Rubrik, Inc. (RBRK) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 10, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Matthew Martino
analystAll right. Good morning, folks. We're going to get started in the interest of time. We have a pleasure to have Bipul Sinha, CEO of Rubrik here this morning. Welcome back to the conference, Bipul.
Bipul Sinha
executiveThanks, Matt.
Matthew Martino
analystRight. Well, let's get started. So Bipul, you've called this a singularity moment for AI and cybersecurity. As enterprises become increasingly reliant on AI systems and autonomous agents. What do you think changes most about the way organizations think about risk and resilience?
Bipul Sinha
executiveWe have been talking about this for the last many years that prevention and detection is not sufficient. Folks have to really think about recovery and resilience because you can't prevent the on preventive. And what Metros and frontier models have shown us that you can't really prevent and detect anything because these attacks are at machine speed. And at machine speed, you can't prevent all the technologies that we have built for cyber in the last 20, 30 years was built for a human operator and human attackers. We are in a completely different era. So this is a new moment. And all you can do is to think about how do you patch your systems at machine speed and how do you deliver cyber recovery at machine speed. And that's what Rubrik is solving for our customers, doing a cyber recovery at machine is speed.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. And even over the last 2 years, I think Rubrik started with backup, you evolved into cyber resilience, and now you talk about security and AI operations. So when you connect those dots, what do you ultimately want rubric to become? 3 years from now, what do you think customers will be buying from Rubrik that they're largely not buying today?
Bipul Sinha
executiveSo our goal is to deliver resilience to every aspect of operations. What are the different things we do. Number 1 is data. So we want to ensure that your data is recovered and your applications are up and running. Number 2 is identity. Because we want to ensure that the data risk comes from identity and identity systems are up and running, and they are in the correct state. And then the third piece is AI. As we know, agents assume identity and operate on sensitive data. So you need to have resilience and security for agents. So how do we ensure that agents are only taking the right actions. And if they do bad action, how do we remind the action of agents. So we are very clear. There are 2 major trends in the market, AI and cybersecurity Underneath ARM cybersecurities identity and data, we want to deliver complete cyber resilience across data identity and agentic world.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. You talked about prevention and detection alone not being enough. I think you've been very consistent in that message. So if attacks are becoming increasingly autonomous and continuous. What does the security architecture ultimately look like on the other side of that shift? And where does Rubrik sit within that architecture?
Bipul Sinha
executiveSo in my mind, since attacks are going to be at machine speed. It will be a world of continuous attacks. Today, operations in cyber are two different teams and two different things inside any business. I believe that these two operations and security will merge. And you will have a situation of continuous attack and continuous recovery and continuous patching. And in this world of continuous attack and continuous patching, you need to have a human in the loop at the very, very minimum level where the humans are making decisions, but machines are implementing this -- and this is where the cyber is going to go. It's going to be a world of no human in the loop patching, mostly no human in the loop recovery.
Matthew Martino
analystLet's pull that into the most recent quarter. Net new ARR accelerated to 35%. You raised the full year guide. I guess, a 2-parter here. One is what felt different in the business this quarter? And then I guess, if we dovetail off previous question. Are you seeing Rubrik sort of increase in relevance within sort of the security get more broadly? Like how is that shaping customer conversations today even relative to a year ago?
Bipul Sinha
executiveIf you think about this idea of [indiscernible] and frontier AI and machine speed, businesses, particularly Board and CEOs are realizing more and more that cyber has gone from a technology discussion whether it's endpoint, network, cloud, Zero Trust network, all of that mumbo jumbo to a risk discussion that can we keep our business up and running. What is our dollar address should we go down for a day or 2 or 3? Do we have a situation where my large manufacturing will come to a screeching halt is because of the ransom attack or cyber attacks. So that's the discussion now. And Rubrik plays in that discussion because we are giving experience to our customers saying, no matter what happens, whether it's AI attack, human attack, machine speed attacks, you'll always be up and running. Because of our preemptive recovery engine. We precalculate a clean data estate in peace time to be able to deliver a machine speed recovery. And this message is resonating Obviously, Rubrik is a considered purchase, we are not like a Facebook app that millions of people download overnight and we won the market. So there will be a process. But I like that process because at the end of the day, I want us to have consistent high growth for many years. And we believe that we are set up for it.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. Now A lot of the strategy increasingly is around data, identity and agents, right? So you broadened the aperture from just pure cyber resilience into some new categories. Why is it important to see all three of those together? And what can Rubrik do with that combination that customers can't get from separate point solutions?
