Genpact Limited (G) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 19, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#1

Hello, everyone. Thanks for joining in. This is Tien-Tsin Huang. I cover the payments and the IT services sector at JPMorgan. And super happy to have with us Ed Fitzpatrick, the CFO of Genpact, to give us an update. And like the other sessions, we're going to do a fireside chat format, again, with the questions that I've gathered from the investment community. And if you have any questions, feel free to log in through the portal in the Ask a Question section here. And I will be monitoring the questions and happy to ask Ed, especially the hard ones, as I get them. So Ed, great to see you. Thanks for joining us today.

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#2

Thanks for having me. Glad to be with you.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#3

No, it's great. I know you guys are really busy. So we'll get right into it, if that's okay. I thought we'd just start. I know coming off your earnings that you disclosed a lot already. But maybe just get everybody on the same page here and just maybe quickly walk us around the globe, talk about what trends you're seeing from a client priority standpoint and how well you've been positioned here, especially given where we are in the pandemic.

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#4

Sure. Sure. I think I'd say just first, broadly, the market is every bit as attractive as it has been. The demand, as you've seen, there's been an elongation of our bookings that we talked about in the last quarter -- or last quarter or half or so. But broadly, the priorities are similar for our clients as they were before the pandemic, right? Need to find ways to transform their own businesses, right, and keeping a competitive advantage. That's continuing. And COVID, in many ways, just kind of accelerated certain things. And we do expect over the long haul that this is probably more of a tailwind for us, even though right now, it's been a struggle for most companies. But we do view this as another impetus to say, "How can I run my business more effectively and efficiently?" And there's a few -- I'd say a few trends or things that we're helping our clients deal with, right? So -- and one is, you heard Tiger talk about the shift from off-line to online across every industry. It's just happening, right? And the virtualization of technology and the solutions. Everyone is having to deal with that, right, with the virtual environment that we're all in. And that accelerated consumption of cloud-based services, is also a necessity in this environment. So these are all areas that we're doubling down in, making investments both organically and inorganically. And on top of that, you heard us talk on the quarter call about analytics continuing to grow at an accelerated clip. And I'm really thrilled to see that happening as all of this data, the digitization of data is now getting organized, and data management and the prevalence of that is allowing us to do a better job of doing real-time predictive analytics on clients' data. And that's been a big demand that we continue to see, and we expect to see it going forward as well. And then you kind of wrap that all together with the customer experience, the customer and user experience, whether that's B2B or B2C. For our clients, they're focused on it, and we're dialing up our investments in that space. So all that, you bring that all together, it's the investments that we've made in digital and analytics capabilities, both organically that we've been building, but also by M&A and through our partnerships. It helped us drive these solutions for our clients and position them to better compete in this environment.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#5

Yes. And I'd like to think Genpact seems to be in a good spot here, given where we are in the cycle and the type of work that you can do with the clients, especially with some of the digital and with some of the analytic investments you've made. But I wanted to maybe kick off a little bit here just asking about sales cycles. I know you talked about activity is back to pre-pandemic levels, but bookings are expected to be down. So maybe if you could just elaborate on what that means for the P&L here, both in the short term and the midterm?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#6

