Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 30, 2024

NASDAQ US Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 49 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#1

So I guess we will get started. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for coming today. I'm Stacy Rasgon. I'm Bernstein's senior research analyst. I cover the U.S. semiconductor and semi-cap spacing. And I can't express what an honor it is to have our guest here today, Haviv Ilan, the President and of Texas Instruments. [Operator Instructions] And -- so look, like I go on every year if is usually here. And I always talk about the more remarkable [indiscernible] transition story that benefited TI like over the years, and they made it look easy. They like to say that people see them as boring. I'd say that the company and the stock and the strategy have been a little less boring lately. And I want to dig into that. So to help us understand why? It's my great pleasure to welcome Haviv. So thank you so much for being with us here today.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#2

Thank you, Stacy, and thanks for having us.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#3

You can all hear me.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#4

So, Haviv, I want to start out, I think, I guess, with the Elliott in the room. So clearly, I don't think TI has ever had an activist involved. And maybe just to start out there, can you -- just to level set where we are, can you just go over, what the actual baseline plan is for your capacity and CapEx investments. And then I want to talk a little bit about the letter itself and the case that they're kind of laying out and just get -- whatever you can -- I don't know how much you can say at this point, but like whatever you can say, I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#5

So thanks for the question, Stacy. I definitely expected it. But I can't say a lot, just to give you the facts, we have learned about it on Tuesday morning for the first time. So it's pretty fresh to the team. We are, of course, reviewing the notes. And definitely, we look forward to engage in a constructive dialogue with Elliotts. I will say that, as always, we run a company and make decisions to support the company and the entire shareholders of the company, so that will continue to guide us moving forward. Now I won't go into the details today because I think it's fair we do that with Elliott first, but I will be happy if you talk about our plan. First, we can talk about the why and the whats and provide as many details as needed as you go through your [indiscernible]

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#6

Got it. So I guess just to level set on the current [indiscernible], if I got it wrong, so it's $5 billion in CapEx per year from '22 to '26, and that was taken up from $3.5 billion to $5 billion. My impression there was you're effectively reinvesting in the investment tax credit in more CapEx because the depreciation guidance at the time was sort of held constant. So $5 billion through 2026. And then '27 and beyond was 10% to 15% of revenue on CapEx to support in theory, 7% to 10% revenue growth at that point. Do I have that right?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#7

Well, let's -- some cases in some of the points yes, some of the point I would like to provide a little bit more detail. But first, let's think about investment...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#8

And why, to your point? Because I mean I think by the end of -- by the end of '26 to maybe like 2030 revenue capacity was -- I can't even remember was supposed to support -- I can't even remember what number was it. Was it $30 billion, maybe it was more.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#9

Again, we'll talk through this. But let's talk about why first and the why start with the market opportunity. I think it's obvious to us that the secular industrial in automotive is actually accelerating. Of course, sometimes tough to see when you go through a correction and there is an inventory correction in the market. But if you put it over a trend line, it's obvious that secular growth is there and in my opinion, accelerating inside this decade.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#10

Because this is industrial auto, I mean, you've been pushing this. You're one of the first, I think, I mean it's kind of 10, 15 years ago at least, right?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#11

Which leads me to our position and the position of -- we talk a lot about revenue, but revenue doesn't get rated just by letting the market grow. It's related to our investment and our strategy. And you're right. Back in, I remember, in 2011, we said, hey, we are going to bias our investment, our R&D, our SG&A towards these markets with a vision that secular growth is going to come. We have done well. I mean I have seen the R&D [indiscernible] ranking out more and more, part used to have 1 business unit building automotive parts, for example, in 2010. Each and every business [indiscernible] in the company and the number of product lines is more than 60 product lines, they all be automotive products. So the opportunity is very, very vast. And this is how we build a position. It creates a product portfolio, you engage with customers, you invest in your sales and application team, you invest in your website, which led to a strong position of almost 75% of our revenue in 2023 in industrial and automotive. So to me, to be exposed at such a high level to, I believe, a couple of the fastest-growing markets in the semiconductor industry is a good win to have. The third one. And then I think we talked about it even last year. There is also a tailwind on how customers make decisions. And we run an average unit price at around $0.40 or so or less market. And these decisions would be made at the lowest level of the engineering force at our customers. But today, especially in the last couple of years, we get -- our customers received guidelines from their leadership team, from their CEOs, from their CPOs about the dependability of capacity in TIs in a unique position to provide this geopolitically dependable capacity at a very affordable cost competitive manner. And also with a muscle or the size of the capacity. So when you think about these 3 elements and you say, hey, we have grown industrial and automotive between 2020 -- 2013 to 2023, a 10% CAGR. Could we accelerate this decade? I think we can. Hard to see right now because we are going through an inventory correction. But when I think about the next peak, this is what guides our recreation, I want to be ready to support this potential. And this is why we are invested in [indiscernible], okay? And it's done in 3 phases, and I would like to go through each of [indiscernible].

