Walmart Inc. (WMT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 10, 2021

NASDAQ US Consumer Staples Consumer Staples Distribution and Retail conference_presentation 5 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#1

Hello, everyone, and welcome to this roundtable. My name is Maria. I'm the Head of Retail at retail -- at Reuters Events. And I'll be the moderator today, and I'm really, really happy and excited to be joined today by these 5 amazing professionals today, with the combined, what did we say, 100 years of experience, a century of experience basically. There's a juicy topic of supply chain continuity and that data-driven decision-making. And I'll begin with a short introduction from the amazing talents. And then we'll dive right into the topic, and we'll get our teeth into it. Everyone, relax, grab your tea, coffee, biscuits, whatever you like, and then we'll get straight into it. Just remember, everyone, you can ask questions in the chat, and then we'll try to -- I'll take some time to answer them as well. So all that being said, I'll start with some short introductions from everyone, and I'll take it in the order of the screen, and I'll start with Prabhu. And so Prabhu, if you could quickly introduce yourself.

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#2

Thank you, Maria. My name is Prabhu Chandrasekhar. I work for Advance Auto Parts as the enterprise data analytics lead, focused heavily on the platform technology side but also working with the business -- lines of business, and supply chain is one of them. And definitely, a lot of interesting knowledge, what I can share, and interest to learn more from the panelists as well as the questions that might come from the audience through it.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#3

Perfect. Thank you. And next up is Brian.

Brian Hecht

executive
#4

I am Brian Hecht, Supply Chain Strategist for Kroger here in the U.S., and my responsibility is to help make sure that we're getting the information we need to make sure that the supply chain runs smoothly.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#5

Wonderful. And Luca, if you'd like to go next.

Luca Suriano

executive
#6

Hello, guys. Good morning. Luca Suriano, Vice President of Sourcing for Under Armour. My portion of the 1/5 of the 100 years, I've been spending the time in the factories when sourcing was majority facing vendor, facing the back-end supply chain. And I think the interesting thing now is shifting towards more of a front-end supply chain. So I'm really excited to be here with you and share a few things I've learned so far.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#7

Amazing. And we have Nick joining us as well.

Nick Hunt

executive
#8

Hi, Maria, yes. Thanks. My name is Nick Hunt. I'm Enterprise Account Director for Tradeshift here in the U.K. I look after retail and CPG. So I spent all my days chatting to retail and CPG companies, understand any issues and trying to solve some of those issues for them. So really happy to be speaking to you today.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#9

Wonderful. And last but not least, Bill?

William Mines

executive
#10

Hey, good morning, everybody. I guess good afternoon and good evening as well. I am Bill Mines, and I look after finance as well as data and analytics for Walmart's U.S. supply chain organization. Been down here in Bentonville, Arkansas with Walmart for 6 years. Prior to that, I had different supply chain and finance roles for a number of different organizations, Diageo, prior to that, Pepsi and before that, Cargill. Looking forward to the conversation, I don't think there's any better time to talk about data than there is right now. We've been through nearly 12 months of pandemic, and certainly in retail, we've seen a big shift towards -- focus on the importance of an omnichannel organization. And having the right data in the right place at the right time is absolutely paramount now in our business, and making sure that we've got the accessibility and the accuracy that we need is just hugely important. So looking forward to the conversation.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#11

Brilliant. So I'd like to mention, Bill, so the discussion today is basically about supply chain continuity in relation to data and how we use that data. And we know data is everything now in supply chain, especially when you want a visible, agile and proactive supply chain. And -- but then the finer points around data collection, integration and collaboration still needs a little bit of refinement when it comes to supply chain.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#12

So I think as a question to start off to all of you, but then Bill, if you can answer first. What are some of the key elements, key kind of challenges that you foresee in relation to data, to supply chain in the coming months and possibly years as well?

William Mines

executive
#13

Yes. So I think a few things spring to mind. Number one is you've got to have strong foundations, okay? You've got to build a house on a solid platform. So governance for me is extremely important, particularly in retail, and I don't think Walmart's unique in this. We come from an environment where you've got a lot of different platforms, generating a huge amount of data. And one of the challenges where you've got lots of different legacy systems is making sure that, number one, you've got one version of the truth so that when you're having a conversation around data or you're presenting data or you're referring to it, leveraging it, whatever, you've got confidence that it's coming from one source. It's being validated, and the definitions of the data are properly governed so that when folks in different parts of the organization are accessing the data, and for us, in Walmart, these days, that means accessing it from the cloud largely, they've got confidence that it's one version. It's being validated. It's being governed, and they can rely on it and they can access it easily. I think the other thing that I'd point to is speed. So you think about what's happened over the last 12 months and the shift towards or an accelerating shift towards customers wanting to be able to shop online or pick up from store for us, then you're no longer in a world where you can think about data and rely on things or that you couldn't take hours to get all the data. It's got to be accessible within minutes and real time, even in seconds, because we're living in a world where customers want to be able to shop online, get stuff delivered in hours or even 1 to 2 days. So having that data accessible and being able to access it quickly, reliably at speed so that you can make decisions about how am I going to get something delivered to somebody's home or enable them to pick it up in store in a very, very rapid manner is becoming increasingly important.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#14

