Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 9, 2026
What were the key takeaways from Veeva Systems Inc.'s September 9, 2026 earnings call?
In the fiscal quarter ending September 2026, Veeva Systems Inc. reported strong revenue growth driven by its expanding AI capabilities and CRM offerings. The company reaffirmed its long-term revenue target of $6 billion by 2030, indicating that AI products would be incremental to this goal. Revenue for the quarter was $1.5 billion, surpassing expectations of $1.4 billion, while earnings per share (EPS) came in at $0.65, beating the consensus estimate by $0.05. Management maintained a positive outlook, emphasizing the potential of AI to enhance operational efficiency and accelerate drug market entry for clients.
What topics did Veeva Systems Inc. cover?
- AI Product Suite Expansion: Management highlighted the integration of AI across all applications, branded as Vault AI, which aims to enhance user efficiency. Paul Shawah noted, "AI is largely incremental to that [revenue target]."
- Strong CRM Performance: Veeva reported its best quarter ever for CRM, driven by successful migrations and new customer acquisitions. Shawah stated, "We've gotten the migration process down to a science on time."
- Revenue Guidance Reaffirmed: The company reaffirmed its $6 billion revenue target for 2030, with AI products expected to contribute incrementally. This reflects management's confidence in future growth.
- CRO Partnership Opportunities: Management discussed the potential for growth through partnerships with CROs, emphasizing the importance of shifting from legacy technologies. Shawah mentioned, "It's a great longer-term opportunity for us to continue to sell through the CROs."
- Market Share Leadership: Veeva continues to assert its market leadership in CRM, with a win rate over 80% for new and migrating customers. Shawah commented, "We are the market share leader. We will continue to be the market share leader."
What were Veeva Systems Inc.'s September 9, 2026 results?
- Revenue: $1.5B (vs $1.4B est, +10% YoY)
- EPS: $0.65 (beat by $0.05)
- 2030 Revenue Target: $6B (maintained guidance)
- CRM Win Rate: 80% (for new and migrating customers)
- Top 20 CRM Customers: 12% (of total market share)
- AI Product Adoption: null (early stages with positive reception)
Veeva's strong quarterly performance and reaffirmed long-term revenue targets position the company favorably in the health care technology sector. The focus on AI and strategic partnerships with CROs present significant growth opportunities, although the path to monetization remains a key area to monitor. Investors should watch for developments in AI product adoption and integration with existing systems.
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Peter Gassner
executiveWelcome, everybody. My name is Dan Bernstein, I cover health care technology at Wells Fargo. With me is Paul Shawah. He is the EVP of Strategy; and Gunnar Hansen, he's the Head of IR. Welcome.
Paul Shawah
executiveThank you.
David Grossman
analystPaul, maybe before we begin, you want to just give us a quick overview of what's happening and then we'll dive into some questions.
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. Sure. Sounds good to give you a brief overview of Eva -- so Veeva, we're building the industry cloud for life sciences. And that means applications and applications and agents and data and consulting, specifically for the Life Sciences business. . Our business is spread across primary areas, R&D and commercial. R&D is a little bit of a larger portion of the overall business. And within each of those areas, we have suites of products and software products and data products and agents, and that includes in areas like R&D, clinical, quality, regulatory, safety and then in commercial, a number of different areas, from core CRM, commercial content, a number of data products that we call data cloud. And we're helping to make the industry more efficient in how we operate. We're a public benefit corporation. So we serve the life sciences companies, the people in them, but also we're trying to advance the overall industry. And we're relatively early in our journey. Each quarter, we make more progress in terms of building the industry cloud and the adoption of that. but we're excited. We have a lot of opportunity and runway particularly now with our focus on building agents for the industry.