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#12

Yes, please. There's a lot of different pieces here.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#13

Yes. And it's very complex. I can tell you that the execution of that plan is complex, and it's actually more than 3 years of an investment period. It's 6 years, not in 2021. With the acquisition of the -- acquisition of the assets from [indiscernible] high acquisition. And then working through 2022 to qualify the fab and to ramp into production, which we have done at the end of '22. I think I was here a year ago, and we talked about the [indiscernible] into production. We have continued to do that and I love Lehi because simply it doesn't need revenue growth to get utilized. So you think about Lehi as a transfer fab. This is where every week, we have wafers moving away from TSMC, UMC into Lehi, it's done in 2 waves. Wave...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#14

This is analoged in or it's embedded here?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#15

I think embedded but analog is following. Let me start -- give you some more granularity here. 2022 was really S65 we call it or 65-nanometer embedded nonvolatile memory, serving low-power [indiscernible], serving DSPs, serving wireless activity. All of these parts are now qualified in Lehi and shipping from Lehi. Not only you get more control shipping out [indiscernible] versus Taiwan, cost or the fall-through is [indiscernible]. Think about what happened with wafer prices, the foundries in the last couple of years. The Lehi investment is predominantly done. The main power was there when you took the team, the port is almost a very well close of a [indiscernible] gas, some electricity. So a very beautiful transfer of revenue from further into inside TI, and allows us also to invoice with the dependability of capacity. Lehi in essence as it ramps to full production somewhere in 2025 will be simply revenue replacement. It doesn't need growth.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#16

Okay. How much does Lehi support when it's at full capacity?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#17

So I think the -- it's close to $4 billion, which is aligned. And it depends on the mix. It's going to start with [indiscernible] and later on had what we call high-speed mix signal of analog. And this is what we do right now. So 45-nanometer this year, and next year is analog. So when you complete that, more than $4 billion of revenue support. It's a very nice fall-through. So that's point number one. The point number 2 that is going right now is RFAB2. RFAB2 is again a beautiful investment because the fabs are connected. So if you think about the way you add capacity...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#18

Our fab when was the original back from 2010 with the [indiscernible] assets?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#19

Correct. The cost to build off RFAB1 was much lower. Of course, we bought equipment -- both the equipment in $0.10 on the dollar, these days are over, and we can talk about why. But I think we all know why. And RFAB2, we've built the shell. I wish we had it earlier supporting the previous cycle, but it support a slight now. And the way it does it is as you add equipment into our 2 wafers are traveling between the fab. So it's actually one big connected fab, which is a very efficient way to end modular way of adding equipment. But more importantly even customers don't see it as a new factory. So I don't need to...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#20

Requalify.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#21

No requalification, change notification, it's the same factor. So that serves us very well. Especially now because, Stacy, I'll be very frank, part of the headwinds we experienced in '21, '22, we did not have enough capacity. And I was in the center of making some very tough decisions of who are the customers that are going to be told, hey, we have to find a different supplier. So it's very tough. I'm talking about a huge amount of revenue that we had to say not right now, mainly outside of industrial and automotive. So I think what consumers think about enterprise and some of the comps and tough. But now as RFAB2 ramps, we go back to the socket and we go and rewin and it's a very, very effective way to do it, very low cost. And that's one of the way that RFAB2 right now is highly utilized.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#22

Are you winning those sockets?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#23

We are. I think customers are smart. I don't think we will be handed over 100% share, but let's stop at 50 and work ourselves from there. So I think that is very, very important. And again, RFAB2 is fully utilized these days. They're fully utilized. It's not at full capacity because equipment is being added.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#24

But for the equipment that's there.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#25

Yes. Yes. I mean when I say we felt above 90%, okay?