Great. So you mentioned a few key things here. So speed, real-time visibility, accessibility, getting those foundations done. I think my next question is -- I think those are the main challenges. The next question is how do we exactly achieve all those things. And these are usual kind of supply chain buzzwords, but how exactly do we get to that real-time visibility? Are we even there yet? What are the elements that can get us to have a more speedy kind of data accessibility and making sure we get the data when we need it and in the form we need it in. And this is for all of you. I think probably, Brian, I'm relying on you maybe to kind of provide the technicals on this one as well.

Brian Hecht

executive
#15

So from my perspective, being able to get the data in real time is a challenge. And I want to agree and reinforce what Bill said. We have a lot of legacy systems as well, and that master authoritative source is definitely a concern. There is a cost of getting that data that we have not had to deal with, I don't think, as an industry. It's easier for us to use labor in many cases. But as things get tighter, we need to get data in a speed that matters as efficiently and cost effectively as possible. And I think as an industry, we're still kind of in that emerging space, where we see where it's going to go, but we're not quite -- haven't been able to quite implement it yet across the board. Prabhu, Bill, would you agree with that?

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#16

I'll take it on from there. Thank you, Brian. Definitely resonate with a lot of what Brian said. I do want to add that, I mean, like -- I mean, this retail industry has been, much like what Bill and Brian said, was -- they've been in the legacy world for quite some time. Some of them have actually started moving the needle over the last few years. Though I don't work for them, I could exempt, Walmart is probably the biggest example in that sense who actually embarked on this journey much before everyone else. Take Amazon out of the equation but -- because that started as an IT company. But if you start -- Walmart, they were kind of the evangelists in this. I think a lot of them are trying to mimic or follow the lead of Walmart Labs in that sense to provide that capability. You don't have the same problem and the scale that you have to do for Walmart, or do you think, but net-net, there are issues with the legacy systems. Are they capable of doing real time? What do you need to do to patch -- bridge that gap real time? So that will be technical debt, if I can use that term, along the way when you actually replatform those systems to the newer world. So we have to take those calculated investments and risks, so to say, to get people moving along the direction and get the mindset shifted toward real time. And then the technology can -- once you -- you don't need to take the rug as a whole. Start doing things underneath. And when you take it off, take the covers off, everything seems seamless at that point. That should be a journey. The second part, as what Bill mentioned about the data governance, quality is a big issue in the legacy systems. There was a lot of manual touch points, people keying in data, point-of-sale systems having varieties of issues, the distribution centers having issues. People have their own interpretation of how things have sprung up in the tribal world, if I want to call that. And so collating all this stuff and bringing that central mass data for product inventory, products master or a customer master or anything else is very important. And that is -- goes hand in hand. You cannot -- one cannot go before the other. So these need to happen. So the systems start adopting the mass data, while they start slowly unwinding from the old legacy way of entering -- manually entering information. So it is a journey, and it's not a few-months journey. It's a multiyear journey. And every organization is going through it. The example I've always heard is Best Buy, for example, has a real-time dashboard of their sales on the CEO's desk. Well, I don't know if it's true, but I've heard this. But that's, as they want to say -- everyone wants to get there. But you also need to figure out it's really worth for your own organization or your own industry. That's the lead up to it. Hopefully, I answered that question.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#17

No. Definitely. Is there something that Bill, Luca, Nick, you'd like to add to this then?

Luca Suriano

executive
#18

Yes. I will chime in here. It's very interesting to look at data and to think about quality of data and structure and governance. And I feel that when we do that, we are in the day -- we are back in the days before COVID. And I actually discovered that in the old days, decision were based on signal that we used to receive, and the delivery of those signal were data, absolutely. And then we can talk about signal stability. And of course, governance and quality were the one -- the 2 lever that we used to have to improve those signal. But I would say that with COVID, we actually discovered that the data quality is not the only issue we have. We have the ambiguity of the signal that come from the outside world. And I would say that today, on top of the used to be the one problem of, I don't know, let's call it, a 10% deviation. One time, it's bullwhip. One time, it's data quality. But I think today, on top of that 10%, actually, there is a greater concern for all of us, and it's the ambiguity of information. And it's almost feels that we are at the turning point that we had to make a decision are we going to invest in having better systems or are we investing to have better processes. Because I think that with increasing the flexibilities on processes, it actually can overcome the fact that we have that data. And I think that we tend to focus on the technology part because this used to be everybody's enemy from the old days. But I think today, we probably are better off start looking a little bit more holistic, end to end and think of -- instead of focusing only on technology, let's focus on shortening that end to end so that we can make that journey faster and then probably bring back technology, which, by the way, I do agree that we are sitting on some very legacy and obsolete platforms. So it probably -- it's really fascinating. The post COVID is going to be a transformation for the entire industry, I believe.

