Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 3, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorThank you for standing by, and welcome to the Ambarella's Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's program is being recorded. And now I'd like to introduce your host for today's program, Louis Gerhardy, Vice President, Corporate Development. Please go ahead, sir.
Louis Gerhardy
executiveThank you, Jonathan, and good afternoon. Thank you for joining our second quarter fiscal year 2027 Financial Results Conference Call. On the call with me today is Dr. Feng-Ming Wang, President and CEO; and John Young, CFO. The primary purpose of today's call is to provide you with information regarding the results for our second quarter of fiscal year 2027. The discussion today and the responses to your questions will contain forward-looking statements regarding our projected financial results, financial prospects, market growth and demand for our solutions, among other things. These statements are based on currently available information and subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. under no obligation to update these statements. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions as well as other information on potential risk factors that could affect our financial results are more fully described in the documents we filed with the SEC. Access to our second quarter fiscal year 2027 results press release, transcripts, historical results, SEC filings and a replay of today's call can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website. The content of today's call as well as the materials posted on our website. Our Ambarella's property and cannot be reproduced or transcribed without our prior written consent. Before starting the call, we hope to see you at one of the following investor events that we have scheduled in our third quarter. First, on September 8, we'll host a D&B bus tour at our offices in Santa Clara. September 9 will be at Citi's 2026 Global TMT Conference in New York. September 15, we'll participate in Piper Sandler's Growth Frontier Conference in Nashville. September 16, we will host Sanford Bernstein's eighth Annual West Coast semiconductor bus tour. And during the week of October 4, we will have a European NDR with cities to be determined. Also available to investors during the third fiscal quarter will be our booth and presentations at the AI Infrastructure Summit in Santa Clara on September 15 to 17. We hope to see there whether we will lead the physical AI track with a number of EGI and robotics demos in our exhibit area. Fermi is now going to provide a business update for the quarter. John will review the financial results and outlook and then the 3 of us are available for your questions. Fermi?
Fermi Wang
executiveThank you, Louis, and good afternoon. Thank you for joining our call today. Driven by a new record level of AGI revenue, we reported fiscal Q2 revenue slightly above the midpoint of our guidance with non-GAAP EPS of $0.18, and with guidance for seasonal fiscal Q3. By product, we are in the midst of a very steep revenue ramp with our 5-nanometer CV75 and CV72 AI SoC and by market, we had sequential growth in both IoT and auto with automotive revenue driven by commercial vehicles. The market is increasingly recognizing the strategic value of AGAI as well as our AGAI and the physical AI platform leadership. We continue to make significant progress with the expansion of our AI platform leadership, including new go-to-market strategies, and the engineering and market development for a number of new higher-value SoCs, some of which extend our reach into entirely new markets. We remain optimistic about the long-term secular growth opportunities in the AGAI market and our R&D priorities are aligned with both the physical AI markets that represent a vast majority of total revenue today as well as the robotic and edge infrastructure markets that are in the early stages of developing. Altogether, our technology product and new go-to market, combined with the significant secular growth in AGAI are increasing our 5-year serviceable market forecast today. Before I review our new market forecast, I would like to step back and discuss the market environment we are in. Demand signals for the application of AGAI remains strong. At the same time, it is obvious that memory vendors and the entire supply chains are prioritizing AI data center demand, which is resulting in rising supply chain costs for everyone. Searching memory price and the scarcity of supply are impacting the entire industry. Related to this, we are providing significant assistance to customers who are attempting to create a wide variety of workarounds to the memory situation. Ambarella itself is also facing rising supply chain costs. and we plan to pass this cost to our customers to maintain our long-term gross margin target of 59% to 62%. Returning to our rolling 5-year serviceable market update. I would like to remind you of our methodology. Our SAM for any given year is based on the products we expect to have available for production in that year, overlaid on the total available market projections from a number of third-party research clients. So our 5-year SAM captures any revenue-generating products unannounced on our road map in the next 5 years. Our prior 5-year rolling SAM was announced in May 2025 and the projected a 5-year fiscal year '26 to fiscal year '31 compounded annual growth rate of about 18% with auto representing a slightly higher or proportion of the terminal year. Our new 5-year rolling SAM from $8.5 billion in fiscal year 2027 to $22.9 billion in fiscal year '32, represents a CAGR