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#26

And that's portion of what, $4 billion or $5 billion when it's full...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#27

When it's fully built, it's going to be close to $6 billion, okay? And the other point, which is -- again, now it's all tactical, but there is also [indiscernible] wafers to our -- this is the first time we do it. It's not into, but we are transferring wafers for our [ 150 ] millimeter wafer fabs that we announced, I think you -- maybe people don't remember that. [ $2 billion ] [indiscernible] kind of fab in Sherman in Dallas, 6-inch fab...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#28

I thought you closed your in 6-inch fabs.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#29

We haven't. We haven't. But we are doing something very unique is modernizing these parts. So think about passive from the [indiscernible], getting redesigned into modern 300 [indiscernible] wafer. So think about from 2,000 chips per wafer into 0.5 million [indiscernible], cost [indiscernible] really packed test costs. And the exciting part here is forget about the cost [indiscernible], it's really the modernization of the part, meaning customers now have a piece of mind that I can run to the next 40 or 50 years. So that they are out of all factories and they have -- they can design them in into future systems, especially the lower cost that we are running right now. I'm excited about that. That's another -- again, when we talk about capacity, yes, there is $30 billion, but this part is going to shut down. So this is also a tailwind that no one takes into the effect of -- what I'm excited about, and we build these factories during a downturn revenue declining because revenue is starting to stabilize and maybe starting to show momentum. Having these 2 factories running at full capacity. One on the expense of the foundry is -- one of the expense of about 200 -- so underutilization in 200 and 150, maybe growing but our 300-millimeter wafer fab the running at full and I think...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#30

Those ones are fully depreciated anyway to 200.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#31

But there is still labor there, and there is underutilization associated with them. But that's hard work to utilize your best capacity or most modern capacity, especially because it prepares you for the future, I'm excited that people underestimate that. And you will see that fall through. You don't have to wait 15 years for that, that's coming now as we speak. So this is Phase I. LFAB2...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#32

That's all Phase I.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#33

Phase I, Yes,. This is LFAB1 and RFAB 2. Now, the more complex one is -- let's talk about LFAB 2 and talk about Sherman, which is the heavy lifting in Texas. So LFAB2, in my opinion, more straightforward. It's also on our slide, large investment on a larger fab.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#34

$11 billion.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#35

Yes. And we support probably more than that on revenue [indiscernible] sophisticated type of product compared to what we do. So running from 65 all the way to 28.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#36

Do you have any products in 28?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#37

We are developing them now. It's our own process and the investment over these technical to our portfolio, mainly led by embedded but also high-speed mixed-signal for analog. And this will ramp some time. It will ramp our structure in LFAB, but we'll continue to ramp in LFAB2. And LFAB2, when we think about 2026, why we have 2026 as a milestone. This is when we are ready to sit. And LFAB 2is a beautiful fab because it's connected. So we will add in a modular way to as a function of revenue. And we said, I think, in the last capital management, we will decide capital beyond 26 based on where revenue is first, what's your position. And then growth perspective. So you said 10% to 15%, so I disagree. It's -- and that was also on the slide, I think -- it's a funnel, it's a funnel, okay. We also -- it's not about we change the slide, we decided not to touch it, but I think you asked a question during that call, it can go from 0 to...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#38

Right. I mean, if revenues are growing 2% in 2017, I'm assuming [indiscernible].

Haviv Ilan

executive
#39

Absolutely. And then you think about the fall-through, it's immediate, right? So let us to clarify 2027 and beyond on that investment. Now Sherman is a little bit more complex. And the reason is Sherman is what we call a new bottleneck. Luckily, the map is proximity to North Texas. It's only 30 miles away, but it's a new fab. When you build a new clean room, and we are building 2 together because it's more efficient. We said on the call equip Sherman 1, what we equip is really qualified. So the capacity is going to be very small, less than, I think, less than $0.5 billion of capacity when you see it, but you need to build it in order to not only qualify the fab, you also have to get acceptance of your customers. So it's a long lead time type of approach. And that's how we think, you build the infrastructure so you can build into that clean room when the time comes. Same example is LFAB2 but needs some equipment in 2026. We are running the, Stacy, analog right now, copper and aluminum, 130 to 65. So it's a very sophisticated fab. And the revenue [indiscernible]

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#40

That's the plan for Sherman right now?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#41

Yes. And revenue per fab is going to be close to $9 billion over there.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#42

And there's going to be 4 fabs eventually?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#43

Correct. But again, you build according to revenue. The beauty of SM1, SM2, and again, they are connected, we can think about as one large fab as you add capacity in a modular way based on revenue. So just going into more details about our plan and also to clarify the '27 and beyond. Now we said we finish it in '26. We always try to execute at that level and it's within '26. I don't have the exact month yet, but I think we should be done some of them at the end of '26 and earlier. So that will guide later on our capacity investment.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#44

I guess if I add all of the incremental revenues, we had Lehi, which was -- maybe I don't know how much of it is incremental from where we are right now, it's somewhere you look maybe it's...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#45

Yes, Lehi, don't think about Lehi's incremental revenue.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#46

Okay. Okay. And I guess [indiscernible] Lehi 2. So Lehi 2 is $11 billion. And then it sounds like Sherman when it's done is what $36 billion, $9 billion a piece you said.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#47

