year or 2, we've continually executed around cloud upgrades, major product upgrades, and we continue to work in this -- on the SaaS side with our clients. And as Tom said earlier, that is impacted on the cost basis, the likes of cloud ops, where we've had to increase the teams to make sure we have global coverage in place for the amount of activity we have going on in the cloud. In terms of the key priorities for going forward, we have quite a few multinationals and we are working with them in terms of the implementations we're working on now, but also having discussions around what else we can do with those multinationals and other places. These are very significant carriers and not only with the areas where we're working today -- an opportunity for cross-sell within those areas in terms of the products we have, but also other various other countries as far as there's opportunities. So we will work those with those partners and look for new opportunities in terms of the cross-selling. The IDAM and the frame side is still very much the dominant area of our business in terms of revenues. But as I called out, New York Life have just issued a case study, and that certainly opened a lot of eyes as being the first truly purpose-built platform for employee benefits for group volunteering and options management. And so we are receiving quite a bit of praise and indeed in trust in business as a result. New York Life will continue to promote that case study jointly with us as they see it being a big change in their environment and gives them a competitive advantage as well. So we continue to have our focus on the platform subscription revenues. And we will continue to migrate our existing clients of their existing on-premise systems. And there's still quite a lot of that work to do, quite a lot of customers, particularly in the APAC region. And we'll be migrating to the new platform. Overall, though, in terms of our focus, we're very much focused on new customer wins as well. And our pipeline has grown, but it has been continually slow to get conversion of deals. There's also a bit of competitive environment, and there's also systems integrators involved as well. So it's a more complex environment we face. We're kind of prevailing kind of environmental issues as well in terms of the macroeconomics and so on. But, I think we'll be optimistic in terms of the carriers coming into profitability in terms of the results and growing again. So I think we're cautiously optimistic, but still proceeding with caution, as I said. The overall opportunity as well in terms of regulatory and the way that, that is continuing to change in North America was very positive for us. It does cause a strain in turns to the R&D and the extra work we could do, but obviously, it causes the carriers who don't have FINEOS even more pain. And therefore, I think we're on a trend here to positivity and for future growth. So it's very focused on the sales and marketing side, very focused in terms of new name business. And we continue to see a large pipeline of cross-sell and upsell of the existing base. So Slide 19 just covers the New York Life achievement, 9 million customers, 4.1 billion are premium managed on FINEOS, and we replaced 6 legacy systems over the last 2 years and upgraded the FINEOS on-premise claims system into the FINEOS AdminSuite. If I turn to the last slide, Slide 20. As I said, the outlook we have is cautiously optimistic. And we're projecting a revenue of EUR 135 million to EUR 140 million for FY '23. There's a good pipeline in terms of what our sales team have built so far. And we're hoping to see some new business, new name and indeed, quite a few cross-sell opportunities as we move forward. And we still see, as I said, of the backlog of cloud upgrades as probably the largest opportunity in terms of the next 12 months, but also cross-sell opportunities where we implemented our platform and there's an opportunity to expand. We raised cash last year and we're in a strong position cash-wise, as Tom said. But we are actually moving towards a free flow cash situation for FY '24. And we signaled that in the last quarterly update. But again, just to reiterate that. So I'll leave it at that in terms of the update. And I just finally want to say thank you and a goodbye [indiscernible] Tom Wall, who's leading FINEOS to the [indiscernible] And we'll be welcoming Ms.Susan O'Connor to the next update we do on this. She's joined as our CFO. So thank you very much.

Operator

operator
#7

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Garry Sherriff from RBC.

Garry Sherriff

analyst
#8

Can you hear me okay?

Michael Kelly

executive
#9

Yes.

Tom Wall

executive
#10

Go ahead.

Garry Sherriff

analyst
#11

A few questions. The first one, just about the FY '22 North American subscription growth at South quality is just super strong. So I just want to try to get a sense how much of that growth was from New York Life? And what was the remainder?

Michael Kelly

executive
#12

Yes, that's a good question. Actually, we have a special deal with New York Life because we're a charter client. So I would say that not a huge amount of that growth was New York Life, Garry, because they had -- we have a partnership that they could move their full book to FINEOS as part of the overall partnership over the years. So I can't take you the detail of it was.