of about 20% with IoT markets now representing about 70% of the terminal year. While there are several factors behind the strong growth and the underlying mix change, I will focus on the most important change. In the last year, it has become clear that operational efficiency or the ability of enterprise to generate more revenue and/or to reduce expenses is likely to be a key driver of our emerging edge infrastructure business. Operational efficiency at age refer to the use of open weight and the distilled models running on on-premise inferencing hardware in contrast to the large frontier models that are down in the cloud. Benefits of this approach include reduced latency, data protection privacy, lower bandwidth costs and high reliability. [indiscernible] markets include security, retail, lodging, logistics, health care and more. The on-premise operational efficiency use case has emerged with growing expectations for sustainable high-volume influencing and increasingly for agenetic AI and the fiscal application that can perceive reason and ultimately act in the fiscal word. The key question has become who can help the enterprise lower the cost per useful AI influencing outcome. This is where Ambarella's superior performance per watt portfolio kicks in, providing the efficient edge intelligence needed to enable this next generation of agentic and the physical AI workload at scale. With this perspective, in the last year, we have several new products in development targeting on-premise hardware or what is company called a infrastructure. As you know, we already have our n65-AI SoC in the market, and we have additional unannounced AI SoCs in development. We also are implementing a stand-alone AI accelerator product line targeting the age infrastructure market. Together, this new age infrastructure products, both AI SoCs and standard alone are accelerators represent the single most important reason for the upward revisions in our SAM. Before I introduce our first stand-alone accelerator, allow me to be clear about our terminology. We define AI SoC as on integrating all of the accelerated computing functions into a single chip, camera perception, craters, CPUs, in coatings and so on. We define an AI accelerator as an AI processor that is not camera specific and targets a wide variety of digital or physical modalities. We believe this type of multimodality is critical for each infrastructure applications by target operational efficiency. [indiscernible] announced, I would like to preview one of the new AI [indiscernible] that will anchor this new product category for us with another well-defined, more performed product already behind it. We refer to this new AI SoC X7. This SoC is simple now and expected to land initial design wins in aged infrastructure applications where it can serve as an AI coprocessor for host processors such as ARM or H86. Together with our new product trust, expanded market reach and the SAM, we expect our revenue growth to be supported with 2 incremental go-to-market strategies. First is the multistep establishment of indirect sales channel and the second is a semi-custom chip strategy, both of which will augment our existing direct sales efforts. As a reminder, virtually all our revenue is generated by our direct sales teams. And today, I'm excited to announce 2 material partnership agreements to develop our indirect sales channel. Combined, this true partnership plan to drive a significant amount of incremental revenue over the next 7 years through customers who have largely been unserved by us so far. First, today, we announced Ambarella strategy partner with Cap gemini designed to help enterprises adopt HAI and the physical air solution faster by reducing the complexity moving from evaluation to scalable deployment. By combining Ambarella's power-efficient AI software and platforms, we kept Gemini's global engineering system integration and industry expertise the partnership and to help customers improve operational efficiency, enhance real-time decision-making and deploy intelligent systems and in physical world environment with greater speed, scalability and the confidence. In our second partnership to develop our indirect channel, today, we also announced a 7-year agreement with Macnica, a leading global technical distributor. Macnica will support both American's physical AI and the new age infrastructure products by developing and supporting an independent software vendor ecosystem, including onboarding, technical integration support and joint go-to-market programs. With this ecosystem in place, Ambarella solution can be offered as individual component or as a complete bundle for multiple HAI vertical markets. including video analytics, smart city, edge computing platforms, robotics, industrial IoT, intelligent transportation systems, retail analytics, security and surveillance. I want to emphasize the importance of the indirect channel to serve small and midsized customers and highly fragment market like robotics. However, the indirect channel is also critical to support. Our more complex SoC targeting the infrastructure where our broad network of partners is vital for our long-term success. Meaningful revenue is expected in 2 to 3 years and will grow as we introduce new products for the market. Our second incremental go-to-market is our semi-custom opportunity, which can enable us to gain more share in existing markets and reach into new markets. We have our first semi-custom project underway, the 2-nanometer [indiscernible] which expected to generate first production revenue in fiscal 2028. And we are in discussion with other companies for additional semi-custom chip projects. Our