Bipul Sinha
executiveLet's just take agents. If you think about genetic security and governance, there are many pieces to it. You need to have visibility into all your agents sanctioned or unsanctioned. Second piece is, can you do identity-based just in time regulation on activity of these agents. That's the net. So that's an identity-based MCP server level, which database, which entity these guys can update. The third one is runtime security, and this is where the intent understanding of agents are important. What happened in the Open AI hugging phases, these agents to get to a goal they actually circumvented the gardens that was built for them. So you need to understand the intent of the agent and check the intent on every interaction of the agent to be able to stop the Agentic action on run time at the point of action. And then finally, the refined piece that if the agent still does something that is not desirable, how do you undo it. Folks are now buying observability from one vendor, identity from a different vendor, runtime security, intent from third vendor and agent rewind or recovery from a fourth vendor. We believe that businesses need a consistent, fully integrated agent security and governance platform. And Rubrik has the vision and the path to deliver that.
Matthew Martino
analystJust on the Open AI hugging face point, right? I mean, I think in the past, you've seen a lot of basically major brands ransomware attacks creating a catalyst for new spend within category. To what extent are you actually seeing that play out in your own customer conversations and pipeline, particularly for agent cloud?
Bipul Sinha
executiveI mean hugging face incident is new, and the word is getting out in the last few weeks, but if you look at like all the write-ups around it and what is new is that there were attacks in Europe and in America coming out of are largely innocuous testing and sandboxing of agents. Just think about if it was a malicious kind of a situation where somebody designed these agents for attack and the goal was to attack. The goal here was to -- was different, we would be -- we have a completely different outcome. So now folks are realizing that agents and AI is making the world more dangerous. And obviously, AI has tremendous promise of like productivity and benefits but it also creates 100x more risk. So now they are looking at a world where you have 100x more opportunities, but it can also do 10x more damage at 1/10 of the time. And that's what they're grappling with.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. Let's pivot to identity. I think it was sort of interesting your disclosures at the Analyst Day, you showed how enterprise data security scaled to $100 million in 2.5 years. You did that with identity. It's $50 million in just over a year. So Tell me about your sort of aspirations for the identity business more broadly. Could this be the next several hundred million dollar business? What are the biggest factors that determine how large that opportunity becomes?
Bipul Sinha
executiveLook, data security fundamentally is impacted by identity because user interaction on data is what creates risk. If you have more user interaction or an entity interaction on sensitive data, you have more risk. So identity is critical for enterprise data security. And what we are also seeing is that identity has become the perimeter for enterprise. Hackers are not breaking in. They are logging in. And as a result, identity systems have become ground 0 for cyber attack. You have issues around destruction of identity systems, persistence persistent identity where identity bad identity persists for a long period of time. And you can't just undo the identity system because then you'll not just under the persistent bad identity but you will also bring your x employees back into the system. So how do you undo and redo both together undue for all the identity changes and redo for only good identity changes so that you bring the identity system in a correct state. All these are very difficult problems for our customers to solve, and this is what Rubrik is delivering in the marketplace. If you look at the identity systems, it's not just 1 or 2 systems. You have active directory, you have [indiscernible]. There's just a number of identity systems and you need consistency and recovery and removal of persistence across all of these. So we believe that it's a tremendous opportunity. We are in the early innings of it. I can't tell you here that if it is bigger than data protection or smaller than data protection, but if you look at the growth rate and acceleration in this market, we are very excited.
