Revenio Group Oyj (REG1V) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 10, 2022

FI earnings 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jouni Toijala

executive
#1

Good afternoon from snowy Finland, and welcome to Revenio Group earnings call. My name is Jouni Toijala, and I'm the CEO of Revenio Group. And with me today we also have here our Group CFO, Robin Pulkkinen. I'm going to start to go through by -- going through the Q4 highlights and also 2021 highlights. After that, Robin is going to go through a bit more details on financials and then we are going to end up with the Q&A. So Q4 was a record quarter for us. Net sales totaled EUR 23.8 million, it's an increase of 20.7%, and it's a really good result compared to really tough comparison from the last quarter from the last year. Operating profit was EUR 7.1 million, which is 29.9% of the net sales. This also includes roughly EUR 0.6 million impairment related to the Cutica. The cash flow was very strong during the Q4, resulting at the EUR 11 million, and that's up from EUR 6.2 million from last year. And the EPS was good, slightly below the last year. So if going full year numbers for the 2021, so net sales totaled EUR 78.8 million. So that's an increase of 29%. Operating profit was EUR 22.1 million, 28.1% from the net sales. That's also a good increase. Then if you look at the adjusted numbers and adjusted EBITDA, so we had the acquisition costs related to Oculo, EUR 1.7 million and then the Cutica impairment EUR 0.6 million. So adjusted EBIT was EUR 23.4 million. Then if we go to the cash side, so the cash generated from operating activities was also up from EUR 15.2 million to the EUR 21.5 million and the EPS went up from EUR 0.505 to the EUR 0.652. So in a nutshell, extremely good year for us. So if looking bit behind the numbers, so what was the reason behind the good numbers. So we were successful on the sales and marketing side. So the sales activities, digital marketing activities, we're going really well during the 2021. Then if looking at the product side of the business, so we saw the same trend during the Q4 what we saw in the Q3. So the imaging sales was extremely strong for us. Tonometers were growing as well, but not as rapid pace as the imaging side of the product. But if looking the tonometer side, it's worthwhile of noticing that actually we did over 30 million patient measurements during 2021. So that's a lot. Then we also managed to gain new openings. So we managed to start getting the footholds from the larger optical retail chains and the global customer accounts, which was really good, and that really happened also during the Q4. Then almost the whole year, we also struggled with the component shortages, but we were able to tackle the issues as they arise really well with our manufacturing partners and with our operations department. But we really see that it's going to be challenging times also on the component side during 2023. So a couple of highlights also from the product perspective. So we launched -- on March 2021, we launched a next-generation HOME2 device with the related mobile phone applications plus the cloud software and we also received after the 2021, so about 2 weeks ago, we also got the FDA approval for the HOME2 device. Then on the April 2021, we acquired Australian software company called Oculo, and that gave us access to the software and solution market, which is going to be important growth area for us in the future. Then on the imaging product side, we also launched the EIDON Ultra-Widefield lens for our EIDON family, and that has been well received among our clients. So also a strong year from the product perspective. But with these words, I give the floor to Robin.