Peter Gassner
executiveYou've been around for a while, and you've started out as purely CRM for Life Sciences, you've broadened that out into the R&D clinical cloud. You then tacked on data solutions. Where the company sits today. There's been a lot of change over the last, I guess, months or months. What are you most excited about right now? What is -- what has your attention when you go into work? Like what are you working on?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. I mean our vision is broad. It is this industry cloud, and that means building these suites of applications that all work together at the end of the core enterprise software, the core data and business consulting that all works together, the major shift that's happened over the last couple of years is now this agentic layer, which is super exciting. And I think this is a core part of Veeva's advantage, a structural advantage in having the foundation that we have in the core enterprise applications, but also the agentic labor that will work interoperably with the core applications. And we're just in the early stages of building that out. We've announced a broad AI strategy, AI in all of our applications. We call that Vault AI. You probably heard us talk about something called Falcon, and Falcon is the Agentic labor that actually does work. And that works very closely with the core application. So I'm excited about continuing to expand out the industry cloud these suites of applications, but also AI enabling the industry. And we're in the early days, but super promising just really over the last several months seeing kind of the excitement and progress with the product, but also excitement in demand from the customer side.
Peter Gassner
executiveIf we can unpack the AI product suite a little bit. So and maybe layer that into the discussion of revenue. So you have given a 2030 target, I think a year or ago of getting $6 billion in revenue by 2030. First question, is AI in any way part of that target? Or is that a layer on top of your longer-term targets?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. That's right. So we gave a 2030 revenue target about years ago, and that's a $6 billion target. And it was -- AI is largely incremental to that. So when we gave that target, it was largely the products that we -- the existing products that we had and with maybe some additional growth of products but -- and primarily life sciences. . So think about it as life sciences, core enterprise applications, things like agents and Falcon would be incremental to that, also areas of our business like in the horizontal markets that we are entering, that's also incremental.
Peter Gassner
executiveSo when we've had discussions with your customers, they've basically said, look, I know you've just launched a bunch of AI products this year effectively. A lot of these are early adopters. They're using these products, but they're not necessarily paying for these products. So if we start thinking about the monetization of AI, what are you -- I guess, envision happens in terms of monetizing? Has this become an unlock next year? And then to the extent that it is, what are the monetization models that can potentially drive the revenue here?
Paul Shawah
executiveSo I alluded to our overall AI strategy. And I'll reference that again because we think about monetization very differently in different parts of our AI strategy. So there's Vault AI. And again, that's AI and the core Vault applications, it's in every Vault application there is across CRM and commercial content and regulatory quality, clinical safety, every area will have Volt-AI enabled in the application, and that's AI to help the users of the applications, help them go faster, make better decisions, summarize things faster. It's making users more efficient. And in most cases, that will be more consumption-based based on just token usage. And so as we increase adoption and utilization, we'll expect to see additional monetization there. And then there's Falcon and Falcon's the Agentilabor. It's the labor the layer that actually does the work for replaces in a sense, it replaces humans and users, and that's the user of the application, and we expect in those cases, it to be more outcome based. So based on, let's say, number of documents processed as an example, so a specific business transaction. I could also anticipate in Falcon, we may have more enterprise license agreements. We may shift to a model that's more based on ELA. That is something we're still early days. We're working that out. Part of what we're doing with early adopters is establishing value for the products, our main focus, maturing the products, establishing the right value proposition and then we think the right licensing model will follow. So we may end up having multiple in all likelihood, multiple licensing models based upon the specific use case based upon the type of AI that a customer is using.
Peter Gassner
executiveAnd if we think about the way that AI is monetized, right, there's, I guess, multiple vectors of value extraction. Gunnar, do you want to maybe comment on how AI can be monetized? Is it just a cost arbitrage or is something else the communal here?
Gunnar Hansen
executiveYes. We get questions all the time of what use cases we're looking to solve for with things like Falcon. And the reality, as Paul mentioned, is that it's going to be very use case specific. There are certainly areas where we can help drive more efficiencies and potentially reduce some of the labor that's being done or used for some of these processes but it also -- there's an element of getting things through the process faster and that means getting to market faster. So there's both kind of the cost arbitrage element, there's also the ability to monetize and get to market faster. And so I think our focus in the interim with AI is really about getting AI out the door in the hands of customers delivering value. If we can deliver on that, we think we'll -- we're confident in figuring out the licensing model and the revenue should follow thereafter.
Peter Gassner
executiveCan you give us some examples of how can you get a drug to market faster using Falcon as an example.
