Gartner, Inc. (IT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 2, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Information Technology IT Services conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#1

Hello, and good afternoon. My name is Andrew Nicholas, and I'm the research analyst covering the information services, consulting and HR technology sectors here at William Blair. Before getting started, I'm required to inform you that for a complete list of research disclosures or potential conflicts of interest, please visit our website at williamblair.com. With that out of the way, I'm very pleased to welcome Gartner's CFO, Craig Safian, to the 41st Annual William Blair Growth Stock Conference. Thank you very much for joining me, Craig.

Craig Safian

executive
#2

My pleasure, Andrew. Good to see you as well.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#3

I was hoping we could start off with just a minute or 2 on the business as a whole, maybe a quick snapshot just so that everyone on the webcast is on the same page. And then from there, we can move into some of the more kind of specific topics relevant to the current environment.

Craig Safian

executive
#4

Yes, absolutely. And thanks, everyone, for joining today. So let me give you a quick 1- or 2-minute thumbnail of Gartner, who we are and what we do. So Gartner, we deliver actionable objective insight to executives and their teams. Our insight, expert guidance, tools all enable better decision-making across every major enterprise function, including IT, HR, supply chain, finance and all the others. We essentially predominantly deliver our insight through individual subscriptions, which we sell to leaders and executives across the enterprise that run at least 1 year and in fact, average greater than 1 year in length. We are a free cash flow growth compounder, and we believe we have a long runway from a total addressable market perspective to grow our business, top line at double-digit growth rates, bottom line at double-digit growth rates, free cash flow at double-digit growth rates. Our long-standing financial model is consistent with our medium-term guidance. We can go into the details of that a little bit later, if you like. But basically, high level, our medium-term guidance includes double-digit revenue growth, modest margin expansion from a normalized 2021 level of between 18% and 19% and free cash flow growth at least as fast as EBITDA. And our free cash flow -- the power we see in the free cash flow, whether you look at it in terms of a percent of net income where we're well in excess of net income or as a percent of EBITDA, that free cash flow number reflects the benefit in our business of upfront billing. And so for the vast majority of our research contracts, we actually bill upfront, collect the cash upfront and then recognize the revenue and deliver the value over the subsequent months. We have a very strong balance sheet. And we expect to use our free cash flow to return capital to shareholders through our repurchase programs and also do opportunistic strategic tuck-in acquisitions. So that's the high-level view of Gartner.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#5

Perfect. That's helpful. And I'll probably touch on capital allocation a bit more as we get through here. But maybe with that as a starting point, we can kind of transition into how the business has navigated in the past 12, 15 months since the start of the pandemic, if you could kind of speak to that. And also maybe within that, talk about some of the major learnings or takeaways over that time frame, whether it's in terms of new product opportunities or customer demand dynamics, whatever you think is most important to the story.