Yes. I'd say that although bookings have elongated and are taking longer to get through the funnel, if you will, the good news is, is our pipeline of deals has grown, right? As you might expect, it's good. You're seeing the pipeline growing to record levels, near-record levels, and we're happy with that. And it's a combination of later-stage deals because of that elongation, right? There's more kind of back-ended, if you will, but also a healthy dose of front end, right? The middle is kind of where it was the weakening point, but the front end is heavy -- or the beginning of the funnel is heavy, and the later-stage pipeline is also heavy, which is good. So we see that coming through. So the sales cycle is definitely elongated during that period, necessarily so and just as expected, frankly. It shouldn't be a big surprise. What we're seeing happening is the conversations with clients, the number of conversations are increasing dramatically. Part of that purposeful, right, where Tiger and our leadership team has said, "Look, we need to have more conversations with our clients, and it needs to be virtual." But those conversations are happening because just about everybody has more time on their calendar, right? Nobody's traveling, so they're able to take meetings that used to be, wait a minute, I'm traveling. I can talk to you this week or next. And schedules just couldn't meet up. That isn't happening. And clients are engaging with us more and more so now than they ever have. Tiger has talked about his own calendar. Hard to imagine him busier than he was before, but he is, right? I'm having more conversations with CFOs and CXO level than I ever had before because I have the time and they have the time. So I think that's been helpful. So I think this engagement has actually increased, believe it or not, because of the frequency, because of the number of our people who are also dialing up their time. People that didn't even have conversations to the extent they had before, having people like me, even more so than previously. So I think that's helping. Does that equate to in-person meetings? Maybe not. But the frequency of it, the number of conversations does help. And when things do start to return to somewhat more normal levels where you can do some meetings in face-to-face, I think the combination of the 2 actually leads to a better environment to be able to maybe even speed up the pace of deals getting closed. We'll have to see how it plays out. I don't have a crystal ball, but I do think the engagement has not lessened, it's only increased. The in-person engagement has been less, as you'd expect. But when things come back, I think the combination will be even more powerful.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#7

Yes. No, that makes sense. I know leading up to the pandemic, Genpact had a lot of momentum. You had some large wins in Walmart and in Bridgewater. Then of course, COVID hits. And we transitioned. But you just mentioned your engagement level, it is up. But I'm curious, like that momentum going into the pandemic, do you feel like you're sort of back on that kind of pace? And what -- have those wins opened up maybe more doors for you to talk to maybe larger clients or other clients that you otherwise wouldn't have talked to?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#8

Well, I think for sure, when you land iconic names like those as customers, there's definitely a eyebrow raise from our customer base in those -- particularly in those particular verticals, right, where we serve them. So that's certainly been positive for us. And we're -- we've used those as references in the past and expect to continue to in the future. And obviously, the capabilities there that we're looking to leverage and build, we're definitely looking to leverage those. So that -- I think that definitely has helped. Is the momentum back to where we were in Q1? Hard to imagine because Q1 was probably the -- probably in my career, was probably one of the best quarters that I've seen. Not just the numbers were great, and they were growing in the mid-teens in terms of growth, both GE and GC, but then the pervasiveness of the growth across all of our verticals was just so good, and then this pandemic hit. So disappointing that, that happened because it's kind of stalled some of the momentum that we had. But it doesn't change the attractiveness of the services that we're providing to our clients. It just doesn't, right. So the market is every bit as attractive. And that's why we feel very strongly that, as the bookings get back to that normalcy of coming -- of flow through the pipeline, we'll build back up to that double-digit-plus growth rate that we've seen for a long, long time in Global Clients because the penetration rates are just similar to where they've been for a long time because we continue to add services to our skill set, like supply chain and financial planning analysis and others, right? So with that penetration rate being so low, we do see growth returning to normalized levels over the next several quarters. We think that will happen.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#9

Yes. I mean, it seems like it's set up that way for you to get back to that double-digit growth hopefully sooner rather than later. But we'll see. I think it's just a matter of time. I get that. But how about just backlog conversion, Ed? I mean, your ability to convert the backlog, both from a delivery standpoint, but also the client willingness to move here. Is that -- do you have good visibility on that?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#10

I think it is improving, Tien-Tsin. I think it's -- but it's kind of aligned with what we thought, right? When Tiger said 1.5 quarters ago on our Q2 earnings call, that he expected it would take a few quarters to get back. The back part of the Q4, effectively, of 2021 until we get back to 10%. He was thinking that it would be a gradual improvement. It wasn't all going to get solved overnight. Like all these deals coming through the funnel and getting done in 1 month just isn't practical, right? It's going to take several quarters. And the good news is the next quarter when we just gave the guidance with a little more specificity in terms of the rollout, bookings have started to come in again, right? We talked about the 3 large deals that happened in the quarter, and that's good news. And we expect -- we're not expecting it to all again happen in Q4, but we expect that, that trend to continue of, hey, we ought to be able to get a few large deals in the quarter. And if that trend continues, 2 deals per quarter in a large deal stage, that's where the growth comes from, right? That's where we get back to, okay, when you do a big deal, that gives you growth for the whole year, right? Because it starts out smaller. Each quarter, you build up on that particular account, and that's what fuels that growth. That's why when you have a bookings pause like we saw in Q2 into Q3 at lower levels, that has a longer-term effect on our business. We come down slower than most, but we'll return slower than most because of that long-term nature of that build.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#11

