Macquarie Group Limited (MQG) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 10, 2020

Australian Securities Exchange AU Financials Capital Markets shareholder_meeting 136 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Samuel Dobson

executive
#1

Good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining us for our 2020 Operational Briefing. Thanks for your support. This morning, before I hand over to Shemara to go through the 3Q update, a bit of housekeeping. If you wouldn't mind just turning your mobile phones to silent or turning them off, that would be appreciated. And I'll hand over to Shemara go through the agenda and Q3.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#2

Thanks, Sam, and welcome, everyone from me as well. So this morning, I'll be going through the third quarter -- the update since the interim results at the end of the third quarter. But before I do that, I just want to spend a couple of minutes telling you about the agenda for this morning because we usually give you a deep dive into parts of the business. And at this one, what we're going to be doing is looking at the Banking group. So starting at 10:40 a.m. we'll have Mary Reemst, who's the CEO of Macquarie Bank Limited, introducing the banking businesses and talking about our strong focus in terms of where the bank fits within our structure, the regulatory framework it operates under and, as I was saying, a strong focus on governance and independence there in terms of making sure it's financially strong and independent. And I thought I'd just give you the background on each of the speakers before they get up. So Mary has been with us since 1999, coming over with the BT acquisition, and she started in the investment bank, in the infrastructure business, having a leading role in energy, including renewables. And then moved, I think, in 2003 to be Head of Credit and had that role until 2014 and then moved to be CEO of MBL and is also chair of our foundation now. And you'll find, as I talk through these people, they've all moved from the center and into the businesses and back and have roles right across the business. But Mary then will introduce the 2 group heads in our Banking group, which are Greg Ward, who's seated with us with his team over there, and he'll talk to you about Banking and Financial Services and give you a much deeper dive into the customer focus there, how we streamline the operations and our risk management culture in that business, together with his team, leaders Ben, Dean and Sean. And then we'll have Nick O'Kane. And I should say, Greg has been with us since '96. And as you all know, he started in the finance area, helped a lot with the launch of Infrastructure Funds, that was in '96, '97. And then he moved to take over the role of CFO and was in that role until 2011 and then moved in 2013 to take over running the BFS business. And it's been quite repositioned since he went across to that business. So again, moves from the center to the business and vice versa. And then Nick O'Kane, who's also here in the front row, who's the group Head of CGM, who is the longest-serving of our presenters today since '95. He's going to talk to you and give you a deeper dive into the CGM business together with Cindy Khek and Simon Wright, who are also here in the front row. Nick has worked with us all over the world since he joined in '95 in the CGM business. I think he worked in Malaysia, Korea, then London, then went to the U.S. in about 2005. Was that right, Nick? You can correct me when you have your right to reply, and went to L.A. and then was involved in a lot of the growth of that, particularly the CMS division of CGM, the Commodities business, and has been based in Houston now since about 2009. So Nick and the team will take you through a much deeper dive into the Commodities business and the client focus in that business and the deep expertise that we have. Preceding all of that, Patrick Upfold, who's also here in the front row, who's our Chief Risk Officer, will talk to you about our Risk Management group and the approach we have in terms of risk management, the development of that business and the governance. And Patrick has been with us since '97, and like Mary, joined into the Investment Banking Group and had a leading role in that business before moving across into the finance role. So he was Treasurer and CFO for a while, transitioning until he managed to have Stuart Green, who's also with us, take the Treasurer role off him, and Patrick was then CFO until he moved over to taking over the Risk Management Group a couple of years ago. So all very varied roles across the business in their time long-serving leaders of our group. And Patrick will talk to you about the role the Risk Management Group plays, but risk management, obviously, is something that we think every single person who works at Macquarie has accountability for and Patrick's group is there basically to challenge and hold us to standards and bring that independent perspective to us, but it's a very important function. So hopefully, you'll find that deep dive very useful. I'll now take you through, as I said, the result update, and then we'll hand over for questions before the team present. So starting, as we always do, with just reflecting on the half result. As you will recall, at the end of the first half, we had 60% of our contribution in the first half from our annuity-style businesses, which are the asset manager, Banking and Financial Services and parts of the Commodities and Global Market group. And then the other 40% from the market-facing activities in Commodity Global Markets and Macquarie Capital. So looking then, as we move into the end of the third quarter, how we performed. We had satisfactory trading conditions across the whole group. In the annuity-style businesses, we were up on the prior comparable quarter and also up on the 3 quarters to date versus the previous year, and that was driven, as we've disclosed previously, by higher base and performance fees in the Asset Management business and continued volume growth in the Banking and Financial Services Group, which was partly offset by margin pressure. In the market-facing businesses, at the third quarter, the result was significantly down on the prior comparable quarter. And also for the 3 quarters to date, in this financial year, the result was down on the prior comparable period, and that was principally driven, as we've disclosed previously, by the investment-related income in Macquarie Capital being down, particularly in the third quarter last year, where you will recall, we had 3 very significant realizations being the PEXA assets, the Quadrant assets and the Energetics assets, which were very, very large realizations and all happening in the third quarter last year. Now that was partially offset by stronger activity across most of the businesses in the Commodities and Global Markets business. And then looking group by group in terms of the third quarter experience. The asset manager has its assets under management at a record level again of $587.7 billion (sic) [ $587.5 billion ], which is up 5%. That was made up of the traditional asset management business, MIM, having a 6% step-up in assets, and that was mostly the Foresters acquisition and market movements, offset by the foreign exchange. And then in MIRA, the equity under management was up 2%. In the quarter, we were able to raise $5.5 billion of new equity, have $7.2 billion of new equity invested and $5.5 billion of realizations or divestments to leave us with $21 billion of dry powder at the end of the quarter. The other thing we'd note in the asset manager is, in the quarter, we entered into a sales agreement with Sunsuper to sell another 25% of the Macquarie AirFinance business. So we're continuing the transition of that business to a fiduciary business that follows PGGM taking 25% previously. Then looking at Banking and Financial Services. The volumes are up there, as I said. So deposits are up 3%. And the mortgage book is up 11%, and the business banking book is up 4% over the quarter. Funds on the platform were flat, and the vehicle finance portfolio was down slightly at 3% down. In our market-facing businesses, the Commodities and Global Markets business had a strong contribution in the commodities platform from -- across the platform, but particularly from Global Oil, North American Gas & Power, EMEA Gas & Power and Metals and Agriculture. And then we also saw continued strong customer activity drive results in both our FX and our futures businesses. The Asset Finance business that was transferred across, which is called Specialized and Asset Finance now had consistent performance through this quarter. And Nick will talk to you about some of the outstanding achievements that we had when he and the team speak in CGM in the quarter and over the year. And then turning lastly to Macquarie Capital. As you'll see, we say there that our fee revenue was up on the prior comparable period across all our activities in advisory, debt capital markets and equity capital markets, but as I said, the main impact was that investment-related income was significantly down on a very particularly strong prior comparable period, especially the third quarter. So that's an update on the group. Looking at our staff and people footprint. We had 15,760 people at the end of the quarter, and 58% of those were working in international offices. So now moving on to some information on our balance sheet and capital position. You see our balance sheet remains strong at the end of the third quarter as well with our term funding well exceeding our term assets. We had a slight growth in the balance sheet, and that was driven mostly by the growth in the loan assets in BFS and also the trading activity in CGM were the big drivers of the increase there. And with capital, at the end of the quarter, you can see there that our Basel III capital surplus is at $5.8 billion. That's come down from $6.7 billion at the end of the previous quarter, and that was mostly driven by earnings and movements in reserves of $0.7 billion, offset by $0.9 billion in terms of the interim dividend that we paid and $0.6 billion invested into the business. And I'll take you through where that $0.6 billion was invested in a moment, but we just wanted to touch on one point in relation to additional Tier 1 capital, a couple of points there. First of all, as you see, we announced that we intend to repay the $400 million of Macquarie Income Securities. These have been on foot -- now for over 20 years. And they've received a transitional treatment under APRA's prudential standards that results in reducing capital recognition and the repayment will reduce our Tier 1 capital by $94 million. Then in relation to the Bank Capital Notes, we also have announced that we intend to redeem the $429 million of BCN on the 24th of March. And we also announced that the BCN2 issued by Macquarie should -- are to launch shortly. Alex, there's not an update on the timing of that, is there?

Alex Harvey

executive
#3

No but I expect to have one shortly.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#4

Right. And then I mentioned that I'd step through where the $0.6 billion was invested. Principally, that went into Macquarie Asset Management in seeding and underwriting growth of the annuity-style income streams there. We also had some growth in the BFS loan book and CGM trading activity. And the last point on capital is that our regulatory ratios continue to be well above the Basel III minimum levels. So I particularly note the CET1 ratio is at 11.4% on an APRA Bank group basis and at 14.2% on a harmonized basis. Now in terms of regulatory update, you see on this slide, there's a long list of things we're working on with one of our 2 principal regulators, APRA. And the third last bullet point, I think we say that based on the information currently available, it's our expectation that we should have significant capital to accommodate any likely additional regulatory Tier 1 capital requirements as a result of the items listed on this page, noting that a number of these are at early stage. A few that I would point out is that APRA is still finalizing its regime in terms of unquestionably strong, and we're working with them on that. Also in relation to loss-absorbing capacity, APRA released a response to submissions paper in July '19 and its approach in relation to LAC in order to support an orderly resolution. So we're working on that as well. And the last thing I think worth noting is that in terms of resolution planning, we are working with APRA on that. The discussions are progressing, and we will continue working on these initiatives in consultation with APRA and update you as that progresses. Then in terms of offshore regulatory matters. With Brexit, we just wanted to note that we now have all our required licenses for our activity in Europe. We continue to be very committed to both the U.K. and the European region, earning about 30% of our income from that region and seeing good opportunity to grow across the region. And then lastly, in Germany, we've mentioned that we're cooperating with the German authorities and responding to request for information in relation to both the 2011 German lending matter and the short-selling-related activities. We'd note that none of our staff have been interviewed to date by the German authorities and that the amount involved is not material and fully provided for. So the last section for me then is in relation to our outlook. And in terms of the short-term outlook, as we've said previously, in Macquarie Asset Management, we expect the base fees to be up on the prior year. But the other items we expect to be broadly in line, and that's performance fees and investment-related income, net of impairments and net of operating lease income. In the Banking and Financial Services Group, we continue to see higher deposit and loan and platform volumes, but we also have the competitive dynamics of margin pressure impacting that business. In Macquarie Capital, we're assuming the market conditions will stay broadly in line with FY '19. But as we said, investment-related income will be down on a particularly strong FY '19. And then in the Commodities business, we expect the strong customer base to continue to drive consistent flows for commodities, fixed income, futures and foreign exchange. And we also expect a consistent performance from the Specialized and Asset Finance business. The business has benefited from strong market conditions across the Commodities platform year-to-date, and that's not something we've historically seen persist. Then across all of the groups, the compensation ratio, we've said we expect to be consistent with historical levels and the effective tax rate we expect to be broadly in line. Putting all of that together, our forecast for the overall businesses that, while we -- while the impact of future market conditions does make forecasting difficult, we continue to expect that the result for FY '20 will be slightly down on FY '19. Now that's, of course, subject to completion rate of transactions and period-end reviews, the market conditions, including the impact of geopolitical events, the FX impact and potential regulatory changes and tax uncertainties and the geographical composition of our income. For the medium term, we continue to expect that we should be well-positioned to deliver superior performance. And that's as a result of our deep expertise in very diverse geographic and segmental markets, which gives also a lot of protection and resilience to our income. And that's supported, of course, by our strong and conservative balance sheet and our proven risk management framework and culture and the fact that we'll continue to try to identify cost savings and efficiency initiatives as we move forward. We've dwelled on the medium-term by business, so I won't stay on that. And also, with the returns in terms of the businesses as at the end of the half year. I'll just note, we've shared this with you previously, but the annuity-style businesses in which we have $7.9 billion of capital invested, returned 24%. And the market-facing businesses in which we have $8.7 billion, returned 18% and after taking into account the group's surplus at the half of $6.7 billion, we returned 16.4% across the businesses. So with that, I'll hand over to Sam to take questions that you may have. Thanks.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#5