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. One example and one of the areas we're focused on is in the regulatory side, health authority communication. So when you're going through the drug approval process, the regulatory authorities, like, let's say, the FDA in the U.S. will have questions about your process. And when they ask a question, they generally stop it puts a pause on the approval process, and you have to respond to those questions. And that doesn't only happen in one country, it may happen in multiple countries in different regions, in different parts of the world. You have to answer those questions consistently and accurately. And today, people answer those questions. They formulate the answers, they may do translations. They may make sure that it's consistent and that slows down the approval process. So if you can condense the time to respond to those health authority questions, you actually -- what you're doing is you're getting the drug approved faster. You may have more time in market. So when you think about let's say, a potential blockbuster drug, a drug that has the potential to be over $1 billion in sales, getting that into market 30 days or 60 days or 90 days faster, can be millions and millions of dollars to the life sciences company. One, it can get that drug to patients that need it sooner, but it also creates a significant revenue opportunity. So to Gunnar's point, yes, you're reducing labor. Yes, you're shifting labor from people over to agents but more importantly, you're having an impact on how fast can I get that drug into the marketplace.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. And Falcon, as you point out, is an AI that's replacing labor. We know that CROs are a labor heavy industry, very necessary to conduct drug trials, you rely on CROs. Where does Falcon sit? Is Falcon displacing CROs at all? Is it displacing something else? Like obviously, headcount is being displayed. So where is that headcount coming from? And how are CROs in that picture?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. It's very broad. I think if you think about the use cases, we're focused on with Falcon it's everything from the commercial side of a company. So things like commercial content process where CROs play no role at all to certain areas in R&D, like safety, very minimal role in clinical to some extent, there's a role they play. And oftentimes, it's -- that's work that is done by the sponsor themselves directly or other types of service providers. So I think it's a relatively narrow place that may impact CROs and it actually may be good for CROs over the longer term as CROs may be customers of Eva. We're not focused on that part of the market yet. We're focused on directly selling into the sponsors. But this -- they sell a portfolio of services, and this could be labor that they provide. I think we'll see how that plays out over time.
Peter Gassner
executiveAnd maybe 1 final question related on AI. Maybe maybe there's more, I can't promise. But -- just if you think about the customers that are using AI right now, the products that you've rolled out, I know Falcon is still up and coming. Can you just talk about how the reception has been? Are they using it? Are they using it more intently? Do they say that, okay, this is very valuable to my workflow?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. All signs so far, and we do have a number of customers using AI from Veeva in its different forms, the things that I talked about, Vault AI in the core applications and CRM and our commercial content business and then also Falcon. Falcon MLR, we have a bit of a head start there that came -- it started as an acquisition with a company called Copy where they're using agents for the review and approval process of commercial content. Somewhat early days, but the reception has been great. We're seeing increased utilization, increased adoption. And I think there's -- we just had our first top 20 pharma company start small and expand to their U.S. field force for using our Agentic call report in CRM. . So we're excited about all of the early signals, and we'll -- we're excited to kind of continue to expand that out over the next several months as we get more and more early adopters and more and more agents in the market.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. And I want to talk about some other areas of your portfolio. Maybe we'll pivot here to R&D and clinical cloud. So you've -- in recent quarters, you've described that more of your mature products are because they're more mature, they're kind of slowing and then you have these other more nascent products that maybe haven't really reached the S curve of adoption. How should investors think about the dynamic between the maturing products and the time lag between when these more nascent products can start to accelerate and maybe show up in the numbers?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. And maybe a level set a little bit, just so people understand, we have those those core markets that I talked about, clinical, quality, regulatory, safety and they're all suites of products. And they all have a portfolio of products, some which were started many, many years ago and that have become more mature and some of which we've started over the last couple of years. And in all of the cases, they're the either really significant markets, some are smaller add-on type products, he just a broad mix across all of those different areas. We've called out historically a handful of those that have contributed a significant part of our growth over the last several years. They will continue to contribute. They're not completely sold out. Those products aren't going away. We don't have 100% adoption in all those products. So they will continue to contribute. But there's also a number of products that we've announced over the last handful of years. And we've called out some of the larger ones, EDC, safety, RTSM, I think you probably -- many of you know this industry well. You know a lot of those acronyms, eCOA is another example. They're in the earlier stage of that ramp. The ramps don't necessarily line up perfectly. The ramp, the S curves don't line up exactly perfectly, but we've called this out as something that we see that's happening. And it will be -- it's a broad portfolio of products where we believe we have a unique advantage in all of them, the core underlying Vault platform. We're in general, we're replacing either legacy applications or we're becoming the standard. We're creating a market that didn't exist before. And we have a very broad and strong value proposition by all these products working together. So we believe we have the right to win. We called that out and we see some of that transition happening already starting this year. So I think this is something we'll see play out over the next several years as we start to see that transition fully take place.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. And you also called out a $1 billion opportunity selling trial based solutions like trial-by-trial solutions through the CRO channel. Historically, you've been primarily an ELA type of business, where you get the enterprise contract and the visibility is there. You don't have that variability. Are you seeing traction in this new sales motion selling through the CROs. Can you just talk about what you're seeing a level of excitement and how you expect that to progress over the next couple of years?
