Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 10, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Brian Essex
analystOkay. Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Brian Essex, Goldman Stock security software analyst. So thank you to everyone for joining us today for our second day of our Technology and Internet Conference. Just a quick note before I get started, if anyone on the webcast has questions they'd like to address, please enter those questions in the webcast portal. I'll try to leave 10 or so minutes at the end, depending on how many questions we have. And we'll do -- to get to some of those questions and we'll do my best to get to as many as I can. Today, I have -- I'm very excited to have Ken Xie, Founder, Chairman, CEO of Fortinet; and Keith Jensen, the company's CFO. What I'll do to start though is I'll pass it off to either Keith or Peter, whoever wants to do kind of safe harbor disclosure, and then we'll kind of kick it off from there.
Keith Jensen
executiveSure, Brian, this is Keith. And my understanding is that they're going to put the safe harbor language up, and there's not a need for us to read through it. So I assume that will happen at some point during the presentation.
Brian Essex
analystOkay. Got it. We'll assume that that's going to happen. And maybe I'll just move right into Q&A then.
Brian Essex
analystSo first, I'd like to touch on the macro. Either Ken or Keith, there's a certain -- a certain portion of the business, particularly the mid-small side of the business, you may not have a great deal of visibility into. But for segments such as large enterprise, what were conversations like as you kind of moved through the pandemic last year? How they changed through the year, and how do you feel about the business going into 2021?
Ken Xie
executiveI can go a little bit first, and then Keith will help me. I think if we count 1 years ago when the pandemic start, the corporate IT had some rush by whether to fix the work-from-home issue or like how to handle these lot of data to ASIC remotely. So using VPN or ASICs. And then once pandemic goes through, we do see a lot of companies started thinking how to digitize their whether service or how to work from home, kind of make it more permanent. So that's the internal process, whether if you look at -- whether the remote base of service kind of approach of kind of like a Zero Trust remote access or place some of the VPN alone. And then probably, right now, a lot of them are thinking maybe work-from-home will be like long-term solution. And also what's the infrastructure impact they may have, how to make the home office more like a branch office, they call a home branch. All these kind of things going on. So it's quite some change. And also, they started thinking what's the right way to do the whole infrastructure. But before, they only like have all these campus or working environment are secured. At home, it's all mixed traffic, whether the entertainment use or -- it's obviously all mixed together, so they try to see what was the way they can expand some of the working environment, both the quality and security work-from-home because as you can imagine if you're in a call right now, if there's something going on, or especially some meeting, important meeting, it could be pretty damaging there. So that's where there are a lot of solutions starting to come up. And so we call it security-driven networking, make sure it's -- they have a very good quality network, and the same time, it's very secure. It's more like the campus of branch office environment that also can be extended to home.
Brian Essex
analystAll right. That's super helpful. And maybe I need to ask the obligatory SolarWinds question. How did that change things? How did that change the narrative with companies that you have conversations with both like during the event and as you're kind of sitting here in 2021?
Ken Xie
executiveIt's from the marketing impact, it's similar like how the target Sony case happen in like 2012, 2013. So all the companies starting -- especially government, is starting like -- I mean, raised awareness of all this importance of a cyber security. But this trend all come from the supply chain from third party. So sometimes, even their corporate IT can be pretty good, but somehow, they simply also have difficult time when it happens. So that's where I feel they may bridge the whole industry standard, or to certify some third party, whether software or hardware or other things, make sure they meet certain security standards. And at the same time, leverage some other like service providers, equity vendor and also help them like what's the right architecture to prevent this to happen, or if it's happening, how to quickly like contain it and make sure it's not spread out, reduce the damage and also make sure they can also do the remediation or other things can be done. But on the other side, it's really, like I said before, the whole infrastructure security is very important, internal segmentation, and also make sure to secure all part of the infrastructure, not just the server, but also like the home device and the network itself and also working with cloud. And it's the whole infrastructure security that is very important.
