Metsä Board Oyj (METSB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 9, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Mika Joukio
executiveGood afternoon and welcome to the presentation of Metsa Board's Q4 and Full Year 2022 Results. My name is Mika Joukio, and I'm the CEO at Metsa Board. With me is also our CFO Henri Sederholm. Let's first go through the presentation, and we will then open the lines for your questions. I will start with Q4 in brief. Weakening demand for consumer products and destocking in the value chain were reflected in paperboard deliveries and they were lower than in the previous quarter, but also in the corresponding period last year. However, the average sales prices of paperboards increased and sales were therefore 15% higher than in Q4 2021 at EUR 600 million. To respond to the slowdown in demand, we adjusted our production in the fourth quarter with production volume was clearly lower than in Q4 last year. However, for the full year production volumes differed a little from the previous year. And in fact in pulp and BCTMP, the production volumes were at the record high in 2021 -- 2022. Costs continue to increase, especially in chemicals, energy and wood. This of course impacted the Q4 profitability, which after everything, remained very strong. Comparable operating result was 17% of sales. In December, the new recovery boiler and turbine started up in Husum, which will increase the pulp mills' electricity production and improve the energy self-sufficiency of the whole integrate. And once again, we have remarkable success in sustainability. In CDP we managed to achieve A lists in all 3 categories; climate change, forests and water. We will only -- we were one of the only 12 companies that achieved a triple A out of nearly 15,000 companies scored. Excellent work. In addition, based on our continuously strong operating results and solid credit metrics, Moody's upgraded us to Baa2 with a stable outlook. So despite an increasingly challenging operating environment, we managed to deliver a good result in the last quarter of 2022. And if we then look at the full year development through our long term financial targets, the result was excellent. Our comparable return on capital employed was almost 21%, well above our targeted level of 12%. Our balance sheet remains strong with leverage at 0.2x. And the Board's proposal to AGM for the dividend is EUR 0.58 per share, according to our dividend policy, which is to distribute at least 50% of the net result as dividends. Now the paperboard sales and the overall demand situation. The full year delivery volumes were some 6% lower than in the record year of 2021, were due to the pandemic, demand for packaging was boosted by a shift in consumption from services to products. Yet at the beginning of 2022 paperboard demand was at the high level, but declined towards the end of the year. And I'd like to highlight 2 reasons for this decline. First, rapid cost inflation with rising interest rates weakened consumer purchasing power, leading to a fall in demand for consumer goods. Second, a massive destocking in the value chain led to a decrease in order inflow and lower delivery volumes. The fourth quarter was especially impacted by this. And if you look at the situation by product and region, the biggest drop was seen in Europe and in folding boxboard. The end of sales to Russia had also an impact. However, we managed to reallocate the 130,000 tonnes of folding boxboard previously sold to Russia to our other markets in Europe and North-America. Then in H1, we increased our very low stock levels and prepared for investment shutdown in Husum later this year. And in white kraftliners, the decrease in demand was more evident in uncoated grades in Europe. So how do we see the paperboard demand developing going forward? In the short term, demand may remain a little uncertain. Quite -- how long is difficult to predict, depends largely on a global economic situation. However, the long-term demand drivers for recyclable packaging materials, which are increasingly replacing plastics, have not disappeared anywhere. The annual growth of the global packaging market is roughly 4% and within that the growth of paperboard is fastest. Now for market pulp starting with delivery volumes for the full year of 2022. Metsa Board's market pulp deliveries grew by 1% totaling 0.5 million tonnes. Our associated company Mesta Fibre's pulp deliveries decreased by 6%, totaling 2.9 million tonnes. Demand for softwood market pulp in Europe remained at a fairly low level throughout the year. In China, the demand was stable in relation to supply. Towards the end of the year, the demand declined due to the increase in production curtailments in paper and board production in both Europe and in China. Throughout the year, the supply of softwood pulp was limited due to the several production shutdowns rapidly rising costs in energy and chemicals and a shortage of wood especially in North-America. Bottlenecks in logistics, which have reduced supply for a long time, eased towards the end of the year. And pulp prices, they increased from 2021. Before I let Henri move on to financials, let's take a quick look at a couple of key figures in sustainability. In safety, we saw a clear improvement compared to previous year. TRIF was 6.7 still too high compared to our target which is 0 injuries. Energy efficiency improved by 2.7% compared to the base year of 2018. The improvement was a little lower than last year and is partly explained by the production adjustment measures at the end of the year. The use of process water has decreased by more than 12% compared to the base year of 2018. Here, Husum's pulp mill renewal will have a positive impact going forward. And the share of certified wood out of all softwood was 83% against the targeted level of over 90%. But now I will hand over to Henri to open the financials more.