Garry Sherriff

analyst
#13

No, that's fine. That's actually better than -- that's fine. I actually thought or likely the bulk, but it sounds like it's not. Now second question, yes, perfect. Second question was really around -- you've given a sales guide for '23. I mean how should we think about that sales mix and the quality? I mean, I assume it continues to grow, the subs revenue, but just trying to get a rough idea. I mean do you have many existing clients migrating on to your cloud product in FY '23, really just trying to firm up the quality of the FY '23 sales guide?

Michael Kelly

executive
#14

Yes. I think the FY '23 is predominantly cross-sales to existing clients. So as I said, we are cautiously optimistic that within I suppose, conservative as well in terms of what we see out there. I'm making sure, as usual, that we deliver to our guidance. So most of it is in existing customers where we've got cloud upgrades happening for the number of clients in FY '23. And we've also got cross-sell opportunities as well with those customers and other customers from some of the other components. So most of -- the vast majority, 90-something percent is cross-sell from the existing clients in terms of the overall number. .

Garry Sherriff

analyst
#15

Okay. Yes, that's great. And the final question, you mentioned the regulatory landscape and the climate landscape and how that benefits you. And you also mentioned briefly about potentially selling directly to companies other than insurance carriers. Can you just give us some more detail on that? I mean, how progressive is that opportunity? Are there certain sectors you're focused on are we likely getting revenues from that in '23? Or is this a medium-term story? Just first time I heard it, so I'd be interested to hear about the strategy of potentially selling outside insurance carriers.

Michael Kelly

executive
#16

Yes, sure. Look, I think in the U.S.A., and in other countries as well, most of the larger, what we call jumbo employers, our national employers as some of the carriers refer to them [indiscernible] in the States. A lot of them are self-insured. So a lot of them actually manage the risk on the capital on the P&C, so they call it Self-insured on the Life side. So that's a segment of the market that is quite big. It's really the larger type employees in a way. We've got thousands and thousands of hundreds of thousands in some cases, where they'll actually ensure their own business. So there's an opportunity there anyway. But the opportunity in terms of FINEOS is around the option side, where employers will maybe outsource or take the employee benefits on the list side from a carrier. And then they may say that they want to wonder options and they move management themselves. So a lot of them in-source staff. And what we've seen, obviously, we know our competitors in the absence management software space, sometimes all up against us in the carrier world. And we have sticked to a meeting in terms of being very calm and focused and make sure we address and talk to the carrier first. But now there's an opportunity to sell our options directly to the employers. It's been the same stuff. It's all the same regulatory compliance and adjudication of rules. There is an extra piece of work around letters and correspondents and things like that, but it's insignificant and compared to the size of the sector platform. So I think employers are outsourcing their options, I think something like 33%, 34% of them overall in the USA outsource Absence management to the carrier. And the carrier has the software and long hours. But then there's probably about 20% to 25% of employers that in-source and directly run it themselves. So that segment of the market is available to us to go sell -- in terms of the options product. And as I said, down the line, maybe some version or with me. And at the wholesale for if they manage all of that stuff themselves. But our focus here is on the Absence side in terms of the initial steps.

Garry Sherriff

analyst
#17

Okay. And just a final follow-up to that. Are those jumbo employees that you refer to the one's was running the absence management the cells. Are they not government or are they private -- it's not the government, Yes. That's all was looking...

Michael Kelly

executive
#18

Yes, they're both. To be honest, they're both. But a lot of private companies financed along with, as we said, over 20%, maybe than 25% managed their own lead internally. And they have a lot of administrators. They have people in various roles, lead manager, assistant lead manager, lead director, whatever. And all they do is manage the rates. And so it's a complex area given the 50 states in the U.S. and the legislative changes that are happening all the time, including them internally as well, the wrongly put laws and -- so when you pull it all together, it's quite a complex area. It's costing them a lot of money. And the other piece of software that can basically help them to do the adjudication and manage that at an efficient low-cost. So those particular employees are open to us. We're obviously not interested in competing with the carrier. We're not offering risk or anything like that. It's complementary, if anything. So it's an area that we're looking into. And we'll pursue that but only with the jumbo carriers, and hopefully, in the next year or so, we'll see some action there in this perspective.