Okay. Thanks, Shemara. James? Just in the front.

James Ellis

analyst
#6

It's James Ellis from Bank of America. Just a question on Slide 18, the short-term outlook. The statement around Macquarie Capital 3 months ago included a bullet point saying the pipeline of realizations was expected to be strong. Given that, that bullet point is no longer there, can you just comment on what were the realizations like in the third quarter and what you're expecting in the fourth quarter?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#7

Yes, we had a number of realizations. The most material of those was our Taiwanese wind asset, Formosa 2 and Formosa 3 as well. But the others were just ordinary course smaller realizations. And given that now that has been achieved, we don't expect, in the fourth quarter, that there's a material amount left to do. So it will be ordinary course from here.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#8

Brian.

Brian Johnson

analyst
#9

Brian Johnson, Jefferies. Shemara, I had 2 questions, if I may. The first one is about Germany. And what I'd like to do is to go back to stock exchange announcement on 28th of September 2018. It was talking about Macquarie Bank was a lender to a group of independent investment funds in 2011. The funds were trading shares around the dividend dates where investors were seeking to obtain the benefit of dividend franking withholding tax credits. And then the important bit, "Investors' credit claims were refused, and there was no loss to the German revenue in relation to this matter." I'm just wondering that last sentence, is there any reason why that doesn't seem to be included in the text anymore?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#10

We're just adding any material information as it comes. So that's all still valid, we're just -- when we make further disclosures, we basically add what is material.

Brian Johnson

analyst
#11

So basically, just to confirm, so the German government lost no money on the Macquarie transaction?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#12

The statement you read out is correct.

Brian Johnson

analyst
#13

Right. The second one is, if we were to go back to the first half, the comment was made then about the -- in Commodities and Global Markets that the strong trading market conditions, whilst you just covered that down, the strong Commodities and Global Markets conditions weren't existed -- expected to persist into the second half. That seems to have actually -- am I interpreting what you said today correctly, that does seem to have continued into the third quarter?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#14

Yes, we had favorable conditions across the CGM platform in the third quarter as well. But there's also been a lot of organic growth in terms of customers and the build-out of the business. And when Nick and the team give you a deeper dive into CGM, you'll see that organic growth coming through as well, but we did have favorable conditions.

Brian Johnson

analyst
#15

Shemara, I get the nuances of slightly down is slightly down. But what you've basically said there seems to be slightly less bad than what you were saying at the half. Slightly?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#16

You can interpret it as it's slightly down is the guidance we're giving. And that makes sense, given that we had 3 very large realizations in Macquarie Capital last year that have not repeated. So that alone would have brought our result down. Net, we're slightly down is the guidance we're giving.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#17

Go to Jon who's behind.

Jonathan Mott

analyst
#18

Jon Mott from UBS. Just a question on the realizations. They've -- through the cycle, you've got some great returns out of this, but they also add a lot of volatility. Again, you've talked about the last pcp was a great period. This isn't going to repeat. So I just wanted to get a feeling when you budget the year, when you look ahead, how do you manage realizations? Do you sit there and go, "We need to get a certain number of realizations in our guidance this year." What are you looking for? Or is it completely opportunistic? How do you actually manage that, not just this year and into the future?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#19

Yes, there are 2 big factors that drive the timing of our realization. One is the business we've invested in operationally, is it timely to be looking at realizing that in terms of -- because usually, when we invest, we're looking to drive greater earnings and growth out of that business and repositioning it, is it right for realization? And the second one is what are the market conditions like for realization. So are they conducive or should we actually look at going a little earlier because of our anticipation of conditions or should we hold on. So they're the main drivers of timing of realizations. Clearly, the large ones that can make our -- that can give some sort of lumpiness to earnings in terms of timing. So it just happened in the third quarter last year that it was timely to exit 3 very big businesses. Ordinarily, those principal investments, you find them typically in Macquarie Capital in both the Advisory and Capital Solutions business and the Infrastructure and Energy Group. In the Infrastructure and Energy Group, where we're mostly investing in renewable projects that have a shorter-term hold, they're moving through quite regularly. So we're investing and realizing every sort of 3 years to 5 years investments. In the Advisory and Capital Solutions, where there's a range of industrial investments we make in the old principal finance, in the telecommunications, media and technology space and across the legacy advisory and capital solutions, those can be held for a longer time. So PEXA, we held for about 4 or 5 years -- sorry, Quadrant for 4 or 5 years. PEXA for much longer than that, and Energetics for a shorter period. It was really driven by when is the best time to drive the best results for shareholders and for the group from realizing those assets. So -- and there'll inevitably be timing implications in the investment-related income of Macquarie Capital.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#20

Maybe just to add to that, Jon. I mean, obviously, you've seen that slide the last few results where we talk about the capital deployed alongside Macquarie Capital's business. And one of the key things that we look at, I think, is how's the team realizing. So we actually gained the realizations, and we have ongoing conversations with them at an individual asset level about how they're tracking towards realizations and what stage of development they're at. But we're also interested in the deployment of capital. And so the key for us, I think, from a go-forward basis on your volatility point is, is the team deploying capital, continuing to deploy capital. Because if you think about an average life of 2.5 years or 3 years coming through that book, obviously, what you put on the books today, you expect to realize on average over that period of time. So you start to see that coming through. So there's a drop-off in the investment then that's something, obviously, we look at from a go-forward viewpoint.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#21

But I should just clarify that we wouldn't scope the timing of an exit based on a result for a year. What we're trying to do is drive the best returns from those investments. And so we want to realize them when they deliver the best return.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#22

Richard. Just in the front here, Richard.

Richard Wiles

analyst
#23

Richard Wiles, Morgan Stanley. Shemara, I've asked this question before, but then I'm going to have another go. You've described the conditions in the quarter as satisfactory. I'd like to know why your commentary isn't more positive on that. In Macquarie Asset Management, which is 40% of your group, your AUM is up, your IUM is up, you've raised more capital than you've ever raised before. Surely, the conditions are strong in that division. In Commodities, you've said that conditions are strong. So why is the commentary about the third quarter not more positive than how you're describing it? And are there any areas of the group where they're actually pretty weak and you're concerned about the operating performance?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#24

At the moment, as we said, we actually think they're satisfactory across the business. So there aren't areas where we're particularly concerned about the operating performance at this point. Even in Macquarie Capital, where we've guided that the numbers should be down, it's in timing of investment-related income, but the market conditions are satisfactory, as we said. So they're conditions that are conducive to all our businesses being able to operate and that's why we described them as satisfactory.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#25

Start with Brendan. Just go to Brendan first. Yes.

Brendan Sproules

analyst
#26

It's Brendan from Citigroup. I just got a question on tax. I mean, you guided to a flat tax rate from last year. But obviously, the first half, it was significantly lower. Could you maybe talk about the revenue composition from a tax perspective in the third quarter? And is there anything that you're expecting in the fourth quarter that may give rise to a higher tax rate when you compare half-on-half?

Alex Harvey

executive
#27

I mean, obviously, we -- as you said, Brendan, we've guided to in line with where we were last year. So you can -- based on where we were for the first half, you can sort of get an estimate where we think the full year is going to be from a tax rate viewpoint. I don't think there's anything in particular from a composition viewpoint other than to say the tax rate obviously reflects the geographic composition of income. And the nature of income is coming through, some income -- some expenses are nondeductible for the sake of the example. So there's some variances to effective tax rate based on the nature of income that's going through. I don't think there's anything particular we want to call out in the third quarter or the fourth quarter. It's the same, I guess, message that we've been giving over the last little while, the geographic composition of income and the nature of income is really driving our effective tax rate.

Matthew Wilson

analyst
#28

Matt Wilson from Evans & Partners. Just further to Jonathan Mott's question, how do you think about the size of the equity portfolio that you invest in? Going into 2007, it was 85% of your book equity, today at $8.5 billion, it's around 50%. What's the constraint on the size of that portfolio? Because the world is a big place. There's lots of investment opportunities. How much equity are you willing to put at risk?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#29

Yes, we do look at that from a top-down perspective of our total equity position and how much equity risk we're prepared to have. We also very much look at it from a bottom-up position of every single investment, and Patrick will speak to you about the risk management culture, but we need to make sure that we've looked at the downsides in terms of every investment we're holding, the correlations of those investments, and is it tolerable within our risk appetite. . And importantly, what we're looking to do is can we add real value to that investment, bring human capital to it, which means that we get upside that warrants taking all of that downside risk. So at the moment -- and the Board is very involved as well in looking at the level of equity risk we're prepared to take at a point in the cycle. We're comfortable with the level we're at, at the moment, given how we see broader macro conditions, but also where we see the capabilities. Typically, that equity investment is allocated broadly across the various groups that are investing. Obviously, the 3 main users of the equity capital are in the Investment Bank, the Infrastructure and Energy Group and the Advisory and Capital Solutions and in Macquarie Asset Management are the 3 big users. So we have rough indications of what appetite we have from the top-down. And then from the bottom-up, we sweat every single investment. And there may be times when we're prepared to spike above because something exceptional comes up or because things are due to roll off soon and other times where we'll sit a little bit below, but that's the Board approach. Patrick can elaborate when he speaks.