Brian Hecht

executive
#19

So one thing I just want to bring up as an escape technologist, that technology can't fix process on its own. Technology can be used to augment process and to refine it and to help get good data at the appropriate points within the process, but the business has to understand what the process is and make sure the process is as efficient and flexible as possible.

William Mines

executive
#20

So I just saw an interesting question on the chat room, which was, "As you go on this journey, have you got the right people?" And I think it's a great question because it does underscore the fact that it's not just about technology. Yes, I agree, process is important as well and all those things. But at the end of the day, if you get it all right, and I think lots of organizations are really almost at that intersection of starting to see a lot of this come right, then the question then becomes, okay, have we got people to leverage it and have we got the right skill sets, the right training. And I think one of the things that we've seen and are very cognizant of is if you go from a world where we rely on enterprise systems and doing a lot of sort of spreadsheet work in Excel to one where you've got cloud-based data and you've got way more sophisticated tools that enable you to access a lot more data a lot more rapidly, then you actually got the people that are going to be able to do that. So I think there's another component of this around making sure that the people that you've got in the organization, you're taking them on that journey with you, providing the right training and the right change management there.

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#21

I just want to add on to what Bill said, right? In the organizations that you're inheriting or you're part of, there are a set of process experts, and there are a set of people who are technology experts that are inclined to learning the new technology or people. There could be some process experts who've been doing some technology stuff, but they are more capability and who know in and out of how the system works, not the technology company, but how the process works and how these things come together. They have to focus and continue to be delivering the subject matter expertise in that area. And somebody had asked the question, "How do you bring -- I mean, do you expand -- so -- on getting partners or anyone?" Yes, absolutely. In this journey, you want to get some SIs if you wouldn't think of the right technology. You want to bring the SIs, the system integrators, who will actually do that for you. They can do the fishing for you originally. But now if you go back to the earlier point I mentioned about splitting the technology experts and the process experts, you want the technology experts to be learning how to fish along with the system integrators. And then at some point, they step away, you become -- you learn, you start fishing yourself. That is the journey that you've got to take your organization through. It is not about people losing jobs or people, hey, what do we do with -- that has -- we got to build the psyche around what everyone's input and value-add to the organization as they move forward to the next gen.

Brian Hecht

executive
#22

I absolutely agree. We are problem solvers. On the technology side, on the business side, it doesn't matter. Our job is to understand problems and solve them. And when you solve problems, you do a good job, you get new problems to solve. You should be constantly working yourself out of the tasks that you're in currently. I -- if anybody hasn't seen The Martian, go watch it. It was written -- Andy Weir, who is a technology architect from what I've read, and you can tell, it's -- you figure out the problem, what's the problem you're trying to solve, and you solve it, and then you move on to the next problem. And once you've solved enough problems, you get to go home. So it's a great movie. Everybody should see it if they haven't.

Nick Hunt

executive
#23

Yes, you're right, Brian, it's a great film. One of the things I see in Tradeshift when I go out and speak to retailers is, I think, Bill, you said this the other day, that we have so much data, right? It's like what is the important data that we have in the organization and is that data accurate as well. So one of the things we do in Tradeshift when we're speaking to organizations is we talk about data actually coming from source. So when you're collaborating, for example, with your suppliers, why are you updating that information in your ERP system? Why aren't you getting the suppliers to be providing that information? Because they know it best. And the critical thing now is really about that collaboration across the supply chain, so not just you and a retailer on your own but looking and trying to protect and work with that supply chain. And only in that way are you actually going to get the best results. And certainly, through COVID, I think that the retail supply chains have been under an enormous amount of pressure. I mean here in the U.K., we still have a lot of retail organizations that are closed because of COVID, and that affects the whole supply chain. So being able to have the right data, being able to collaborate across that supply chain is really, really important at this moment in time. And I wonder what you guys think of that. Luca, I'm putting it open to you.

Luca Suriano

executive
#24

Tough question. I think we are at a turning point, and I believe it's very important to have a significant alignment with one running strategy first. And once that alignment happens, we are able to better understand how to cascade. And especially when it comes to speed, I believe that, that is the clarity because when we run projects, I believe that projects, most of the times, have got conflicting priorities. And the alignment on priorities, the alignment on time lines and the alignment on the speed to execute, I think, it's -- they're extremely important. So I would definitely look after for very, very high level direction to start with before entering a journey of change management.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#25

So we've got quite a few questions coming in. And Bill has already answered one of them. So I think I'll take another one because these -- there's loads of them, and they're all quite good. So let's see, which one should I pick? So let's see, "What are the examples of the impact you have seen with the ability to see your supply chain from end to end or the lack thereof?"