Operator

operator
#19

Your next question comes from Tim Lawson from Macquarie.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#20

Just in your strategic pillar slide on 18, you talked about dental, vision and the direct-to-employer absence management. Just checking is sort of -- are you hiring that more than you have in the past? And is that sort of the potential investment there considered in your cash flow breakeven comment?

Michael Kelly

executive
#21

Dental and vision is considered in the cash flow breakeven. We've put that on We can cover dental and vision from a new business underwriting policy and billing and partially in the frame but the dental and vision investment that we're going to make -- we will make in the future will be along claims adjudication. And there are no plans for that at this stage. We're really, really busy with the options side. And we definitely see that as the stronger near-term growth earlier for FINEOS. So we want to continue on that, as legislation keeps changing, and it becomes more and more difficult for carriers and employers to manage the lease. We have -- we're taking into account the fact that we will -- as soon as we get a kind of a charter customer on the employer side, we will have a little bit of investment to do, as I said, around the correspondence and guidance and stuff like that, that it's mini skewed in terms of the overall platform. So it should not actually affect move towards a cash flow position in FY '24.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#22

Yes. Okay. Can I confirm New York Life, your largest customer, is that right?

Michael Kelly

executive
#23

Can you say that again. Sorry, I didn't.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#24

New York Life is your #1 customer in terms of revenue?

Michael Kelly

executive
#25

They're not, no, New York Life would be definitely in the top 3 or 4, but they're not the largest client by revenue. Over the years, they have been the largest clients by revenue. Obviously, as we were in a huge amount of build work and we are scaling the product through the last 5 years or so, but they're not the largest customer today. In terms of subscriptions, they'll definitely be in the top 3, but we do have others who are bigger. And that is the opportunity where we fulfill is in that New York Life. They got a kind of a special charter deal. So there's a huge amount of services involved in building the product and doing a lot of the work for them. That's the only thing we're changing that model now because we have the platform to focus on the subscription growth and to get better value, better margin and so on in subscription and increase, obviously, the subscription fees we charge to others. So New York Life definitely paid for the platform to get to where it is today, and they're enjoying some element of a lower price but not anything significant -- and everything is indexed as well, but he's been a great partner as hopefully at the case study.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#26

Yes. Just a couple of other questions on customers. So has there been any customer churn? It just looks like your second half revenues set a bit mostly from the services. I was wondering whether there's any customers that are sort of left or your retention is still good?

Michael Kelly

executive
#27

Yes, we've had churn on the Limelight new business underwriting side. So those impacts will hit us in the next FY. And that's been unfortunate because we didn't have as a new Limelight, obviously, is in the middle of COVID. And the clients were implementing at that stage. A couple of them pulled out at this very early on because they -- obviously, they're seeing the FINEOS take over is something that they had a thought, maybe all for different vendor or something like that in other areas. So this is complex. And then also in terms of customers are certainly one customer is going a long time on long life and do stuff. And that -- the impact of those terminations are hitting us in our next FY. And therefore, as well as Tom has indicated, we did go through and accept an impairment on the overall asset. Over the past 2 years, online, I'd say we've invested in live in the product. And this SIs turning that corner in terms of having that as part of our full suite. And we definitely needed the whole new business underway increases. But yes, that we have lost strongs on that side of the house that [indiscernible].

Tim Lawson

analyst
#28

Yes. Does that explain why the -- if you annualize second half subscription revenue, you get to a number that's more than the June ARR?

Michael Kelly

executive
#29

Not quite sure about that question. So the second half of...

Tim Lawson

analyst
#30

I don't know the subscription revenue in the second half of EUR 28.6 million. So if I just simply annualize it over 57 and that you've called out in your slides, an ARR of 56.4%. So below that second half, it just looks a bit unusual.