Brian Essex
analystRight. That's super helpful. I wanted to ask, one of the narratives that we hear from investors quite a lot, and I think one of your peers talks about it as well, is no longer needing an appliance to do security at some point. And I guess, as we kind of walk through this whole kind of software meets the world theme, how do you think about the future of Fortinet? And how you're positioned for things like Zero Trust and SASE and the mix of software versus appliances that you might have several years down the road given where we see digital transformation playing out?
Ken Xie
executiveI think because security touch all part of digital transformation or all part of the infrastructure, you can look at history what kind of architecture. You can look at like 20, 30 years ago, the PC server replaced the mainframe and terminal, right? So -- and then like 10 years ago, the cloud mobile started replacing some of the PC and server. But Gartner, they say in the next 2 years, they say that the edge and the immersive technology will replace cloud and mobile. It's always some -- like a 2-part: in some part, centralized; and some part somehow has been on the customer side, which mostly is more in the hardware. So that's always the case. And even like work-from-home, all these kinds of things, you do need hardware to make things working. I think some companies, they are probably more software-based. They don't have a capability to really work in hardware. And that sometimes, it all has to be using software instead of hardware because of their own limitation. But look at the whole infrastructure, you do need hardware. Even a lot of companies, whether cloud like a Microsoft or Amazon, all these things, they are kind of like a software company, but they also develop their own hardware, their own chip, right? So the same thing for Apple, because you have to address the whole infrastructure security and how a software need to be working together with the hardware, where the software runs up. So that's where, especially when you have the edge computing, whether like your auto-driving car, home appliance, your IoT device connected to 5G, you do need all these has to be working together. That's what we call the whole infrastructure security or secure-driven networking. So the best case really would be design the infrastructure, design the network already have security built in. So that's what make it more easy to manage, more secure. That's where like when you do SD-WAN or the 5G or any other new infrastructure, to consider to security together instead of our security add-on later. So that's what making the whole infrastructure more secure.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. That's very helpful. Maybe Keith, I wanted to throw a question your way. You guys reported earnings last week, I think great results. I think some were a little surprised with the reaction of the stock, given the magnitude of the beat and the level of your guidance, particularly on the revenue side. Some may, though, have been concerned about margins implied by 2021 guidance. So I wanted to get your sense of how do you think about setting guidance there? And how should we think about margins in general, your approach to balancing growth and profitability?
Keith Jensen
executiveYes. Hey, Brian, and thanks for acknowledging the very strong performance in the fourth quarter of 2020 and throughout the entire year. I think the sales team would thank you as well if they were on the call. Yes, I think the first -- just stepping back on the margins, I think if you normalize the operating margin for the T&E and marketing savings that we had because of the pandemic in 2020 versus how we're modeling in 2021, we would make the point that we're actually taking margins up by 50 to 100 basis points. In terms of how we think about it, the company's been very successful for many years now executing on this balanced growth and profitability framework that we talked about. And I think we've quantified it a little bit over a year ago where we said we expected growth in the midterm to be over 15% each year and margins to be in that 25% average throughout that time frame. And if you look back at the performance during -- you've seen a company that's actually grown at over 20%, largely organically throughout the last 3 years, and it's added about 200 basis points of margin each year for the last 3 years. So I think that, at a very high level, that's kind of how we look at it. Now within that framework, there's years that maybe we tilt a little bit more towards profitability; in other years, we tilt a little bit more towards growth. And that's really a reflection of how we perceive the market opportunities as we start of each year. And I think, clearly, as we start off into 2021, we're fairly bullish in terms of what the opportunities are in front of us. And so within the framework, we've messaged that we see an opportunity for growth in 2021.
Brian Essex
analystGreat. That's super helpful. And then I guess, from a seasonal perspective, 1Q, the first quarter guide implies a more substantial seasonal revenue decline. Maybe thoughts about seasonality and how you expect things to play out through the year?