Henri Sederholm
executiveThanks Mika, and good afternoon. Let's start with sales. As Mika already pointed out, despite the drop in delivery volumes our sales were clearly higher both in the quarterly comparison Q4 versus Q4 as well as in the full year comparison. This is mainly explained by higher paperboard sales prices, which on average improved by 25% compared to last year. Comparable operating results for full year was EUR 521 million corresponding to an operating margin of 21%. And although the last quarter in 2022 was weaker than the 2 previous quarters, profitability was still strong. Operating margin was 17%. Now a closer look at the items that impacted the result, starting from Q4 compared to the same period last year. Operating profit improved by 10% and the biggest positive contributor was improved sales prices, mainly in paperboards. In addition, FX impact and the result share from Metsa Fibre, also had a positive impact. The main negatives were derived from significantly higher costs, especially in energy and chemicals. In addition, logistics and wood costs were clearly higher than in the previous year. Lower delivery volumes in both paperboard and pulp also weakened profitability somewhat. Then moving on to the full year comparison. Comparable operating result, EUR 521 million, clearly exceeded the 2021 level. Also here the biggest improvement came from higher sales prices boosted by the strong U.S. dollar. In 2022, we sold unused emission allowances worth EUR 29 million, which is a little more than last year's EUR 21 million. For this year 2023, we are planning to continue the sales in every quarter. Costs increased in every category. Cost inflation was particularly fast in chemicals and energy. In chemicals, price increases were most notable for caustic soda, peroxides, starch and latexes. Energy costs were driven especially by higher electricity prices. Logistics costs increased due to limited availability of transport capacity and higher fuel prices. Wood costs increased not only due to the higher wood prices, but also higher harvesting and transport costs. In paperboard profitability was weakened by higher pulp prices, but the overall impact of pulp on Mesta Board's result was clearly positive. All-in-all, the total cost increase, excluding pulp, was some 20% year on year. Operating cash flow for 2022 was EUR 232 million, EUR 100 million lower than in 2021. The increase in working capital was EUR 150 million whereas in 2021 it decreased by EUR 50 million. Around half of the increase was derived from rise in the inventory value of paperboard due to cost inflation. Other factors behind the increase were a higher paperboard inventory level and an increase in trade receivables resulting from higher prices for finished products. Cash flow after investment was negative EUR 41 million. And just a reminder about upcoming possible dividend payments. first quarter typically includes the dividend Mesta Board receives from Metsa Fibre, whereas the company's own dividend payment is scheduled for the second quarter. And now for the financial position, which remained strong with net debt at EUR 94 million and leverage at 0.2x, plenty of headroom to our targeted level a maximum of 2.5x. And this position creates a solid platform for our ongoing and planned growth projects about which Mika will tell you more. So back to you, Mika.