Matthew Wilson

analyst
#30

Can you give us a feel for where the upper band is? And then secondly, correlations are nice, but when we have an event, they all go to one.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#31

Yes, look, we do look at -- we've just been through our whole annual stress testing process and we have a level of tolerance for how much we'll wear. And we run many factors through that, epidemic scenario, there's a whole lot of different stressors, liquidity related ones that can cause stress to the book. And we're certainly comfortable, through this rigorous process we go through, must have spent a good part of this year on settling our stress test for this year that we're comfortable with not just the size, but the nature of exposures we have. Because when you say they all go to one -- the liquidity is also important, and we are termed out with our funding, as we discussed. If we're holding really good, robust infrastructure assets and they're term funded, those tend to be much more resilient than other sorts of assets that could suffer in the short term. And so we also look at when do we have to realize, what earnings capacity do we have against it, et cetera.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#32

We've got a couple more questions. Andrew?

Andrew Triggs

analyst
#33

Andrew Triggs from JPMorgan. Shemara, just wondered if you could give a few more details around the performance fee side of things, both in terms of what was realized in the third quarter, but also if there's any been any change in the near-term outlook.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#34

Yes. We -- I mean, look, in the third quarter, we had some reasonable realizations of performance fees across a range of the funds and across all geographies as well. In terms of the outlook, Martin Stanley, when he spoke a few years ago, he gave guidance on where performance fees typically are in terms of basis points, equity under management or where investment-related income is, and they were 50 and 20 points from recollection. For the last few years, we've been a little bit above that. But I guess we can review whether we would guide higher. At this point, we're comfortable with the guidance that we've given previously.

Alex Harvey

executive
#35

Yes. Maybe just to add to that. In terms of the third quarter, we saw some realizations or some, I guess, similar transactions coming out of the European infrastructure funds, particularly 1 and 3. And then we saw some divestments out of the U.S. assets, which we're anticipating to happen in third quarter. And then some performance fees from some assets down here in Australia. So we're very happy, I think, with the geographic diversity on a go-forward basis. Again, I think the other point we made in the half is probably right. What we are seeing is, obviously, more equity under management, which is good for the future, but we're also seeing more diversity and where those performance fees are coming from. So I guess we're happy with the way the balance of the portfolio is coming together.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#36

Yes. But I mean, the big realizations are usually made public. So Hobart Airport here, Brussels completed, but we obviously recognize those performance fees when there's highly unlikely probability of reversal, and then we had Long Beach Container Terminal in the U.S. So they'd all be quite...

Andrew Triggs

analyst
#37

About how many of those funds have extinguished their ability to have better matured and extinguish their ability to earn performance fees in the future. Are those big MEIF funds?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#38

No. We're continuing to raise. So the most recent MEIF fund is EUR 5 billion. It's the biggest we've done. MEIF6 is raising now. We aren't allowed to comment while we're raising. But each of the funds we're raising at the moment have been record size. MEIF5's just been raising and was USD 5 billion fund. So I think those funds we raised at the time before the GFC, which were large, that have pretty much run off by now, was followed by some smaller funds. But since then, they've been getting bigger and bigger. So a lot of our equity under management now is in record size funds.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#39

Okay. Thanks very much. I'll ask Alex to take up the stage. I'll invite Mary and Patrick up on the stage. Post Patrick and Mary, there will be an opportunity for further questions and we'll have questions in between or after the BFS and then the CGM presentation as well. Thank you.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#40

Patrick, I think you can go straight up so you can sit down.

Patrick Upfold

executive
#41

It's been a while. You can tell I'm a little bit rusty here. So good morning. Welcome, everybody. I'm going to take you through our -- an overview of our approach to risk management and take through a little bit of the Risk Management Group and what we've been doing. I've been in charge of risk management for the last couple of years. Okay. As hopefully most of you are familiar with, our approach to risk management is a long-standing one. And risk is integral to and risk management is integrated across all of our businesses. And it's based on 3 fundamental principles, which you can see there. Firstly, the business owns the risk. Really important. Now we enable our people to go out and seek opportunity. But ultimately, they must be accountable for, they must retain ownership of the risk that opportunity entails. And secondly, when assessing risk, we must understand worst-case outcomes. And we must be prepared to accept, reject or reduce such outcomes to be within our risk tolerances and our overall risk appetite settings. Risk is not to be assumed away or rationalized away way on the basis of likeliness or remoteness. Risk is something which must be confronted. And then finally, all material risk decisions are subject to independent review and signed off by the group that I head, the Risk Management Group. The role of this group is to basically objectively assess, accept and manage risk and hopefully, and it has -- this will contribute to the long-term success of Macquarie. Now it does this in a number of ways. Firstly, we anticipate emerging risk and assess risk impacts, and we do that across a range of scenarios, situations and industries. Secondly, we're a force of challenge. And Shemara mentioned that before to the business in reviewing and signing off on risk acceptance decisions. And then finally, we monitor and mitigate risk, and we embed our risk management framework and a strong risk culture. And I'll talk a little bit more about that and manage incidents as and when they occur. This approach, which, as I say, is long-standing for us, is entirely consistent with the 3 lines of defense approach: Line 1 being the business owning the risk; Line 2, being RMG independently assessing that risk; and of course, Line 3, Internal Audit function, providing independent assurance to senior management and the Board. So let's talk about risk culture. Because I can talk about our risk management and the structure of the 3 lines of defense. But ultimately, I think the effectiveness of our risk management framework and the result and risk outcomes, what we witness, is significantly impacted by our culture. Now our culture is a reflection of who we are and what we stand for, individually and collectively. And the slide behind me here provide some historical points of reference over the last 35 years on how we've gone about developing our risk culture within Macquarie. Now what I think this slide reflects, I think there's 3 important characteristics that you can associate with Macquarie's culture. Firstly, there's a fear of complacency. Just because something's performed well in the past and delivered success is not a reason in of itself for us to believe this is going to be the case in the future. And hand in glove with that, secondly, there is a willingness to challenge. Now you can see there what we stand for and the code of conduct have been long-standing feature of our approach to maintaining and cultivating our risk management culture. We're constantly reflected on the appropriateness of these, having regard to the environment in which we operate. We've seen that change certainly recently. And the changing expectations of our stakeholders. These stakeholders include our shareholders, our staff, regulators and the people and the communities in which we're giving the license to operate. And this has resulted in a number of meaningful updates and refreshes over the journey. And finally, there's a desire to continue to evolve. I think a really good example of this is just looking at 2010 there where, in Internal Audit, we established a Risk Mindsets capability to understand and undertake risk culture reviews. And more recently, this team, together with teams focused on culture, conduct, environmental and social responsibility and work health and safety have come together to form RMG Behavioral Risk. And this team is there to help raise awareness and provide guidance to the businesses on how our behaviors may impact our stakeholders, both internally and externally. Just having a look at the divisions that we have now within RMG. There are 9 plus Internal Audit which also has a direct reporting line into the Chair of the Audit Committee. Now it'll be familiar to most of you, the divisions of compliance risk, operational risk, credit risk and market risk. And more recently, since I've stepped into this role, we've introduced a number of new divisions, of which I'll just highlight 3 of those. As I mentioned on the previous slide, behavioral risk brings together highly-skilled employees to focus on culture, conduct, ESR and work health and safety. And the common feature of their focus is the behavior we want to see exhibited individually by our staff and collectively by Macquarie as an institution. Financial crime risk. Most recently, it was part of compliance but now stands on its own, and it reports directly to me. And this change, I think, reflects the importance of the function, the expertise and specialization of staff within that function and of course, the evolving expectations of our communities, staff and regulators on the role that financial institutions like Macquarie play in detecting and preventing bad actors from using the financial system. And finally, the last group I'll mention is the Regulatory Affairs & Aggregate Risk Group. This works across the institution to ensure that we have very consistent approach in our dialogue with our regulators, which is open, honest and transparent. It also provides portfolio analysis and insight across the risk types across all of Macquarie. Looking at our people, we have invested significantly in recruiting professionals with a very diverse skill set, including those with backgrounds in risk management. Those importantly, with front office experience such as in trading. All those with highly specialized skill sets, such as data science, engineering, construction, geology, work health and safety, legal and behavioral psychology. Our staff levels have continued to increase, as you can see over there, and that reflects the growth in our businesses, both across geographies and industries, the types of products and services that they provide and increasing regulation around the world. And more recently, we've seen an increase in staff focused -- risk staff focused on nonfinancial risk. And you can see that, as a result of that, our headcount's moved from around 5% over a number of years, closer towards that 6% mark. Our staff are geographically diverse. It's really important. We're independent from the business units but we're not separated from the business units, so about 60% of our staff are located in offshore offices, which is entirely consistent with the overall Macquarie geographic footprint. And most importantly, RMG and its staff are well supported by the Board and senior management and very well respected across the institution. And this has been critical to allowing RMG to perform its role and to -- for Macquarie to achieve the success it's had over a very long period of time. And then finally, just to sort of touch on risk governance and highlight our overarching risk governance structure. As I mentioned, we're well supported by the Board and senior management, and we have a governance structure in place, which helps facilitate this. To facilitate the Board, there are 5 subcommittees, 4 of which I'll note, being the: Board Audit; Board Risk; Board Governance and Compliance; and Board Remuneration Committee. Now these committees, importantly, have overlapping membership to help ensure that matters that may impact a broad range of areas are properly considered by the Board from multiple perspectives. Regular attendance by RMG and the business units allows the Board to challenge and test the risk acceptance decisions that are being made and the robustness of the risk management frameworks and controls that we have in place. As a head of the Risk Management Group, I report in to Shemara, but I also report in to the Chair of the Risk Committee. And our internal auditor has a similar reporting structure, reporting to me, but also a direct reporting line into the Chair of the Audit Committee. At the Executive Committee level, at the executive management level, there are a number of committees that support management and governance across Macquarie. And one which I will highlight is that we have, for a long time, had a dedicated Risk and Compliance Committee and that reviews the risk across the institution and monitors the operation of key internal risk management controls with a particular focus on nonfinancial risk. So that's the quick summary of our approach to risk and the Risk Management Group. And to finish up, as I mentioned, we're well-respected across the institution. And risk doesn't just sit within RMG. It's integral to the way in which we operate across the businesses. And so we've got a short video here that you'll hear from some of our key senior business leaders sharing their view. After that, Mary will step up and give an overview over the bank. Hopefully this will work. [Presentation]