Keith Jensen
executiveYes. I think I would go back again to -- I don't think seasonality is going to be dramatically different for 2021. You can look at our growth rate that we've -- at the midpoint for the first quarter versus the full year, and I don't think you'd come away thinking that's a back-end loaded plan when you look at those numbers. And again, if you go back to the very, very strong performance we had in the fourth quarter, some of that sequential movement is perhaps just a little bit different than normally. But just again, I think that's just a function of what we saw with the strong performance in the fourth quarter.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. And then I want to go back to a comment that, I think it was you that made it on the analyst call back. But you sounded pretty excited about your pipeline into 2021. How should I frame out the status of your pipeline relative to other years as you've entered the fiscal year? And what are you seeing that's making the most substantial impact to the pipeline as we enter 2021?
Keith Jensen
executiveYes. I think, obviously, we've figured out that the math works with our continued growth pattern, that the pipeline is larger now in absolute dollars than it's ever been in the past. But again, if we look at the percentage opportunity pipeline year-over-year and what we're seeing in the growth there, it's one of the key drivers in terms of going through the guidance-setting process. We also look at things like sales capacity, if you will, close rates that we have, TAM, sales productivity and so forth. And I think we're seeing a very strong alignment there. In terms of the -- what's in the pipeline, if you will, I would probably parse that maybe in 2 different areas. One is on the firewalls. In the firewall, you have the SD-WAN component of it, which is, I think, has done very well for us, and we expect that to continue on. But we've identified probably 15, 16 other use cases for firewalls. And we made the point in the fourth quarter that those other use cases for the firewalls actually grew faster even than SD-WAN did as a pure firewall play. And then if you look at the fabric part of it, I think we're seeing a lot of traction with this platform strategy. There's a very natural tension in virtually any technology set of, is it best-of-breed or is it a platform. And the reality is, just at some point in time, the cost effectiveness of the platform, the ease of management of an integrated system I think provides a fair amount of tailwind for us, and we're seeing that in our pipeline.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. And I want to kind of like maybe use that opportunity to kind of segue into some product commentary. So one of the things I think that's been really interesting from my perspective is the strength of firewall activity in 2020, and the strength that we're seeing, at least from CIOs who we speak to and the channel that we speak to, firewall spend remaining robust through 2021. What is your outlook on that? How do you view the drivers there? And do you think that strength persists? Do you think we have more difficult comps in 2021 as a result?
Ken Xie
executiveI think that the firewall market will continue to grow just like it did in the last 30 years in the space, 30 years now. And because firewall is very unique and it's in good position, it's the needle of the network to really stop all the bad traffic. In the past, firewall is more like open access internally with encrypted traffic. Then like 20 years ago, when we started Fortinet, we pioneered -- we're the -- remember, we call that UTM firewall, the firewall could stop the malware, also the virus or the intrusion there into the endpoint software. And then nowadays, firewall is also starting to handle some other application and also like using the Zero Trust network to replace the VPN. So we're also, of course, announcing the FortiOS 7.0 and also the SASE integration into the firewall. So instead of you have to pull The traffic to the service provider path, you can have the firewall local to process all the traffic. And whether -- and even in the home, so that also will be very, very efficient. Instead of you have different path in the process of different applications, different traffic, if you can process all this within your own kind of gateway, so that's where we increase the -- like the security level, reduce the latency, so that's also where we're integrating the FortiOS 7.0. So that's why we feel it's much better level. So the firewall works simply to integrate more function, like your sandbox, the separate box, now it's part of the firewall and intrusion prevention, same thing. And which we do believe, because firewall is in a unique position in the middle of network to stop the bad traffic, we can integrate more function, and at the same time, we can increase the speed. And also more close to the customer, close to the data, so that's also the reason I'm going to say the edge will replace the cloud because like 90% data all generally on the edge, you need to process real-time local, if you can. So that's where we see the firewall market, network security market will continue to grow. So that's where we also backed by a lot of research with the current IDC. You can see by 2024, so the whole network security product market of $100 billion, and then the network security is $48 billion. It's about half of it, and the [ growth ] of $10 billion. And so, as you can see, it's still a huge market going forward because like 99% attack or threat all come from the network side, right? So you have to stop from where it's come from and not make the whole infrastructure secure -- we call it security-driven networking. So that's where firewall continue to grow. So we don't see any slowdown. That's also the reason we see the product revenue growth in last quarter, 21%, so because of firewall -- they do need a firewall to stop, whether at home or work environment, also deliver network traffic at the same time.