Craig Safian

executive
#6

Yes, sure. Obviously, the last 12 to 15 months have been very interesting, and we've learned a lot. And we've actually had to navigate and pivot a number of times over the last year or so and generally pretty successfully. So when the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a global pandemic, we essentially transitioned our global workforce to operate effectively in a remote environment. And we actually had large portions of our workforce who are already working remotely. We're sort of engineered that way. But we quickly moved everyone remote and made sure we continued with our efficiency and productivity. We also pivoted real quickly to implement a number of cost avoidance initiatives that ensured that we could remain financially strong whatever the environment threw at us. And now as the macro environment has been improving, we have been restoring spending and targeted investments to make sure that we're well positioned to continue to rebound as the economy continues to recover. If we look at it by business, a little bit different story for each business. So Gartner Research, which again represents today about 80% of our overall business, was extraordinarily agile in meeting and exceeding the rapidly evolving needs of our clients. We pivoted our content almost immediately to address critical timely issues on the pandemic, such as remote work environments, cost optimization, business continuity. We took a lot of our best cross-practice content and made it broadly available to our clients. And we also significantly increased the number of content-rich webinars, other virtual events and just other ways for our clients to engage because the world was changing rapidly, and they really, really, really needed our help. On the Conferences side, obviously, the pandemic put a significant hit on that business as we were not able to run in-person conferences from essentially end of February last year through where we sit today. But we also adapted pretty dramatically there to serve our clients. We pivoted as quickly as we could to make our destination conferences virtual, delivering the same great content that our attendees are always seeking and would have received at our in-person conferences. And I'd argue -- and again, we can talk about this a little bit later, too. I'd argue we did a really good job of replacing that lost value, both economically on the P&L, but as importantly, as value to our clients in pivoting to delivering really high-end, high-value virtual conferences. And I guess if we sort of step back and think about the major learnings and takeaways, and some of this we knew and some of this was new learning or just reinforced, one is, the world is a crazy dynamic place, and there are always going to be sources of disruption and drivers of change. This situation was obviously very unique, and we had never really seen anything like it. But we have been preparing for this based on our experiences over the last decade plus of various economic cycles in different regions or different industries or what have you. I think the 1 constant, though, is regardless of the environment or sometimes, especially because of the environment, enterprise leaders and their teams need help. They need insight. They need expert guidance. And they need tools to navigate whatever the world is throwing at them. And this is really the core of our client value proposition and really the foundation for our financial performance in the past and actually as we made our way through the pandemic. The other thing I'd say is digital transformation is affecting all enterprise functions. And if anything, it got accelerated as a result of the pandemic. And every enterprise leader, whether they're in tech, finance, HR, marketing, supply chain, is dealing with disruption from digital transformation, and they need to address it. And we're obviously in a great position to help them. And then I think the last thing I'd say is we were able to demonstrate a great ability to effectively manage our costs. We had started on this journey exiting 2019 as we had kind of come through a very heavy investing cycle. But we were really quick to harvest savings, really quick to stop spending. And you saw the results of that flow through both from our EBITDA we generated in 2020 as well as the free cash flow we generated in 2020.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#7

Yes. I mean, you touched on a bunch of different topics there that I'd like to expand on. Maybe I'll start with kind of the improving macro backdrop and what it potentially meant for all the positive signs that we saw in your Q1 results. Pretty, pretty impressive business momentum across most of the businesses, particularly on the CV side. So maybe with that in mind, I mean, can you walk us through the major drivers of improvement in the first quarter relative to the fourth quarter, maybe how much was from new logos versus existing clients versus win backs, and maybe how that would compare to kind of a prepandemic breakup of those growth drivers?

Craig Safian

executive
#8

Yes, sure. No, of course. I think in the first quarter, on a stand-alone quarter basis, we actually have really strong performance. And it was really a continuation of the improvements that we had seen in the fourth quarter of 2020. Now the 1 thing just to keep in mind is all of our year-over-year and rolling 12-month metrics are burdened, for lack of a better word, by the really challenging second quarter of last year. And once we roll into reporting our 2Q results this year, we'll be past that headwind. But on a stand-alone basis, really strong operating results across all of our businesses. The contributions to the improvements were also really across the board, and this applies to both GTS and GBS. We saw underlying retention improve. We're starting to see some win-back activity. We're seeing growth in new logo contract value. And while it's not all the way back to normal, we're also seeing a lot of progress in selling more or expanding with existing clients. On top of that, in GBS, all of our practices, with the exception of marketing, grew their CV year-over-year at double-digit rates. All the practices positively contributed to positive quarterly [ NIC ] fee, and GBS new business was actually up 87% year-over-year. So it was across the board, but again, I think continued momentum, a better selling environment, for sure, but continued momentum from the fourth quarter.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#9

Great. Great. And you touched on it here, but -- or just now, but GBS specifically, I mean, why do you think GBS has rebounded so quickly from what now looks like a trough in the third quarter to double-digit CV growth in the first quarter? And if there's any thoughts about its growth relative to GTS even, maybe that would be helpful in us comparing it to.