That's helpful to know. So let's -- just sticking with the delivery theme. I know Genpact, you were very quick to move to work from home. I commend the company for that. I know we've heard you and Tiger say you learned quickly from what you saw in China and moved on that information. So can you execute these contract ramps effectively based on what you know now from working from home for some months now? And then more importantly, your ability to hire, train, right, staff, as things ramp up here in this virtual world, not knowing when we get back to normal. Can you update us on that?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#12

I think we're all kind of in this mode now of virtual engagement, whether that's supervising your team or hiring or training and retaining your crew, that's kind of -- that's the world we're in right now. So we'll have to see how it plays out. I'm pretty confident that we'll be able to ramp the deals that we need to because it's a core competency, right? We're able to ramp large deals pretty quickly. Our HR team, it's a core competency of the company, right? It's -- you don't get to close to 100,000 employees without knowing how to hire, how to retain, how to train your crew. So I think that's something that our teams have a great handle on. They've been doing it virtually even in this environment. And I suspect as growth kind of returns and continues to build throughout 2021, that we'll be able to handle the ramps. Some of those ramps will also be rebatched in nature as you've seen us do, where we're stepping into the shoes of our client because we like the capabilities they have in particular areas, and areas that you talk -- that we've talked about where we want to build our own competency. So I think that will also be part of it. But there will also be a ramp in hiring that we'll see throughout 2021 if our forecasting holds true, and we expect it will.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#13

Good. So let me ask you sort of back to a bigger-picture question. Based on what we learned from COVID and what you said where we've adapted to this virtual world. This -- the pendulum of outsourcing versus in-sourcing and captives and the importance there, do you feel like there's a shift here towards outsourcing? That's our sense, Ed, but would love to hear your thoughts because the world is getting more complex and uncertainty levels are high, but outsourcing can cure a lot of that.

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#14

Yes. I don't have a crystal ball, but I definitely would say that it's more of a tailwind than a headwind for us, I think, Tien-Tsin. I think it's -- the comfort level of dealing with people virtually has just significantly accelerated, right, because everyone has had to go to a virtual environment and virtual engagement with their own teams. They used to be sitting right next to them in the office next door, whereas now, they're closing the books, they're doing their financial planning analysis, supply chain analytics, all of that is happening virtually with their own teams. So that discomfort of working virtually with someone that might be halfway around the world, but they're talking to them on the Zoom call, has just been -- the myth you can't do that effectively has been blown. And I do think that, that will be an impetus for people to say, "Wait a minute. If I can do this now virtually, why can't I work with someone in another company, by the way, that gives me a little bit more diversity?" Also that has a full focus in driving improvements in this area. We'll drive investments in technology to keeping evergreen on the latest and greatest technologies in this space at scale. I think those types of things will resonate even more with our clients. Again, I don't have a crystal ball, but I would definitely view it more as a tailwind than a headwind for us going forward.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#15

Okay. Got it. So in your -- in the beginning here, you talked about the accelerated consumption of cloud. I know on the call, you talked about cloud quite a bit. I get this question a lot, too. Just how does cloud and digital transformation directly and indirectly impact Genpact? Because we're all trying to -- we hear this theme a lot, right, modernizing the core and automation and everything else. And then you've got the business processes that sit on top, where Genpact also historically has been, that might be impacted. So how does Genpact get impacted by this theme?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#16