Brian Essex
analystThat's really interesting. And on that, how much growth do you see from competitor displacement versus developing new use cases for firewall?
Ken Xie
executiveI think if the market grows 10%, we grow 21%, definitely. We do take over some of the competitors, right? Because so far, we see all the other networks that we vendor, we don't see their products has any growth. So that's where -- because the advantage we have, whether from ASIC or most a function of the internal development integrate together, so that make it automate together. So that's the advantage compared to our competitor acquisition. Most likely, it will be different product and is difficult to integrate to automate. So that's the challenge we're facing. So we try to plan this, we invest this ahead of time. And so that's where the investment on the internal development or the function, make sure it's integrated ultimately from day 1. At the same time, using the ASIC to lower the computing cost and increase the computing power and also more function can be added in. So that's definitely we see it a lot of long-term benefit.
Keith Jensen
executiveAnd Brian, if I can just step in. I think you've touched on 2 very key points about the business. One is competitor displacements, particularly as we move up on the enterprise, is a key part of the business. And I don't want to ignore the very kind question about new use cases and point out SD-WAN is a new firewall use case. So thank you for asking that question.
Brian Essex
analystI was going to get there, too. I want to ask Ken about SASE as well, given that we kind of touched on it briefly. How does your SASE offering compare to competition? And what are you seeing as the most prevalent use cases that you can address with SASE architecture?
Ken Xie
executiveYes. The most benefit from SASE really is the service space, especially during the pandemic, a lot of IT people, they're very busy or they don't have some knowledge on working remotely, secure remotely. So that's the SASE benefits starting to come up. But also the SASE costs tend to be like 3 to 5x more expensive compared to if you have your own infrastructure, you manage all this together. And so that's where -- and for us, we do feel SASE eventually will be better for pretty much all the service provider to offer, and at the same time, you need to integrate and automate better instead of a different part and different products to handle all this traffic application. So that's where we -- we are the first one, we integrate SASE in the OS level instead of we have different SASE service, whether SD-WAN in different box, the web in different box, the firewall in different box, SASE in different box. So we have published in the same FortiOS, whether you can load on the cloud virtually or you can run it in our plants with virtual acceleration. So that's where the customer, the service provider or even the system integrator, they can select themselves, give them the flexibility, at the same time, integrate, automate better.
Brian Essex
analystThat's very helpful. And how meaningful -- I mean, what do you think your business mix is going to be going forward, large enterprise, mid-market, service provider? Is anyone going to really -- has any one of those segments are really going to be a dominant piece of your business? Or is it going to be relatively balanced across those segments?
Ken Xie
executiveTraditionally, the service provider carries the biggest market for us. It's been reached like 25%, above 20% a few years ago. And now you can see last quarter, the #1, the kind of government, a lot of local, state, international government, it's about 17% come from government. And then the carrier service provider is about 16%. So these 2 still the 2 biggest ones. Maybe the -- during the pandemic, a lot of governments spent a lot of money building infrastructure to help in solve the working remotely issue there. And then the enterprise is also doing quite well. The retail and the activities and education, all this -- health care, even finance service is also doing quite well. So all this is all very important sector, but also pretty diversified. We don't have any sector over 20%, and the same thing for the geodiversity there. But going forward, I do see that the carrier service provider is still a very, very important part, especially with the old SD-WAN going on or the 5G starting to ramp up very, very quickly. And a lot of whether, call it, SASE or some other service based security also selling that very important now to helping the customer offload their burden there. So yes, we continue keeping closely working with them and provide better infrastructure, better service to support the secure infrastructure.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. Got it. Super. I want to touch a little bit on some of the other product cycles you might have [indiscernible] One is NP7, which you announced last year. What we're just starting to see now those announcements from a year ago to have an impact on -- even when new products have been introduced last year. How much of an impact does it have in the income statement today? And how meaningful of an impact do you think it would be -- it would have on the results as we kind of go throughout the year?