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#2

Thank you, Jouni. So let's go a bit more through numbers. Jouni covered some of these already, but basically, the net sales, EUR 23.8 million for the last quarter with a growth of over 20%. And here I also want to highlight what Jouni also covered a bit that the comparison number from 2020 already included a growth of -- organic growth of more than 35%. So the comparables we started off this last quarter was really tough and still we were able to grow more than 20%. For the full year, EUR 78.8 million growth and almost 30% growth with the EUR 78.8 million in sales. We have the EBITDA numbers here and also the adjusted EBITDA numbers. So looking at the last quarter, basically there is no adjustment for the EBITDA line for the last quarter of last year. So EUR 8.6 million, 36% of sales with a growth of 3.2%. That's basically the same also for the adjusted line. For the EBITDA for the full year, EUR 25.7 million, which is 32.7% of sales with a growth of 18.6%. And here, you can actually see on the adjusted EBITDA line that we've added back the EUR 0.7 million of the Oculo transaction costs on the adjusted line where we get to the EUR 26.4 million in EBITDA, 33.5% of sales and with a growth of almost 22% year-over-year. On the EBIT side, 7.1% for the last quarter. It's a bit down from last year, but here also the Cutica write-off was -- or the impairment was playing a key factor. So basically when you add back the EUR 0.6 million to the EBIT for the last quarter, we get to EUR 7.7 million, which is 32.6% of sales and up a little bit more than 1% year-over-year. Last year also, as some remember, our other income was extremely large. There was roughly a little bit over EUR 1 million contingent consideration release from the CenterVue acquisition. So that also played into the profitability of the comparable numbers. Also this year, we did have some EUR 800,000 of other income, which consisted of different R&D tax credits in the U.S. and Australia and Italy also in Finland. But also there were some other kind of COVID-related income, which is more related to the kind of sustainable management of the pandemic within the company. On the EBIT for the full year, EUR 22.1 million, that's basically 28.1%. So the reported EBIT percent is actually the same in 2020 and 2021. When we do the adjusted -- look at the adjusted line, we basically added back the EUR 0.7 million acquisition costs and EUR 0.6 million impairment of Cutica to the '21 numbers where we get to EUR 23.4 million, which is almost 30% of sales. And for the comparable numbers, you can see it going from EUR 17.1 million to EUR 19.1 million. There in Q3 2020, if some remember, we actually did have an impairment on the Cutica as well, which amounted for EUR 1.9 million. So that's basically the adjustment for the comparable EBIT line. EPS, EUR 0.65 for the full year. The board is proposing a dividend of EUR 0.34 at the AGM. That's basically a little bit more than 50% payout ratio for last year. And then let's turn to the next slide. Some of the other key figures. We've shown this slide earlier. So basically, having the equity ratio is still very strong, actually improved year-over-year. If you look at the history a bit more in 2019, that was the time where we bought -- acquired CenterVue. And basically, the equity funding and the bank loans did have an impact on the balance sheet. So the end balance of the balance sheet went from below EUR 20 million to over EUR 100 million. So the whole structure changed a lot. So that actually is the key driver of the bigger difference or change in the 2019 numbers. And then looking at this year, we actually did add in Oculo to the numbers, but basically it doesn't really show too much in the graphs here. Looking at kind of the net gearing, basically, it is still -- the cash flow for the full year was really good, like Jouni mentioned. And the kind of the net gearing after the Oculo transaction was actually more than 20% positive. So considering that we're back to negative, it's quite a good end result considering that the cash balance is basically close to the same where it was a year ago. Meanwhile, we paid more loans in '21 than '20. We paid more dividend in '21 than 2020. We paid for the Oculo transaction over EUR 11 million in cash for the shares of the company. And also, we've continued to develop the software development, software solutions with the Oculo team, and we funded that for pretty much the whole year. And like we've said earlier, that's been cash flow negative for a couple of years. So basically, still we're ending at almost the same cash balance where we were a year ago. So kind of the cash flow has been extremely good for us. Also, some of you probably have noticed, the balance sheet has a quite large short-term liability, which is related to our bank loan that was repayable at the September-October time frame this year. That's actually been renegotiated after the close of the change of the year. So still in the financials, the year-end financials because the paperwork was not done, it shows as a short-term liability. But in reality, that payment schedule has been pushed out. So we continue to pay down EUR 1,050,000 per quarter for that loan. Some of the main shareholders, basically, December was the first month in the history of the company where the foreign ownership actually went above 50%. So it's the first time ever. The Finnish owners have always been more than 50%. But like we know, starting in 2015, the foreign ownership was somewhere around 5%, and it has been going up quite rapidly from there. And now we're actually -- the foreign ownership is more than 50%. Some of the bigger trends, I guess, in the changes for the last 12 months is that the larger American institutions have come on the list. They've increased their ownership. William Demant has remained the major owner for our company. So basically, Demant is a Danish-based company. So Finnish ownership around 50%; American about 16%, 17%; Danish about 14%; Swedish ownership about 7% and then it drops quite a bit before the next larger countries. And the financial guidance for this year, we expect our exchange rate adjusted net sales to grow strongly from the previous year and profitability excluding non-recurring items is estimated to remain at a good level.