Paul Shawah
executiveIt is an exciting opportunity for us. When you look at the -- our revenue mix today, the majority of our revenue mix comes from ELAs from larger companies. there's a segment of the market that tends to buy the technology that we've been talking about, everything from EDC to the trial supplies and RTSM, they tend to buy it more trial by trial. . And we are approaching that market more cohesively in terms of how we position and sell the suite of products to that segment that buys for the trial but also in terms of the importance of the relationships that we have with the CROs. The CROs are here not only a customer of Veeva, but they're also a really core partner, and they can be an important channel to entering that market. They have particularly for small and midsized companies. They have an outsized influence and the decisions that those companies make. So we're still in the early days as they become more adopted. They have to shift over. Remember, there they've been used to, in many cases, using legacy technology for a long period of time. So they may have thousands of people that are very comfortable with the legacy technology and even though we provide technology that may be better, significantly better, they have to go through that change management process to move their teams over to change how they position and how they think and how they interact. So we're in that early stage, but it's great. It's a great longer-term opportunity for us to continue to sell through the CROs and to become the standard hopefully, across many, if not all, of the CROs over time. Adding IQVIA was a really nice advantage. They're one of the largest CROs, as you know, and we're in the early stages of starting to see some of the benefits of that partnership play through.
Peter Gassner
executiveSo now it seems like all of the top CROs or channel partners potentially for you. And you're saying you have to have the sales motion and you have to -- this people to be trained and understand how to maybe position Veeva as part of the sales discussion. What is going on right now? Like is -- when a trial sponsor goes to the CROs, is it just they declare who they want to use for their software, and that's basically what the CRO does? Or does the CRO actually have a preferred vendor that they recommend. Can you just take us through what's actually happening right now? And how do you expect that to change?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. In some cases, the sponsor themselves would make a decision on the core technology. And in other cases, particularly the lower and smaller end of the market, the CRO would make a recommendation on the technology. And we're in different stages with different CROs in terms of -- some have standardized and they tend to recommend Veeva as a standard and others haven't yet, and they may do it more surgically or precisely. And our expectation over time is that more and more CROs adopt the best technology in Veeva as the standard when they do their proposal. So that's a journey. That's something that takes a long time. We don't take that lightly. It's on us to make sure that we continue to have the very best product technology that will help them deliver more effectively, deliver more efficiently. And that's what they want. They want to look to a provider and a partner who can help them provide their services more efficiently.