William Mines

executive
#26

Well, let me pick up on something that Luca said, which is from a retailer perspective, obviously, you've got a lot of stakeholders. I mean one is obviously, we've got customers. And the interesting perspective there is not just coming out of COVID, but I think over a period of years now, you're starting to see that the customer has access to more and more information to make their decisions on. Pretty much everybody has got a smartphone, iPhone or whatever. And you can see that people are using that to access information that's available publicly to make decisions about where they shop, how they shop, what prices are out there. So they can pretty much instantaneously compare prices across lots and lots and different retailers, whether it's in-store, online, however, they want to shop. And so one of the challenges that we've got is we got to be prepared for that and cognizant of that and recognize that we're here to service the customer and make the customers' lives easy, and customers generally want to shop with everyday low prices. So one of our missions at Walmart is to service the customer and make lives easier and do it at everyday low prices. And then you think back up the supply chain. To do that, we've got to get to a world where we're sharing more and more data with our upstream stakeholders, whether it's vendors or other interested stakeholders in the supply chain, and then you get into, "Okay, well, what are you going to share? How are you going to share it? What's the sort of medium? How regularly are you going to share it? And how are you going to make it available to vendors to meet their specific needs in a secure manner?" And I think that the last point around security is clearly something that becomes more and more important. I was kind of reflecting this morning on that story that came out in the last couple of days around a hacker that tried to pollute a town's water supply in Florida or in D.C.. Well, that's -- one, that's absolutely terrible. But two, there are people and organizations out there that are constantly trying to think up ways of doing things like that. And so you've got to be one step ahead of the game there and thinking through, "If I do want to share information, and that involves making information and data available, to people, how am I going to do that in a manner that's secure and protects my data, my customers' data and the organization's data?" So I think as you -- as data becomes more widely available, the sort of security aspect and the aspect of how we're going to stay one step ahead of people that purport to abuse that becomes more important as well.

Nick Hunt

executive
#27

Absolutely. Just to pick up on that, Bill, I think that is really, really important because if you look at the way in which retailers have always like spoken to the supply chain or collaborated, it's been via -- on the one hand, EDI, which is very formulized. It sort of requires quite a big investment, and it's not very flexible. And on the other hand, you have e-mails, and we all know what happens to e-mails when people leave the organization. So it's really hard to collaborate. What you're looking for really is something in the middle, which sort of is security protected but really allows you and your supply chain to see the same version of information, collaboration, collaboration across documents, across orders, et cetera, in the one place but really give you that sort of security that you get with that. And I think organizations are looking more towards that now and maybe moving away a little bit from EDI and that sort of thing.

Brian Hecht

executive
#28

I think that...

Luca Suriano

executive
#29

Go ahead.

Brian Hecht

executive
#30

So thanks, Luca. I think one thing that we also have to realize as part of the end-to-end visibility, the question that popped up, and the COVID kind of disruptions that occurred are bringing up the great toilet paper shortage of 2020, where the -- to Bill's point, the customer was on social media, and hearing that there was a great toilet paper shortage, which made the great toilet paper shortage worse, and -- was there anything that we could have done as an industry to get ahead of that and somehow tap into any reserves or anything we could do to make sure that there was product on the shelfs to alleviate the concern? And with the cycle times, I'm not sure that I have an answer on that yet, but it is something I'm thinking about. And how do we make sure that a just-in-time inventory system upstream from the Walmarts and the Krogers is flexible enough to be able to handle those surges? Because they will happen. They happened once, they'll happen again. And I don't have an answer for it yet, but it's something I think that we need to consider because we have to make sure we have fresh for everyone in our product chain. So...

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#31

So just to address that part, Brian, because this gives us an opportunity to go find out new vendors, new people who can help out on this process. And it's a healthy competition to have during the good times, but it also gives you the fallback mechanism during the bad times when people come out of woodworks to help you out. I mean again, a lot of people have capitalized on the COVID situation in terms of -- but that's not -- whether that's ethical or not -- I think that's not our point here. But people have brought -- it's sparked a lot of ideas about how to get out of these situations, so these -- the toilet paper issue or the hand sanitizers. And they just -- people started getting creative at home with ingredients. So I think all these will factor in, and it's probably to harness some of these new ideas. That'll be a good opportunity when COVID finishes. That is the whole cycle that's going to spur and get people ready, how do we harness sources.

