Genpact Limited (G) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 31, 2023

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#1

Good morning, everybody. I'm Bryan Bergin, Cowen Services and HCM analyst. Welcome to TD Cowen's 51st Annual TMT Conference. Thanks for joining us. With us today with Genpact, we have Mike Weiner, CFO. Thanks for being here, Mike. Genpact is a global BPM and IT services vendor with over 100,000 employees, and it will drive to over $4.6 billion of revenue this year. Mike's been with the company now for nearly 2 years. Is that right?

Michael Weiner

executive
#2

Correct, yes.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#3

Prior experience in insurance and financials and looking forward to a good discussion here.

Michael Weiner

executive
#4

Great. Thank you for having us.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#5

To kick off, I think what will be helpful is really to discuss key structural drivers for the industry. And if we put aside the short-term macro cyclical influences around the business, if you could talk, Mike, a bit about the underlying demand dynamics that are driving clients to leverage your services in each of your segments.

Michael Weiner

executive
#6

Sure. So fundamentally, I think it's a question I asked when I was interviewed for the job, why, right? And I guess since we're talking about. And you hear a lot of things, but my analysis now [indiscernible], is that fundamentally, again, outside of what's currently going on in the last 6, 9, 12 months, companies want to be in the business of developing products, marketing products and solutions and services, right? And to a much lesser extent, the middle office and nobody wants to be in the back office, right? And it is kind of founded for multiple years, very cost, very sophisticated companies have moved to this model over the last, say, 10, 20 years. as we have marquee clients like a Walmart of the world, but as you know, are operationally super efficient in the way they kind of think through things. And more and more, the TAM of that type of middle and back office work has expanded dramatically, right? And we're one of many beneficiaries of that from that perspective. So it really fundamentally gets back to what are companies good at doing and where do they want to allocate their time and their resources, right? Again, that is going to be on, as I said, developing products and services, marketing them and selling them to their clients and being that real front office and the top and the middle office for them.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#7

Okay. Now if we bring in the near-term dynamics around macro. Maybe talk about the current state of demand for your services in the segment this year versus last year? And any main areas where clients are leaning more or they are not being leaning less?

Michael Weiner

executive
#8

Yes. So this is a dramatic pivot that I would probably say I'm trying to put my pin in when it happened. It's primarily in the third quarter of last year. We call it the cost versus growth agenda, value versus growth. So we were coming off of a period, right, that started pre-pandemic and certainly to grow at any cost, right? And kind of silly to say that, but it's true. And so a lot of the work that we did, we had our legacy clients, which we were supporting many of their middle and back office operations, but dramatically had a huge tick-up in supporting them in either for lack of a better term, digital marketing, customer segmentation, lead work, helping them get to the next-gen solutions in terms of cloud-based technology, implementing them, but all really focused on competitively growing. And that is actually amongst other -- a lot of industries. It could be in my legacy insurance financial services industry, capturing share. If you think about what an insurance company spends or spent in digital marketing over the last couple of years, we're just talking basketball a couple of minutes ago. You can't see a basketball game without the 3 big personal insurers, all fighting for there, and they're spending over $1 billion each in marketing, right? So a lot of infrastructure that supports that, right? And again, we're one of many in this industry that does that, right? So we've seen a pivot, I would say, quite dramatically and to paraphrase another company's CEO, the CFO is back on the table. As the CFO, I love that, so I have it printed out on my desk. And what he means from that perspective is the grow at any cost agenda. And [ to supplement that ], our primary contacts in these, we serve Fortune 100, the Fortune 500 clients were the CxO relationships. It was always the CFO, who's always there, right, but the CIO, the Chief Marketing Officer, with customer officers, procurement officers were all there as well, but by no means were they driving the agenda. And now that we've seen just a pivotal change that the CFO is really back driving a lot of strategic transformation, right, but all with a mindful value-based approach, cost-based approach. And then if you think about it from -- as you move from the third into the fourth quarter, there's a dramatic pickup on we have to reduce costs in our organization, right? The grow in any cost agenda has now been cut cost than any cost agenda. And we've seen that. We hear it, right. You hear it with the large social media companies, large tech companies, financial services companies. And again, a robust buildup, particularly the middle and back office that happened, you blame in the pandemic or not, but certainly did. And so if you think about what is one of the best tools in the toolbox, the services we provide, particularly in our digital operations that allows people to take legacy either onshore costs or even some of their offshore costs centralized and implement best of breed practices and reduce costs and have that throughput done in a very, very quick fashion. And we're the beneficiary of that, and we think that's going to be a sustainable model as we go forward. You'd like to have a more equilibrium between that transformation business we do, and we call that our data tech and AI business. And we called it AI a year ago before it was actually -- we probably should have thought a little bit more, but generative AI, but whatever we'll talk about that later, business and our digital operations business. But again, we've seen just a huge amount of growth and demand for growth, pipeline, bookings, et cetera, really on the digital operations work that we've done. And again, really focused on cost takeout.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#9