Matthew Martino
analystAnd then maybe another way to think about this, just I think Rubrik has traditionally priced identity like per heartbeat, if you will. With nonhuman identities, I mean, we've all seen the statistics 8:1, 10:1. I mean how are you thinking about maybe evolving the pricing mechanics to kind of capture that opportunity as we start to see a lot more agents running on our behalf.
Bipul Sinha
executiveI mean, look, we'll work with our customers. We learn from the market as how they want to protect the nonhuman identity or Agentic identity, maybe Agentic identities could be more important than human identity in the next several years. Ultimately, our goal is to meet where our customers are, create value for them. And I'm confident that monetization will happen.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. I want to get your perspective on a more recent development within the business, which is sort of self-hosted and sovereign. You guys have actually started to see a bit of an improvement in that business. And it's not just rework specific. We're starting to see that across broader software. From your lens, what's driving that trend? Are customers thinking differently about where critical data and AI workloads should live? And does that make this a more durable opportunity than investors appreciate [indiscernible].
Bipul Sinha
executiveThis has been the trend for the last few years. And I'll give you an example. I was in Germany and talking to one of our very large customers CIO and she came into the room and first question he asked was that BiP, we are using your cloud and what if you guys decided to shut down the cloud for us because of geopolitical situations or the geopolitics risk. And so everybody in lots of countries around the world are thinking I want so vent in terms of operations. Sovereignty in terms of data, sovereignty in terms of infrastructure, locality. So we are giving them Rubrik Security Cloud, private addition to ensure that the sovereignty is maintained. And sovereignty is not always going into their own data centers, it could be colocation, it could be a bunch of controls around cloud and cloud is hosted in the right country. So there is a lot of flavor to it. But ultimately, I believe that geopolitics will force more localization. And we have the solutions to meet our customers where they are. So we believe that the non-cloud sovereign on-prem deployments, particularly international could be a good part of our business.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. And then let's talk about Flex. You introduced a new consumption model. I think this sort of defines your pivot from, let's say, more cyber recovery to a broader sort of platform play. What kind of early customer feedback have you gotten there? And with the early deployments under your belt, like, what are you learning? Is it changing how customers evaluate, adopt or expand with Rubrik in ways that you expected or perhaps didn't expect?
Bipul Sinha
executiveIf you look at our business in the last, say, 3, 4 years, we are now a fully fledged platform play with many different products that has this complementary network effect. What I mean by complementary network effect is if customers adopt more than one product on Rubrik platform, the value of all the products go up. For example, if they're protecting data and start to protect identity with us, now we can give them information about threat actor on both sides of the equation. Same thing with data center in the cloud. If the protected data center, if they add cloud, we can immediately tell them if the same threat actor or the securities posture is same different across these two and because of 6, 7 different products that we have on our platform, every time we wanted to introduce a new product to the customer, you have to go do a new contract because we didn't have a vehicle on which we can add new SKUs or have them try new things. Plus, they are buying many different products. They don't -- they want to swap one further [indiscernible] customers go from on-premises to the cloud. They want to increase cloud more and reduce on-premises or the vice versa. So they need flexibility to have one contract, one commitment, one purchase across 6 or 7 different product suite that Rubrik has. And Flex made more sense to give our customers flexibility so that they can actually buy and consume Rubrik in a consistent way.
Matthew Martino
analystLet's drill into competition. As Rubrik expands into identity resilience and agents does the competitive landscape start to look materially different from the one you operated in a few years ago? Like where are you seeing the basis of competition evolve most quickly as you expand into these newer product categories and markets?
Bipul Sinha
executiveObviously, with identity, we are seeing a new set of competition, whether they are legacy or the new edge competition for identity recovery, identity resilience I mean that's the nature of the game, right? We want -- we are an ambitious company. We are building a platform play with many different products. And as we expand, we run into a new competition. But what we have to make sure what I have to make sure is -- we have products that are ahead of the market that has a very compelling value proposition. And as the customers adopt more of the Rubrik solution on our platform, we increased the value of all other products because it's naturally fully integrated as opposed to them buying different products. I mean ultimately, Rubrik is a platform company. We are not vendor of tools. We are a vendor of one platform with many products.