Luca Suriano

executive
#32

I would like to go back to the previous point, talking about visibility and EDI. I think EDI has always been that very strong element to put together information which otherwise they are basically in silo. But I do believe that most -- more often, that EDI conversation has always been left on the side and CDS has been replaced in order to communicate faster if not email, as you were mentioning, Nick. So I would like to imagine that in the future, some clear investment are addressed in order to create that collaborative platform because the thing we were discussing before, we were focusing on the quality of data. But in the end, we know we were actually in a better place by streamlining the process to get data and signal faster for decision-making. This -- basically, the same exact happened in the back end of the supply chain. We have so many parts that are interconnected, but they are basically still having walls among themselves. And I do agree there is a privacy concern when we're looking at the customer, but the same when we're looking at our vendors and our partners. And until we decide what -- if it's not EDI, what else it is? Because it is certainly absolutely needed to start having those conversation. If we foresee that in the near future, we will land on anything closer to blockchain, which is a secure network, but we are not even talking about a network today because it's just not on the -- it's on nobody's agenda. And I think that, that actually has to become a priority because before we can go and start working together collaboratively on sustainability, for instance, one very, very important topic at the moment, how can we do that if we have to basically replicate task between one entity and the other entity and the other entity again. So we're just not going to be able to fulfill our North Star, which is to become transparent and sustainable. It's just not going to work if technology doesn't support that across the entire chain.

Nick Hunt

executive
#33

I think one of the drivers of collaboration is all about balancing benefits. So historically, if you look at EDI and other things that went before, it was sort of loaded in favor of the retailer, to a certain extent was -- you must follow these guidelines and so on. But I think the benefits of balancing, the benefits across the supply chain are the way forward. And if a supplier has a benefit from collaboration over and above just receiving the data, then they're all going to take part in that. And I think that was what Tradeshift started off with and to this day follows, is trying to balance the benefits through the supply chain so that a supplier can sign up and get it free of charge and a customer also gets the benefits as well. Do you feel that balancing the benefits is the way to successful collaboration?

Brian Hecht

executive
#34

Yes. I think you need to have a win-win for everybody involved. So we get better data and better information on what's available and what we can provide. Our suppliers get better feedback on what we're going to need and what our road map looks like for -- so they can increase their manufacturing capability or warehousing capability. So I think that collaboration is definitely how we're going to have to go forward.

Luca Suriano

executive
#35

Yes. I agree. I think we have to share agenda. I think today, sustainability, for example, cannot be only one brand need. It needs to be for the entire supply chain, the same need. We need to align strategically in what few elements we agree on as a supply chain because as I believe Christopher Martin (sic) [ Martin Christopher ] was saying, we are competing supply chain against supply chain. And I think that this is exactly where we are at the moment, the set of step that are bringing forward product and information. I think this is how the new competition is evolving.

William Mines

executive
#36

I think that's a very important point, Luca, because if you think about our 2 organizations, clearly, we're heavily invested in each other. It's not just about quality of data. I mean that's got to be -- in the future, that's going to be seat at the table stakes, and it's not just about sharing everything with each other. I think we've got to be more surgical about understanding what is important to each other and what our agenda is, what questions are we trying to solve for collectively and making sure that we use the data and that we pinpoint bits of data that can help each other rather than just saying, "Here's everything we've got, and we'll give it to you, and then you can go away and figure it out." I think there's a lot more that we can do to say, "Okay, let's try and pinpoint what are the important things there that you can go away and follow up on or action more." Because otherwise, it just becomes -- you can always get -- you can always drown in a sea of information. And I think the other thing that highlights for me is not just between organizations, what are we going to look at and giving everybody access to everything so they can sort of swim around in it. Internally, I think we've got a lot of work to do around how people consume the information within the organization. Because if you work in retail, as I've learned over the last 6 years with Walmart, everybody loves to have sales information. As somebody said, the CEO has got the sales information real time. Okay. So what are they going to do with it? And actually, do they need that? Or do they need something that says in the background, we've used machine learning or anomaly detection or all those other things that are now becoming commonplace to identify what the outliers are and what the CEO should be worried about rather than just saying, "Here's all the sales data. So you can troll through it, and you can figure out what you think the outliers are." It's taking it to the next step and the step after that, that says, "Okay, so what does that mean? And what are the things that you need to be worried about." And if we're communicating across different organizations, understanding what's important to each other and what the concerns are so that we can solve problems rather than just exchange terabytes of information or data.

Brian Hecht

executive
#37

I think that kind of winds up with something that [ Matteo Bettini ] said in the chat about is the implementation benefit worth the cost. And we're actually having that conversation yesterday, is the juice worth the squeeze. Because a lot of this, there's really good ideas and things that may be good in the future, but the implementation costs are going to take -- it's going to take a lot of resources and analysis to get something working. And would it be better to do it now or later? And I think that's a question that we have an obligation to ask and push back on when we're given, "Hey, I want this." Well, why do you want that? What are you going to do with it?