Craig Safian

executive
#10

Yes, sure. I mean, if you just look at GBS as a stand-alone business, I think the first thing I'd note is the value proposition of our products and services within GBS are really strong and just as valuable as the long-standing value proposition that you've seen from our technology research business, and you're seeing that now. I think the growth rate that we reported in the first quarter being up 12% is a great indication that our compelling client value proposition is resonating with prospects and clients. And we're seeing it from a retention rate perspective, and we're seeing it, as I mentioned, on the new business side with growth up over first quarter of last year of up 87%. I think all the practices, as I just mentioned, grew double digit with the exception of marketing, but all of them positively impacted the positive NCVI or net contract value increase performance in the quarter. I think comparing to GTS is okay. Within GTS, obviously, it's a much larger business selling into 1 single function. So to put it in perspective, GTS is a roughly $3 billion business selling to the IT function. GBS is a $730 million business, and that's carved into several unique enterprise functions like HR, finance, sales, marketing, supply chain, et cetera. And so we have -- we believe we have a huge market opportunity on the GTS side, and we believe that we are wildly underpenetrated on the GTS side, but even more so on the GBS side. And I think we're definitely seeing the benefits of that. And then the 1 other thing I'd say is we were on a path prior to the pandemic of getting this GBS business up to double-digit growth rates. If you recall, we exited 2019 on an upswing with, I think, it was 7% organic CV growth, 8% reported CV growth, and we felt good about the momentum. Obviously, the pandemic jumped in front of that a little bit. As you mentioned, the trough was really in the third quarter for this business and then really started accelerating from there. And we're happy that we've gotten the double-digit growth rates, but we always believe that this, just like GTS, could be a really strong, consistent double-digit grower for us.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#11

Given all that, do you feel like with the market size being multiples of the GTS market size, I think you've outlined that in prior investor days and in calls, and the accelerating momentum around kind of the new products and the build-out there, I mean, is this a business that can grow in excess of GTS for the foreseeable future? Or is that within the range of outcomes? It certainly seems like given the smaller size, that would be a possibility, particularly given the fact that marketing has been a headwind due to some of the product transitioning over the past several quarters. So if you could maybe talk about the range of outcomes and also when we would be lapping the marketing headwind and what that could mean to the overall growth rate.

Craig Safian

executive
#12

Yes, of course. So I think if you look at our medium-term outlook or guidance for both GTS and GBS, we believe both can grow between 12% and 16% per year. And obviously, we're very excited about the GBS opportunity as we have been all along despite some skepticism out there. The value proposition for GBS is exactly the same as it is for GTS. We're providing actionable objective insight to help leaders and their teams just make better decisions. GBS, as we just talked about, has been accelerating. And I think really 2 things just to kind of double-click on what we just talked about. One is we are seeing the benefits of the building blocks and investments we put in, in 2018 and 2019. We added experts. We added service. We grew and trained the sales force. We introduced new seat-based or role-based products for individual leaders and their teams. And again, as you talked about, that market opportunity is enormous. And again, each of those enterprise functions that we sell to are massive double-digit billion-dollar opportunities in and of themselves. And then your last question on marketing. Most of that nonrenewal business is behind us. There's a little bit that hung over into 2021, but it's a tiny fraction of what we encountered in -- over the course of 2020. So we've essentially lapped that headwind now and moving forward.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#13

Okay. All right. That's helpful. One other kind of component that you've mentioned a few times was kind of the investment cycle in '18 and '19 and hoping prepandemic to harvest a lot of those investments in 2020. I think one of the things that you talked about quite a bit over that time frame was some of the recruiting and training initiatives that you put in place. I realize the pandemic makes it a little bit murkier and more difficult to kind of figure out what that product -- progress looks like. But is there anything you can say in terms of that particular aspect of the productivity kind of equation and maybe how that informs your hiring plans on a go-forward basis?

Craig Safian

executive
#14

Yes. Those were all good things that we were working on and putting in place coming in the tail end of 2019 as we rolled into 2020. And some of them, we were actually able to action pretty actively and aggressively over the course of 2020, and I'll double-click on that in a second. And some of them, just because we weren't hiring nearly as much and because we had to go virtual on all training anyway, we didn't get to really see the full benefits of. But we did take the opportunity to really refine and continue to test and drive those shorter training periods so we can get people into the field more quickly. I think the 1 area that we talked about that I do think yielded really nice benefits for us in 2020 and will moving forward is the territory optimization work we talked about in the back half of 2019 or dynamic territory analysis. And so what we've been able to do is really aggressively look at whenever we have a territory turnover because the person left or the person was promoted or whatever it may be, what is the best optimal use of the dollars associated with filling that territory? Are we better off combining that territory with another territory and going after it that way? Or are we better off not rehiring in that exact territory and deploying it to some other place where we think we can drive a better, faster, near-term returns? And so we've been very aggressive around doing that. And again, if you look at our headcount growth, some of the glide down we've seen in headcount is because we've been very aggressive in territory optimization in that I'd argue the territories we have in place now are of significantly higher quality than -- on average, than they were 12 or 15 or 18 months ago. And that sets us up to really now grow the sales force, as you alluded to, in the high single digits this year. So all those programs, we worked on. Some of them, we were able to on at scale, like the territory optimization. Some of them have had less scale flow through them just because of the pandemic. But again, we still believe they're all really good things to do that can drive really nice productivity and efficiency gains for us into the future.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#15