Ken Xie
executiveYes. We announced last year, I think, on the product refresh, probably only about 1/3 of the product may be refreshed right now, starting with the NP7 as well as [ there's still a ways there to go ]. And also the high-end tend to take a little bit more time to run part of sales because customer service provider, they didn't have time to do evaluation. I feel later this year, next year, we'll see a lot of benefit from NP7, also including the FortiOS 7.0 also looking quite well. We do already see some good result like 2 years ago when we announced the SoC4, helping the SD-WAN and on the low end, retail branch office does already see pretty meaningful growth right now. And we'll continue to benefit from that. And -- but also, going forward, we can see the network speed keep increase with 5G, some other parts. So NP7 has seen that advantage compared to some other solutions.
Brian Essex
analystYes. Interesting you mentioned 5G, I was going to touch on that. So how big of an opportunity do you think that is for Fortinet? And when do you think we'd start to see that materialize?
Ken Xie
executiveIt's -- different country, region has a little bit different progress. We see some international part, they kind of want to be faster. Because 5G, they must to connect all the device as there also is quite some business leverage on this. We do see the -- towards network security, towards the old LTE security, it can be pretty good opportunity. And yes, it would be a pretty huge market.
Brian Essex
analystAnd then I wanted to touch on basically kind of your core ASICs technology. Maybe if you can help frame out ASICs versus field-programmable, why go that route? And why can't some of the big cloud companies, other semiconductors companies, build their own security chip?
Ken Xie
executiveThe security chip also need to be -- come from a software function working first. And then later, you can put algorithms into the chip, whether you design an engine to run all this more efficiently. I think on average, probably when you put like a software function into the ASIC compared to using general purpose CPU, the performance tends to jump in like 30 to 100x. So that's probably including like 7 to 10 years progress on the -- what most kind of CPU program there. So that's a huge advantage. That's how the GPU, the Google GPU and like a lot of -- some companies develop their own chip. But they have to be working in a software algorithm first. And at the same time, you need to have the quantity, you also need a long-term investment, like each chip, on average, you need about 3 years and can cost hundreds of million dollar. If you don't have enough, like quantity, the market is not large enough. And also if the company not quite have a long-term vision or long-term strategy, it's very difficult for them to get into the ASIC space. But for us, like in my previous company, NetScreen, or Fortinet, from day 1, we secured and need huge computing power to support it. We do need to have ASIC to helping you run more function and long faster. And eventually also lower the cost because right now, security can look -- and on average, they're like 100x more expensive, 100x more slower compared to the networking function [ or this engine ]. So that's the issue that prevents security to be more deployed broadly. So that's where ASIC will solve the issue. But also, security market is not as big as networking or some other PC server, mobile phone market. So you do need that. So right now, we have probably 30% to 40% of the total global unit shipment. So we do have the economy of scale working for us because we're doing this for a long, long time now and also been invest for like more than 20 years in Fortinet in this area. So we do build a lot of IP. We do build a lot of technology and also we're working with all these kind of different supply manufacturer to making a chip or kind of working. I think that's what we do see going forward is we're keeping as a huge advantage for us.
Brian Essex
analystAnd given the cost performance advantage of the platform, why aren't you taking more share?