Well, it's -- there's a lot of technologies that are coming out, right, that are helping everything in digital, whether it's RPA, artificial intelligence, machine learning, now cloud-based technologies, right? Whatever the technology is, we're aware of it, right? Because our whole mantra is to improve process, right? It's relentless pursuit of process improvement, right? That's what we're all about. So continuing to look at a better way to do things, right? It's the Six Sigma way. That's what we do. So -- but it's a combination, right? It's not just what is this new technology? What does it do? It's what is the process that you're doing today? How can it be run most effectively, right? What's the end game in terms of the process and the problem you're trying to solve? So if you don't know the domain and the process that you're running, you can't just port it to some new technology, and all of a sudden, your problems are solved, as you know. But we do think that with all these technologies that are coming, they are allowing us to accelerate the process improvement and get to scale in terms of some of these solutions. And the cloud is just another example of that, right? You think about server-based -- physical servers and capacity constraints and/or having to have them regionalized. And if you can go to the cloud and distribute analytics to the teams in the field at a touch of a button, that's better, right? In my own financial planning analysis team, we're actually able to deploy a workflow based -- or whoever is allowed to have access to certain data, we're able to distribute these analytics to that particular vertical or service line that should be seeing that data now much more. It's not an Excel spreadsheet push anymore by e-mail. It's using data -- cloud-based solutions on top of our data to be able to give access to our global teams to the data real-time. And those things -- those are real solutions, right? To improve the speed of getting data to our -- in the hands that need it.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#17

And then just on the automation side, for clarity, just thinking about the risk and the opportunity. So automation, you can do the work as you've talked about. But you could argue also reduces some of the TAM as well in terms of more efficiency. And I know we've talked about this for years, Ed, but given what we've learned with COVID and the embrace of automation here, is the viewpoint different?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#18

Not really. I mean, it's really -- it's, again, another tool to make a process more efficient. And every time we make a process more efficient, that eats into a predefined market or TAM, right? So that's what we do. That's part of our being. And what we found is it hasn't shrunk our TAM at the end of the day, where it's actually grown our TAM because we've been pulled into other areas that is very process-centric. Like how do you improve this process? How do you improve my end-to-end experience, both for my own employees and for our customer base, right? So the supply chain and supply chain finance end-to-end that we're doing for clients was not even in our servable TAM a few years ago. And then we got pulled into that. Financial planning analysis has not been an area that we've really focused on. We're now getting much more pulled into that because we've been a -- we've been getting through and digitizing the data for our clients, getting into data management, helping them organize their data better and using our own data scientists to help them analyze the data and do predictive analytics. Those are areas that have kind of dialed up meaningfully for us because we're applying that domain plus that technology, that new technology, to take us to the next level and improve the processes for our clients. So I said it probably 6 years ago when I first came: I look 5 years forward, and I see hey, can this company grow? What's the rate that I think is the right, reasonable rate for us to assume? And I thought double-digit was about right 5, 6 years ago when I joined because it was Global Clients could grow at double-digit plus, and GE would be flattish over that time line. I feel the same way now, and even better about our growth prospects, 5 years forward than I did 5 years back. So that just speaks to the TAM not really shrinking because there's other areas that we're getting pulled into. And the TAM, I view, is not even something I'm worried about at this point.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#19

Okay. No, we share that for view as well. So maybe just maybe bringing it to a sort of CFO-level question. I think given everything we've talked about, automation and some of the cloud trends and work from home, are clients asking for different types of SLAs and sort of pricing models now, given sort of the new world that we're in? What are you seeing as you're negotiating these contracts financially? Any change?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#20

It is evolving. It's not a revolution. I think it's evolving the way we thought it would, Tien-Tsin. It's a -- we used to be very much full time equivalent to full time equivalent, if you remember, right, not that long ago. We've shifted meaningfully over the past several years to a combination of FTE, which is still the largest part of what we do because there still are a lot of people engaged in doing the work that we're doing and is a comfort level with the clients in pricing. But it's moving much more so, because of technology, because of automation, because of the outcomes that the clients look for. The clients are looking for an outcome, and we're -- and the conversations we're starting with is, what is the outcome you're looking for? Or here's an outcome that we can drive for you. So outcomes-based pricing, which would be gaining share or value-based, value-share types of models are becoming more prevalent, and customers are getting more comfortable with that. Or underwritten models where we say, "Look, we'll do it for you for this price. Fixed price over a period of time. You have certainty that will be your price. Whether we can do it for that or not, that will be your price." Those types of things are happening because it is a combination of technologies and people. And it's evolving. I think it will continue to evolve that way as that FTE model continues to get disrupted.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#21