Is the territory optimization work focused more in the U.S. or international? Or is it pretty balanced across the 2?

Craig Safian

executive
#16

It's wherever we have territories basically, because it essentially informs where we want to put new territories and what we want to do with territories when there is any sort of change in the person serving that territory. So it's global. The real focus is on where do we put the growth. And so if we've got 100 slots, what are the top 100 slots to deploy? And then if we have 50 more, where are the next 50? And so on and so on.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#17

Sure. Makes sense. Makes sense. So we've talked about the growth outlook a little bit. We've talked about hiring plans now. Obviously, that all kind of gets into the next topic, which is kind of the medium- to long-term outlook for margins. You mentioned your plans to kind of modestly expand EBITDA margins compared to a normalized EBITDA margin in 2020 -- or excuse me, 2021. I think that would put you at levels that you haven't seen since at least 2017, depending on what's implied there, maybe as high as something you've seen or have not seen since 2013. So kind of help me bridge the major components of that shift higher because I think there's a lot of positive things to point to that would -- I would think are constructive for margins. So if you can kind of break those down, quantify anything that you could, I think that would be helpful for the [indiscernible].

Craig Safian

executive
#18

Yes. No, happy to. So I think the easiest way to think about it is we were in an investing cycle from 2017 through 2019, which was when you saw margins move below the historical range. Obviously, 2020 and now our guide for 2021 reflect unusual circumstances from the pandemic and the resulting economic environment. For 2021, our guidance obviously reflects the large addressable market we serve, the compelling value proposition we offer and just talked about and our ability to execute. We are now restoring additional costs and accelerating growth spending as we move through the year. And that's why we're pointing to normalized EBITDA margins between 18% and 19% because that will reflect like our merit increase that we put into effect on April 1, reopening costs, resumption of some travel, opening up real estate and the resumption of gross margins. From there, we expect 2022 margins to modestly increase from those normalized 2021 margins. And so that's essentially the way we're thinking about it. I mean, if you think about what are the levers that will help drive that, one, we're committed to really maintaining the tight cost controls that you've seen from us over the last 18 to 24 months; two, we expect to move in the right direction in terms of growth to the overall top line, which, again, as GTS rebounds and GBS continues to do well and conferences gets more back to normal and we're able to go in person, all of those have positive impacts on the overall P&L. So it's a combination of we're running the business to drive double-digit top line growth. We're taking the learnings and the cost discipline that we've learned and applied from the last year. And we're just continuing to make sure that we're balancing, investing for the future with really nice profitable growth.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#19

Absolutely. Makes sense. I mean, you started to speak to events a little bit, so maybe I'll pick up there. It certainly seems like things are turning in the right direction on that front and maybe a possible return to in-person conferences later this year. I know it's not included in your guidance, but I was just kind of wondering if you could kind of walk us through how you stand on that topic where we sit today, and maybe more importantly, how much lead time you feel you would need to transition from virtual to in-person here in the second half. I think from an operational perspective, you've already mentioned kind of being ready to go on that front or at least that was the message on the first quarter call. But I'm also kind of asking about how much lead time you need to give to clients and sponsors for that -- this to kind of work as a normal conference would. So I'll open that up to you.