Mika Joukio
executiveThanks, Henri. And now let's take a look at our ongoing investments. In Husum, the new recovery boiler and turbine started in December. This will increase the pulp mills' electricity production, which will reduce energy and maintenance costs and improve the production efficiency of the whole Husum integrate. It will also improve the integrated energy self-sufficiency and take us closer to our 2030 target of 100% for self-reproduction. Increased energy production will also be needed later this year when the capacity expansion of folding boxboard will ramp up. The annual production capacity will increase by 200,000 tonnes after which the total capacity of Husum's board machine number one will be 600,000 tonnes per year. The added capacity is expected to be full in the market by the end of 2025. In Kemi, we will increase our white kraftliner capacity by 40,000 tonnes after which the total capacity of Kemi's kraftliner machine will be 465 million tonnes -- 46,500 tonnes -- 465,000 tonnes, sorry, per year of coated white kraftliner. The investment will also improve the mill's energy and water efficiency. Here our initial investment estimate was EUR 67 million. But due to the high cost inflation, among other things, it will most likely end a little bit higher. In total, our capital expenditure was EUR 304 million in 2022 of which annual maintenance CapEx was roughly EUR 50 million. On the right-hand side, you can see the indicative timetable for both our ongoing and planned investments. We have started pre-engineering for the new folding boxboard mill in Kaskinen with an annual capacity of 800,000 tonnes. Pre-engineering includes technical and infrastructure design and logistics solutions, tendering for the main equipment and permit processes. The possible investment decision can be made in 2024 at the earliest. In addition, we will continue the Husum pulp mill's renewable during this decade by replacing the mill's old fibre liners with a new one. Investment values for these 2 projects will be specified in the contexts of possible investment decisions. Now let's move on to the near-term outlook, which isn't very easy to predict. Slower than expected economic growth, continued inflation and weakening consumer demand are all creating uncertainty in the operating environment. The visibility of paperboard sales development is rather weak. However, we expect the paperboard delivery volumes in Q1 to remain roughly at the level of Q4. For folding boxboards, we expect higher average sales prices in Q1, whereas for market pulp, the prices are slightly lower compared to the previous quarter. Cost pressure will continue. Especially wood costs are expected to increase. Due to the startup of Husum's new recovery boiler and turbine in December, depreciation will be some EUR 10 million higher in Q1 compared to Q4. And a positive impact from FX and no maintenance shutdowns will support profitability. And with these assumptions, we expect our operating result in the first quarter to remain roughly at the level of Q4. Then to summarize, in 2022 our profitability was at record high. Comparable operating result was EUR 521 million, or 21% of sales. With our successful price increases in paperboards, we managed to more than offset the rapidly rising costs, as well as the slowdown in paperboard demand and decline in delivery volumes. Nevertheless, uncertainty continues in the operating environment driven by global economic challenges and weakening consumer purchasing power. In the near-term, the visibility of sales as well as cost development is rather weak. Despite the challenges, we focus on developing our business, investing in sustainable and profitable growth to increase shareholder value further in the future. The Board's proposal for the 2022 dividend is EUR 0.58 per share. This is in line with our dividend policy and reflects our confidence of huge success. And with that, we end our presentation and are ready for your questions. Thank you very much.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Next question comes from Linus Larsson from SEB.
Linus Larsson
analystMy first question is relating to your first quarter guidance and the building blocks and assumptions that are baked into that guidance statement. You do quantify the depreciation increase of 10 million. What else would you be able to quantify? And in that context, for instance, how much do you expect would cost increase in the first compared to the fourth quarter? And also how much of a success have you had with regards to your folding boxboard price renegotiation? So a few questions relating to your first quarter guidance please.
Mika Joukio
executiveOkay. Before Henri will open up these pluses and minuses, I would like to say that the annual volume of price negotiations, they have been successful and we have been able to then also have price increases for these annual deals 2023 compared to 2022. And that is the basis why we say that the prices are expected to increase in Q1 compared to Q4, especially in folding boxboard. But Henri will open more about this plusses and minuses.