Luca Suriano

executive
#38

But I -- that's a very good point. And I give you my experience across the past, I don't know, 10 years. And where I've have seen that, we go through a software implementation, and by the time you start your brainstorming and you implement at least 2 years later, if not 3, the requirement has changed. The business has changed. And it's unfortunate because if we go back to your question, is it worth the squeeze, well, if you never start, you will never get a better tool to facilitate things and bring information faster. So this is really a big dilemma. That's why my -- our early opening, I think that we need to continue the reengineer process because as the process tend to be customized as -- more and more with time because customer demand is getting more fragmented. If we think about it, for a time where there was one car -- one color to today's time where basically customer are requesting to customize the offer in the -- and even where they buy and how they buy it. So in theory, those are all different SKUs. I think that if we continue to imagine the tool that we need to use, it will basically -- it's a never-ending tool. So I think we need to simplify a little bit that journey, that technology journey and cap that at 80% that it's simple enough for us to convey information from one end to the other and make that seamless. We need to add, on top of that, some robotics, some automation or robotics because what I've learned is that, that piece on top, it's so much more easy to be customized. And I think that piece is going to help us to bridge that gap between a stable tool on technology, but the customization can never reach that 100%. It needs to stop at 75%, 80%. And that last piece, it's either human or robotics that can help, and they continue to reiterate depending on how the process is changing, how the rule is changing because, today, taxation wants one paper. Tomorrow, there's another paper. If you go back and change your ERP, you have work for 2 months. If you do change your robotics programming, it's probably 24 or 48 hours' effort. And I think we need to be smart in how do we play with those different tools in order to really get faster from that perspective because we don't make money with technology, right? Those are all tools for us to collaborate. On the other side, we need to learn more what the customer needs and what customer wants and, without even turning to our supply, make sure that, that product continuously to flow based on what demand. And we definitely will arrive to the new horizon of demand sensing and that the whole thing, how basically it -- maybe, I'd say maybe because I'm not there yet. But maybe it's more on real data than historical data. And I think that this is the frontier that we are about to conquer.

Nick Hunt

executive
#39

It's interesting, Luca, when you talk about costs, I often get asked this, "What's the cost of your solution, et cetera?" But one of the things that organizations don't really think about is what's the cost of doing nothing, and we see this in retail all the time. Certainly, here in the U.K., I can give you 10 retail organizations that have gone out of business this year. One of them is 150 years old. So it's not necessarily what is the cost and how expensive it is at the moment. It's what's the cost of doing nothing.

Brian Hecht

executive
#40

Ask Sears.

Nick Hunt

executive
#41

Exactly.

Brian Hecht

executive
#42

But that actually brings up another interesting thought process, and I'm going to pick on Sears here for a moment down this path because they had a strategy that worked for them for 100 years. And everyone knows that Sears, Roebuck catalog back in the day was the go-to. I mean that was where -- it was the Amazon of its time. And they shut -- there was a really interesting documentary on YouTube about it on the fall of Sears, and they shut down the catalog business. I want to say it was 1995, right at the dawn of the Internet age. And they had so much, call it, political capital or consumer capital that if they would have thought ahead and instead of shutting down the catalog, made it an online thing, culturally, it probably would have led them into the Amazon of today. But they didn't focus on what were their strengths and tried to shift away from them, and it cost them their entire empire. So just one of those things to think about what the long-term ramifications are and think outside the box and be willing to push back if what's coming down doesn't make sense.

Nick Hunt

executive
#43

It's a good point.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#44

Oh, Bill, were you going to say something?

William Mines

executive
#45

Only to reinforce what Nick said around -- and I can't wear 2 hats on this because I'm a finance guy and also a supply chain analytics guy and you're -- we're constantly saying to people, well, you've got to bring the business case here. But it's sometimes difficult to quantify what the cost of doing nothing is and/or not going on the journey. So I think that sometimes it becomes very difficult for an organization because when it comes to technology and product, there's a lot of things that you can do out there as an organization, and there's probably more on the list than everybody has got the financial resources or the human capital to undertake as quickly as they want. So I think you've got to be choiceful around how you prioritize things and what you prioritize. And then once you've decided what it is you're going to do, I think there's a big challenge now around figuring out how you're going to go faster, okay? So as I think about all of this, and we've talked about -- and I agree with Luca, I've been in organizations where it seems to take years and years to get stuff done. I think you have to figure out, okay, well, how can we go faster and get things done a lot quicker these days. And there's an interesting analogy out there at the moment. If you think about the last 12 months, and you think about the development of the vaccines for COVID-19, there's companies out there that figured out how to do something that normally takes 10 years, and the fastest it's ever been done is 4 years, and they got it done in 10 months. So I think there's a challenge when it comes to technology and implementation here around how do you take a cycle that took years in the past and get it done an awful lot quicker.