That's what we talked about 10 to 15 years, but we'll build them as revenue comes.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#48

Incremental revenue capacity growth between now and '26 is primarily Lehi 2 then is what you're suggesting?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#49

No, it's 0 from Lehi 2. Lehi 2 as we said at the end of '23, it's clean room only, okay? The $11 billion is for, of course, for clean room and liquid, mostly equipment. Equipment doesn't start before '27.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#50

Okay. So there's $5 billion a year spending between '26, but there's not a ton of incremental revenue capacity that's ready to go between now and '26?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#51

No. RFAB2 is increment revenue [indiscernible]. Of course, we are right now winning back socket, but it gives you more capacity. So capacity for the company will grow. We mentioned, I think, supportability of $13 billion, but that's sterile number I think is like mix, but [indiscernible] 100%. And I have a couple of [indiscernible] to shutdown, okay? So all of that gives you the picture of where we can be. And now let's talk about the revenue [indiscernible] so 2014, 2018, 2022, TI grew between every peak every time, 21%, I think, 27% and you named a year and the growth of maybe let's take 2026 as an example because it's exactly that 4-year frame. I don't think revenue is going to be flat to 2022, especially even how was compressed in 2022 and especially [indiscernible]

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#52

The revenue do you think you gave up or left on the table in by '21 and '22 because of the constraints you have.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#53

Look, we have done that discussion internally, it's significant, and it was concentrated on the 3 markets I...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#54

As it really is interesting you actually look at the data over the last like 4, 5 years. I mean, you clearly did lose share. I mean, I think this is the primary reason because it wasn't just nano it was analog and it was embedded. If I just look like strictly just at China as well, I'm sure we'll get to China, but everybody is worried about the Chinese taking care and like broadly the multinational analog players have been gaining share in China for you, like you've been losing share in China over the last several years if you just the data. Do you think it was just all because of constraints? Do you think there was something else going on? And is there anything changing there?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#55

So yes, first, as we like to talk about market share, as you see there is we have forecasted Q2, I think revenue is building momentum, let it play out, okay? And we are not done with the synchronous cost inventory [indiscernible]. So let's go through this. But I will say that it is a big part of the issue. I will say that the decisions were to how to select the customers in which you will have to take a step backwards, I mentioned the market. And in China, we had some big customers on the consumer side, and we had to give up some of the socket. But they see what we are doing right now and they're willing to entertain us, and we are going to fight hard and get back on the board. So that's the China comment. And I can talk about China later. But to me, compression. The second point, and I was thus about to say it on the -- how we picked in -- picking '22 and [indiscernible] actually peaked a year after the middle of '23. But if you think about the pricing move of Texas Instruments versus competition [indiscernible] into all the numbers, I may look at -- and we have to [indiscernible] you have to distinguish is the pricing it's not always the same thing. There's a ton of mix going on there right now because of the synchronous nature of the market. But if you look at -- just to listen to what people did and also hearing it from our customers, I think we were the most customer-friendly. We haven't hiked the price to the level that people did. And that's part of the compression of the peak in 2022. That's my belief. This is why I give ourselves a good chance to form a new peak. And also the probability is very important, Stacy. How bad will it be? To have the opportunity in '26 and not execute, that would be devastating for the company, and we are not going to let that happen.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#56

Yes. I mean your inventory strategy flows into this is correct. So I find it interesting that -- I wondered about -- I know you guys were constrained, but at the same time. You're also building a ton of inventory and you still are -- and again, I'm not going to -- I understand why I understand the whole idea of the lifetime of the product as we move on, it doesn't go [indiscernible]. You just build the wrong kind of inventory like at that point? Was it just hard to match what you built with [indiscernible]

Haviv Ilan

executive
#57

We're talking about the beginning of COVID may be.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#58

The beginning. [indiscernible] yet like anecdotally a lot of constraints were coming from TIs?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#59

So let's be fair. Maybe we built a ton of inventory which we have built 2 tons of [indiscernible]. Okay. So it was not the wrong inventory. It was the right one.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#60

that's not enough of it?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#61

Not enough. Because this way, we were flying high at the beginning of the up cycle because we had the intent are unique there. We had product on the set.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#62

You were the only ones that actually decided to keep running on COVID. Everybody else shut down. It was a problem, right?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#63

Correct. I don't think it was well received at the time, but all we wish right now even more, right? And that's what guides are current inventory investment, which is the right part because we have the right data to know chart. And we think it's going to step up very well, especially if the surge is in [indiscernible]. And at least I prepare at least similar historical surges. Stacy, if you look at units. I know you look at the unit you take a unit spend, forget about TI. Look at the market without memory, we're below [ 2019 ] growth, right? Are there more stock for every end equipment? There are. How come we are lower than the [indiscernible] It's going to catch up. It always does.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#64

[indiscernible] Versus 2019 was the last industry downturn, 23% was a downturn. Non-memory revenues in '23 were down about 2% year-over-year. It wasn't a bad younger, but units were revenue -- units were down almost 20%. The only other [indiscernible] year-over-year unit growth was 2001.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#65

Correct.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#66

And units [indiscernible] were below the prior downtown 2019. ASPs were 30% higher for the industry and [indiscernible].