Matthew Martino
analystAnd maybe just another one at a different angle on competition. I mean if you think about the broader security platforms, they've all extended into new market categories. Data security seems to be one of the highest growth priorities within security budgets. So what makes this problem so difficult to solve? And I guess what sort of like sustains Rubrik relative to some of these other vendors that could be looking at the space?
Bipul Sinha
executiveDealing with the data infrastructure and Rubrik ultimately is a data infrastructure company. It's a very different ball game than do risk analysis of attack. If you have like think about firewall or whatever. And if it tells you have 90% probability that you have an attack, that's a high-value thing. But if I give you a 90% correct data, nothing will work in your environment. I have to deliver every single bit to the last bit right. It's a very deterministic complex data management, data infrastructure issue. So obviously, everything is a C program or Java or whatever it right, these days, anybody can do anything, but these are completely different disciplines. And so what we do is an extremely hard problem to solve. Because not only we are extracting data from a running system, but we're restoring data back to the system and bring that back up, think about your banks drilling out money on ATM. None of that will work if Rubrik doesn't deliver the right data.
Matthew Martino
analystGot it. All right. At Rubrik forward, you guys kind of moved from preemptive recovery to autonomous recovery, right? So how far can that evolution go? Does autonomous recovery ultimately create a new spending category? Or does it mainly increase the value of the existing platform?
Bipul Sinha
executiveHere is the fundamental question. Everybody talks about fighting AI with AI. But to fight AI with AI, they bring their 20-year-old software, where human beings are using that software and responding to a cyber attack. If the attacks are happening at machine speed, you can't respond at human speed with your old software. So the first thing we did was we made Rubrik platform itself as an agent. That agent watches what is happening, understand the implications of it, creates the recovery plan and brings human in the loop only for decisions, but the implementation and recovery is done autonomously. That's the vision for the future. Because if agents are attacking you, agents have to also respond and recover so that you are in the continuous recovery mode. And that's the new world. And it is our first step in that direction. But this is where the whole security industry has to go. Every aspect of cybersecurity has to be Agenetic response.
Matthew Martino
analystIs this having an effect on -- we talk a lot about the newer products, identity agent cloud. But even just in the core, there's a pretty large sort of brownfield displacement opportunity out there. I mean how are the advancements on the core platform driving sort of accelerated engagement or win rates across some of these legacy competitors that you compete with? I mean what are you seeing out there?
Bipul Sinha
executiveI mean our win rate continues to be extremely high against Legacy I mean, the competitive landscape remains the same as we have been saying. I mean, we do lots of legacy replacement. But the thing is that we are also adding more and more capabilities because unlike infra discussion where cloud is the new infra and on-prem is old infra, we discuss data and data in the cloud is as important as data on-premises or the other way around, data on-premises is, in many cases, more important because they may be running the most critical application on premises. So ability to consistently apply security policy and autonomously orchestrate, recovery and response is where the market is, and this is where we are actually driving the industry.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. And I want to talk about agents again. I mean enterprises seem to be experimenting with agents today, but feels like relatively few are actually letting them operate autonomously. What do you think the biggest gating factors are here? Like what is the change for companies to get comfortable allowing agents to execute critical business processes on their own because that obviously dovetails with sort of agent cloud selling motion broadly?
Bipul Sinha
executiveSo just like in the world of SaaS, the same kind of things will repeat in the world of AI. So if you look at businesses, business has built custom software for their custom business processes. And then they bought horizontal software to actually do things that is not their core expertise. So if you look at what is happening in AI, they are buying coding agents, search, copilot, these are horizontal things that every business needs. And these things are getting adopted very, very fast because it doesn't have impact or implication on their own business processes. But when it comes to their own business processes, understanding what is the customer for a customer, what is the order to cash process. Every business has a different process. So the AI will be custom AI when it comes to the enterprise workflow automation. Because you need to understand data and entity relationship, what Palantir called ontology across different silos of data to be able to orchestrate AI across your enterprise to run your custom business process or your own proprietary business process. That's not going to be overnight. Somebody flips a switch and you automatically transform your enterprise into an AI [indiscernible]. So that's going to be a process. Our goal is to make sure that our customers can deploy agents, whether it's coding agent, search agent, copilot with confidence that these agents are not doing things outside of the scope of these agents. And as they build more custom agents for their own business processes as they automate their own business we want to parlay the same platform, same technology on this customer AI. That's how this industry will go. Early days for custom, the coding and search are going faster. And that's how these things go.