Ken Xie
executiveWe try to balance the amount of growth and profit. And so from day 1 of the IPO, we are like a profit and we balance the amount of growth and profitability. I think if we probably invest more, we can grow faster like some other companies, losing money, keeping all of our growth. We feel it would be the healthy business to -- so far, we're keeping whether the rule of 40, rule of 50 and balance amount of growth and profitability. And also, we do need time to -- I feel this is a more healthy growth, put it this way. And also, we continue to expand because the other part also, we accept not only the ASIC, but also there's other part of infrastructure. We also mostly develop internally. It will take a long time or effort compared to acquisition. But long term, all this different part of infrastructure product that integrate, automate together. So that's what we call the fabric, it works much better. It's a platform approach. It's integrated like whether the SASE, Zero Trust network access all into the OS, and whether the mail product, web product, all these kind of things, endpoint products, all designed working together from day 1. It's different compared to the acquisition, is that you can see some bigger networking company or some like security company are mostly acquisition. And then after a few years, right, so since no longer working is our multiple products and difficulty making progress. So we have this single FortiOS, keeping integrate more function. At the same time, using ASIC to keep an accelerated and also keeping build on other platform, different part of infrastructure, integrate, automate together with all this FortiGate, FortiOS.
Brian Essex
analystYes. And given that, I mean, is ASIC a limiting factor to innovation because it takes so long to develop? How do you think about your ability to leverage that platform to keep growth at a pretty high pace?
Ken Xie
executiveNo, ASIC is the additional benefit, right? So we have initially functioned just like any other security companies all work in a software. So I think every FortiOS, FortiGate, we have all the software version, you can run in the general purpose CPU, can run in the cloud on any device. And because we develop more function internally, as we integrate, it perform better even on software-only. And then the ASIC will give additional acceleration. So that's why we're using, we call secure computing rating. For the same function on average, we have a 10x performance advantage if it's only on ASIC. But we don't have to use an ASIC. We can use any software version approach in the cloud is all working quite well, even better performance because we internally designed all different functions working together. And then ASIC will be ancillary. So you can look at the FortiGate, we do have a general-purpose CPU in there. It's the same as any other competitor. But the ASIC gave us huge advantage whenever the function can be ancillary, the ASIC will be 10x performance improvement.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. Super helpful. And maybe could you shed some light on XDR solution you recently launched in a dynamic control low-engine power. Is it -- how do you compete against existing XDR offerings in the market? And what is your outlook for that business?
Ken Xie
executiveYes. Our product advantage related, they're working together with networking side, with cloud side, with all the other parts of infrastructure, right? So we try not just using XDR itself. It's working with network side and working with all different applications, different cloud infrastructure. So that's what we call the fabric in that we automate together. It's much effective that way compared to like a different XDR and different endpoint compared to different networking device and then different other like a cloud or some other part. So that's where I think the biggest issue facing a lot of ATP in the enterprise, there's too many security products from all different vendors. They never designed to working together. They're all designed to compete and not share any information, not to integrate, automate together. So that's where our XDR working well is our network security working well with all the other applications via web and cloud, obviously.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. That's super helpful. And we've got about 8 minutes left. So I wanted to give Keith a chance to chime in as well. I guess -- or maybe you, Ken, if you want to take this one, with regard to success moving upmarket. We've seen an increasing mix of high-end FortiGate billings. How has your go-to-market strategy changed with your large enterprise focus? Are you seeing similar traction upmarket with non-FortiGate as well?
Keith Jensen
executiveYes. I think the -- just pausing there in case Ken wants to jump in. Maybe he'll cover me after. But I think the company has been extremely successful with the channel strategy since its inception. And for all product segments, including the enterprise, we think the channel has a very, very important role and a leading role in it, if you will. Now that said, when you pivot into these large enterprises, it is key, it's important to have your own direct sales force that is bringing deals, particularly through maybe some of those resellers that you're being introduced to for the first time or may have an established relationship with a larger vendor, if you will. And so one of the metrics that we track, for example, is just how many accounts are assigned to an enterprise salesperson. As we go through this expansion and through this evolution, and as Ken kind of alluded to it, within this framework of growth and profitability. And the metric we look at is how many accounts are assigned. If you go back 3 years ago and look at, say, the U.S., there was probably 65 different accounts assigned to each sales rep. If you fast forward to today, as we came out of 2020, that metric is now under 25 accounts. And so as we continue to -- the go-to-market strategy is bringing more capacity, if you will, into that direct sales force to then work with the channel partners and bring deals to the finish line. I think the other dynamic about it is, are you the incumbent or are you the challenger? And internationally, I think we're very much the incumbent. We're the leader in the market in many, many countries and geographies, and I think that's probably -- we benefit from having home court advantage when you're the incumbent. When you're the challenger, as we are in the U.S., it takes a little more work and a little more effort to share the results.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. That's helpful. And then I wanted to touch on SD-WAN real quick. I think, Ken, you've noticed -- I think you've noted previously that you want to be the #1 SD-WAN vendor. As you compete against vendors like VMware, how are you positioned against them? Obviously, your secure SD-WAN, but how does that play out in the markets when you competitively go up against these vendors? And what do you see yourself having the advantage longer term?