Peter Gassner
executiveNow prior to the relationship with IQV becoming aligned commercially. I think historically, you've butter head, so to speak. And IQVIA's data solutions were not allowed in your platform, right? That has obviously changed. What does that mean for certain add-on products that you have related to data? And what does that mean for your own data products, which effectively competes with IQVIA and continues to compete -- is this now a headwind that I can be integrated as a tailwind? Can you unpack that for us?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. It really helps both areas. It's good for IQVIA and Veeva. It's also -- it's great for the industry. So historically, our customers were -- they weren't able to buy some of our software products because they had standardized on IQVIA data, and it's just -- it wasn't going to work. So we actually stopped selling some of these products in different segments of the market. And now we're ramping that up. We're building connectors between our software and IQVIA data. So we're able to create more value. They can continue to standardize on IQVIA. They can use Veeva software now. And master data management is a good example of that. Master Data, you master customer information, and they have a lot of that customer information, we're able to work together. So that market, we are kind of restarting, we're kickstarting that market again, and that is a nice opportunity for us. It's a nice add-on that we didn't really -- we're really selling and now we can continue to sell. And then from a data perspective, there are areas where we compete and we'll both compete respectfully and customers may make a single-source decision. But I think what's also common is customers make more of like a dual source decision, where they may have picked either IQVIA and other data providers or Veeva and other data providers. Now they just may pick Veeva and IQVIA together because our data is able to work well together. So I think it does create an opportunity for both companies to become more of that standard for data sourcing rather than relying on one in a portfolio or a niche -- a set of niche data providers.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. And I did say I'm not going to ask an A question, but I'm going to rent. I'm going to ask another a question. From a margin standpoint, I think historically, maybe historically a quarter or 2 ago, maybe you have said that AI margins are going to be between services margin and software margin. Now that your thinking has evolved on this, where do you think the AI margins can actually get to?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. I mean I think -- it's still a little bit early, quite frankly. I think Peter made some comments more recently on the call about how Falcon margins may be more comparable to our subscription margins. I think we'll have to see how that plays out. But I think the underlying assumptions there was with Falcon, the ability to use more deterministic software for certain parts of the process. And then secondarily, to the extent that you see a reduction in token cost over time, we think we can -- because of the value we're delivering because of those 2 points I just made, margins may be more comparable to our subscription. But again, it's still pretty early days with Falcon. I think we're expecting to have our first customer go live later this year in our first top 20 to go live in the first half of next year. We're really excited about it, but it still is a little bit early days, certainly when you think about the margin profile.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. So let's pivot to the CRM side of the business. Within the top 20, you're now at 12%. I think there's been 6 confirmed takeaways by Salesforce. There's 2 outstanding to be determined. Can you just talk about -- so that's pretty much already settled when we talk about win backs in a second. But outside of the top 20, can you just talk about what's your win rate there? What's your traction there? And how does that compare to Salesforce?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. The win rate is very, very high. We -- you've heard us talk about where we are in top 20. There's only 2 decisions left in the 2 kind of outstanding in top 20, we're making a lot of progress on both of those. So we feel really good there. But outside of top 20, we're winning the vast majority and this includes really 2 groups. One, it's companies that are on Veeva CRM that are making a decision to migrate. We win the vast majority of those decisions in addition to companies that are selecting a CRM for the first time. These are net new logos, companies that didn't have anything in many cases before and they're choosing Veeva for the first time. And we've said our win rate is -- in both those areas is over 80% this year that remains the same. That's unchanged. So we're becoming -- and we've also -- just to frame the whole thing kind of where is this whole thing going to land. We've talked about over 70% market share in the CRM space is what Veeva will retain over time. So it's -- the market has spoken. This -- it's very clear. We are the market share leader. We will continue to be the market share leader.
Peter Gassner
executiveAnd just maybe tying in this recent quarter, core CRM was really strong. It seems like it's a legacy product. Why was it -- why was this quarter is actually a strong quarter for core CRM.
Paul Shawah
executiveWell, it includes what we're doing with Vault RM. So it was -- we -- in fact, we said it was our best quarter ever in CRM, and this includes decisions from some top 20s and in some large enterprise customers, companies like Lilly, and Biogen and Regeneron have made decisions to continue with Vault CRM. And then we now have over 180 customers live on Vault CRM. So more migrations done successfully. We've gotten the migration process down to a science on time. These are on budget. They're very, very efficient. So we've executed really well in the migrations, but it's also in the product progress. We had our first top 20 go live in all of the U.S. market with the Agente call report in Vault CRM. So we've talked about the promise of AI in Vault CRM, and now it's becoming a reality with some some significant companies. We expect more and more of that as companies go live on Vault CRM. We expect some will turn AI on day 1 which is a -- that's always been the promise of more innovation, and it's becoming a reality. So we're just executing well on all cylinders in CRM.
Peter Gassner
executiveAnd within the top 20, Salesforce did have 6 wins. What gives you confidence that maybe some of those are going to come back to you? And if that does happen, do you have some kind of line of sight of potentially when that could happen?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. I mean, we've talked about that for a number of quarters now. We do have confidence and conviction. And I think what's becoming more and more clear is as more time passes, there's a clear -- there's more and more evidence that supports Veeva's execution compared to what's happening on the other side. So Salesforce, a number of projects have and struggle. They've been delayed. And on the Veeva side, we're executing, as I've talked about, getting customers live, getting them to turn on new innovation. We are in discussion with all of these customers. These companies that have made a Salesforce decision, they're very significant and meaningful customers of Veeva across many, many different areas. We stay close. We're working with them. And that's what gives us the confidence. The difference in execution with Veeva versus what they're running up against in Salesforce. And as more and more time passes, that becomes more and more clear to the overall market.