Haviv Ilan

executive
#67

Yes. We started the history as well and by the way, we look at what in WTS come with soon in a couple of days for April. But I will tell you that I think we're going to break a new record of [indiscernible] on unit given versus the [indiscernible] and model [indiscernible]. To me, we have to prepare because that thing gets us up. No one believes it during the [indiscernible] when you see it, it's too late.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#68

So let's talk about that. Broadly, it's been a weird cycle, right? I mean it's been very asynchronous and we've had different end markets [indiscernible] peak and trough and leveled off over the different points. Does it like industrial [indiscernible] has rolled over really hard. And I think we've crossed a lot of the times were down 40% or whatever peaking revenue. Auto starting to -- It's no lapsing, I wouldn't say, but it's starting to roll over. It looks like broadly for most -- you and your peer people calling Q2 was the bottom. And you talked about like sort of like hopeful signs of recovery I think there's still some controversy over the shape and trajectory that [indiscernible]. But like what are you seeing in, I guess, in the near term. I'm looking into the second half and maybe in the [indiscernible]. Are we seeing actual signs of like robust recovery yet? Or is it V-shaped or U-shaped or L-shaped, or like and I know you guys usually don't talk about cycle. In this form, I don't usually like to like drill a ton into short-term questions. Especially if you're actually looking for a recovery and preparing for you, what are you in terms of where that recovery might actually be starting now?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#69

Look the duration of the down cycle was because of this synchronous nature, I think you're right. And we just see a [indiscernible] behavior on everything. If you look at markets, call it fee first in, call it...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#70

It's kind of stabilized for you guys.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#71

Now it's gained momentum. Yes. So it's driving growth or is year-over-year growth and it's accelerating. And you can see that, I believe, I mean, we'll have [indiscernible] could be here in [ 2024 ]. You think about geographies, China first, we have up cycle. [indiscernible] down cycle. Are we seeing some signs in China that things can recover we mentioned [indiscernible]. I think that's going to look better as we go. Industrial, to your point, [indiscernible] to maybe [indiscernible]. But in a different, different levels. So Industrial a very strong correction. Over there, I don't think it's still just inventory over building and now just in -- I will say that automotive, I'm excited about for revenue for TI, I mentioned 10 to 2013 to 2023, 10% growth for industrial and automotive is 15%, which I believe [indiscernible]

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#72

[indiscernible]

Haviv Ilan

executive
#73

[indiscernible] actually 34 and growing. So if you think about last year grew 17%, if you think about Q1 declined year-over-year for the first time, at minus 2%. So very low single digit. But I think we are seeing a very shallow trough. So and I think it's related to [indiscernible] growth in automotive. Second, our position, I think our position is good. So I'm excited about automotive. I think we see momentum building sooner than later. So that's on the automotive side. And yes, we've guided mid-single digits, I think, for Q2. I think in some areas, as I mentioned, consumer earnings may be enterprise and [indiscernible] following. And I think industrial will be the last to correct. Because it declined more or less -- the tough sector in industrial decline during the end of last year. Last point I will make on industrial and you know it's hundreds of end equipment. Not everyone is the same. Power tools and thermostat, call it, appliances, building automation and are already looking to gain momentum. Factory automation, [indiscernible] still in the correction phase. So every end equipment has its own -- now you asked about the -- when the market goes back up, when all these -- immediately when I see a decline, I'd like to count to 4 quarters when all these markets go through one year of inventory correction, we are somewhere at the end of '24 when it's done. So we can think about an opportunity moving forward.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#74

Is it fair to say that you guys clearly do a lot more in-house on even more control, everything you're doing is you have more control over your own destiny. But you don't have as much of a channel, you don't have as much of a buffer. Is it fair to say that you're what you're seeing is likely closer to what your end customers are actually seeing versus having that buffer between [indiscernible]. People look at you as the first actually start to see the decline, right? Maybe for that reason. People wonder -- is that a...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#75