representative customer engagement this quarter once again demonstrate Ambarella's expanding traction across a broad set of applications, robotics, automotive, security, drone cameras and smart video intercoms. Whether CV72-based quadruped robot validates Ambarella's high resolution, high multi-camera HDI capabilities in robotics. A major AMP 100 communication equipment company announced an AI-based enterprise video intercom further extending our reach in the emerging access control [indiscernible] We landed another win with multi for AI trail cameras and win with Canon, Suprema, IDS and Seprofurther strengthen our AI monitoring pipeline with CV75, CV72, CV5 wins using our own AISP software. Through Tier 1s, we had 2 in-cabin vehicle wins with Tier 1s in China 1 for driver monitors and one and the other for more complex camera monitor system using -- used in Audi and the VW vehicles. The breadth of these wins and the wide variety of corresponding AI workload highlight the programmability and the flexibility in both our AI SoCs and our Cooper development platform. This ease of use is faciliating the onboarding and expansion of our indirect sales channels. Very few competitors can offer this type of proven platform with more than 50 million AI SoC shipped. In conclusion, I remain very excited about the overall growth opportunity of the HAM market and our company's specific growth drivers put us in a unique position to benefit. Ambarella expanding beyond low-power AI OC to deliver the complete foundation for physical AI, and we are becoming a full stack fiscal AI platform provider. With that, I will now turn it to John.
John Young
executiveThank you, Fermi. I'll now review the financial highlights for the second quarter fiscal year 2027, ending July 31, 2026. I will also provide a financial outlook for our third quarter of fiscal year 2027, ending October 31, 2026. I'll be discussing non-GAAP results and ask that you refer to today's press release for a detailed reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results. For non-GAAP reporting, we have eliminated stock-based compensation and acquisition-related expenses, adjusted for the impact of taxes. In addition, this quarter, as described in our Q1 fiscal 2027 10-Q filing as a subsequent event, we recognized a $9 million reduction in our GAAP research and development expense due to the cancellation of a customer's development project. We do not expect any impact on our non-GAAP outlook from this development. For fiscal Q2, revenue was $108.1 million, slightly above the midpoint of our prior guidance range of $105 million to $111 million, up 7.7% from the prior quarter and up 13.2% year-over-year. Automotive revenue established a new revenue record on continued strength as the commercial vehicle adoption of AI remains strong and auto revenue slightly outpaced the growth in our IoT business, where our enterprise-driven businesses outperformed our consumer-led businesses. Non-GAAP gross margin for fiscal Q2 was 59.3%, below the midpoint of our prior guidance range of 59% to 60.5%. Non-GAAP operating expense in Q2 was $57.4 million, slightly below the midpoint of our prior guidance range of $56 million to $59 million. Q2 net interest and other income was $1.8 million. Q2 non-GAAP tax provision was approximately $344,000. We reported Q2 non-GAAP net profit of $8.2 million or $0.18 per diluted share. Now I'll turn to our balance sheet and cash flow. Fiscal Q2 cash and marketable securities were $272.3 million, decreasing $5.5 million from the prior quarter but increasing $11.1 million from the same quarter a year ago. The sequential decrease in cash and marketable securities was primarily due to higher payments for IP licenses. Receivables days sales outstanding decreased from 35 to 32 days. While inventory dollars declined 4% sequentially, the days of inventory increased from 145 days to 157 days. Operating cash outflow was $260,000 for the quarter. Capital expenditures for tangible and intangible assets were $6.8 million for the quarter. Free cash outflow was $7.1 million for the quarter. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2027, we did not repurchase shares of our stock. During the second fiscal quarter, Ambarella's Board of Directors authorized a new $50 million repurchase program valid through June 30, 2027. The repurchase program does not obligate the company to acquire any particular amount of ordinary shares and it may be suspended at any time at the company's discretion. WT Microelectronics, a logistics partner in Taiwan that ships to multiple customers in Asia, was 60.2% of revenue for the second quarter. Acuto, a logistics and distribution partner in Japan was 11% of revenue in the quarter. I'll now discuss the outlook for the third quarter of fiscal year 2027. We are anticipating favorable seasonality in our fiscal third quarter, with revenue in the range of $115 million to $124 million or $119.5 million at the midpoint. At the midpoint, we expect our growth to be led by physical AI demand from the IoT market. We expect fiscal Q3 non-GAAP gross margin to be in the range of 59% to 60%. We expect non-GAAP OpEx in the third quarter to be in the range of $56.5 million to $59.5 million. We estimate net interest and other income to be approximately $1.9 million, our non-GAAP tax expense to be approximately $700,000, and our diluted share count is expected to be approximately 44.9 million shares. Thank you for joining our call today. And with that, I'll turn the call over to the operator for questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] And our first question for today comes from the line of Christopher Rolland from Susquehanna.