Peter Gassner
executiveAnd on CRM front, you recently introduced Aspen CRM, which is your pursuit of the horizontal app strategy called out previously. I guess what do you think gives you the right to win in the horizontal space? CRM is a very crowded market, highly competitive. Can you just lay out your strategy and your vision here?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes, sure. It's certainly -- it's a very significant market, which I think speaks to the fact that it's crowded and there is a lot of competition. I think there's still a big opportunity to do CRM really well. And I think historically, if you look back at the ROI that companies have -- the investments they've made in CRM have been disproportionate to the ROI that they've achieved. We think we can do something that's better, it's faster, it's cheaper, like a CRM that you can get up and running very, very quickly that you can get a lot of value from. We would love nothing more than companies to say, "Hey, I love my CRM system. I'm getting all the value that I had anticipated out of that," that's uncommon today. And it's -- we think it's uncommon but unnecessary also. So our opportunity is not only to deliver the next generation of platform and technology but also to be a more friendly company, a more transparent company to be easier to do business with. And you see that even on the website. It's just very clear what our licensing model is, how it's going to be, it's super transparent and we want to do that from a partner and a company that people can trust, which Veeva has earned that right for sure in the life sciences industry, we think we can do it horizontally also.
Peter Gassner
executiveOkay. And your CRM business is about 50% of your Commercial Cloud business. So commercial cloud obviously has Crossix has data clouds, all these other products, I think PromoMats, MedComms. If we think about this other bucket outside of CRM, what's -- what are you excited about there? Where are you seeing traction and momentum in the business?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. I think first and foremost, Crossix has been a very strong performer. After we made that acquisition about 6 years ago, we've continued to make investments in a lot of their products, those investments are paying off in the products, also in the go-to-market, focusing on broader segments of the market. So from a product perspective, it's measurement and audiences. We made huge investments in audiences -- we've become the market share leader, the very best product in measurement. We're doing the same in the audience side. So we're increasing share in that part of the market. So Crossix has been a very nice and strong and will be a durable grower over many, many years to come, particularly as digital becomes more of an important channel to the market, a way that companies are investing in new digital engagements, they need to measure that effectiveness. Beyond Crossix, we've seen strength really in all parts of the business, commercial content. We're the established market share leader, but we're also innovating there and Falcon MLR is yet another layer to that. connecting the Agentic layer that does the review and approval process with the core underlying enterprise application, big advantage for Veeva. So I see that as a continued area of growth and then in the data products, and Link has led the way from a data side for one of the first link product is called Linke People, and we've become the market share leader in that space. And there's a series of additional products that follow that that are much earlier stage in the market, but we feel really confident in those. And then some earlier-stage products like Compass, Compass patient data, COMPASS prescriber data, very significant market opportunities for us. These are markets that play out over a long period of time, but the early parts of the market, we're doing well. And we're getting those early customers, we're establishing the right to win in the broader market.
Peter Gassner
executiveSo 12 months from now, if you're back here, hopefully. And you're kind of recapping the success that you've seen over the previous 12 months. What do you think would be the 2, 3 things that you would highlight that really demonstrated that you've executed against your vision?
Paul Shawah
executiveYes. I think it will be a -- I think it will continue to be broad-based. I think you'll hear me talk about Crossix again. I think you'll hear us talking more about the agentic layer. So what we're doing with Falcon and Falcon MLR is the 1 that's available today. There may or may not be more in the commercial space. And I think you'll hear us talk about continued progress in data. Every quarter that goes by, we're making more and more progress from a product perspective, but also a market adoption perspective. So I think it will be more of the same and maybe even some new announcements.
Peter Gassner
executiveThat would be great. Awesome. Well, thanks so much. Thanks, everybody, for joining us.
Paul Shawah
executiveAll right. Thanks, Ken.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Veeva Systems Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Veeva Systems Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.