Mary Reemst

executive
#42

So good morning. Today, you're going to hear from the 2 groups that operate within Macquarie Group -- Macquarie Bank. But first, it's my pleasure to give you a quick introduction. So Macquarie Group is structured as a nonoperating holding company and has a banking group and a nonbanking group. The banking group comprises Macquarie Bank Limited, which is the authorized deposit-taking institution, and its subsidiaries. It operates a diverse set of businesses through Banking and Financial Services and Commodities and Global Markets. Banking and Financial Services operates only in Australia and provides a wide range of personal banking, vehicle finance, wealth management services and business banking. Commodities and Global Markets, on the other hand, is an international business operating in 27 markets with 51 offices around the world. They, too, provide a comprehensive range of services and products to their clients, including commodities, futures, foreign exchange and asset finance. Just a few words about the regulatory framework. The banking group is well regulated, and we engage with 200 regulators across the globe. Our regulatory relationships are of prime importance to us and all staff at Macquarie are held accountable for the way they conduct themselves with regulators. As an authorized deposit-taking institution, we're regulated by APRA. And of course, other key Australian regulators include ASIC, AUSTRAC and ACCC. Most of our regulatory relationships are long standing, and we aim to maintain an open, cooperative and respectful relationship with all of our regulators. Consistent with our principles, our long-held principles of accountability and integrity, this defines the expectations of staff and dealing with regulators. It's also important to protect the interests of Macquarie Bank and we do this through a very, very strong governance process. Macquarie Bank and Macquarie Group have separate boards, separate executive committees and separate charters and minutes. As Patrick just noted, clear roles and accountabilities are established through a strong risk management framework. The Banking group adopts the Macquarie-wide risk management framework, consistent with its principles of ownership of risk at the business level, which you just heard is tremendously important, understanding worst-case outcomes, which you also heard about and independent sign off. In terms of funding and capital, the bank remains well funded with strong regulatory ratios. Last year, in December, Standard & Poor's upgraded Macquarie's rating from A, which it's held for 28 years, to A+. Standard & Poor's advised that the upgrade was raised on the strengthening risk management and took into account, amongst other things, the reorientation of earnings towards sustainable and repeatable income, the significant diversity of activities in terms of geography and product and the resourcing of the group's risk management team. In a moment, you'll hear from Greg Ward on BFS and Nick O'Kane on CGM. The 2 groups provide a diversity of business for Macquarie Bank. The bank also benefits from being part of the wider group. Diversification benefits include geography, with BFS being Australian focused, and CGM's international presence providing revenue-generating capacity in Australia, EMEA, Americas and Asia Pacific. Similarly, less concentration in revenue streams is achieved by the provision of different products. BFS is focused on the domestic market and a predominantly retail and SME client base, generating annuity-style income. CGM, on the other hand, focuses mainly on market-facing businesses with repeat customers and multiple products to wholesale customers. The diversification of geography, customer, annuity and market-facing businesses provides resilience and less concentration, providing a better ability to withstand economic shocks. The group's structure also provides economies of scale and cost efficiency. The combination of a diverse business model and the cost efficiencies from being part of a broader group, have allowed Macquarie Bank to drive innovation and competition over the years, which has been illustrated in both groups. Thank you, and I'll now hand over to Sam for questions. And while Sam's coming up, I was just thinking we should note that as well as the group's heads who are presenting today, we've got up from New York, Michael Silverton, who's a Co-Group Head of Macquarie Capital; and next to him, Florian Harold from also Macquarie Capital on the Principal Investments; and Nicole Sorbara here in the front row as well. So they're available for questions.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#43

Thanks. So before we hear from BFS, a couple of minutes question time. So Richard, please.

Richard Wiles

analyst
#44

Richard Wiles, Morgan Stanley. Patrick, you said the staff numbers in Risk Management Group have grown at a compound rate of about 7%. And it looks like they account for about 5% of the group total. Do you expect the staff numbers will continue to grow at that rate or perhaps flatten out a little bit? And do you think 5% is about the right number as a percentage of the overall group?

Patrick Upfold

executive
#45

Look, it's hard to be prescriptive on whether 5% is the right number. Ultimately, we're responding to the environment which we're operating in. Pretty clearly, at the moment, there's a real focus by regulators across a whole range of areas that impact risk management. So operational risk, compliance, financial crime risk are just some of the areas that we've seen increased expectations. And that increased regulations, and that necessarily means that we need more people on the ground to ensure that we're meeting those expectations. So I expect that it will continue to drift upwards in terms of numbers overall in the short to medium term.

Richard Wiles

analyst
#46

And does that number that you gave on staff numbers, I think it was about 900, does that include the risk professionals embedded in each of the divisions? Or is that just within your group?

Patrick Upfold

executive
#47

That's just within my group. And then there are substantial resources within -- risk resources within each of the business units. For example, in my operational risk group, we currently have about 60 or 70 people that sits within -- in operational risk, but out there in the business units, we have business operational risk managers, and they would number in excess of 200. That's just one element of risk. So I'll come back to the point that I made before that. Risk is integral to who we are, and it's integrated across -- all across Macquarie. And I think Greg can perhaps talk a little bit about just some of his risk people within -- in his group when he gets up to speak.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#48

Brian.

Brian Johnson

analyst
#49

Brian Johnson, Jefferies. Two questions. Many years -- so 2 questions. The first one is, many years ago, and this held Macquarie in particularly good stead during the GFC when the earnings still fell. But when it came to risk, it used to be very much about earnings at risk. The other model is capital at risk, which means that you could tolerate quite significant losses. I'd just be intrigued, is Macquarie still run with the constraint being an earnings at risk measure, or capital at risk? And then the second one I had, in one of the most comical things of all time, I'd encourage everyone to grab out the Westpac: Pillar 3 and read about their 3 lines of defense and how they manage reputational risk, et cetera. I'd just be intrigued, how can we be confident that the disclosures made at the front of the Pillar 3 can truly be relied upon?

Patrick Upfold

executive
#50

Yes. Okay. So just dealing with the first one in terms of in terms of earnings and capital at risk. I think for some time, we've said earnings and surplus capital. We carry a surplus for many reasons, but one of which is to provide a buffer against adverse market conditions. And so nothing has changed on that front. We're continually operating stress tests to test that, to test that we do hold sufficient capital and that we're looking at the composition of our earnings to make sure that our earnings are resilient through all kinds of market cycles and downturns. So there's been nothing -- no fundamental change in that front. We have put more resources into that space. And I think we're getting better at the work that we perform on that front. And I can't say that I've looked at Westpac's Pillar 3 disclosures. So I can't really comment on that. I've just outlined to you the 3 lines of defense model that we operate. And you just heard from some of our business leaders about how risk culture is truly embedded within the institution. So I've given you a pretty good feel for why we could operate effectively. Ultimately, however, I think it's kind of our history, which I think can give you comfort that Macquarie has an appropriate approach to risk. And I think on that front, I think our record speaks for itself.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#51

Ed?

Ed Henning

analyst
#52

It's Ed Henning from CLSA. You talked about the need for ongoing increase in people in risk. Can you just touch on the technology side, what you're doing there? And can technology play a role in reducing the cost going forward in the risk department?

Patrick Upfold

executive
#53

Yes, it certainly can play a role. And indeed, does play a role. We work hand in glove with certain Nicole's team in terms of applying technology to minimize the cost of, for example, compliance. However, some of that technology still needs to develop and evolve. And so there is a lot of manual processes. And there's still a need for human -- a lot of human touch at multiple points. And I can give you an example of that. For example, something like monitoring surveillance, we're very focused on voice technology. But voice technology hasn't hit the point where it is entirely reliable because it's still -- we're still going from voice to text. So we are using some of that technology, but we're compensating for the deficiencies in that technology with the use of people. So we'll undoubtedly see an increase in the use of technology over the years to come. But I'm not sure that that's going to necessarily mean that headcount won't increase over the journey.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#54

We have time for one more question. [ Michelle ]?

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#55

This is a very basic question. How do you source people for the risk team? Like, if I wanted to work in risk, what degree and qualifications will I have? And do many people that work in risk move back and forth in the businesses, just like Shemara was saying, other people had opportunities to do?

Patrick Upfold

executive
#56

Yes, look, it's a really good question. We really want -- I'm a true believer in diversity and a whole range of fronts. One of the things I say to my direct reports is, "Don't report someone who's -- who -- don't go and hire someone who's exactly like you because we actually want to have that multiple perspective, people with different backgrounds, who are able to kind of challenge things, which are new and actually challenge the status quo." So we're constantly out there looking for all types of people. I don't think I can kind of summarize it in one form. I gave you a bit of a hint before. I think we've got geologists. We've got engineers. We've got people that come from medical backgrounds. So it's a diverse range of people that we, ultimately, we look for. But the characteristics that I like to see in people is that willingness to challenge, that independence of -- and that independence that follow are some of the key characteristics that I would look for.

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#57

And we said that people move back and forth all the time. We talked about people have moved into risk roles. But our 2 heads of the investment bank at the moment, Michael Silverton, who's here, and Dan Wong, started their life in RMG. Allan Moss was head of RMG and became CEO. So as far as we're concerned, it's a fantastic training ground for understanding the business. But we really value people going both ways.

Patrick Upfold

executive
#58

Yes. I should add to that, that it's a real focus of mine that we do like people in RMG going out into the businesses. Whilst we're sad to see them go from RMG, they're picked up within a business unit, and that helps educate the business unit on risk and it helps give the business unit the perspective of where the Risk Management Group is coming from. At the same time, I'd like to see people from the business unit, I'm obviously one of those people that have come from the business unit, come into the risk group and actually be in that commercial lens to risk-making, our risk-making decisions. So I think as we get the best result, we get that movement coming both ways.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#59

All right. One more. Matt?

Matthew Wilson

analyst
#60

Matt Wilson, Evans & Partners. How does the role of MD and CEO influence the risk appetite of the group? And how has it sort of evolved through Allan, Nicholas and yourself? Because you all start at different points in the cycle. You all come from different sort of expertise. How does your judgment at the end of the day influence the ultimate decision?

Shemara Wikramanayake

executive
#61

Yes. Okay. Look, interestingly, we actually had all our former CEOs back in November for a panel to talk to our executive directors at our 50th anniversary. And I think all of the directors that were there said they were really struck by the consistency of the attitude going right back to when Stan Owens set the business up of the way we've -- culture under which we've operated, which is trying hire the best people, create a framework that empowers them all to go and look for opportunity in their communities where we can bring our skills but then very much be accountable for the disciplined execution of that and act with long-term integrity in terms of making sure we add more value to communities and all stakeholders and we [ cost ]. And that's been core to our culture through all of our CEOS. There have been different market cycles we've all operated through. Tony Berg was there in the deregulation of the '80s. Allan was there post the '91 global recession through a period of strong growth. Nicholas took over at the GFC and rode through the recovery from that. And I've come in at the market environment we have now. We all had different styles as well, but it's been fundamental that we had the same focus on opportunity, accountability, integrity. So whilst we empower people to go and be entrepreneurial, take some risks, fail, look for opportunity, we very much say everyone who works at Macquarie, all 15,700 people, are accountable for risk management and accountability and integrity. So that's been consistent for 50 years.