Henri Sederholm
executiveYes, okay. So, well, if we start with the positives so what we can sort of quantify a little bit is the maintenance impact, which is going to be around EUR 10 million positive against Q4. And what comes to the FX impact also, let's say EUR 5 million to EUR 10 million positive against Q4. What we will not be able to quantify at this stage is the impact of the price increases. But that's something to mention also on the positive side here. And then on the negative, so as you mentioned the depreciation minus EUR 10 million. And then the kind of cost inflation impact is also something that we aren't able to specify at this stage. Obviously, wood prices we haven’t mentioned separately, but the cost pressures will continue. Also, otherwise, as we know energy prices are very volatile, even though they have decreased now somewhat so those are the elements.
Linus Larsson
analystBut is it fair to assume that you're expecting increasing variable costs for non-wood input as well?
Henri Sederholm
executiveThat's a fair assumption.
Linus Larsson
analystOkay. And then if I may, just on CapEx, do you provide a CapEx guidance for the full year?
Mika Joukio
executiveOkay, Henri will...
Henri Sederholm
executiveYes. The guidance is EUR 250 million to EUR 300 million so slightly lower than last year.
Linus Larsson
analystGreat. And where are we when it comes to the phase 2 in Husum? You've concluded the recovery boiler investment, but when it comes to fibre line, what's the timing of that part?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes, the recovery boiler and turbine started up in December and now the fine-tuning kind of period is ongoing at the moment. And then concerning the second phase, as you said, the new fibre line, we do not have the exact date or a year here, but it will be then during -- now we see it so that it will flip in the -- during the second half of this decade. of course, depending on a lot what we will do concerning the Kaskinen investment. So Kaskinen, anyway, this decision will be made. Our target is to make that decision first. So later, during this decade.
Linus Larsson
analystOkay. So that's some time away, then I understand.
Henri Sederholm
executiveThanks.
Operator
operatorNext question comes from Johannes Grunselius from DNB Markets.
Johannes Grunselius
analystI have a question on your volumes or shipments for the fourth quarter, and you indicate to us I think that they will be largely flat. I mean, you have obviously free capacity, but are you deliberately avoiding volumes and sort of prioritizing price in this market situation? Or how should we think about that? Could you potentially sell more volumes and have a positive P&L effect, but your reasoning is that it's more important to keep prices. Can you elaborate on that please?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes, it's in a way mixture, but of course, the prices are in good level and our intention is not to go down with prices. And of course, then they shut downs or standstills are a kind of natural result of that. That is our approach.
Johannes Grunselius
analystAll right. And then you talk about, obviously, quite low visibility in the volumes, but you're still guiding for flat volumes. Is that based on sort of your current or the backlog what you have now and can you elaborate a bit on that please?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes, that is based on our backlog but also then our kind of estimate concerning the February and March deliveries. So that's pretty much based on our understanding.
Johannes Grunselius
analystAnd then final question for me, at least here. I mean, if you separate the U.S. market and European market on the folding boxboard and maybe also white kraftliner, how do you see these 2 geographical markets developing? I suppose U.S. is stronger. It would be interesting to hear your thoughts there.
Mika Joukio
executiveYes, the situation in the U.S. comparing to Europe, it's quite similar, actually. The U.S. is slightly stronger, as you said, but the differences are not very big one, big ones.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions]
Andrew Jones
analystThis is Andrew Jones from UBS. Just a question on the reasons for the volume weakness. To what extent is being influenced by, potentially, pressure from imports elsewhere? And I was wondering if with the easing logistics costs for shipping from places like China, are you seeing any rise in imports or any pressure from that additional capacity you're seeing in China in your markets?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes. So first of all, the reasons for this demand situation, I already went through those in the presentation. So it's kind of consumer purchasing power and cost inflation and then a weakening consumer purchasing power. And then on the other hand, the kind of stock level from producers to retailers. So it's -- that inventories are quite high, and for that reason, the kind of destocking has taken place. And then, yes, Chinese, they are a little bit more active now in the certain parts of -- geographical parts of, I mean, EMEA area as they used to be. And I think the reason is quite evident that the -- as you said, the container prices from China to Europe or to China, wherever kind of West pound is cheaper now than, for example, a year ago. So we have seen more volumes, for example, in Turkey, as an example. Not remarkable ones, but anyway, we have seen the Chinese being more active.