Jouni Toijala

executive
#3

Thank you, Robin. I think it's time for questions. So please.

Operator

operator
#4

[Operator Instructions] The first question we've received is from Daniel Lepisto, Danske Bank.

Daniel Lepistö

analyst
#5

It's Daniel Lepisto from Danske Bank, and I actually have a couple of questions. So First of all, you gave out the nice number of over 30 million measurements made with the tonometers last year, and you mentioned that the process have been continuing strong. So has there been any change on the number of measurements performed per device on average during the pandemic or has the kind of growing installed base of the tonometers driven the impressive number here?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#6

So we have seen a couple of things happening. So we have been able to grow the installed base of the devices during the pandemic. And then in the certain regions, if we go as an example to certain countries in Southeast Asia, so they were, in some cases, reusing the probes. So I think that those things have been also now driving the probe sales as well. So there's not so much reuse.

Daniel Lepistö

analyst
#7

And my second question is about the DRSplus. And maybe just if you can give some color that why is the device showing -- or how is the device showing this kind of very strong demand? And if you can just kind of give some more information that if this device is comparable to that all of the other traditional fundus cameras on the market or does it have some specific niche value proposition that it does very well?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#8

So if now taking perhaps a bit more broader spin at first and then I come down to your detailed question. So if you look now the trend what we have had already many, many quarters is that the whole imaging portfolio which we have, so it means EIDON family. So we have 3 devices there, EIDON AF, FA and normal EIDON. So those are the 3 ones, and then we have the DRSplus. So throughout all the quarters, so the demand has been strong and we have been able to get the market share from the competitors throughout all the devices. So I think that's good to know. And then if we go for the DRSplus, so that's a unique device in that very specific product category and price points. So we use so-called TrueColor Confocal and it's fully automated. So it's a single button press and you get extremely high-quality images in a really fast manner. And that's a unique technology packaged with the great usability in that very specific price point. Hopefully, that answered the question.

Daniel Lepistö

analyst
#9

Absolutely. My third question is about iCare HOME, and as you mentioned that you successfully received approval from the FDA. So have you started the marketing U.S. based marketing already? And what sort of feedback you have received? And what kind of demand would you expect from the U.S.?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#10

So the FDA rules and regulations are quite tight. So after getting the FDA approval, so then if we play by the book, so then we are ready and then we have a permission to actually start marketing and selling. So we have done preparatory activities and now moving into the implementation. And really, the reason is that no chance to market and no chance to sell before the FDA approval and not even market. So that's the status. And based on the current feedback, so the device usability plus then the new supported iOS versions of the application, so that's -- we envision that that's going to be well received also in the U.S.A. as in Europe.

Daniel Lepistö

analyst
#11

And my final question is about the kind of the overall product pipeline you have. So how is your product development pipeline looking like? So anything on the tonometer side or imaging devices parameters or you have something new coming?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#12

I think if you look now the performance of the company in the past years and look how important it is really to have a competitive product and where you can actually now see this one especially this year is that we have been traditionally investing roughly 10% to the R&D. And if you look what's going to be the R&D investment this year, so it's going to be more than 10%. 2-thirds of that, one is going to the device side of the R&D. So in a long run, keeping the tonometer product line competitive and keeping the imaging product line competitive. So 2-thirds of the R&D investments are going to go there. And then one-third is going to go to Oculo and related software solutions where the plan is to combine devices plus the software assets what we are having. So I don't want to go in the details of what's in the pipeline, but there's things in the pipeline and the R&D teams are working really hard to get the -- and keep the road maps competitive and products competitive in years to come.

Operator

operator
#13

The next question is from Sami Sarkamies, Nordea Markets.