Patrick Upfold

executive
#62

Yes. I think this without -- just a more general comment that there's been no sudden movement. We've evolved. Our business evolves. So it's we take cautious steps, I think, when we move into new areas. A good example of that is our green energy business where we've started off relatively small and got to really understand the risk involved in that business. So I think that's an important point to remember that there's no kind of sudden sort of moves into new areas. And the second thing is that there's a lot of longevity in the senior management team and within the Board. And longevity, ultimately means that you'll have scar tissue from many of those kind of market cycles that Shemara has referred to in the past. So that all -- that's very much still there within the management team.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#63

Okay. That's great. Thanks. Mary and Patrick, I'll ask you to step down the stage.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#64

Greg, Ben, Dean and Sean, if you can come up, we'll hear from BFS. As Greg and the team are coming up, we will play a short video for BFS, and then we'll focus on the slides of BFS plus staff. [Presentation]

Greg Ward

executive
#65

Fantastic. Let me add my welcome to that of my colleagues. A little video there showcasing some of the experiences we provide to our customers. We think their market-leading experiences that they have, the very important relationships that our customers have with us. And the way they view those relationships, we have relationships going back nearly 40 years with customers and our client retention rates are very, very high. And the other thing I think you see in that video is the mindset of our people. Customer obsession is really at the forefront of the way they operate. They have a growth mindset and an innovative mindset. And we think that sets us up really, really well. In terms of BFS, lots of you all know this business. A very successful business, we think, now operating wholly in Australia. Financial services, both Wealth Management and Banking Services, 1.5 million clients and growing significantly. We operate through 3 channels, and you'll hear shortly from the channel heads. So personal banking, business banking and wealth management. So very familiar, I think, in terms of the nature of those operations. And we leverage a very sophisticated technology platform across all of those businesses, and that has been instrumental and key to our growth. In terms of the history of this business, you can see that there, and perhaps surprisingly, this goes back a long, long time. So 1980 with the establishment of the CMT, so 40 years ago and still a very successful product today. We know that today, of course, as the CMA, the cash management account. You can see on this slide, the early establishment of the business bank back in 1985 when we got our banking license in some of the earliest segments in that business. In the early '90s, we started in the home loan business. And back then, of course, it was an originator securitized business, so not really a balance sheet business as it is today. And in the late '90s, the Wrap platform, which has gone on to be the leading platform in this market. Fast forward a number of years, and I joined this business in 2013 and the time we relaunched our strategy. And what I saw at the time was an opportunity to make use of technology which was available, which could significantly change the experiences and the way we service the clients. So no longer did it seem necessary have a very large branch presence to build scale in this business. So that was a real game changer. And so we set about a new strategy. And I'll talk about some of the features of that strategy in this deck but in mainly just under 3 headings. The first one was to really put clients at the center of everything that we do. And that has been pivotal. We worked out that more than price and more than anything else, clients stay with firms -- are attracted to firms based on the experience they have. So client experience is at the center of our strategy. The second part was to earn trust through excellent risk management. We had a tough lesson in 2013 with the enforceable undertaking and we learned then the importance of strong risk management and strong governance. So risk is at the center of everything we do. And the third was to make this big investment in technology to enable us to build a business with scale and to provide those experiences to clients. You can see there on the bottom there, the profit over the last 5 years or so. So the strategy has been working well for us, and we think sets us up going forward. I'd say, the first part of our focus is on client experiences. Now I'm sure all businesses and all retail financial services businesses say they are focused on their clients, and they're all about client service. But it really is different here. This is absolutely at the center of everything we do. Whenever we think about a change or a new product or a change of process, the first thing we ask and want to understand is, what does it look like to the customer. We encourage all our staff to be customers. We want them to understand firsthand the experience that they're building and what it's like to use that product. I'm a customer. Of course, I know Shemara is a customer. Alex is a customer. And we encourage our staff customers to be vocal about their experience. It's -- they're a very tough judge of the characteristics of the product. We don't just rely on that and we don't presume to know what customers want. So we use a range of measures to understand the experience customers are having with us. You heard on the video, human-centered design. That's one of the techniques we use. We have voice of customer work that we do but there are a range of analytics that we run ourselves to have a better sense of the experience customers have, and we then make heavily database decisions in all of the changes. So with the changes that we make, the new products, the changes of features are fact-based driven on real knowledge about what customers are experiencing, and it is very, very powerful because we know we're spending our money in the right areas. With this focus on clients and them being at the center of what we do, we want to make sure that their experience is always positive, and there are no bad experiences so that their best interests are looked after. There's been a number of industry changes over the last while. And often, what you will see is that we have moved ahead of the industry in terms of these changes to make sure that the products operate in the best interest of customers. So we were the first to remove ATM fees. We were the first to have an open banking platform so customers had more control of their data. We were the first to ban gambling transactions on credit cards to make sure we were protecting vulnerable customers. We stay very close to industry groups, to regulators and to our customer lobby groups to make sure that we evolve the business in a very proactive way. We don't just wait for rules to change. The other thing we've got, of course, is a very strong risk culture. You heard Patrick talk about that before. There is a really strong governance and accountability culture within Macquarie, as you heard Patrick explained. The tone from the top is very, very present at Macquarie. The tone from the Board. You saw Peter, the Chairman, on the video, and Peter's here today. He's very present in the business as are the Board, the tone from the top is very present as it is from Alex and Shemara and Patrick and the other leadership team. So we then have a very experienced senior leadership team. And that senior leadership team have a long tenure at Macquarie. So this is a team that's been operating the business for a long period of time. When they make decisions, they're making them for the long-term, in the best interest of clients, in the best interest of the business because they will be here over the long-term to work through any issues that arise. So it's a very, very senior team. We've kept up our investment in terms of compliance and in terms of risk. We find ourselves well positioned in terms of changes coming out of the Royal Commission. There were no specific findings against Macquarie and we've been proactive in changing our business, as I mentioned on the previous slide, for changes that we think will come through the industry. And finally, the governance measures here and the need to be a risk professional aren't just at the senior level. With every person in the business, regardless of their role, they have risk management KPIs that we assess a couple of times a year and constantly, in fact, and there is a very strong consequence management framework if they don't meet the very high standards that we set of our people in this area. The next part I'll talk about is the simplification of our operations. What we recognized was we could really win here if we focus on a limited number of things. So we understood what we're doing and we do those well. And so we spend a lot of time closing offices and operations that didn't have the scale or the payback that we might want. We exited a whole range of noncore businesses. We combined businesses to get operational efficiencies. And just recently, we put the finance leasing business into BFS for similar reasons. And you see there a discontinuation of a range of products, simplification of our pricing structures and other arrangements we have in place where clients deal with us and a significant decommissioning of our systems. All of this, making it a much more simple business to operate, which means we get more things right. It's simpler to manage. We make less mistakes, it's easier to control risk and it becomes more efficient. And we see some of that efficiency coming through in our cost story. What you see here is the cost over the last 5 years or so. And they're basically flat. They went up in the last year as we brought across the motor vehicle finance business. The buffer that the -- the costs have remained flat. And what that's meant is that we've been able to invest more money proportionately in technology whilst keeping costs flat, and that technology investment is allowing us to grow at scale. And on that right-hand chart there, you see the line is our funds under management, our loan assets and our platform assets have been increasing and our staff numbers are not increasing. So we are building scale and I expect this graph to look similar as we play forward over the next couple of years. Volumes going up, cost base not going up. And this is just an example of some of the technology investments that we've made. There are literally hundreds of features and investments under this. I just picked out some of those. The key thing, I think, was in 2013, we decided to do a full digital transformation. So rebuilding the tech stack from the bottom up: new infrastructure, new environment, new applications, new core banking system, everything from the ground up. And that has brought tremendous benefits. And you're seeing that now paying off in the home loans space, and Ben will talk to that in a little while. We've had great leverage from those investments in our digital assets and our environments and also that core banking system. We're turning our attention now to the wealth platform. So we are re-platforming the wealth platform. That's the first time in 20 years. So that's a significant upgrade, and will bring with it tremendous benefits, I think, in terms of our wealth business. And likewise, in our business banking business, they haven't had significant technology upgrades, and we are leveraging the investments we've made on the personal banking side across to business banking, and I expect us to get the rewards there as well. In the interest of time, I might just jump over the next slide. We are a little bit behind, but this is just some of the technology stack that we have. Some tremendous functionality here. I can see Justin, who runs our IT team, Nicole is in the audience. We have a superb tech team and product team. And we really do have some leading technology here and a lot of it, the first time it's been seen in financial services has been at Macquarie. And I think we're very sophisticated in terms of our cloud strategy as well and much more advanced than what you'll see in the industry. I'll hand over now to the channel heads. You can see here the way the business is structured. We go-to-market through 3 channels. Again, this customer obsession and this focus on customers. So it's the 3 channels, which face the market and face our customers, and you'll hear from the channel heads. And then we are supported by our product teams, our IT teams, our operations teams, our risk teams and so forth across all those platforms. Today, I have Ben here. Ben runs the Personal Bank. Ben joined Macquarie 23 years ago, and has worked in the Macquarie Capital business and the Asset Management business, both here in Australia and in the U.S., and joined BFS in 2013 and has been a big driver behind the overall BFS strategy. But importantly, the Personal Banking business. Dean's been with Macquarie for, I think, 25 years, wholly in the business bank and has been running the business bank for about the last 5 years. And Sean joined us back in 2011 after a career at ANZ, running the private bank, high net worth business in Asia, and time also at BT, and has been a big part of the driver behind our platform growth. I'm going to pass over to you, Ben.