Brian Hecht

executive
#46

I think in this -- in the COVID case, in that rapid delivery cycle that we had to do, I think we really were able to look across the project and say, what's a -- what truly is the minimum viable product, what can we cut out of it. The movie Gung Ho with Michael Keaton comes to mind where, okay, we got to start leaving out little things like engines and how do they deliver a product that met the minimum requirement, which, in their case, was something that could be counted as a car. But there's going to be architectural debt that was incurred as part of this cycle that we're going to have to take time and go back and make sure that it is a hardened solution, and it will work outside of what we've currently got because I think we cut a lot, and I'm saying this industry-wide. I think that as we try to react to what was a black swan event, we did the minimum that we could to get the -- keep the lights on, in some cases, and make sure the shelves were full. But is it sustainable? Is it something that really lines up with the way we want to go going forward? Or was it a duct tape and Band-Aid kind of scenario?

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#47

So I really want to ask some of these questions. I think I had one from ages ago stuck with me and then also the most recent one. There was a pattern here, I think I wrote it down about 20 times, which was collaboration and partnerships and how do we make that work. That was a point that came across a lot. And one of the questions was about interoperability and data standardization and what your thoughts were around that and the implementation of that, if anyone has anything.

Brian Hecht

executive
#48

I'm an escape data architect. So knowing what your data model looks like is extremely important. Understanding it, being able to have a glossary and be able to use it, that speeds up your development efforts. So if we can use industry standards instead of having a business standard. So this is something that -- this is the way Kroger does it, or this is the way Walmart does it, we should be doing it. This is the standard that this standards body has put out and we reuse it so that when we do want to interoperate, then everybody is already running off the same playbook. That is of critical importance. And projects live or die by how good their data is. So industry standards are a plus.

Nick Hunt

executive
#49

Yes. I totally agree, Brian. One of the standards that we deal with in Tradeshift is like e-invoicing standards and stuff like that. And we're seeing now with PEPPOL and sort of regimes like that, that there is standardization. And you're right, there's sort of savings to be made by everybody following the same standards because you don't have to reinvent it. And half the cost is on the reinvention of these things. And we certainly don't -- for those of you who remember, we don't want to be into a Betamax, VHS sort of argument. What we want to do is be using standards that are totally interoperable amongst organizations. And certainly, from a Tradeshift perspective, that's what we're trying to do with our network, is to make it as accessible as possible without having to reinvent the wheel really.

Brian Hecht

executive
#50

Yes. And if I remember correctly, Betamax was the better technology.

Nick Hunt

executive
#51

Correct.

Brian Hecht

executive
#52

VHS opened themselves up and didn't have the closed environment that Betamax did. So -- well, I guess, VHS is still dead today.

Nick Hunt

executive
#53

And then we go into streaming, and it all changes again.

Brian Hecht

executive
#54

Yes.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#55

So another interesting point is here, and a lot of people are mentioning in the comments tools for data sharing. So what does cloud do? There's a mentioning of blockchain as well. And what are some of the things that we can use? Are these solutions like cloud and blockchain viable to be able to kind of overcome that data sharing conundrum that you all have?

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#56

I'll take that. Blockchain, I mean, with talking almost from -- skipping the crawl-walk stage and trying to run. And I think the industry as a whole will get there. Are we there? No. But when you start doing blockchain or data sharing, people are not used to these security standards. Name it, our B2B partners or your suppliers, whatever it is, right? They don't -- they are still finding their way through it. Putting these things will only slow down the progress you're trying to implement and the technology you're trying to implement. You just don't want to be too far ahead, where you don't have people to go along, whether it's within your organization or outside. But it's a great concept. I know eventually, that should be where we all should go. Blockchain should be the way to -- for people to move and transfer data. But I think the industry as a whole is not ready for that yet, in my limited view.

William Mines

executive
#57

I think, just to pick up on that point, you've got to be thoughtful around what is the problem that you're trying to solve. So blockchain might be great for -- and I can think of examples within Walmart's supply chain where it's got a role to play and it's very useful. But saying blockchain is the answer to everything is not going to get us to where we need to get to. We've got to think through, okay, what is the use case. What is the specific problem that we're going to -- that we're trying to solve here? And then what are the right tools that are out there to solve the problem? So I think I come back to you can have an awful lot of data and you can have a lot of tools and you can have a lot of solutions. It's like being a surgeon. What's the right combination? And what are the right solutions that you're going to leverage to solve that particular problem in that particular use case? And so what you're going to need to understand is what are the benefits, what can everything do for you? And I think it does then stop demand, okay, well, what is out there and what is the universe of solutions. But I think that you have to be more customized around the problem, the specific problem that you're trying to solve to get the best outcome.