Sami Sarkamies

analyst
#14

Firstly, starting from tonometers, could you elaborate on the growth rate you did experience in Q4? And then regarding the outlook for this year, you're expecting the growth rate to return to pre-pandemic levels. Would this imply roughly 13% to 15% growth that was the Group organic growth in 2018, '19 before the pandemic?

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#15

Maybe I'll start with that one. So the corona pandemic has been really -- put our numbers in a funny format in a way that 2020 our tonometer sales took off really, really well for the second half of the year especially because of the hygienic benefits it had over the competitive technologies. So basically, going into the last quarter of '21, the tonometer business was facing extremely tough comparables, while the imaging business has been picking up all the way from early 2020. So kind of that's been more linear compared to tonometer. So the imaging devices obviously grew extremely fast for the last quarter, but also the tonometer business was doing really well, significantly faster than the market in general. But I guess for this year's 2020 growth, I'm not sure we want to disclose an exact percentages what we think where it's going to kind of end up, but we'll stick to the guidance there.

Sami Sarkamies

analyst
#16

And secondly on the margin guidance where you're expecting profitability to remain at a good level. If we look at last year, there was some margin pressure, about 1 percentage point. Are you assuming a margin recovery this year or is it so that the step-up in growth investments like R&D and sales and marketing will actually sort of trigger similar margins to what you had last year?

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#17

So the guidance for the full year last year was for the profitability was the exact same that the guidance is for 2020. So basically, there's a big impact of course. The R&D investments are going to be bigger this year. We have some bigger projects in the more kind of money-eating phase this year, but not all that's going through the P&L. But kind of even with that, I think it's a big -- the profitability is also dependent a lot where do we sell them, what products are selling, what the mix is. So in the U.S. where we sell straight to the end users, our margins are better. So it's also critical how the sales split goes between the kind of the U.S. versus the rest of the world. But kind of in general, the guidance for the profitability is the same than it was for '21.

Sami Sarkamies

analyst
#18

And can you elaborate on what sort of operating expense increases you're planning in sales and marketing? I mean, thinking about the Oculo launch in the U.S., think about the iCare HOME2 launch in the U.S. So I mean how material investments you will be making this year?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#19

Hard to come up with the exact numbers, but I think that there's a couple of buckets here. So we saw already traveling increasing during the Q4. We also saw a bit more higher expense going to the trade shows. And then, of course, in order to get the launch activities well running in the U.S.A. for HOME2 then same for Oculo, it's of course eating money and we have to make an investment for that one. But then if comparing that one as an example to 2021 where we launched the HOME, when we launched the EIDON Ultra-Widefield, so there's a constant run rate of cost budget related to sales and marketing, which in a way, always is there because we launched the devices, we market the devices all the time. And we have been having an investment second half of 2020 and during the 2021 also for digital marketing. So we have been increasing that part as well. So in a way, it's hard to give an exact guidance because there's always quite a big amount of money going regularly in every year to the sales and marketing.

Operator

operator
#20

The next question is from Pia Rosqvist, Carnegie.

Pia Rosqvist-Heinsalmi

analyst
#21

It's Pia Rosqvist from Carnegie. I have a few questions. First of all, it's encouraging to hear that you've been successful with larger optical chains, et cetera, during last year. How big a share of sales now comes from optical chains and larger direct customers?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#22

That's a harder thing to say because we do certain sales directly by ourselves than of course distributors are selling to the optical chains. So I would perhaps say that it's increasing. And then also the optical chains are then coming also more sophisticated from the examination point of view. So it's also in the future going to be important for us in addition to the address of ophthalmologist and their clinics, also the optometry side of the business. Sorry, I don't have an exact number because we don't fully know because of the setup related to the distributors as well.

Pia Rosqvist-Heinsalmi

analyst
#23

Then discussing inflation, you say the supply chain issues continue, and we of course see inflation as a theme also spreading. But do you say or at least I get the impression from your report that you are confident that you can continue to push these inflationary pressures into your enterprise? Am I correct here in my reading?