Has the growth attribution or the bookings attribution differ meaningfully between new logos and the existing base of clients?

Michael Weiner

executive
#10

We've received -- yes. So the existing base of clients, we work -- that work we've done, we've continued to sold down work, particularly in digital operations, enhancements. So what we'll do is, for doing finance and accounting for a particular vertical, we'll move into the next one, the next one, the next one. But what we've seen on the new logos, and [indiscernible] the same land and expand strategy, others have as well. Digital operations work that we've done. Historically, we would have done it for a year, 2 years, however long and then work on getting the bigger piece of it, we're getting it all at once now, help us blueprint solution, transform this for today, right? Then let's work on what we can do to dramatically reduce our cost, implement efficiencies in operations, centralize things so we can see those immediate benefits. And that's been a pivotal change. It's not as much strategic as it is cost focus. But the nice thing about it, it's long term, right? These aren't project-oriented work that's going to go away in 3 or 9 months.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#11

Okay. Let's talk a little bit about macro sensitivity of the business. So maybe give us a sense of how sensitive that digital operations piece is the underlying client volumes? And do you -- what's kind of a mix of recurring revenue within that segment?

Michael Weiner

executive
#12

So great question. So in our digital operations business, it's all [indiscernible]. These are typically 3- to 5-year agreements, right? But there's a huge amount of productivity in agreement. So if you sign on making this up, a 4-year $100 million per year, $400 million TCV deal, right? The revenue recognition on that isn't completely linear throughout the period of time as you build in efficiencies to that so you always have to sell at the end just to maintain that level with that client or bring in new clients. So that's very, very sustainable, and we have very good predictability into that business, which makes up about 70% of our portfolio in total. We think about it almost like an annuity basis.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#13

Okay. And then shifting to Data-Tech-AI, what areas in that segment have been more pressured amid the discretionary pullbacks? And then alternatively, what areas within DTA have actually been more durable?

Michael Weiner

executive
#14

So the analytics -- I'll answer [indiscernible]. The analytical work that we do has been a lot more durable than others. The data component of the business, right, which ties in thematically which I'm sure, we'll talk about later on in terms of what data you need for either current or generative AI type work has been good, and that's really cloud-based migration, that type of thing. What has not been as robust as it was 6, 9 months ago for lack of a better term, we think about it as digital marketing, right, digital sales, supporting those organizations with a lot of their marketing support work, right? And that makes logical sense, if you think about it as companies have pulled back from what they've spent in terms of their marketing budgets in totality. Now we do a lot of work also in terms of helping them support content creation, new programs, new campaigns. So what we're seeing is people saying, maintain what we're doing, right? That type of particular customer experience enhancement, we want to do, right, keep it in your pipeline, but let's push another quarter or another quarter. And that makes logical sense. To some extent, if they're under such cost pressures that the markets are really driving right now. And again, we're coming either out or still in a hyperinflationary pressure environment. Customer demand has been good, but companies are just on edge.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#15

Have you talked about the composition of that segment that is more exposed to that pullback versus the analytics piece that seems more durable?