Michael Kelly

executive
#31

Yes, there's some impact there and there's more impact next year. So we're -- yes, and that should be the end of it in terms of first half and the early half if I say the early half of next year, that will close in all that, and we don't -- we expect them to show the Limelight fees. But unfortunately, as I said, it has been one of the things that has pulled us back. However, we definitely needed that product, we could'nt get that product in time. And now as we have is reference to the customers. We've got a great partnership with EY on this and we're developing, right. So we're the first -- the first vendor to have that quote point, and that's really, really important for the industry.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#32

Just a couple of other quick questions. Deferred revenues are up materially. Just trying to understand exactly what's going on there.

Tom Wall

executive
#33

That's just due to the timing, Tim. Just timing, Tim, in regards to when we would raise the invoices on the subscription charges. So they increase. And obviously, then we recognize them on a monthly basis going forward.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#34

Okay. And then just on the decline in the gross profit margin, is that cost inflation and currency because we thought with the mix towards subscription versus services that underlying gross profit margin should be increasing?

Tom Wall

executive
#35

No, we would have called this out previously. The impact of that was around the SIs when we were getting third-party folks involved to work on projects. Their actual daily cost rate would have been higher than what we would have had from the FTEs from the gross profit margin cap. So that would have been here.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#36

Okay. And you've previously talked about software within your guidance, the growth in software or subscriptions. You haven't called it out this time. Is there any particular reason?

Michael Kelly

executive
#37

No, we haven't done that at this stage. No, I haven't done that. And again, we're being cautiously optimistic. But -- we're not calling that out, but we definitely see very healthy growth rates on the software subscription side as well.

Tim Lawson

analyst
#38

Yes. And just last question for me. The delivery percentages, delivery cost as a percentage of either total revenue or service revenues up quite strongly. I'm just not quite sure I've missed any question on that.

Michael Kelly

executive
#39

We would have been -- we would have -- I know we would have taken in Sis under our wing to work as part of our teams where we would have got very low margins with the idea of being to train them up and not get them still on some of our programs and not necessarily to make money on them. So that would have affected our margins on the delivery side. Anything else from your side, Tom?

Tom Wall

executive
#40

Yes, there's one of the things it just flows through. It's not the main contributor to return, but it's an element. When the utilization goes down, that means that your overhead goes up now and do that as well. And then we would have had some FX impact regards of the guys from an overall perspective, depending on what regions they are in. So that would have been some of the main contributors to that.

Operator

operator
#41

Your next question comes from Jules Cooper from Shaw and Partners.

Jules Cooper

analyst
#42

I'm sort of just interested, you've made a couple of comments. One, around your headcount kind of being at scale now, and where you'd sort of like it to be sustained? And then you've sort of mentioned about the R&D that you don't need to sort of continue to invest more additional headcount in that area. Should we sort of think then that as a proxy for your professional services revenue that slight head count broadly down in the other parts of the business being relatively flat at that means essentially a flat professional services revenue into next year would be a sort of a reasonable expectation?

Michael Kelly

executive
#43

Yes, that's a reasonable deduction. In terms of the R&D side, as I said, we're pushing a pro India hiring and using that cost base advantage in India. And maybe reducing hiring replacements or whatever in North America, which is the most expensive market for us. So we are getting extra heads and focus from people in terms of the R&D, but we're leveling off on the R&D. And it's obviously a big spend anyway. So we're still investing. It's just we're leveling off the growth, good phenomenal growth in R&D. On the services side, in terms of the forecast, yes, that's a reasonable reduction as well in terms of the growth rate on services. Overall, last year, we would have taken a big jump in services around 1 or 2 big programs. And we've replaced that with new business in terms of backfill and so on because those programs have tapered down a little bit. And then as I said, we would have given away quite a bit of services to SIs. And we want to continue that trend with very, very strong appetite from SIs to work with us and we're having to kind of give them the services. So it's in line with the growth of software revenues to and that it's -- we want to try and get a shot where revenues to be, by far, the biggest number in terms of the revenues and the subscriptions. So yes, the production is good.

Jules Cooper

analyst
#44

All right. And then just as a follow-up there, you sort of made a comment that you would like to see the product revenues above 50% and growing. Are you able to sort of share a time frame which you sort of hope to achieve that goal? And also just to, I suppose, the insight would be should the professional services revenue be roughly the same level as it is today under that scenario? Or do we sort of see the services coming down when you get to 50% because the pie smaller essentially?