Unknown Analyst
analystThis is [indiscernible] Olivier on for Christopher Roland. So -- it's nice to see your road map sort of expanding, and I know that you announced this X7 accelerator. I was hoping to hear a little bit more about this new chip -- is this a chip that you can bundle with your existing N1 portfolio? Or does this address a different part of the stack.
Fermi Wang
executiveSo yes, Chris, for the X7, this is chip is an accelerator which can be bundled with any host, including our own chip. So in fact, that our customers using a certain part number and they feel they need to have more AI performance for certain workloads the X7 give them flexibility to upgrade the product without redesign the Board. So this accelerator definitely is a way to design that. But in addition to supporting our own SoCs -- but any other CPU like Armor [indiscernible] Intel chip, Intel CPUs that can -- we can also bundle X with that as a AI Accelerator.
Unknown Analyst
analystGreat. Appreciate this. And for my second question, I wanted to ask about sort of the physical AI and human not opportunity. Is this responsible at all for this increase in SAM? Are there any new engagements or new designs that you can point us to?
Fermi Wang
executiveYes. So definitely, that's a big part of that. And in the last earnings call, we talked about in design win for the robots, including for roughly $100 million, although we didn't give you another breakdown, but I can say that we add more design wins to [indiscernible] pipeline and the higher revenue target. So from that point of view, we continue to make progress. But in addition to robots, I also think that each infrastructure and also enterprise security as well as portable video are all the reasons that we are increasing our same number.
Louis Gerhardy
executiveYes. Do when we did, Fermi mentioned a quadruped robotic dog with a CV72-chip this quarter. So continue to add on to the robotics wins we've described before.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from the line of Joe Moore from Morgan Stanley.
Joseph Moore
analystI wonder, first, in terms of the broader ecosystem, you talked about some of the challenges on memory. What does that mean for your business? Do you think -- is there a risk of pull forwards or things like that because people are trying to get ahead of memory price increases? Is there pressure on you? Just what are you seeing from that memory impact from your customers?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So we continue to monitor this situation very closely [indiscernible] by talking to customers all the time. So for Q3, we are comfortable with our -- our -- the guidance we provide today. In Q4, we continue to to the customer to make sure our customer will have -- we can secure enough memory for a Q4 business. That's definitely the uncertainty that we are dealing with.
Joseph Moore
analystOkay. That's helpful. And then in terms of opening up to a broader ecosystem distribution partners, things like that, I think you made the comment about -- that would take a couple of years to inflect. I guess I would sort of think that those customers would act a lot more quickly and would that pipeline could build a lot more quickly than what you had seen previously in automotive. Just what do you -- what was the comment that I maybe misunderstand there? And then what is the time line to start to see traction from that kind of broader ecosystem?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So when I say 2 to 3 years, we talk about meaningful revenues. And I agree with you that we -- in fact, we really start seeing a small amount of design wins which can generate rev next year. But when we talk about meaningful revenue that will have an impact to our revenue forecast, I think that will take 2 to 3 years. In fact, when we talk to both Capgemini and Macnica, we kind of -- in fact, the range of revenue we are expecting from this collaboration is $0.5 billion with each 1 of them. So from that point of view, we definitely looking forward to gradually ramp up the revenue for the next couple of years and start seeing meaningful revenue behind that.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Tore Svanberg from Stifel.