Benjamin Perham

executive
#66

Hello. You can see here that we've grown our home loan book by $14 billion over the last 18 months. And since the middle of 2017, we've been increasingly focused on our Macquarie-branded loans. We ceased originating all-new white-label loans about a year ago. Because of the strong growth that we're seeing in our book, it's weighted towards more recent originations, with 2/3 of the book having been originated in the last 3 calendar years. Our application volumes more than doubled in 2019, which we attribute to our focus on delivering a superior client experience. One dimension of client experience is the time it takes to approve loans, and it's particularly important in the broker channel where we originate 90% of our new business. Brokers tell us that we have the best approval times in the market. We're consistently at least twice as fast as the industry average. And that's a result of our multiyear investment in people, technology and processes and a willingness to invest ahead of time and build scale and capacity for a much larger business than we had. You can see that scalability in the top right chart. We were able to maintain our industry-leading processing times in 2019, even while our application volumes more than doubled. At the same time as winning more new customers, we've also been focused on delivering outstanding client experiences for our existing customers. And you can see in the bottom right-hand chart that's had a dramatic impact on the number of customers leaving us with our external refinance rate from Macquarie-branded loans now in line with market and improving every month. Our strong growth is happening in the context of a very prudent, indeed, conservative risk appetite. We've moved ahead of the industry over the last 5 years to implement tightening measures. For example, in May 2015, we were one of the first lenders to start buffering other debts. That means our servicing calculator added a margin of safety on the interest rate of a client's other debts that they were not refinancing with us. We think that moving early to implement tightening measures laid the foundation for the step change in market share that we saw in 2019. Another example of our prudent risk appetite was our strategic decision in July 2017 to reward customers who have more equity in their homes. We were the first lender in the market to introduce a separate pricing tier for customers with at least 30% equity in their homes. And for 2 years, we were the only lender in the market with that strategy of focusing on lower-risk loans. You can see it's had a dramatic impact on the mix of clients we're attracting and the business that we're writing. In this financial year, 56% of our new volume has been at a loan-to-value ratio of below 70%, and we write almost no business or very little business above an 80% LVR. At both ends of that spectrum, we compare favorably to market. On the top-right chart, you can see that loan-to-value ratio is highly correlated to arrears rates so we're confident that our strategic focus on having a very prudent risk appetite means that we're building a better quality loan book, both our 30-plus and 9-plus arrears rates are materially better than the industry. This page presents another lens on how we've repositioned the business over the last 5 years. You can see the change in our mix of flow over -- our mix of business over time. And when you look at our recent flow, you can see that we're attracting a higher proportion of owner-occupied clients than the industry. Our average loan size has increased to about $600,000 for new business. And our overall portfolio is more weighted to the Eastern states than the underlying population. I'm now going to hand over to my colleague, Dean Firth, who runs our business bank.

Dean Firth

executive
#67

Well, thanks, Ben, and good morning, everybody. The business bank has been built on a strategy of specialization, and that specialization has really been focused around a segment strategy. As you can see on this slide, there are 11 segments that we're specifically focused on. 8 segments are relatively mature in the context of our offering and 3 we would consider to be emerging. As a consequence of this segment strategy, what we're able to do as business bankers is put the same bankers, and the same teams in front of the same business every day of the week. And as a consequence, we build really great insights and knowledge about what's important to that business, not just their financial requirements but their business requirements. And as a consequence, we believe that we can innovate and provide very unique propositions into the marketplace. I think the best way to articulate that is by way of example. We very early recognized that the collection of rent was an issue for our real estate agent clients. So we developed a product called DEFT. DEFT was the first outsourced provider in terms of invoicing, receiving and reconciling the collection of rent for our real estate agents. It did a number of things. It removed cash from their office, it automated a process and it improved their operational efficiency. But that was only really part of the equation. The money had flowed from the tenant to the trust account. We then had to get the payment from the trust account to the landlord. And at the time, real estate agents were really reconciling line-by-line with landlords. So with the knowledge that we gleaned from the client interviews that we've been doing, we understood that business management systems that they are operating on were pivotal to their operational efficiency. So we built integration between our payments platform, our banking platform and the property management systems that our real estate agents were operating on to automate this transaction from tenant all the way through landlord. So that delivered operational efficiency once again into the back office of our clients and actually dropped profit into their bottom line. But that was really the accounts receivable side of our clients' business. We then put our mind to the accounts payable side. So each property throws off about 25 bills a year, gas, electricity, energy, rates, the electrician, the plumber, the painter. And as a consequence, we had big manual processes happening inside of our clients' businesses. Once again, we built automation between our accounts receivable process, our accounts payable process and automated that within our clients' back office. And finally, and more recently, we've taken the product attributes of DEFT to develop a product called Auction Pay. So if you were to go to an auction and buy a property from an agent that actually banks with Macquarie, you don't need a bank check. You just use Auction Pay and that removes the check and the paper process from our clients' back office and makes them more efficient again. It's this process that we've taken to every one of the segments that we bank, which we believe demonstrates a real understanding of our clients' needs, not just from a financial services perspective, but from a business services perspective. And internally, our mantra is endeavor to be more than a bank to our clients and make them really critical in the way that they run their business on a day-to-day basis. Small business typically don't have the resource to build these technology solutions. So we partner and collaborate with our clients to make that possible. That really goes to the heart of our client retention rate. Our churn is low. Our client retention rate over the last 5 years is running at 93% and it's not been below 90% for 20 years. Our growth in lending volumes is at 11%, that's from December '18 to December '19. And importantly, deposits represent more than 60% of our balance sheet, running at 1.6:1. It has also underwritten 100% growth in our loan and deposit books from relatively small bases over the last 6 years, and the outlook is very -- looking very positive. This is just a bit of a deeper dive as it relates to what we do from a business deposits perspective. We haven't just built this integration with real estate agents. We've built this integration with every one of the segments that I referenced earlier. And this integration, combined with the payments platform that we have, is delivering a unique proposition to our clients. You can see that our deposits are weighted towards property services. But as we build out our propositions into other segments, we can see great opportunity there. And as evidenced by the slide on the bottom right there, our deposit growth year-to-date from December '18 to December '19 is 6%, with the predominance of that growth coming from the emerging segments that I mentioned earlier. This slide goes to the composition of our loan book. You can see at the top there that our loan-to-value ratio is conservative and that our level of realized losses is low. We think that goes to the heart of understanding the businesses that we're lending money to, not just against bricks and mortar, but against their working capital assets. On the bottom left side, you can see that 44% of our exposure is against the business themselves. And I can tell you that small business owners love the fact that we recognize the sweat equity that they're building in their business on a daily basis. And finally, the composition of our loan book is changing as we build out into emerging markets. Finally, vehicle finance, and Greg referred to this earlier. This is the business that transferred from CAF into BFS recently, just over 12 months ago. Half of this business actually sits within Business Banking. We look at the dealer finance as another segment that we provide finance to, both them and to their clients. And then the consumer component of the vehicle finance business sits within Ben's business, which is really the consumer and the Novated side of what we provide from a vehicle finance perspective. Thank you, and I'll now pass you over to Sean.

Sean West

executive
#68

Thank you, Dean, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to spend the next few minutes talking about our wealth management business, a business that's had a long-term commitment to the advice market in this country, both in terms of the thousands of advice businesses that we serve in the open market and, of course, our own advice business. So this commitment actually dates back, as Greg alluded to earlier, to more than 40 years ago now with the launch of Macquarie Cash Management Trust or Cash Management Account as we now say, or CMA. Today, the CMA is approaching $30 billion in funds under management and is used by thousands of investors around the country, including more than one self-managed -- more than 1 in 3, I should say, self-managed super fund accounts in Australia have a Macquarie CMA, still known for its service proposition and leading functionalities such as data connectivity for financial advisers. In fact, we leveraged our cash management capability to launch Macquarie Wrap some 20 years ago now. Our Wrap is the second largest wrap platform in the market with over $90 billion in funds on platform in excess of 20% market share. Still growing strongly today from a net flows perspective, with $3.3 billion in net flows for the 12 months to September '19 last year. And since inception, we've continued to enhance the capabilities of our Wrap platform. Our managed accounts capability, for example, being a more recent enhancement, seeing very good growth. But we know the advice market is changing. So advice businesses around the country are rethinking their business model and their service model, with around 1/3 of them expected to make a change in the coming 12 months. We believe the expertise we've gained and the capabilities we've delivered over the last 40 years position us well to partner with advisers to help them navigate this change. So we're very focused on delivering exceptional client experience. And that's really important to us in terms of advisers and clients. We're investing in our people and our technology and using human-centered design techniques to very much co-create solutions for advisers and clients. We're replatforming our Wrap platform, very much focused with cloud-based open architecture technology to integrate within an adviser's business or an adviser's ecosystem. We're also leveraging our core banking platform from a CMA perspective. Re-platforming provides a whole range of benefits actually for advisers and clients, including greater, if you like, international capability from a Wrap perspective and real-time banking from a CMA perspective. That doesn't just provide benefits to advisers and clients, it also helps us continue to get the benefits from scale in our own business. Now we're not just investing in our core platforms, we're also investing in our digital interfaces. So our Adviser Online capability, which helps advisers run more efficient businesses. We're integrating our award-winning e-banking and mobile banking technology so clients can see their wealth and banking in the one place. We're always looking for opportunities to innovate. Our Digital Portfolio Manager capability is an example of that, which enables advisers to manage clients' investments more efficiently by automating investment recommendations, advice documentation and portfolio implementation. We're very much investing for the future. Moving now to our private bank. In an evolving advice market, we chose to be very specific on the segment we focused on in our own advice business. We brought together our private bank and private wealth business to focus clearly, focus our growth strategy on the high net worth segment. Certainly, this was a natural -- or logical evolution for us in that business. We've been serving high net worth clients for many years now, albeit not exclusively. We believe that very much a segment-focused strategy represents a significant growth opportunity for us as we bring the best of Macquarie to high net worth families. We now have a very focused business that's very well awarded business as well and serving the needs of clients very, very well. So in summary, we believe that our long-term commitment to the advice market in this country over the last 40 years and the expertise we've gained during that time, combined with the fact that -- of our continued investment as a result of our scale and the strength of Macquarie's brand and balance sheet, will continue to benefit advisers and clients, enable us to make the most of opportunities available in a very much evolving market. Thank you, and I'll hand back to Greg.

Greg Ward

executive
#69

Thanks very much, Sean. Well, as you can tell, we think we're very well placed for growth. We're expecting growth going forward across all 3 of the channels in all parts of our business. Sam, in the interest of time, I'll hand back to you. I'm not sure that we've got time for questions, but let me hand back to you.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#70

Thanks, Greg. We'll just take a couple of questions. Matt?

Matthew Wilson

analyst
#71

Matt Wilson, Evans & Partners. When we look at the numbers on Page 44, you're sort of, on average, you're 10% the size of an average major bank. Yet you spend more than 1/3 of what they do on average on technology. You've clearly got the best technology. As we've heard today, you can price risk and you don't have a back book to protect. There's huge inertia rents that sit in the sector. How are you holding yourself flat because you've got this tremendous opportunity and all the tools and expertise to grab it?