Luca Suriano

executive
#58

I would see -- I would imagine this conversation going in the direction where we put in the middle live data, which means that an abundance of live data. I would believe that in the future, basically, we will need to run the business with abundancy of data. Because at the end, we're going to use mathematical tools, a machine learning or to basically cluster them, derive data point that we can use and implement those data point, which are basically very selective data point. They're not the live one anymore. And they are used at certain milestone and gateway when we develop, when we innovate, when we deliver to customer and so on and so forth. And they will help us improve processes along the way. I would imagine that this is the vision, how in the next 3 to 5 years this is going to develop. Can I see -- can I say that right now, we have a tool to keep that safe? We call it blockchain because it's the only word that was available, and everybody can put these 2 images together. But in reality, I have not seen a tool that can do all of that safe and with speed and with the accessible cost for enterprise to do that shift. In my opinion, it's almost like if we want to tie it, we only use one finger. So that's how it feels. And again, I'm not an expert on blockchain, but this is my feeling as somebody that would be interested in, but the tools that I see at the moment available are not yet developed to sustain a large scale of integration. Because if we think about it, only our back-end supply chain, there are at least 4 tiers. And if every level has, I don't know, 10 players, you do the math, and it's clear to understand that integration of 40, 50 players is just not going to work. So I would say that the potential, it's incredible. Technology really has to do a vertical development, almost like in 1995 when Window (sic) [ Windows ] brought to market a software that needed RAM, RAM price just dropped because it was so necessary that technology did that leap forward. So what I'm thinking is we are at that stepping stone where things have to change in order for us to really get full access on what the potential is.

Nick Hunt

executive
#59

Yes. I totally agree with that, Luca. And certainly when I was going out speaking to organizations maybe 5 years ago, they were afraid of cloud, yes, networks weren't strong enough, et cetera. Now pretty much, Bill, you said that at the beginning, Walmart, everybody uses cloud, right? And everybody tends to use multi-tenant as well. And certainly, that is the way things are going. And blockchain will come in, in whatever form it is, but certainly, the security will be tightened up so that you have or you know who changes the record and when it happens and so on. So that is definitely going to happen. And I think that's certainly the way forward.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#60

Brilliant. And so we've got -- well, we -- I thought we had 2 minutes. We've got about 1 minute left. And I usually get some final thoughts from everyone. But I think -- and what I'd like to ask is a final question from everyone is around that decision-making process and how were you able to make a decision based on all these data that you have or didn't have. Did you have to do gut-feeling decisions? Did you manage to kind of have that actionable insights proven from data? And I know it's probably a wide question, but make sure we can fit it -- squeeze it in 1 minute.

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#61

Do you want to start with me? Okay. Yes. No. I mean again, lot will start with expertise. You mean, call it, gut or expertise that go along with it. You want to start the use cases with where the problem areas or what the pain points are and what people think are the right ways to do. You -- that is the starting one. You just can't come out of the woodworks and think of something that is -- so you want to have that. Then you build around that holes, what are the things that -- from a data standpoint, from a technology standpoint, from a process standpoint, how are these things going to help build that case? You take one. That one doesn't need to be -- that one use case you take is -- doesn't need to be the biggest one. You probably want a smaller one that you can show the value and impact quicker, and then use that as a stepping stone for future success. That's it.

William Mines

executive
#62

Let me summarize my thoughts. I would say I am extremely excited about where we are when it comes to the world of data. I don't think there's ever been a more exciting time in terms of tools, techniques, the opportunity that's out there to leverage data and really get to more fact-based solutions. I saw somebody talk about gut feel. I think there's no reason why we can't all accelerate our journey towards scientifically-driven and fact-based solutions, and this is a great time to sort of be involved in that. I do think -- and there's a couple of people in the chat room that have talked about this, change management is going to be a huge deal in all of this. So it's going to require a lot of people in every organization to change the way that they consume data, what's important to them, how they do it and how they make the most of it.

Maria Hurghis

attendee
#63

Perfect. And so we'll probably -- we reached the end now, and there's quite a few questions here. And so maybe I'll try and send some over to you, and we can answer them at a later time. But thank you so much, everyone, that asked questions and, of course, the panelists that joined today. And having said that, have a good day. Thank you all. And hopefully, we'll do another one in a year's time, and we'll see where we are. All right. Well, thanks, everyone, and goodbye.

Luca Suriano

executive
#64

Thank you.

Prabhu Chandrasekhar

executive
#65

Bye, everyone.

William Mines

executive
#66

Thanks.

Brian Hecht

executive
#67

Thanks, everyone. Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Walmart Inc. transcript — plus 250,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Walmart Inc. earnings transcripts and 250,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.