Andrew Jones
analystOkay. And do you expect that to -- that pressure to increase later in the year? Or do you think it will be a bit of a round together?
Mika Joukio
executiveThat's very difficult to predict because that's largely dependent on the kind of local consumption and demand in China. That has always been the case. The Chinese, they are coming and going to EMEA region, depending on the currencies, depending on the local situation in China, et cetera. So I think visibility here also is quite -- it's not very clear.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Robin Santavirta from Carnegie.
Robin Santavirta
analystNow first question is related to paperboard deliveries in the quarter, which had a quite strong performance in many quarters. Now recently -- it was now in Q4, quite weak. Actually going back, I think the last time you had the kind of paperboard deliveries was Q4 in 2016. I was just wondering whether that reflects in your mind more customer inventory destocking now in Q4. And if that is the case, do you still see that increasingly or decreasingly or whether that reflects simply sort of weak underlying demand?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes. Again, so both reasons are valid. So kind of destocking, but also then the end demand. It's good to remember also here that, let's say, a year ago and first half of last year, the demand was really, really, I mean, high and everybody, most probably by purpose then increased the inventories, because order -- I mean, the delivery times were long and then customers, they thought that they need to secure the volumes also in a bit kind of a longer period. And then as a result of that, then the inventory levels were very high in -- roughly in Q3 last year. And then after that, then the customer started to destock. And at the same time, also seasonally December is always low. Then the order inflows then got thinner and for that reason, then we also curtailed our production somewhat. And now after the year turn, then early January was pretty much similar situation. But now we see some improvement here and there concerning the order inflow and end demand. But coming weeks and months, will tell what is the kind of reality in that.
Robin Santavirta
analystI understand. The second question I have is related to input costs. You provided a bit of a background, an input to that. I was wondering if you could say something about logistic costs, chemical costs, and energy costs. Now going into this year we can see spot prices of different kind of whereas logistics coming down quite significantly. We can see some chemical prices already sort of in spot level coming down. And we can certainly see power prices and energy prices basically plummeting at the moment. Still sort of I understand when I listen to you and some of your peers it seems this is at least not to the start of the year having a positive impact, rather the opposite. So could you describe a little bit sort of why that would be, since start you agree for a certain period of time when you buy chemicals or logistics? And if so, what is that sort of time line, so we understand how we should then look at perhaps H2 when it comes to these cost type in terms chemicals, logistics, and energy?
Mika Joukio
executiveOkay. Henri will open up, please.
Henri Sederholm
executiveYes. I think our comments on the difficulty of predicting the near-term future definitely apply to this kind of cost outlook as well. One of the kind of main drivers being the kind of development of the energy costs, which still are quite volatile, even though they have decreased, as you said. So the potential of continuing volatility definitely makes us a bit cautious. But if the kind of energy cost will remain at more moderate levels than they have been lately, then it will then pass on to the kind of indirect impact to the logistics cost as well as to the chemical costs. So the energy prices are very decisive here. In chemicals cost, we have different kind of agreements when it comes to the length, so it -- from a few months to shorter and also to longer term, so that varies. Also in logistics, we have elements that come through quicker such as sort of fuel costs, but then some other agreements are for longer term. So it's kind of a mixed picture. But anyhow, if the energy costs will remain moderate, then the outlook will improve. But at this stage, we are still kind of quite uncertain about the development. And the wood costs we already discussed about. So I think that's the summary.
Robin Santavirta
analystSure. I understand. The final question I have is related to the paperboard expansion in Husum that you will have. I guess, capacities of production ramping up as of Q3 this year. And I am a bit concerned that this sort of resource impact of the ramp-up, I mean surely, that will be a profitable production increase for you in the mid and long term. But could you help us to understand sort of Q3, Q4 this year, whether we should more lower volume, delivery volumes from Husum, whether we should model clearly even higher sort of fixed costs or starting costs and depreciation as well. Just thinking that sort of that we don't have that surprise then ahead. So all the information you have on that one is valuable.