Greg Ward

executive
#72

Yes. No, well, we share your sentiments that we're well positioned. We think we do have the best technology. We don't have anywhere near the old platforms to sort of worry about. I think this is why we're seeing the sort of growth that we've seen. The Wrap business will soon be the largest Wrap business in the market. The mortgage business is growing significantly. The business bank business is growing significantly. So we think there's lots of upside here. And importantly, as you see on this slide, we're trying to do it in a way where we pace our investment, and we could sort of accelerate a little bit but we think we're growing at a manageable pace.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#73

Jon? Let's take one more.

Jonathan Mott

analyst
#74

Just a quick one. You said at the very beginning in the operating update, volume growth is fantastic. We can see it, we see it in the [ operating stats ] every month. You also talk about margin and the margin pressures there. There was another comment here today about margin. Can you talk about how margin is performing? And how you expect that to go, especially as you continue to focus on premium product, as Matt talked about, is a very competitive space and the industry margins continue to be driven down?

Greg Ward

executive
#75

Yes. The key margin pressure we've seen is on the deposit side, I think, with the rate cycle going down, and that's eroding some of the margin in terms of the sort of the mortgage product. In business banking, margins are about the same as they were in business banking, likewise, in leasing and probably the mix of business in leasing for us is changing a little bit. So our margin is up a little bit in leasing. The biggest margin compression we've seen is in the Wrap business. There's been a lot of lot of pressure there coming from, again, the deposit side, but also there's a lot of competitive pressure in terms of fee rates there. On the mortgage side in terms of the credit margin, that looks okay. That looks okay. So if we were to think to a standard, sort of, transfer price, then the margin is sort of okay, but the -- well, the deposit margin is coming down. So the overall margin is down a little.

Jonathan Mott

analyst
#76

And the volume growth will offset the NIM pressure, you'd still expect revenue growth coming through?

Greg Ward

executive
#77

Yes. Yes, as you've said, the volume is very strong in mortgages, particularly in the last quarter, but it has been all year. And it's been very consistent in business bank the whole period.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#78

All right. The last one, Andrew, as long as it's a quick one.

Andrew Triggs

analyst
#79

Just a quick question on funding. So obviously, 40% annualized home loan growth, very strong. You did a PUMA series late last year, I think it was almost a $3 billion deal. How many of those do you need to run per annum to keep NIM in check, I guess?

Greg Ward

executive
#80

Yes, we're very fortunate. We've had this very substantial deposit base. We had more deposits than loans for a long period of time, and deposits are still growing significantly. And as Dean has shown, we have a whole range of new segments that we can grow deposits. We'd like to accelerate deposit growth. As you say, we did a $2.88 billion securitization issue. That was the largest non-major deal ever done. We've done some unsecured issuance. Our funding markets are very attractive. We're underrepresented in the term deposit side. And frankly, we're underrepresented in transaction and savings accounts where the growth for us is only about $80 million a month. So there's a range of mechanisms for us to lift the deposit side and the technology suite that we've brought to bear is primarily on the mortgage side. I think as we shift our focus to enhancing the deposit offerings, I think, we'll see deposits start to increase, and we'll be able to fund that growth.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#81

Just in the interest of time, we'll leave it there. I'll come back to you, Brian.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#82

BFS, if we can have you out of the stage. Thank you very much. We'll have the CGM team come up, Nick, Cindy and Simon. And as Nick and the team come up, we'll play a short video on CGM. [Presentation]

Nicholas O'Kane

executive
#83

Good morning, everyone. What a fantastic video. I think it really clearly demonstrates that link between our staff, our customers and the solutions that we're providing them on a daily basis. Today, I've got the pleasure to talk to you about the core elements that define Macquarie's CGM business. Shortly, I'll be joined 2 of my colleagues, who run 2 large, yet diverse businesses within that platform. CGM is a client-focused business. We have deep, long-standing client relationships. Our staff have specialized strong technical expertise across a broad range of geographies and products. Our business lines are diversified, resulting in a strong and stable earnings base. And finally, risk management overlays every decision that we make and is core to everything that we do. Once again, customers are the most important element of our business. We have over 5,000 unique customer relationships, each having exposure to either a financial or commodity market or a requirement for some kind of capital. They include sophisticated investment managers, producers and consumers of commodities. Each year, our customer base continues to grow. 85% of our client revenue is generated from existing relationships, demonstrating the core strength of our customer franchise. This leads to a confidence to be able to forecast future activity levels, helping us make sound investments and decisions when it comes to things like staff, products and markets. Our customer relationships are well diversified over a full spectrum of products and services with limited concentration in any given sector or product. Given how important our customers are to our core business, we often ask them about their experiences, like we did in the video, like we've done through human-centered design processes as our colleagues in BFS and other parts of Macquarie have. Some of the insights that they share with us include, they appreciate the bespoke offering that's tailored specifically to their needs. We make them feel like they are our only client. They respect our strong understanding of the market, which results in a shared partnership experience. And finally, they tell us that they buy Macquarie for our people. And this is an offering that has evolved over many years. This is a really interesting slide and a lot of data on the slide. But I think it really clearly demonstrates the evolution of this business over the past 40 years in partnership with our clients into a broad range of products and markets. Some of this activity has resulted in businesses that are niche, and some of it has resulted in businesses with scale. This is further evidenced by industry recognition. In the past 12 months alone, our businesses have been recognized as Natural Gas/LNG House of the Year, Asian Electricity & Environmental Products House of The Year and Energy Research House of The Year. This results in scale across some of our business lines. Our futures business is ranked #1 on the ASX. Our North American gas business has grown to be the second largest in that market. And our asset finance portfolio has grown to be over $8 billion in notional value. So over the 40 years, our clients have been at the forefront of our portfolio. We have evolved into different geographies where our clients are located and where their risks need to be managed. This has resulted in coverage across 50 offices in 27 countries. One of our more recent expansions has been into gas trading in Mexico City where the domestic gas industry there has recently deregulated. This was a journey that took us 12 years in the making, waiting for the right time to identify it to enter that market. When our customers demonstrated that the need was there and we deemed that the regulatory environment was appropriate, we were able to move quickly, one and the first in the industry to do so. Our people have a broad range of skills and specialist technical expertise. Over 2,500 of our staff are tailored to solve our customers' risk management, capital and logistical challenges. Some of those specialist skills include logistical experts who help us manage the movement of commodities from where they are produced to where they are consumed. Meteorologists who forecast weather patterns that impact commodity prices on a daily basis. And data scientists and quant PhDs who help us interpret the wealth of data we accumulate on a daily basis. This combination of a diverse customer base, broad geographic reach and deep client relationships results in a strong and stable earnings base. One of the least understood aspects of the CGM business is that 65% of our portfolio represents recurring income from either annuity business lines like lending, leasing and financing or from repeat revenue that comes from our stable client base. In fact, when we analyze the CGM business lines further, and more specifically, our commodities business lines, we find that between 60% and 70% of those business activities have either very low or no correlation between them. So when volatility does drop in one of our sector portfolios, it is likely offset by increased activity in another business line. A good example of this was last financial year, we saw reduced volatility and subsequent reduced customer activity in our global oil businesses. This was offset in our portfolio by an increase in volatility and subsequently customer activity in our North American, European gas and power businesses. So this correlation results in a lower risk of volatility for our earnings base. So let's talk about risk a little bit further. When I'm talking to investors, they often ask me what keeps me awake at night. And invariably, it will come down to some kind of discussion about risk. Whether that be geopolitical tension in the Middle East, the impact on global demand and demand of oil or the coronavirus or the impact of technical -- technological disruption on our markets, risk management is a factor in every decision that we make. This experience has been accumulated over half a century of managing risk across our organization, resulting in a mature and consistent control environment, governed by Macquarie's risk management principles. This includes managing our global risks right down to managing out independent granular risks. As we've heard from Patrick and Shemara, we have a very strong second line of review and challenge that comes from our central RMG function. And we are all focusing on the worst case outcomes in every decision that we are making. There is a really strong focus on risk culture across CGM, in much the same way that, that focus permeates all other parts of Macquarie. Every individual in our business is held accountable for all aspects of risk management. If you were to ask any of our colleagues across New York, Singapore, Geneva or Houston, every one of those individuals will tell you that they are each held accountable for all aspects of risk management, including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, nonfinancial risk and conduct risk. This manifests itself in not only our ability to manage our own risks but to partner with our customers to manage theirs. As I mentioned earlier, we have a lot of diversity across all of our businesses. Roughly 60% of our revenue is generated from commodities, a further 25% from our financial markets activities and 15% from our asset finance activities. Today, I would like to introduce you to 2 of our business heads who run commodities and financial businesses. Firstly, we have Cindy Khek, who has joined us here from Houston. She runs our North American -- she co-heads our North American gas and power business. Cindy joined us from an acquisition back in 2005 and has well over 20 years' experience in managing risks and relationships across that industry. After that, we'll hear from Simon Wright. Simon has been with the firm for over 30 years and runs our Fixed Income and Currencies business. Simon has been at the forefront in driving the growth of that business over the last 2 decades. Cindy?