Got you. We made it this far without asking a margin question, but that may be a good segue into margins. If you don't mind, just you're -- I don't think I've asked you this in a while on the stage, I guess. But just your -- has your priorities or thinking around margin changed here? Because balancing growth and margin and opportunities to invest here, given all these waves that are happening, right? And to get the pipeline converted and everything else. How do you balance that today?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#22

Good news is, that model, I think, continues to -- our model continues to hold. We could drive margin improvement. You've seen it, right? We could probably drive it 50 to 100 basis points in a year just by G&A leverage because we've been leveraging as we -- if you're growing 10%, you don't need to grow your infrastructure that much because we are global. We're set up to be a global corporation, and we can scale pretty meaningfully. But we've been making -- we've been ensuring that we don't overdo the flow-through to income because we're underinvesting, right? So we've been investing in R&D in those places you heard me talk about, in digital, in analytics, in cloud, in each of the vertical-specific capabilities that we need to win in those particular verticals. So those investments were apparently about making sure that we're investing. In a market that's as underpenetrated as it is, and it continues to be, our view is you have to make sure that you're investing back into those areas with capabilities to make sure that you can continue to drive that top line growth in that double-digit place -- plus that we talked about. And I think that's too important. And I think there is a healthy balance and a healthy tension of making sure we're driving improved profitability and leveraging, but at the same time, making sure we're investing enough so that we stay out in front of the competition. And I think we've done a pretty good job of striking the right balance there, and expect to continue to do that.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#23

Good. No, that's helpful to hear. I have a couple of questions from the audience. It looks like, actually, 3 questions. Two of them are similar around your go-to-market, Ed, and your ability to, once you penetrate an existing client, your opportunity to go into adjacencies and to do more with that client. How big can that be? What's the upsell potential? And how do you rank that opportunity versus new logos? There's a question around new logo versus existing. Did that make sense, Ed?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#24

No, no, it does. It does. And it's another one where we think it's a healthy balance, right? There's still a fair amount of new logos that are being added. It's still about 1/3-2/3, roughly, that we're adding into the fold. A greater amount of our growth is coming from existing clients, which is great. But a nice healthy dose still coming from those that hadn't begun to engage yet. So that's terrific, and that speaks to the underpenetration of the market. And I think we're seeing that continue. And I'd say with the existing client base that we have, there's now -- I think we now have 4 clients that are over $15 million -- sorry, over -- is it over $100 million? Whatever the -- yes, I think it's over $100 million. We had just won GE just 3, 4 years ago, right? And then we've added and we've added. And I think each one of the -- our top 50 clients if you will, every one of them can be over $100 million. Every one of them in the services that we're providing, right? So if you think about GE is over $400 million, right? And there are clients with GE-sized in that fold. So I'm not predicting that we get to $400 million with all these 50. But the view is it's there, if we execute, to continue to drive many of those customers over $100 million as we build. And that's something, over the next 5 years, I'll be disappointed if we're not able to drive double, triple that number of above $100 million over that time frame.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#25

Yes. No, We've -- you and I talked about this, right? GE is a great case study, right? That shows the penetration potential for some of these clients. So it's not just IT, it's the broader SG&A bucket, right, that you can really penetrate. So I think that is important. Maybe we don't emphasize it enough, but the penetration potential of some of your strategic clients. And another -- we have a question...

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#26

I think -- yes. And you got to do a good job for those clients, too, right? So the relationship with GE, as Tiger said it, too, has never been as strong as it is, right? So you got to do a good job, right? You do a good job, and those retention rates stay pretty good, right? So we've got to do that for our entire client base.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#27

With 5 minutes left, I just want to make sure I blend my questions with the investor questions. There's a question around just regulation, election considerations. Any verticals that we should be mindful of that might have a swing one way or the other, up or down? Health care? Because someone was asking about health care. Is there an opportunity to work around some of the vaccines and maybe some regulatory changes? So I guess the big picture question is that, right? Given the election, given maybe what's going to happen from a regulatory standpoint, anything we should be mindful of that could be a help or hurt for Genpact?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#28