Tore Svanberg
analystCongratulations on [indiscernible] and Capgemini partnerships. I'm curious on those, Fermi, what are some of the early use cases that those 2 partners are going to be hoping you maybe you can call out some markets or applications. And how should I think about that in the context of your Cooper platform? And are they -- are they going to be working with you on Cooper? Or are they going to be providing some of their own software? Just curious how that's going to play out?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So let me answer the second question first. Yes, both of them will use Cooper. In fact, that's a key driver for them to select work with us because they see a very mature software platform, they can immediately tackle on and start building around it, generating infrastructure for their own product line. So that our mature SoC as well as the material Cooper software platform is the probably most critical engineering aspect that we offer to our partners. Go back to the potential market that we are talking about. In fact, there are multiple of them. And in fact, I talked to by [indiscernible] CEO in that meeting, they are highlighting that they have already sized winning design wins with our solution on drones and retail channels and also manufacturing. So that is definitely -- you can see that it's really a large market. But however, most of the design wins is small and segmented at beginning, but can ramp up -- if they can ramp up to a large volume of business, that will take time. But we always start seeing our partners start talking about different applications.
Louis Gerhardy
executiveThey can work together as well. As Fermi said, Macnica can serve small to midsize markets that oftentimes are very fragmented, but really for Capgemini, it's large enterprise customers, and you can look at who they talked about before. Those are the type of customers we'd really go after with them. So they're very complementary to each other.
Tore Svanberg
analystVery good. And as my follow-up on the edge infrastructure market. This is obviously a completely new area. It sounds like that's the sort of biggest contributor to your increased SAM. I'm just curious, who is going to be some of your partners there? I mean, are these going to be your end customer sort of building their own infrastructure? Or is there going to be like an intermediary company that's building it? It's going to be the traditional server guys? Yes. Just curious how that's all going to play out.
Fermi Wang
executiveWell, I think obviously, we're going to continue to talk to some of the large customer directly. But at the same time, we're counting on Capgemini and Magnica help us to penetrate because they're already in that market, they're already selling solution to the existing AGI customer with their existing solution. So working with them will help us to ramp up our revenue much better than just we're talking to direct customers directly.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton from Needham & Company.
Unknown Analyst
analystI just wanted to ask just longer term on the -- sorry, Magnico and capgemini partnerships. Does that change the long-term gross margin target? I assume that there's probably some allocation of revenue that would be attributed to those partners. And so wondering if that has any gross margin implications as that indirect channel ramps?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So today, I think our long-term gross margin is still 59% to 62%. We definitely try and continue to watch because this is just -- we just start ramping up this business if there's any change, we'll definitely inform our investors. But today, for us, after we talk to Capgemini and Magnico, we don't feel there's any need to change that target today.
Unknown Analyst
analystGot it. And then I guess just a clarification on the $9 million charge for the project that was canceled. Was that a semi-custom project that was canceled? And does that have any impact on your expected revenue pipeline for the semi-custom business?
John Young
executiveYes. Thanks, Quinn. It is not one of the semi-custom opportunities that we were -- that we've talked about. It was a development project with I guess you could say, an automotive customer, auto autonomy customer, and we've been negotiating the termination of that for quite some time. And in Q2, we finalized the agreement.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Kevin Cassidy from Rosenblatt Securities.
Kevin Cassidy
analystGoing back to the shortage on the memory side, and you've got near-term visibility. But I'm wondering on the design and I know our customers or the market out there is probably dominated by a GPU-based embedded product that uses much more DRAM than years with. I seeing any additional interest because you're more efficient with DRAM content?
Fermi Wang
executiveWell, yes. First of all, the memory situation is [indiscernible] for everybody, but some of our competitor who has more money to buy multiple memories. But however, any customer who comes to us for the HAI or physical AI they probably only use GPUs for their first-generation product, and they understand. So the memory cost is just one reason, but more importantly is power efficiency and other rate. But the memory cost definitely is a driver for people to start considering what's the more efficient way to do the product. So I agree with you that some of the most -- almost all the customers who came to talk to us is because our power efficiency solution and a lower-cost solution what they're using.