[indiscernible] valid cause. And we can see it mainly when we go just in time to customers. So not only we are direct, some of the customers work with consignment. We built a buffer and that could they consume it real time. So I believe we can see real-time behavior of customers and automotive is a great example. Most of the customer bases [indiscernible]. And I think you get real time signal. On the industrial side, there is a heavier reliance on the channel, on the distribution. Our footprint is not large...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#76

Distribution revenue mix that's not that high, anymore.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#77

25% in '24 [indiscernible]. Yes. So 25 -- And yes, probably going to put around that 25% may be a little bit lower over time. But we also are excited about the investment in the other part of the dual channel, we call it, which is our website or ti.com for e-commerce. That's something that we are modernizing and we like the investment we're making there.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#78

What are your sales going through there, by the way? You gave some numbers on the cash a couple of years only happen...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#79

I mean it did very well in -- during the upturn because that's what customers want when you need the immediate availability. I think stabilized to a lower level, but it's still much more significant versus pre-COVID. So -- and it can establish -- and we are making investments over the [indiscernible] data, information that can use bigger [ worlds ] are going to start in the future. We think this last mile as we call it, is kind of messy in our industry. And why not modernize it and take advantage of the IT development in the world to serve our customers better. I think our customers expect that and those who are getting on that modernized channel are excited about that.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#80

I guess it gives you like an early view to what customers...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#81

It's always [indiscernible]. It's always [indiscernible].

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#82

Do you want to talk about China?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#83

China, yes.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#84

So even beyond TI, like a lot of investors, I mean, they see just a ton of capacity coming on in China as well. [indiscernible] is going to go into those fabs. It's all lagging edge because they can't do it again. So people clearly worry about potential for like local Chinese replacement particularly [indiscernible] another lagging edge technologies. And I think you guys have, I don't know, 50% of your revenue goes into China though. I don't think that a lot of that's multinationals. I guess what's the local consumption in China? Do of you have 20%?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#85

So I think you quoted a ship 2 number. [indiscernible] about our largest customer. That's China. I think it's not reporting that [indiscernible] as relevant. So we are now reporting -- we are reporting a headquarter in China revenue. The customer headquarters in China. I think we see Q1 is 17% like, 17% equals higher during COVID. But also, as I said, China was [indiscernible] down cycle, and I think it's probably going to be -- usually it's [indiscernible] see that. And just on the China side, let's put things in perspective of capacity, China is about 17% to 20% of GDP. So in the market opportunity related to GDP we think [indiscernible]. It's still a very important viable market that we want to complete it. And they have enough capacity to serve them and more, because they're built up of lab and is not, I think, for China. They have ambitions to get into [indiscernible] I think about big parts sitting in our servers, in our medical equipment, in EVs. I'm not excited about it. I'm not sure the U.S. government is excited about it. I know that my customer is excited about it. So this is where this geopolitically dependable capacity is coming in big role on the future of Chinese. And I think it's very, very important to [indiscernible] the parameters of our customers make decisions. So that capacity, again, we complete, we see in China, China mainly. We see subset of competitors have less or predominantly stablish and we compete. Luckily, the set of competitive advantages that we've built over the years [indiscernible] technology and manufacturing, as we said, relying on our sales cost advantage. The breadth of the portfolio, which is very unique versus the set of competitors in China. The China advantage, the reach, [indiscernible] touch so some of them very small that the local players don't even know. And [indiscernible] is the position we've built in industrial and on automotive. It's very similar in China, also close to 80% of our revenue in China in [indiscernible] automotive, I give ourselves a good chance to compete, but it is becoming more competitive, and that's what's going on high level over there.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#86

Do you think the pricing trends in China are different from what you've seen elsewhere in the world? Like you can be harder in China versus where you have to compete up?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#87

I do because I think the local -- or the emerging competition in China is highly accepted in China. So -- and I think TI can gain premium over there because we have the breadth, we have the quality being a trusted supplier for many years, especially in industrial and automotive. There is some moats around this type of market. But these guys are capable. I don't want my team to saying they can do only a very simple part because I've seen these people building more and more complex set of solutions. And we need to compete across the board, not -- on the catalog type of more general purpose cards, but also on the application specific [indiscernible] people higher. And of course, the market price is set by them. But it's not a walkaway market price [indiscernible] the cost competitiveness as we play that game.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#88

I guess to touch on that concept is due for [indiscernible] capacity. How important is the Chips Act [indiscernible]. If it wasn't for the Chips Act, would you be pursuing the same CapEx into the year revenue?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#89