Michael Weiner

executive
#16

Yes. So again, a lot of it has to do with the customer. We use the word customer experience network. And again, these are designing, implementing and analyzing very customized solutions for clients in digital, either B2B or B2C relationships that they have, right? And it could be something like a new enhancement to a marketing sales campaign that will -- we think will drive better customer experience, segmentation, retention of it. And we might have the project that we've worked on blueprinting it for the customer for the last couple of quarters, and now it's time to implement that. And they'll still -- they're pushing back and the decision cycles have been elongated saying, we have to maintain our budgets right now. And again, it adds up because these are a lot of small $1 million, $2 million, $3 million, $6 million type deals. But in aggregate, it is a driver of growth for us in the company. And we're just seeing that kind of kick down the road a little bit.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#17

Okay. Let's just shift the pipeline in bookings. So you kind of -- you had an optimistic view on pipeline, I believe, record 1Q signings in that first quarter here. So maybe talk about the composition of large deals in the pipeline that I think you alluded to a bit before, but how is that comparing now? Maybe why are the clients considering these larger programs now?

Michael Weiner

executive
#18

Yes. So that continues into this quarter, right? And why they don't have the -- let's try this silo to the lack of better if we outsource something like this, right? They need those cost benefits and they need them quickly, right? The interesting thing is some of the large deals we booked in the first quarter, right, are coming back now, they want to do an incremental work. And I talked to the solutions folks who we've been there for 2 months, like they want even more savings now. It's great work for us. And we're going to do 3 out of 6 of their finance verticals. Now they want us to add a fourth to that, which is great, right? And typically, when something like that happens, higher margin, we have a little bit more experience, a little more visibility as to what the client needs. So it's a win-win for both. But again, it's really been driven by the client demand for those cost reductions earning in, right, as opposed to a test, let's see what happens over a longer period of time. And again, what we offer is a very sharp tool on the toolbox for these companies. We're supported by implementing and selling those strategic consultants who will go in there and look at everything from span of control, where work is being done, what's critical, what's not, where there's huge operational efficiencies. And then they will often talk to senior management and Board and say, listen, this is an opportunity for you to utilize a company like Genpact, right? They can have an almost immediate benefits to you. There's obviously always risk and risk mitigation. That's why you go to a company with the experience that we have. And then they are aggressively pushing it. And these are public companies, a lot of sponsor companies. These are large private equity-backed companies. They're saying, "Oh, okay, now that they grow at any cost, let's start working on profitability. And for those guys a little bit different, they're cash flow focused, that makes logical sense.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#19

Okay. And large deals stood out in the quarter, you talked about 50 million-plus deals. Can you give us a sense on how long these types of transactions, how long the sales cycle tend to take? And maybe what you're seeing in the conversion of that?

Michael Weiner

executive
#20

Yes. So the ones that we book our 5 large deals in the first quarter, those really started, I don't know, 6, 9 months ago. The ones that we're doing now in the second quarter, the cycle time is dramatically shorter than what they were, right? So we still continuously will see the demand. At least we're seeing in the current quarter, and there's only so much predictability that we have out going in the future for these large deals. But again, fundamentally, we're seeing huge demand in shortening cycle on long deal, elongating cycle on the small and medium deals, particularly those have to do a customer experience, digital transformation type work.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#21

Not a bad trade-off though once that comes back.

Michael Weiner

executive
#22

It is not a bad trade-off when it comes out. But again, I'd love both at the same time, both will be growing that way, but you're building durable client relationships at good margins over a longer period of time. So it makes for a great base for us as a company.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#23

Okay. And some of those deals you had mentioned were rebadge deals?

Michael Weiner

executive
#24

Correct.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#25

Right. Maybe you give your I think a sense of when we talk about rebadge deals, what those are and why you find those attractive?

Michael Weiner

executive
#26

Yes. So rebadge deals are really bifurcated into 2 type of rebadge deals, right? So it's just taking existing for the folks who don't know what it is, it's exactly what the name implies. We're taking folks at clients who are currently doing the work, bringing them over, re-badging them to Genpact employees to work in a captive type solution for that particular client, right? And what Genpact brings to those employees technology, processes, Six Sigma, a whole bunch of solutions that will help drive that efficiency on a go-forward basis so you lead that organization. When I talk about there's 2 ways to do it, there's 1 view of these are current captive organizations that are run for large multinationals throughout the world. That's a component of it. But there's also a huge component that we're seeing a pickup that previously was somewhat quiet during the pandemic, which makes sense. These are actual functional organizations embedded in the companies in places here in the U.S. and in Western Europe that we're now going to be essentially rebadging or offshoring in some cases. Some of it we'll start onshore and over a period of time, we'll migrate it off. So it's all different kinds of flavors. There isn't really one particular trend.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#27

And what do you need to do operationally like guardrails, you've got these larger deals, these transactions, what do you need to make sure to manage the execution risk around these?