Michael Kelly

executive
#45

Yes. No, I think the services will continue to grow at -- it's not the primary focus of the business. Within the next year or 2, I'd say this crossing that threshold and the subscription is continuing to grow above 50%. So it's not that we're holding back in services. They're trying to reduce services so that the product revenues jump up percentage-wise over services. We're trying to grow the overall number from the overall business. So we're relaxed about it. It's not a -- it's not something we're going to do this year, but either just the whole back services and deliver software revenues only. We'll do it in the next year or 2, probably 2 years. And I would say, we're giving to that free flow cash flow as well by FY '24. So we could increase our services revenues. But as I said, it's not a priority. It's really throught to try and bring in the SIs and get them going on our product.

Operator

operator
#46

Your next question comes from Chris Gawler from Goldman Sachs.

Chris Gawler

analyst
#47

I just wanted to ask a follow-up question on the decline in the gross profit margin. I know you spoke about services being a contributor to that in the SIs strategy. But just to confirm, there hasn't been any decline in the software gross margin. Has there?

Tom Wall

executive
#48

No, there hasn't.

Chris Gawler

analyst
#49

Yes. Great. And then on to your FY '23 guidance. You mentioned that 90% of it is locked in or not locked in but from cross-sell opportunities. I mean how much of that is projects that are kind of locked in now versus what you need to go out and bring in FY '23? I guess just trying to get a sense for your visibility into hitting the guidance for '23?

Michael Kelly

executive
#50

The majority of the 90% will be locked in at least 2/3 of it. And so obviously, with that pipeline of the, our pipeline is always balanced in terms of this might start next week if it doesn't start and start or whatever. So we've got a pipeline of deals coming through. We have made changes in terms of our sales team as well that our sales team are focusing then on cross-sell opportunities with our existing clients. So that is definitely the biggest bulk and where we see the strength of the business. . And then as you said, new name, new sales, we're not putting in an off a lot of guidance for that because it's more of a risk environment, we're been cautious. So we believe that where it is. So I'd say confidently, we're 2/3 locked in on that existing cross-sell still.

Operator

operator
#51

Your next question comes from Siraj Ahmed from Citi.

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#52

Just a few questions. Just first one, Michael, I just want you to comment on services being flat year-on-year. So second half, it was down significantly, right, around EUR 31 million. So are you assuming that it improves from there? Or should we have seen flat from the second half levels?

Michael Kelly

executive
#53

No, no, there will be an increase. So we're just talking flat in an overall year-on-year comparison. So we're growing even though they come down in the second half of last year because of those projects coming to an end, as I mentioned earlier, the big ones, but still grow overall. So it'll grow off the back of that second half. But overall, we're saying liquidly being around similar on the services year-on-year.

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#54

Got it. And so that sort of implies that software revenue will be growing at less than 20% or sort of 20%. Is that the growth that we should be expecting going forward?

Michael Kelly

executive
#55

Yes. Software, again, we've guided, I think, 20% every year. And it's just that it will be up there between 20%, 25%, whatever maybe we can go to, could be better. Again, it depends on what way the deals come through. So we're not giving a huge guidance on that, but it's going to be very strong in terms of the product growth rate -- as strong.

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#56

In terms of the free cash flow profile in FY '24, just maybe one for Tom. Just can you understand how we should think about the profile, right? Are you expecting the free cash flow posture for the whole fiscal year '24? I think you burned around EUR 15 million in this half. So should we assume that half and then again goes to zero -- profile, please?

Tom Wall

executive
#57

I think when we talk about the full [indiscernible] reporting we always have H1, which will generate, generate higher cash flow in H2. So from an overall perspective, we would see the trends going that way, Siraj,there will be more of H2 in FY '24 that be the positive area kicks in..

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#58

And just into '22 and '24, Tom, like how do you -- should we assume it halves the cash burn? And then is that the way to think about it or is it mostly in '24?