Yes, I think we talked about it last year and look, you -- every time you make an investment, you look at the probabilities and affordability, and it's always a set of parameters. And we were very clear that we decided to increase our investment or [indiscernible] on capacity because they got -- also because we got some help from the fact. I think we had a plan at the beginning, hey, let's build for loyal revenue opportunity. And we said, hey, let's take it a step up because we are getting help. Unfortunately, I cannot communicate where we are because we are not done yet. So we have supplied the application. Of course, the ITC is helping. But beyond the ITC after...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#90

ITC, it is actually bigger, right?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#91

I mean, it's expected to be bigger, with 25% of your improvement in the U.S., but the [indiscernible] are also important. And we are waiting to see where that lands and I think we've submitted it end of last year, and we should hear I believe, in the coming month where we landed. So this is definitely helping. But compare that to what China does so there in [indiscernible] health is important for us to complete [indiscernible] other players.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#92

Got it. Got it. I want to ask about a couple of the growth markets that might [indiscernible]. So how much exposure does TI -- because I was -- it's not really, really a joke like I would say that you was happy to sell like the headlight controller of the cars [indiscernible] or anything else, right? It doesn't seem -- you're just playing the general content trend. But like how do we think about EVs and their impact on...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#93

First, let me -- I don't know if it's correction or clarification.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#94

[indiscernible] anything I say.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#95

Automotive, a very complex ADAS process of the tenths of dollars all the way to lighting controllers. So I -- we don't like to brag about radar solutions, the 77 gigahertz [indiscernible] right now. But or [indiscernible] high-speed connectivity, the transit hundreds of millions a year and [indiscernible] controller for onboard charger with our DSP solution but we ship them and ship them at a high volume. But we also ship, as you said, a bunch of catalog parts [indiscernible] automate very proud of, and they all end up with a very significant opportunity in automotive. Automotive, I think, right now in Q1 was the size of industrial already, they were on the same level. And I would say that the breadth of the opportunity is only grow. Now we go to EV, more than 2x, Stacy, when you look at our exposure and our opportunity...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#96

Like how much of your auto revenue today is EV? I don't know if -- you said there's going to be overlap, I'm assuming...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#97

I don't have that right now in front me [indiscernible] But it's significant. And the beauty of it is, EVs are not fully run the risk of reduction, right? So there is room to grow over there. But as I talked about the last decade, it was mainly on [indiscernible]. And I think what the future -- 10 years is mainly on [indiscernible] NAV.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#98

Do you think your content in EV is 2x you said?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#99

Our opportunity on EV and we've done that [indiscernible] and we kind of look at as a dollar opportunity, more than $1,000, and it's...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#100

[indiscernible] how much TI -- what's the average TI content in the average car...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#101

Today, we are shipping hundreds of dollars in some cases, close to $1,000 in some cases lower. But very high content. It depends on the how many cameras, how many screens, it depends in the vehicle [indiscernible]. But if you look at the high [indiscernible] well above $500 a vehicle.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#102

Got it. And then I'd be remiss -- I don't know if you want to hear but I have to ask about AI, like -- is there any -- is there an AI play for TI? Like where do you guys benefit from that?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#103

Yes, a growing opportunity. So let's say, the biggest one I'm excited about is cloud and servers and the compute guys, they are starting to power in level by including the meds, and about a 1,000 going [indiscernible] going into [indiscernible] close to a kilowatt and higher. And if you look at -- just want to be higher, right? So the way you serve that is about, we call it, multiphase convert [indiscernible] many, many parts going and serving these process. So I'm excited about [indiscernible] company today, because this is on the newest technology.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#104

How could we know that Sherman go down to it?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#105

At 65-nanometer, we think we are billing the best [indiscernible] processed on earth. And in terms of the opportunity to server very fast growing market from the U.S. again, because you want these [indiscernible] parts to come from the dependable source. I see growing opportunity, the product portfolio is there. We are talking with all the big ones and [indiscernible]. They are also from platform, but I think they are still kind of [indiscernible] the surface. I think the peak trend -- actually look to it, let me see, close to $1 billion business, if you look at the [ datacom ] in the server and also power, but power is the biggest one, okay. So that's on AI. The second part, and maybe I should have mentioned it even last year when you asked me the question. Think about the edge. We have a good low power processing business, thinking about our DSP days. What are the [indiscernible] network and tiering. These are metric manipulation. We would accelerate that we've developed probably over the years. They sit in our processors. And when you think about inference, TI is there. DMS or driving monitoring systems, we have a leading solution, winning us many, many OEMs and that is using the machine learning accelerator. Think about -- even go to [indiscernible] in new energy infrastructure, TI's DSPs are solving that problem as well. So AI at edge for inference is a growing opportunity for the company. And we have early wins. The last one early, but robotics on content per robot for the company is significant. Tens of micro-controllers, some of them with machine vision capabilities. So that is still -- think about the human -- human robotics, they have a lot of content for...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#106