Michael Weiner

executive
#28

Yes. So that's the secret sauce, what we do, right? And that's really partnering with the client, right, and doing a tremendous amount of solutioning of blueprinting work upfront, right? You just literally don't rebadge somebody and say do it this way, right? There has to be a long-term evolutionary transition process, which we will work to implement to get those operational efficiencies. Because at the end of the day, why are they doing this, right? We can talk about cost, right, but there's also service levels, you can cut cost and harvest the business, but -- and what detriment it is to what their actual output is. So we'll work with them, and we've done this time and time and time again, right, to transition over a slow period of time, right, and coupling with particularly using their existing technologies, layering on a layer on top that there's various things that can be -- there are so many flavors of an accounts payable process, right? Utilizing what's currently in their ERP, which they're not using, utilizing best-in-class practices that we have, maybe putting them into somewhat of a factory type setting, which we're doing volumes of other companies work that we do. Again, all different kinds of flavors. But at the end of the day, it's really focused on any of the service levels we need to deliver, right, because in some cases, we're underwriting it not metaphorically, but economically for them. But that's economic. But the ultimate output in terms of service quality, we're running real operations. This isn't a discretionary work. Companies have to close their books.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#29

Are there any -- just in the pipeline now, maybe in the deals you just signed, any service areas or departments or functions that stood out more than others?

Michael Weiner

executive
#30

Yes, yes, it's a great question. Some are brand new for us, not in terms of the work, but brand new types of clients that want -- that have a combination of accounting technology, customer experience type work, right, and are more dramatically moving that middle and back office in one fell swoop over a transition period, a year or 2 to us as opposed to doing the silo type work. And those are everything from -- we're seeing them particularly in 2 large areas, our banking, capital markets, insurance operations, right? And then we're also seeing them quite a bit, and we have a high-tech and manufacturing world that we're seeing a big pickup in that. The consumer goods and lifestyle business, again, a little bit more developed. One would expect consumer goods businesses to be quite forward thinking in terms of that work already. So we're seeing less opportunities in that area, right?

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#31

And as we just think about the economics on these deals, can you just talk about how the margin profile of these rebadge tend to compared to the company average and maybe the life cycle of the margin profile?

Michael Weiner

executive
#32

Yes. So I think it's -- we'll start with the life cycle of it to somewhat from a gross margin perspective, you have to think about it from that perspective. They're somewhat dilutive early on, right? You're taking on all of these folks if they're a rebadge right component of it. You have to work on implementing the operational efficiencies, in some cases, relocation, a whole bunch of different components of that, that will sensibly work in over the period of time we get like an optimal revenue profitability mix. Revenue will pick, let's just say, it's a 5-year deal in year 3, profitability will just linear increase throughout the end of it, right? So you're ending with a smaller revenue base, the highest amount of profitability from that. So I always talk about the more large deals we get, you're going to see my gross margin go down, right? And that's the greatest kind of solution that they want, particularly when you do multiyear contracts and that every year entering into that 70% predictability into that revenue and that margin for the year is a great place to be as we move towards becoming a $5 billion revenue business.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#33

Okay. So more of these large deals doesn't preclude your accelerated margin expansion plans?

Michael Weiner

executive
#34

Absolutely not. And so -- and we saw it in the first quarter, right? We have great margins. So a lot of that accelerated margin growth is just the lack of a better term, sure operating leverage that we get on -- in growing the organization. The strategic and targeted investments that we have in the businesses making sure we're diligent about doing that, right? And then we continuously have to reinvent our operation and delivery centers to meet future requirements, right? And that's really the balance that our CEO and myself and others make every single day. And what does that mean? Talk, talk, talk, right? It could be creating more efficient hybrid operating centers in low-cost areas, right? Being able to tap different talent bases through the new hybrid work environment that previously wasn't there, right, to access different skill sets throughout the world, investing in infrastructure to allow that to be done seamlessly. So all those kind of things are important for us to be able to execute on what we're doing because it fundamentally gets back to we are selling amount of operational efficiencies that we need to drive out over that period of time. And again, it's not by any stretch, human capital arbitrage or labor arbitrage doesn't get you nearly what you need to do. It's having using technologies and those operational processes that we've developed over the last couple of decades to drive that.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#35

Okay. Now let's bring this back to the numbers now. Just refresh us on the outlook for this year as it relates to the growth and the embedded assumptions for operations and DTA.