Cindy Khek

executive
#84

Thanks, Nick, and good morning. I'm delighted to be here today in Sydney. North American Power, Gas & Emission is very much a people business. Many individuals in our trade team have over 20 years of experience and senior team member that worked together for over 14 years. We have strong expertise in specific markets and regions and we have very high retention rate, which is unique in our industry. Our long tenure and continuity as a team underpins our strong Macquarie risk culture and has enabled us to build a seamless round-the-clock client and market coverage. This evolution of our business growth didn't happen overnight. Our growth has been a steady and continued organic growth, strategic acquisitions and seamless integrations over the last 15 years. I'll touch on the most significant ones of those now. Like many of my long-standing colleagues, as what Nick mentioned earlier, I joined the company in the acquisition, in my case, through Macquarie's purchase of Cook Inlet Energy trading business in 2005 based in California. As part of a diverse minority-owned gas trading company, Cook Inlet's legacy continues to be an important part of the Macquarie business today, especially through a strong footprint established in California natural gas markets and disciplined risk management culture. Between acquisitions, we maintain our focus on organic growth. For example, as we integrated Cook Inlet's business, the team was building out the East Power team through a patient, client-led and physical approach to create the significant business we have there today. Macquarie subsequently acquired Constellation in 2009, then one of the largest natural gas marketers. Integrating the teams to one Central Houston location that now forms our regional headquarter with over 400 staff. Our most recent acquisition was in 2017, where we successfully integrated the Canadian gas team in Calgary and its Southeast, Texas and West Power team in Minneapolis. Each acquisition and the steady organic growth was additive to the platform that provides a full coverage of North American gas and power business that we have today. Our business is very much physical in nature, which means we don't look like our industry peers. Our position in North American market is supported by a strong emphasis on deep-dive analytics through which we actively manage on over 80 natural gas physical system, including pipelines, storage facility and local distribution companies. As you can see on the slide, where it's highlighted in blue, we physically ship and find ways to optimize on over 80% of all major interstate pipelines with at least average receipts of 0.5 Bcf a day. We accomplish this mainly through leased physical assets. And our peak physical volume hit 13 Bcf just this year. And to put that in perspective, total North American natural gas production is 90 Bcf as of December 2019. Patrick and Nick earlier talked about ownership of risk. And our business is no different than the rest of CGM and Macquarie. All of our activities are underpinned by a strong Macquarie framework and culture, and every one individual are accountable across all aspects of risk analysis, and risk is owned at the business level. With our extensive physical coverage, we have built a diverse and long-standing client base comprising more than 500 counterparties, they include producers, utilities, power generators and marketers. Many of these clients have worked with us for many years, and benefit from the mix of our analysis, expertise and the physical presence market reach that I described. Turning to the macro and how we're responding. We have witnessed massive shifts in the natural gas market over the last 5 to 10 years. These rapidly changing markets present continued opportunities for our business. Although the shale natural gas revolution began more than a decade ago, we -- our production continues to climb. Not only has overall production has grown, the geographic distribution of production have shifted dramatically. With the northeast region growing the most over that time frame, it has moved from an importer to a net exporter to other regions in this time frame. Today, the U.S. has built 6 world-scale LNG facilities from 0 just 4 years ago. In total, exports out of the U.S. have increased over 355% in the last 5 years. As a result of these rapidly changing supply and demand dynamics, interregional flow across North America has completely reversed, new bottlenecks have appeared and disappeared, while the amount of storage available to absorb the supply and demand dynamics has actually declined. So what does this mean for our business? Given this constantly changing landscape, both producers and consumers have a greater need to manage their energy products and to understand the implication for price volatility as well as physical flow logistics. With our long-tenured and experienced team and extensive physical coverage of North American power and gas grids, we believe we are well positioned to service our clients' needs and continue to see -- help them navigate the uncertainty and volatility of ever-evolving market. Thank you. I'll hand it over to Simon Wright.

Simon Wright

executive
#85

Thank you, Cindy. Thank you, Nick. My name is Simon Wright, and I'm the Division Director of the Fixed Income and Currency business. I've been looking after this business in its many evolutions and iterations for over 20 years. What I can tell you is true today has been true in the last 20 years is that we are a client-led business model. Our primary focus is based upon finding client- or market-based solutions for our clients and then managing the result and risk of that activity. In terms of coverage, we are all things FX, both G10 and emerging markets, operating out of all the major centers. With regards to rates markets and products, we choose not to engage as deeply in all markets. We basically pick those markets where we have a competitive advantage. In the credit markets, ex U.S., we are largely focused on the structured end of that market around origination, structuring, distribution and trading of asset-backed securities, particularly around mortgages in the ANZ and EMEA. With regard to clients, we find our capabilities resonate with corporates, private equity, real money, leverage money, a little of activity around money service brokers and some high net worth. As you've heard today, risk management is key. It is key for us and it always has been at the center of everything we do. Our risk management team and -- are basically our product managers. A lot of managers, our regional managers have, on average, tenure of over 18 years, and all are very well schooled in our risk management systems and our risk management culture. Growth and evolution has largely been in 2 stages for us. In the 1990s and the 2000s, we were very much an Australian-led business model, operating in our domestic markets, focused on the primary market that is talking to end users directly, and then servicing the international market much more than the secondary markets that is talking to those institutions and brokers servicing their end clients. But post 2008, there was a change. We had to change our focus. We had to change our strategy in response to those changing market dynamics. We basically sought to target those primary markets offshore. In doing this, we knew we had to basically hire local origination capability and then harness it and couple it with long-standing Macquarie DNA risk management capability and product capability. We focused on the Americas, Japan, EMEA and Asia. As a result, we are now servicing in excess of 250 private client relationships. As can be seen by the graph on the top right-hand corner, we're experiencing and enjoying year-on-year incremental growth, regional diversity, and revenues are marked by low volatility. Looking at 3 stages of this evolution. What is true to all of them is we put our client outcomes first. Starting with U.S. and Canada. We focus primarily on private equity and corporates, and our clients here have benefited from our ability to partner with Macquarie Capital and build out our complementary skills to provide a much more holistic client experience. In Japan, our experience had been around -- through joint ventures and partnering with banks and brokers. But in 2011, we basically originated a small local team to focus on local corporates. And what we developed and achieved was a diverse range of corporates, multigenerational corporates with strong balance sheets in industries as diverse as education, shipbuilding, electrical and food importation. In EMEA, again, we hired local. We found people who knew their markets, knew nuances, cultural ties, those sorts of things and part of the Macquarie capability and risk management. Here, again, client base has been diverse: fish stock importers, steel fabricators, timber importers, agribusinesses, asset originators. And what has been a real win for us through this whole evolutionary process has been our ability to harness and leverage our experiences in one region and make them portable to another client sector. For example, we designed and executed the term FX hedge with volume variability based upon underlying jet fuel price in North America -- for a North American client. We took this idea and made it portable to Japan, where we're talking to a shipbuilding client with the same FX-type exposure and was linked to copper pricing because of the demand for copper wire. In both instances, these were first for our clients, and it solved a problem for both of them and gave us real leverage. From an outlook perspective, we have lots of room to grow. Our coverage model is only partway complete, and with the current strategy yielding stable incremental growth, we're very much focused on the continued maturation of the strategy. Thank you.

Nicholas O'Kane

executive
#86

Thanks very much, Simon. So as you've heard, CGM is acutely attuned to the evolving market opportunities and well positioned to take advantage of them as they present themselves. When we think about these potential areas of growth, we can categorize them in 2 ways. The first one is areas that are adjacent to where we are already operating, have expertise and market relationships. So this could include the investment in disruptive technologies such as blockchain, participating in the replacement of aging energy infrastructure or expanding into new geographies, including growing our FICC business in Asia, the Americas and Europe, as Simon has just talked about, or indeed, growing our SAF platform deeper into Europe, including expanding our smart meters portfolio and our solar business. All the way, we are looking to capture new classes of customers with this expansion. Secondly, we see a really exciting opportunity in the transition to a low carbon economy. Macquarie and CGM understand the global energy footprint. We understand gas, we understand electricity, we understand oil and renewable markets. We also understand how to move energy, both in domestic markets and international markets. We think this uniquely positions us to capitalize on the opportunities that will relate to the energy transition. This includes participation in the LNG markets where demand is forecast to triple over the next 10 years or the emergence of hydrogen as a new energy class, and finally, the production of renewable energy where we find ourselves collaborating very, very closely with other areas of our organization. We're currently pursuing an interesting opportunity alongside an independent crude producer. We're looking at a program that will capture the carbon where that carbon is emitted, and ultimately, when we will use that in an enhanced oil recovery project. That carbon will then be permanently sequestered into the ground, resulting in a carbon-neutral production of a barrel of oil. Also, we're experiencing high growth in demand from our clients for voluntary carbon offset schemes. So we're working with those clients on bundling the offset schemes with other commodities, and indeed, creating new asset classes. For example, we're talking to a customer about a jet fuel-bundled supply contract with an offset, so that's -- we will provide a single one-stop solution for that customer. There's also the opportunity where we are talking to a customer about development of a carbon-neutral aircraft where the total life -- expected lifetime emissions of that plane are calculated and offset at delivery. So the cost can be built into the CapEx of the aircraft, debt finance and then amortized over the working life of that aircraft. And finally, we're discussing with a major rideshare company to include an offsetting button in their app to allow customers to elect to offset their carbon footprint at the time of purchasing their ride. The commonality across all of these opportunities is that we are partnering with our clients as they transition. So as you can see, it's a really exciting time for CGM. 65% of our earnings are derived from recurring business lines. We're well diversified across customer revenue and geographies, with the majority of our business lines having very low or no correlation with each other. And finally, as we've just discussed, we see significant upside and potential to grow into adjacent spaces to the ones that we're already operating in or to partner with our clients as they transition to a low-carbon economy. Thank you.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#87

All right. Thanks, Nick. We've obviously gone a little bit over time, so thanks for your patience. In the interest on time, we'll just take a couple of questions. We're obviously catching up with investors over the next couple of days. So if we don't get to your question now, we will then.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#88

So Richard?

Richard Wiles

analyst
#89

Richard Wiles, Morgan Stanley. Nick, you went through a period where you made quite a few acquisitions between about 2007 and 2011 or '12. And then in the last few years, you've only made one. Do you think from here, there's going to be more acquisition opportunities? Or has the business become so diverse and so big that it's primarily organic from here?

Nicholas O'Kane

executive
#90

Look, I think the business is quite diverse, and we have built a significant franchise over the course of that period. But we are constantly reviewing potential acquisition opportunities as a normal course of business. Over the course of the journey, there were many acquisition targets that we looked at which weren't appropriate, and we continue to do that as a normal course of business. So we'll find out when those opportunities -- we find the opportunity that we think represents the right opportunity for us, both from a cultural perspective and all other aspects of the opportunity.

Richard Wiles

analyst
#91

And just a follow-up question. Given the changing dynamics and the growth in the U.S. market, do you think it becomes a bigger proportion of your total revenue and earnings over time, North America, rather than just the U.S.?

Nicholas O'Kane

executive
#92

We feel, as we talked about earlier in the presentation, that we've got good diversity across all of our business lines. And we are exporting technology developed in the U.S. to other markets that we're operating in, and we are seeing significant increase in customer franchise, particularly in places like Europe.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#93

Brendan?

Brendan Sproules

analyst
#94

It's Brendan Sproules from Citi. I was just going to ask about the transport and storage opportunities that you've had. You've had quite a step-up in the revenue, I think, about this time 12 months ago. Can you talk about the outlook for that in -- across the business?

Nicholas O'Kane

executive
#95

The -- again, when we review our business and the performance of the business, the majority of our activity is customer-led, and sometimes it will come in one business line versus another business line. Specifically as it relates to the transport business and the storage business, we're constantly seeing opportunities present themselves as the market evolves. I think Cindy did a good job of demonstrating just how we see changes in the U.S. market in terms of where energy is produced and where it needs to be consumed, and that is constantly evolving. And what we do is provide the solution to our customer, where our customers need to get that energy from where it's produced, now the other side of our customers need to consume it. Our job is to get it from where it's produced to where it's consumed. And whilst there's a need for our customers to do both those things, we think will be opportunity.

Samuel Dobson

executive
#96

All right. If there's no further questions, thank you very much for attending. Thanks to all our presenters. Very interesting presentations, and we'll catch up with you in the next couple of days. Thanks very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Macquarie Group Limited transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Macquarie Group Limited earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.