Craig Safian

executive
#20

Yes. No. I think there's a couple of things there that we're very focused on. So one is the feasibility and allowability, quite frankly, of having large in-person destination conferences. And so I think right now, the situation varies pretty widely around the world. Here in the U.S., it definitely looks more promising than it did a year ago, 6 months ago or even 3 months ago. I think the same could be said for places like Australia. Obviously, across Europe, in India and other places around the world, it doesn't look as promising right now. And so I suspect we'll be able to run some in-person, and we'll have to run some virtual just based on the local dynamics that are happening in the market. In terms of planning for it, we very mindfully have given guidance that assumes all virtual. But as you mentioned, operationally, we are planning to launch or return to in-person starting mid-September or October onward. And we're monitoring the situation really, really closely. We're -- our selling motion reflects -- if we say on the calendar that we plan on operationally having an in-person conference, that means our sales teams are selling tickets to attendees and selling sponsorships to exhibitors in preparation for that. Over the next couple of months, we'll have to make calls, at least preliminary calls, because that's when we really start incurring upfront costs from a venue perspective and other things to get ready for that conference. The good news is we've been staying very close to our attendees and our exhibitors and pulsing them frequently around their desire and their ability to actually return to in-person. The sentiment still remains very positive. Of course, it's very COVID- and very region-specific as well. But we feel good about where we are, and we'll update everyone. Probably in August, we'll have much better visibility. We'll be 2 months closer to those conferences, and we'll give an update on where we are and what decisions have been made around do we go virtual or do we resume in-person in a lot of those conferences.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#21

And that's more specific to the next 6 months, 12 months, but in a kind of "postpandemic environment." I mean, how do you think that this model will evolve? What's the steady state of the business in '22, '23 and beyond? I mean, is this -- is the hybrid or virtual conference structure something that you can't really put back in the bag, if you will? Or how do you think about that?

Craig Safian

executive
#22

Well, I think it's a great thing to have in our bag. We don't want to put it back in the bag. We want it in our bag available for use. No, it's actually -- it's a great asset that we now have. That's a great complement to our overall conferences portfolio. So now we can offer 1-day local conferences. We can offer multi-day destination conferences. And we can offer virtual conferences. And I can tell you, even prepandemic, there is always a desire for each of those things or a need in the market for each of those things. And so I think it's a great complement for our business that we will use as a combination of a way to launch into markets where maybe we can't launch a destination conference at scale. Now we can actually do a virtual, build up critical mass and then launch potentially more profitably. There's always going to be a segment of our clients who can't or don't want to travel. And so we can have potentially virtual offerings for them as well. So we think it's a really important asset that we've developed. We've gotten really good at it. We continue to get better with each subsequent conference we deliver. And we think it will be a very important asset for us moving forward as well.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#23

Great. Great. Makes sense. Looks like we have a couple of minutes left. So I'll just wrap up with 1 more on the balance sheet. It's in really good shape, obviously, having navigated the past 12, 15 months quite well. You're now in a position with a lot of flexibility. How do you envision leveraging that position in the near to medium-term? How aggressive can you be on the share repurchase front? And how much are you holding back for M&A? And if there is M&A, where are some areas that you might be interested?

Craig Safian

executive
#24

Yes. I guess what I'd say in the last minute or 2 is no change to our long-standing capital allocation policy -- philosophy, which has been essentially, we use our excess cash for share repurchases and strategic tuck-in M&A. Obviously, we had a lot of cash on our balance sheet as of 3/31. We continue to generate lots of free cash flow. And so we have lots of capital to deploy on behalf of our shareholders. Specifically, we have $446 million on the balance sheet. We only need about $150 million or $200 million to run the business. We think we're going to generate at least $850 million of free cash flow in 2021. So there's a lot there that we can put to use. All of our 2021 and medium-term guidance is essentially organic. So we don't need to do acquisitions to drive growth because of that addressable market we talked about earlier. But we are always looking for strategically relevant, financially sensible tuck-in acquisitions, which can enhance predominantly our research business. As we talked about on the May earnings call, we repurchased more than $600 million worth of our stock through the end of April. Board increased our authorization by another $500 million in May, which was the second increase this year. And so at the end of April, we had about $790 million authorized. And so it's a long-winded way of saying, as has been the case in the past, we have a lot of cash to put to use. And sort of the primary way we'll do that is through our buyback programs.

Andrew Nicholas

analyst
#25

Perfect. Well, thank you very much for your time, Craig, and all the thoughtful answers. Thank you to everyone who's joined us on the webcast, and have a great rest of the day.

Craig Safian

executive
#26

Thanks, Andrew. Thanks, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Gartner, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Gartner, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.