Michael Weiner

executive
#36

Yes. So if you think about our growth this year, right, we'll take quick look back in May of last year, we laid out our multiyear plan, we call Blueprint 2026, probably not the most creative name, but putting that aside. And what that fundamentally said is we put together our road map on a go-forward basis that says, look, we are going to grow our AOI or for lack of a better term, our EBITDA-type margin in the business at a greater rate than historically. So we've historically grown at about 20 -- 10, 20 bps a year. We think we're going to grow that at a faster rate. We see sustainable growth at a CAGR basis of 10-plus percent throughout that period of time, some years better, some years worse. Last year was 11% right? This year, we're targeting that to be a little softer, 6% to 8.5% takes into account. We did have a large client of ours basically pull out some of the work they were doing in totality, that didn't go somewhere else. They just -- they're just not doing that. But putting that aside, we fundamentally think these large deals that we're selling right now and closing will perpetuate us from that growth -- on that growth model for multiple years. So going back to other question of, okay, well, how do you do that and maintain your margin, right? So the gross margin will be impacted, particularly these large deals, you get revenue in early, but you have all those costs associated will dilute your gross margin. Again, we have the natural operating leverage of our business. Our sales and marketing costs are certainly not linear to what our revenue growth has been. And then in addition to it, we keep investing in our own operational efficiencies in terms of our delivery centers, hybrid operating model, so on and so on. We feel really good about that. And there's enough levers in the business in terms of our investments that we allocate for the future. It will allow us to make sure we're on that track.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#37

Okay. And then just within the year, as we think about first half, second half dynamics, you do have a healthy ramp in the second half. Maybe talk about what gives you the confidence in that ramp? And what do you have in hand versus go get revenue to hit that slope?

Michael Weiner

executive
#38

Yes. So we're in a better situation than we certainly were in January, right? So if you think about it from that perspective, we feel very confident about hitting that ramp. It's hard to say which 90-day cycle will it come in but these large deals that we closed in the first quarter, right, are certainly going to help, particularly in the latter part of the third and the fourth quarter and the same level of confidence we have on deals that we're currently doing right now. okay? The challenge for us is on those small Data Tech and AI deals, particularly on the experience side that we're seeing and some analytic work here and there that's a little bit more discretionary and also the small amount of work we do on tech has just been a little bit more fluid with a little less predictability. But putting that aside, if you just apply and discount or risk-weight historical conversion rates on that work that we've done, we feel really good about -- it's a dramatic hockey stick brand, particularly in the third and fourth quarter, but that should propel us really nicely into 2024. So much so when you were to average the -- we think when you average '23 and '24 particularly with the pipeline that we have, right, where we're filling the pipeline as quickly as we're looking at, right, in the first quarter, the bookings that we have, when you average them 2 together, you'll be well back on that Blueprint 2026 track that we have. So it's a good place to be.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#39

Okay. We've gone about 25 minutes without talking about generative AI, but now we're going to do that.

Michael Weiner

executive
#40

Yes, yes. Let's do it.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#41

So clearly, it's on interest in the space lately, a lot of perceptions around different services businesses, the stocks would say one thing. Do you think the fear and the perceived risk around business process management and services is off base? Is it fair? How should investors think about generative AI risks and opportunities for Genpact?