Tom Wall

executive
#59

The trend for -- again, from an overall specifics, what we put in place will be -- the trend will continue, say, for FY '23 will be to reduce the negative free cash flow and then to get to positive, but it will probably be closer to H2 in the FY '24 to we'll get the positive thought. But the trend is H1, we tend to burn more cash. and then H2, we generate more just from the timing of the billings and subscription revenues and activity in that.

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#60

Michael, just in terms of new customer pipeline, when you spoke a few months back, you were quite optimistic on the new customer pipeline. Has something changed there in terms of new deals?

Michael Kelly

executive
#61

No, I don't think so. I think -- look, I am optimistic, but cautiously. It's been -- for us, it's been a top 2, 3 years on the new name front. And we've been building this platform and continually cross-selling it into our existing base to prove it. So I think we've kind of built the credibility and the acceptance in the marketplace that we are the main player. And also that we have delivered to our very large clients. So I think we're in an optimistic situation in the pipeline. The claims side of the business in the past -- during the COVID side, very little claims activity in terms of new name. I thought long and hard about that one and try to investigate way. And maybe the answers I'm getting back is that our carriers were pretty much focused in on the claim side, paying out a lot of claims, and they weren't going to go into any kind of a change program around whatever that we're using at that stage. They'd come out of us. Our claims pipeline has grown again. And that is our new product in terms of the market leader compound and obviously, the Absent dropped into that as well. So quite optimistic about it. But again, decisions are slower, Siraj. I mean it's -- we're in a different world in terms of how decisions again paid in the carrier was. Just seems that they basically have been cautious. Even the customers we have, particularly those who have a IBAN product, they will be doubled down to make sure that the project was a success and that it's scaling and that they're very comfortable and they're getting their oral -- In previous years, we would have seen that they might deployed a few other triggers. And so I don't know, we have that food as well and that will pop over there. We're going to start something there as well. They may have been more ambitious. But now the focus in those carriers is very much return on investment and caution. And I did indicate that, that I see it much more as an incremental growth opportunity on a big buying kind of in our full suite. I think as we continue to prove ourselves in this is mega stuff in terms of the size of these carriers. As we continue to prove ourselves, we will continue to ease the caution that they have and that will hopefully increase our pipeline. So we have a strong pipeline of opportunities and just quite a few of them in a claims stroke Absent imagine as well. It's just a question of getting them to make decisions.

Siraj Ahmed

analyst
#62

Understood. Just last one. You spoke about Australia and the conditions for the last year or so. Given that you stopped update is done, right? I think it's getting to the time frame that they have to upgrade, right? So the question any update on that? Second thing is that assumed in the revenue guidance? Or is that above that?

Michael Kelly

executive
#63

Yes. We have assumed some of that is in the number for sure. We're in active discussions now with an analysis. We've got customers comfortable with it. there is one of our big customers in the region that, unfortunately, we probably won't go ahead as planned in the next step way. So we've taken that into account as well as we head in FY '24, which will be a big healthy growth rate as well. So -- it depends -- the reason that they're not going to have is nothing to do with us. It is run budgets and what they can spend and stuff. So yes is the answer. We will see upgrades happening in the region, and that was -- that's a watershed for us because it opens them into the full AdminSuite. So I'm very, very optimistic about on a coming up to -- quickly on the cloud stuff.

Operator

operator
#64

There are the questions at this time. I'll now hand back to Mr. Kelly for closing remarks.

Michael Kelly

executive
#65

Thank you. So overall, I think it's been a good year, strong year of growth for us. Quite a lot of headwinds. But overall, the finishing up the year with the New York Life case study has been really, really important for us. I think the joint promotion of that in the next few months will be important. We're also sponsoring the Group Tech conference in Vegas on the 20th of September. And at that conference, I'll have one of our other large Tier 1 clients on the stage with me and with one of our SIs PwC talking about the program that we've been doing with them. So I think what you're going to see from FINEOS is more and more really solid referenceability. And a solid performance in the next 12 months and hopefully continue the growth rates beyond that. So thanks very much. .

Operator

operator
#66

Thank you. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete FINEOS Corporation Holdings plc transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to FINEOS Corporation Holdings plc earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.