Kevin Cassidy
analystOkay. And maybe along the same lines with the AI accelerator, you'd be competing against a GPU that uses a lot of memory also. What is the number [indiscernible] inside your X7?
Fermi Wang
executiveWell, inside of that, we need a much smaller footprint -- for example, we only need 4 megabytes memory for the accelerator running large language models. So just show you the -- and more importantly, the accelerator, the power envelope, you have to fit in is anywhere between 4 to 5 watts in the current design win. So all of the power efficiency in my memory size and also cost really helping us to penetrate this market right now.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Suji Desilva from Roth Capital.
Sujeeva De Silva
analystJust a clarification for me on the X7 chip. Is that competing really only with edge GPUs? Or is it other AI specialty chips? Or how should we think about the competitive landscape for this new offering?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight now -- well, in addition to NVIDIA [indiscernible] having similar products in the market space, they are probably 50 state companies are doing similar chips. So it's a cloud space. But however, at end is really about the power efficiency because I just talked about to run a certain workload, you have to have a mature, not only power-efficient solution but mature how and software, which I think we are one of the very few that can do that today.
Sujeeva De Silva
analystOkay. That's helpful for me. And then my other question is you're talking about customization -- now projects. I'm just wondering what's precipitated the demand from the customers or your push to provide customization? What's newer versus your standard products industry now that's driving the need for that or your desire to do that?
Fermi Wang
executiveI think you are talking about the optimization for the memory situation. Is that correct?
Sujeeva De Silva
analystSemi customer, I apologize.
Fermi Wang
executiveYes. For semi customer. In fact, we basically allow our customers give us a pack and we build on the spec. But however, when we negotiate back with the customer, we need to make sure that we can sell this back to somebody else. So we -- for the semi content chip, we pretty much built a purpose chair for the 1 customer, which they benefit from this. But at the same time, we can sell the chip to others that are not competing with the key customers. That's the business model and how it works on the engineering side.
Louis Gerhardy
executiveWe'll try to offer as much of our own IP in those semi-custom chips as possible. For example, we have our own IP for the AI accelerator, then PU for all the perception capabilities, including ISP and encoder, the CPUs, all of those functional blocks are available for a customer to develop a semi-customer custom chip with.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Liam Pharr from BoA.
Liam Pharr
analystIs there a way to frame how much memory cost inflation you're absorbing this quarter, either in basis points or maybe what gross margin would have been without any memory cost inflation? And is a path back above 60% feasible while memory prices stay elevated? Or does that require pricing to come down?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So first of all, the memory price doesn't impact our gross margin is really only have a potential to impact how many chips our customers can buy. So memory cost, because we don't buy memory and we don't resell memory. So the memory price has no impact to our gross margin. So that -- I think I hope that answers your question. But the real question for us is how that memory cost can -- because the -- because our customers need to increase the price whether that will reduce the total volume they can sell and therefore, reduce the total ordering to us. That's something we need to continue to observe. In Q2 and Q3, we see a little impact on our revenue because of many situation will continue to watch for the Q4.
Liam Pharr
analystAnd then I guess for my follow-up, Q3 has guided up 10.5% roughly sequential versus 13.5% last year. How much of this next quarter is normal seasonality versus underlying end demand strength? And given you flag of Q4 memory supply, obviously, in the demand picture, how should we think about Q4 seasonality and whether the full year 10% to 15% is still reasonable for the full year guide?
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So I think the outcome here is still a little uncertain because of the memory constraint that you talk about. And like I said, we continue to talk to our customers for that to monitor how they impact our performance in Q4 barring for any memory impact to our revenue, I think that you should expect Q4 was a regular seasonality.
Operator
operatorAnd our next question comes from the line of Gus Richard from Northland.