Jouni Toijala

executive
#24

That's more difficult to answer. So if you look kind of the normal consumer price index. So then if we start to compare that one to the raw materials and the component prices in general. So those are not fully comparable. So what we did write last year, so already on a spring time 2021. So we did actually huge component commitments, huge commitments to our manufacturing partners to actually order the devices like the DRSpluses, like the EIDONs. So we really made a commitment that whether we are going to sell them or not so we anyway have to buy them and get them into a stock. So that has helped us also to manage the cost side of the things. But this is actually -- if we go to our manufacturing partners or we go to our operations team, so this is daily or if not daily, at least weekly paddle that what kind of components, where we are able to source, what's the price and so forth. So far, we have been able to tackle the thing extremely well, and we can see that one from the gross margin from the Q4. So that was in good level, even better than the last year. But the honest answer is that we try to do our best to get the components and we are trying to do our best to keep the costs down. And we are envisioning that we have to increase the prices most probably this year as well. We did increase on Q4 last year. But the component thing is not going to be easing up, at least in near future, that's for sure.

Pia Rosqvist-Heinsalmi

analyst
#25

And then to costs still, if I may ask, Robin. So can you remind us how much of your R&D costs are capitalized or -- and maybe particularly this year if you are increasing R&D costs, how much do you plan to capitalize on these increased investments?

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#26

The capitalization is not significant. We do have some projects in Italy and Finland that we do capitalize. All the labor, basically in the Finnish projects have gone through the P&L. For next year, there are some larger projects that there are items that we need to acquire from outside also, prototypes and stuff. So the kind of investments going on the balance sheet are going to be in the some few millions, I'd say.

Pia Rosqvist-Heinsalmi

analyst
#27

Then if I may go back a couple of steps to the time when you acquired Oculo. I think at that time you said that you expect investments in this software platform to burden your profitability by 3 to 4 percentage points in 2021. Now I don't think this was visible or you performed much better than your initial thoughts. So how would you do -- what are the main drivers behind that change? Is it purely sales mix and better gross margins or what's the largest factor?

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#28

The cost of Oculo was actually in between 3% and 4%. So kind of the performance of the company didn't make up for it to be hidden in the numbers, I guess, more or less. So we did actually incur a lot of cost with the Oculo Group during last year. So it's kind of a mix of everything. I think one big item is U.S. has been doing extremely well, which is also a key player for the gross margin piece. So kind of we get basically almost roughly double the ASP in the U.S., while we do of course have some costs there and we do pay commissions for the sales reps. But still, it's kind of bringing more bucks to the bottom line than distribution sales.

Jouni Toijala

executive
#29

I think Robin is on the money with that one. So if you look at the time at the acquisition, so I think that we were not fully envisioning how aggressively the imaging sales would grow in the U.S.A. So if we look at the overall growth rate of the imaging product market, so it's less than 5%, roughly 4%, 3.9% or so. So we have been growing extremely fast there compared to the market and especially in the U.S.A. And in the U.S.A., our market share of the U.S. imaging business is less than 5%. So there's still lot to take. So I think we were not as optimistic about the imaging sales growth, which then impacted to the better gross margin what we were kind of envisioning. So I think exactly what Robin said.

Pia Rosqvist-Heinsalmi

analyst
#30

And then jumping still a bit backwards and forward. So to Q4 and the other operating income you recognized that seems -- well, it seems a bit odd. I mean, shouldn't that have been recognized as a non-recurring item or -- in my eyes, it seems quite non-recurring?

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#31

We didn't report the last year either as non-recurring. So we're talking about non-recurring costs versus income. But kind of those are not -- they will be categorized in the non-recurring bucket in our [Foreign Language]

Jouni Toijala

executive
#32

Any other questions?

Operator

operator
#33

No, there are no further questions at this time. I hand back to you.

Jouni Toijala

executive
#34

Okay. I think we are done. So thank you for joining. Have an excellent spring time, and we'd come back to the earnings call on April then. Thank you all. Bye.

Robin Pulkkinen

executive
#35

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Revenio Group Oyj transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Revenio Group Oyj earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.