Ken Xie
executiveFrom the very beginning, we integrate with security. So that's the advantage. We do see some market sort of come back. Majority of the customers, they want to have security to go with SD-WAN, so we have this huge advantage. So we have a single box replacing 3 box, replacing their SD-WAN box, replacing their networking box and also replacing their security box, right? So that's where there's a single box SD-WAN. At the same time, we have basically accelerated performance. So on average our performance like background SD-WAN. So the second competitor that performed probably only like 5% of what we have from a cost dollar base. So that's what's keeping the data advantage, leverage ASIC because it's a huge advantage, computing power and advantage compared with the software approach, whether you're using the versus CPU or some other part loading software on the 1 box. So we do have a huge advantage. And then the third part also because we keep on building in-house, so the innovation keeping going on. So you can look at the new FortiOS 7.0 release. So we do integrate with the SD-WAN with Zero Trust network access and with self-help building and with a lot of other functions integrate with other SASE function there. So that's not all our competitors have all this. So because they come from acquisition, then somehow the innovation start and you don't see any new function come up. And some other -- like one other company still bigger than we are, they're no longer on the SD-WAN Magic Quadrant on Gartner anymore because they are still falling behind on the customer requirement. So that's where all this is, I think, will be our advantage. And so we do feel we keep on gaining market share. So I think in 2020, we more than doubled compared to 2019. So we don't see any slowdown on the SD-WAN growth right now. So we do feel pretty comfortable we'll be the #1 leader.
Brian Essex
analystGreat. And maybe for you, Keith, it's clear Ken's view on organic versus inorganic growth. But you've recently acquired OPAQ, it's out there. How are you thinking about M&A? What does your pipeline look like? And are there any subsegments of the market in particular that you're focused on?
Ken Xie
executiveI think for us, the merger/acquisition will help us, the company, to grow and also long term. So we usually try to acquire the company. Are they our partner? We know how to integrate, how to automate how to working with them together. And at the same time, enhance what we have, right? So we do have our own kind of SASE, the OPAQ will help us accelerate some of that, gaining some additional team experience there. And the same thing for endpoint XDR. And I think pretty much all the other acquisitions are sort of similar. But we do see the issue when a company get bigger, if they just keeping acquire different company, different product, eventually, they cannot integrate and also cannot keep up the change in the space, innovation going on. Because security space is more and more dynamic. Every year, there's a lot of new things come up. You need to follow all the chain. At the same time, even the existing function, also keeping that additional requirement, you also need to be more very, very fast. So that's why you see all this bigger company, when they get bigger, they kind of stop the organic growth, all come from acquisition now. So basically, it's very, very important to keep the internal organic development, organic growth. That will be the long-term growth strategy. Instead of acquisition, you will work for a few years, leverage your channel customer base, the marketing sales power coverage. But after that, the product will starting falling behind, and then will be more product, more difficult to manage. So that's why we feel internal organic growth is very, very important.
Brian Essex
analystGot it. With that, I think we're about out of time. I don't think we have enough time for another question. But Ken, thank you very much for joining us. Keith, thank you as well. And to everyone on the webcast, thank you for joining, too. I hope everyone has a great day.
Ken Xie
executiveYes. Thank you, Brian. Happy to be here.
Keith Jensen
executiveThank you, Brian.
Brian Essex
analystYes. We'll talk to you soon. Bye now.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fortinet, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Fortinet, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.