Unknown Analyst
analystRobotics architecture is looking an awful lot like an autonomous car in terms of what it needs to do. And I'm just wondering you have a domain controller for autos, and you have the CD products -- are you seeing any traction in domain controllers? And -- and then any clarification on where you're seeing the strength is something that's coming out of China?
Fermi Wang
executiveFirst of all, you're 100% right that a lot of robot design main architect looks just like [indiscernible]. And however, I think the robotic market situation really reminded me account driving 7 years ago. When that at that time, all of our automotive customers in trying to just using individual modules and put the solution together and start demoing and selling the third-generation product. I think this is why we act with the current robots. We see a lot of customers are rushing out their first-generation product by putting individual components together to demo their capabilities. However, we do believe that integration path of the robotic will be very similar to what happened to the auto driving car. It is there will be people going to buy perception systems, but down the road, people want to buy domain controller. We do see both opportunity today, but I will say majority of our customer today is asking for perception, modules, perception solution. But on their road map, they want to have a way that can buy a domain controller in the long run. So I think we are -- we have a complete road map we can sell just perception system to a customer today. In fact, people want to bring domain controller like for the brand of the robot, we have the solution too. But our plan is we're going to continue to develop solutions for both so that we can cover the total space of robotics.
Unknown Analyst
analystGot it. And then just if I think about, again, robots, cars are 2D and robots are 3D. And I'm just wondering, is 1 of the limitations of penetration, training and can you help your customers train robots thinking about line, but Go ahead. Sorry...
Fermi Wang
executiveRight. So in terms of training, it's really about how to collect data. One thing we help our customers is we build a platform for people to collect data easily. And also we provide a platform that can provide a service to help people to label those data automatically. -- so people can use our system to reference design to collect data. In fact, some of the, I would say, the people doing mapping generating the CD making are using our system to collect data. And also, we are providing service to some of our automotive customers that we can -- using our tools to auto labeling, all of the data they generate. Those are 2 things we can help to provide assistance on the training side.
Operator
operatorAnd our final question for today comes from the line of Martin Yang from Opco.
Unknown Analyst
analystFor me, you size the potential revenue from Capgemini and Magnico pretty similarly, but they face different variety of customers. Can you maybe talk about the methodology you arrive at those dollar figures? Is it similar methodology or a very different approach to size those potential markets?
Muneyb Minhazuddin
executiveMuneyb just jumping in there. I think both for me and Louis were commenting earlier about how complementary they are, right? So I think One, on the Macnica side, I think Bose has commented as large-scale, medium, large kind of customers we haven't addressed in the past. So think of them as a large volume play where we typically directly engaged with high-volume customers. These will start aggregating a whole bunch of small, midsized customers that we did not have access to in the past. So it's a volume play. And I think Fermi already indicated that we're starting to see some small design wins come through with the distribution. And then if you think about Capgemini is more of a value play. And I think Luis indicated before, these are large enterprises and customers who will bring complex solutions, deploy at scale to enterprises. So the modeling is on both slightly different one. One, distribution channels, resellers scaling with small design wins, building up small volume -- the other ones are large customers and logos, which have much larger opportunity deals, but complex opportunities. So on both sides, the modeling is done on value versus volume. And I think the earlier question was also, you should see different time lines on this. So we do expect faster time lines on the distribution side and more longer time lines and the more larger complex opportunities -- but the modeling has been built out over 7 years of how this will come to fruition. And of course, they are some of them new to our products, so initial ramp-up market-making pilot opportunities is what we are allowing for. But we'll keep you updated as we start winning some large deals and meaningful revenue, as Fermi pointed out in future quarters.
Unknown Analyst
analystI have a follow-up on X7, is that accelerates primarily targeted for as a channel product? Or there's no distinction between [indiscernible]
Fermi Wang
executiveThere is no distinction. And in fact, I'm expecting that both Capgemini and Macnica will do product design for that and targeting different customers.
Operator
operatorThis does conclude the question-and-answer session of today's program. I'd like to hand the program back to Dr. Fermi Wang for any further remarks.
Fermi Wang
executiveAnd thank all of you for joining our call today, and I hope to see you and talk to you next time.
Operator
operatorThank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Ambarella, Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Ambarella, Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.