Mika Joukio
executiveYes. Okay. So the -- as you said, then the kind of start-up after the roughly 45 days stand still then will take place late Q3 or early Q4. And then, of course, after that, then there is a start-up period, ramping up period. So obviously, the production volumes this year will be lower than last year. But for that reason, we are building these inventories in order to then also serve customers during the standstill and then also during the ramp-up start-up period. But then, of course, our target is that already next year then the volumes are higher than -- our production volumes are higher than last year. And then by end of 2025, we have reached the full capacity. But production volumes this year will be due to the shutdown and then the start-up period lower than this year. How much remains to be seen. I don't have a figure for you here. But for that reason, we have built and will build the stocks in order to serve the customers.
Robin Santavirta
analystAnd how should we look at the start-ups occur? Remember sort of last time you expanded Husum, it was a much bigger project, but that was quite sort of costly start and then it was a very successful ramp-up once you sort of got all the volumes in. But the surprises for the market investors and analysts, they're first negative and then positive. So to avoid that kind of situation, what -- any kind of color you could give on profitability impact or earnings impact Q2, Q4 or this year overall?
Mika Joukio
executiveYes. Of course, then the nature of these investments or this capacity expansion is different than the earlier one or the first one. Here we are just getting just -- but we are just getting the machine longer and having more drawing capacity, and for that reason, then we are able to increase the production volumes. But then on the other hand, we can also, in the beginning, then adjust the production so that we -- I mean, depending on what kind of orders we have in hand. So we don't have to by purpose take everything we have in order to start up the machine. So it's a different in nature. But Henri had something concerning the volumes.
Henri Sederholm
executiveYes. I think it's just about the kind of investment shutdowns profit impact. So this year, Q3 will be the kind of heaviest one, which would be the impact around EUR 20 million against Q1 with no sort of major maintenance, and Q2 and Q4, around EUR 10 million negative impact. So that's what I wanted to add there. And the depreciation impact will be lower than what comes to this pulp mill renewal start-up now, which will be about EUR 20 million per year increase.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Johannes Grunselius from DNB Markets.
Johannes Grunselius
analystCould you give us some color on your latest thinking about the pulp market, please? You mentioned in the report that you see some price weakening, but that sort of is something we also see from spot prices that we should expect pulp prices to be slightly lower. But any comments you can give beyond Q1?
Mika Joukio
executiveIt's difficult to estimate beyond Q1. But of course, last year was very strong, both in Europe and in China. And now we know that there has been kind of market-related standstills in paper business as well as in the paperboard business in Europe. I mean, and then, of course, that has and will have obviously impact on pulp market here. And the prices will be lower in Q1 comparing to Q4, but very difficult to say then what will happen in Q2, depending on the overall situation in Europe. In China, on the other hand, then the situation is different because then there are also restrictions in supply. So the demand and supply situation is a little bit better there, not because of the market itself, but also then the kind of supply side has impact on that. But visibility to Q2 or Q3 is very difficult at the moment, concerning pulp as well as paperboard.
Johannes Grunselius
analystAnd any thoughts there on the inventory situation? I mean, when you talk to traders and when you talk to your clients in the Asian markets?
Mika Joukio
executiveI don't have the figures for you here, but we can revert later, if you like.
Johannes Grunselius
analystIt was more -- I'm not after any specific numbers, but if your feeling is that sort of inventories in the Asian pulp market is kind of normal or even slightly lower than normal or any thoughts there, please?
Mika Joukio
executiveIt's quite normal.
Operator
operatorThere are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.
Mika Joukio
executiveOkay, Mika Joukio here. Thank you very much for your active participation. And I wish you excellent Thursday evening and hear you next time. Thank you. Bye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Metsä Board Oyj transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Metsä Board Oyj earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.