Michael Weiner

executive
#42

We think about it as an opportunity. We think about the TAM for us and the industry growing dramatically, right? We have never shied away from embracing technology changes. And that could be a couple of years ago, RPA, some of the blockchain technologies that we've got, that has just accelerated our growth, right? At the end of the day, we're -- again, I'm an insurance guy, so I'm going to keep trying. We're underwriting amount of operational efficiencies that we need these tools to achieve it. It is not a labor arbitrage business, right? So what kind of gets me is that if you talk to anybody or listen to anybody from Elon Musk or any of the big tech companies, where is -- let's just use the word generative AI, generative, right, is the keyword using large language model. So where do we think the immediate disruption will be, immediate maybe 3, 4, 5 years out, right? It's going to be in research, right? And that's a very broad term and it could be everything from legal research to writing contracts, helping us in procurement type space. Customer care, I think we can all probably say that now, listen, we all want the chatbots to work a lot better, right, get huge opportunity for us from that. We also think there's huge opportunities in terms of democratizing kind of coding or development type work that we've done, right? But again, it's all human-centric driven from what we're looking to do. It is a tool in the toolbox that we will utilize and continue to evolve and change our industry. Well, so the question we get the most of it is, what do your clients say? So if I talk to our CEO or others, we spoke to 150 CxO-level clients in the first quarter. It's certainly the first topic to discuss, they need help and they need it quickly, right? So the fundamental foundation of this, it's not that sexy, but it's the reality, data, data, data, right, getting your data organized, getting it cleanse, getting it to a central deposit or getting it to the cloud, right? If you just look at 70% of, I think, its Fortune 500 companies are certainly using on-prem ERP systems, right? So there's a lot of work to prepare to feed these models to do all of this work. We think we can be a disruptor in some of them. Customer care, small piece of our business, we think that is a place that's ripe for this technology, and we can use it right now, right? And we have a whole bunch of use cases, which we're using historical AI, new generative AI models that we have. We bought an AI company in 2017. That's where we've been using a lot of their technologies and the processes we do. So again, we need these tools, and we're ready to embrace them to hit the SLAs and the commitments that we're underwriting for our clients. We also have -- if you kind of think about it, we've been preparing for this, right? We have something like 24,000 trained data scientists and engineers in AI. We have another 60-plus thousand people that have gone through our DataBridge Gen AI training program. So we have a lot of skills and experience out there that we're using in old school work that we're doing. We're always with the mindset of how do we do it better, faster, more efficient. And so we wholeheartedly embrace this. I mean this is going to be great for the industry.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#43

Is there any way it might influence the contracting and the pricing models?

Michael Weiner

executive
#44

Yes. So very -- not yet, right, because it's all talk at this point now. I think it will, hopefully, right, move to -- we use the word alternative commercial models, right? And move more towards output-based commercial models, right? Because it's going to be a lot less efficient to kind of think about how you price them. Okay. Today, we have 10 people doing this. You're going to put this technology in. We're going to have 6 people in the deck. Let's build the pricing model from there. I think that's going to change dramatically saying, with it, this is the cost for this function, right, to deliver this over this period of time, right, it will be this cost on a go-forward basis. That kind of internal imagination of people versus technology is going to become a lot more blended. Now where we have done that today, it's about 14% of our revenue is alternative commercial model. And historically, they're implemented at the end of a large deal cycle. So the client knows what they're getting, right, and what the costs are, right? The margin has been higher from that perspective. Also allows us to build what we call factories. So to the extent regulatory permitted, you can have a factory that does a particular function for multiple clients, utilizing these technologies. Sure, that's going to help as well. But we don't see any margin dilution associated with this by any stretch.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#45

Does the -- all of the conversations you're having with clients on this now, does that translate the potential consulting type revenue around this in the second half of the year...

Michael Weiner

executive
#46

I won't say the second half of the year. I think they are aggressively trying to -- it's so new, right? Every client we talk -- it is a topic [indiscernible] at their Board meetings, these are billion-dollar companies, a multibillion dollar companies. They are trying to figure out where they're going to deploy their investments, their assets to do it. But today, we have to help them with the basic fundamentals of getting them organized and its data. Nobody will disagree with us on that. So again, we see this as Genpact has never moved away from the evolution in technology. We will embrace it. And I think it's going to be net-net good for us.

Bryan Bergin

analyst
#47

Okay. With that, we're out of time. So we covered a lot of ground, thank you, Mike. Thank you all for joining.

Michael Weiner

executive
#48

Pleasure. Thanks for having us.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Genpact Limited transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Genpact Limited earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.