Do you have humanoid robots?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#107

I know that there is a lot of content per robot. I just know how to serve the end equipment. Calling out how many units will be sold in the future, I was never good enough to guess that. Within the socket is where we are busy.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#108

I wanted to ask a little bit more about like industry structure, particularly on M&A. So like TI has not really participated in like large-scale M&A for quite a while, like you've had some competitors who have. I'd argue have been fairly successful at it. What are your thoughts on that view? Is there, anything -- I guess, do you need like -- have your priorities on what you would be looking for if you were looking for deals? Have those changed at all over the years? Or is that what kind of kept you out of it?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#109

Look, we -- I think nothing has changed there. We are always looking. It's -- we always said it's going to be analog-centric. We always look at the [indiscernible] technology that can complement our portfolio. We don't have a lot there when you look at it, even if -- take an example of a [indiscernible] technology. Like [indiscernible] we are investing this internally. So I think we many times prefer to make versus the buy opportunity. But depending on the right time and also we need to think about affordability. Right now, we are so busy in getting ahead on capacity and getting back to that free cash flow [indiscernible] as we mentioned. that's a priority right now. But as we go back to the trend, maybe opportunities will pop up and TI will make a move. But at least, what I like about our position right now. There is nothing that we really need to build a scale and to set the future for the company.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#110

And I guess talk about the free cash per trend. Free cash flow per share trend. Do you have a number in mind? I know you've given like sort of revenue capacity, like kind of numbers. And if you go back to the [indiscernible] coming out $9. I think it was $11 in '27. And I presume you guys have done the math on, hey, if we cut our CapEx [indiscernible] at the free cash flow for sure goes up. But you have some idea of like what that free cash flow per share trend ought to get you in '26 or '27 or 2030 or like where there is like what are we [indiscernible] for here?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#111

Yes. I thought we were very -- I think we had a slide in capital management...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#112

That why I'm asking. I can't [indiscernible]

Haviv Ilan

executive
#113

Okay. It's 12 in [indiscernible] and 2027 not that I remember, okay. But this trend line -- this trend line...

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#114

That was not a target. That was to...

Haviv Ilan

executive
#115

No. But the trend line is [indiscernible], I think like -- or they said it, this is what guides us and that trend line. We haven't shown a trend line 15 years they say, not that I'm picking on you. But we showed a 2004, I think, through 2022 when the extrapolated the trend line through 2030. So when I think about when you get back, it's within that time frame and I don't have 2030 in my brain, okay? I see the modular capacity plan coming in play as a back end of 2015 to '27. And that's the expectation. I mean that's [indiscernible] of course, revenue is to do something during that time. But even if revenue wants to be very poor, then what do you do with CapEx [indiscernible], okay. you let it falls through, and it will fall very nicely. So we have done all kinds of scenarios over there and I'm excited about it and the beauty of where we are, I don't think you put cycles to get that to come into play. So we are -- I think, marching into the next cycle. It's the first time we have predicted or guided for sequential growth after 2 years, I think. 2 years [indiscernible]

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#116

Actually down [indiscernible]

Haviv Ilan

executive
#117

Something like that. I guided the first 9 month for [indiscernible]. And it's easier to invest when you have revenue momentum on your side. So I think that's what my when I compare [indiscernible] to a year ago. I see markets joining the inventory digestion. And I think a big part of it is behind us. There is momentum [indiscernible] on revenue, the factor [indiscernible] operating, using a wonderful cost until alternative cost and as revenue growth, I think that still come to fruition very quickly. So I'm super excited about that thing.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#118

That makes sense. Look, we've got about 1.5 minute left. You've kind of been doing it, but I'll give you [indiscernible]. Why should investors buy TI stock today?

Haviv Ilan

executive
#119

Okay. First, I think, and again, the investment, yes, we make equipment thinking like long-term owners. And I think about [indiscernible] 10 or 15 years, but you don't need to wait 10 or 15 years for this investment to come to fruition. We are a very unique supplier in terms of have a combination of enough capacity. The cost competitor or affordable position and very dependable. And as customers tell more and more about it and as revenue starts to build momentum again after a very tough cycle, I think the company could not be in better state as it is today. I'm excited about the future [indiscernible] for us for all of our shareholders. So that would be my short pitch.

Stacy Rasgon

analyst
#120

And I think that's a good place to leave it [indiscernible]. Thank you so much.

Haviv Ilan

executive
#121

Thank you, Stacy.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Texas Instruments Incorporated transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Texas Instruments Incorporated earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.