I don't think so. [ We'll just see ] what actually happens, but there's nothing that I've read about that concerns me or is making me thinking if this should be a big investment, up or down. I think we'll have to see. As things happen, we'll obviously be following them closely, and we'll try to take advantage of opportunities and be aware of concern, things that might be a challenge for us. Tax rates are there, and we want to figure out what happens with that. But the good news is we're pretty well -- we're a global organization, right, so our income is reasonably well distributed. So I don't know that there's a meaningful impact to us to that. But we'll watch everything very closely and adapt, as we've always had, to changing laws and regulations. For us -- yes.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#29

There's another question -- got it. Another question here around share repurchase versus buy -- versus M&A. There's another question around, given what IBM and what the spinoff, DXC has divested some assets or they changed that, too, right? And then some restructurings at some of your other firms. What does that mean for Genpact?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#30

I think on some of the transactions of others, we feel pretty comfortable with the capabilities that we have. Just growing to get scale isn't necessarily what we'd be interested in. Well, I never say never on an acquisition if it's attractive and it means we can get the scale, that's great. But we've really been focused more on adding capabilities that can make us better, not just bigger. So size isn't necessarily the focus. It's really how do we grow in an attractive market? And it's really making sure you have the right capabilities. So I think that's kind of where our focus is on that. And the first part -- and on capital allocation, that really is [ definitely ] key to our strategy in capital allocation, [ and it's ] supporting organic growth first. And then with the capital that's left, attractive M&A still the priority 1, and that's again around adding capabilities. Tuck-in in nature has been the bias, as you've seen. And then share repurchase is there as well, right? So we'll continue to buy shares to the extent that we have capacity. And we have capacity now, and you saw us do some of that at the end of the third quarter into the fourth, buying back the shares. And we'll go faster to the extent that there's a better value. And we'll go slower if it's less attractive or more fully valued. So no change there. And the dividend, you've seen how we've grown that over the years pretty nicely. As the market cap has also grown, we've been able to grow that double-digit each year for the last several years.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#31

We have 2 minutes left, I just -- a couple questions around just your processing business, which I think they're inferring -- referring to the volume-based work. You have a lot of volume-based work. Have you been exposed to some of the areas hit by the pandemic? I had a -- I think I had a similar question, too, Ed, but I don't think -- I think the answer is no, but I hope you heard that question.

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#32

Yes. Not really. In fact, the ones where we actually had reduced revenue in the second quarter because of the pandemic were more -- those contracts were more fixed price in nature. And we still reduced the volume to make sure that we're serving our client, right? To do the right thing for those clients who are hardest hit. Think about hotels and travel and a few companies in those spaces. We work with them to reduce it because their volumes, as you guys know, dropped off meaningfully. So -- but don't have a lot of other -- there were some volume-based adjustments that we're making with clients, but it hasn't really had a meaningful impact on our business.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#33

Okay. Right. We'll get you out of here, just one last question. Just given where we are from a competitive standpoint, trends have been pretty healthy from -- certainly from the bottom here. I'm just curious how you feel about visibility overall here as we go into the end of the year. Any final thoughts on visibility and how that's evolving?

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#34

No. I think it's visibility, reasonably consistent in terms of our view. At least a quarter ahead, feel decent about that. People have asked me in prior calls about information technology. Sometimes, you get the budget crunch or flush at the end of the year. My own gut tells me that, that's -- that those won't happen as meaningfully as they have in other years because of the situation that a lot of companies are in. A lot of companies are shrinking year-over-year. We've been fortunate to continue to grow through this. But I think it's -- visibility is decent. and I think we'll -- each quarter, we'll tell you that our view is that it should progressively improve in terms of the business environment. And hopefully, growth will improve consistently as we go throughout 2021 as well. We'll see how it goes.

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#35

All right. Great. We covered a lot of ground, Ed. So thanks for being on the hot seat here. And we appreciate you. You've always been involved in the [ dialogue ]. I do appreciate that, Ed. So thanks again for the time.

Edward Fitzpatrick

executive
#36

Thanks for having me. Take care of yourself...

Tien-Tsin Huang

analyst
#37

It's good to see you, and have a good Thanksgiving next week, okay?

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Genpact Limited transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Genpact Limited earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.