Matthew Martino
analystAnd how do you think about -- I mean everyone seems to want a piece of this broader AI governance opportunity, observability, traditional security, ITSM? I guess, as this market develops, like what capabilities do you think will ultimately separate the winners from everybody else?
Bipul Sinha
executiveSo typically, cybersecurity companies have not been in the online business operations. Because once you get the authorization, then you do your things, they are not in that process of doing things. And all the log collection happens in the background and off-line. So expertise in online business operations is going to be critical if you want to truly win in this market.
Matthew Martino
analystLet me ask you another question from earlier in the discussion. I mean I guess, what -- you talk about protection detection prevention not being enough in an AI world, I guess what -- where could you be wrong in that scenario, right? I mean, is there anything that the existing vendors could do to maybe meet the moment as it pertains to kind of agent runtime security?
Bipul Sinha
executiveThey have tons of opportunities. But when I say that Prevention and Detection is not relevant, doesn't -- that doesn't mean that they go away. If you build a house, you have windows and doors and set an alarm, that doesn't mean that people are not breaking. But you need to have those imperatives. So where the near-term opportunity for lots of Prevention and Detection companies is that as the AI-based attacks ramp up, it has to be investigation effort from these companies to ensure that they understand what kinds of acts are happening. Detection is impossible, but post facto, once the things enter in your environment, you need to understand where they went. So it's not that Prevention and Detection companies are going to go away. But the focus of this strategy, the focus of this strategy has to be resilient.
Matthew Martino
analystOkay. We've talked a lot about what enterprises need to trust agents. But underneath all that is, I guess, the question of trusted data. Anapurna was one of the more intriguing announcements or evolutions from the Analyst Day because it uses a sees an opportunity beyond resilience and security. What problem is Anapurna solving that exists data and AI platforms were designed to address?
Bipul Sinha
executiveIf you look at businesses, they have much bigger size of unstructured data that sits in their files other places than structured data that are in their databases. Most of the AI discussion so far has been on unstructured data or semi-structured data. Semi structure and textual data. But if you think about geospecial data, think about your X-rays, think about images and other data that comes from different sensors, that's a huge amount of data that is still not available for AI to operate on. And these are not cost effective to load them into a very expensive AI system or database systems just like that because you may be only wanting to see 5% or 10% of this huge amount of data to do certain AI analytics. So since Rubrik has this unique technology of of the understanding of the data and the metadata on the data. We have the ability to only give a slice of the data to the AI processes based on what they need instead of loading all their data. So our ability to load the meta data customers to decide what part of the data they want to operate in and then only bring data that is relevant is a unique opportunity for us.
Matthew Martino
analystHow early is this? I mean are you starting to engage with customers on this opportunity?
Bipul Sinha
executiveYes. We are starting to engage with the customers. There is a high degree of interest. Again, super early. I can't tell you how big and how fast it goes. But we are excited about what we see very, very early.
Matthew Martino
analystAll right. We'll stay tuned. Maybe close out in the last couple of minutes we have here, you created Rubrik X because large companies often struggle to build their second and third act. Looking across the portfolio today, which bet feels the least appreciated externally but has the potential to become a major business over time?
Bipul Sinha
executiveI mean if you look at just the unstructured part of our bet, so just the unstructured data resilience on the structured data recovery, is not as appreciated, but I believe that it's a tremendous opportunity for us because in terms of like cyberattacks and risk on the data, it doesn't matter whether it's your structured data or run a structured data because you can't go explain to your customers if you're a business that has got attacked saying, oh, it was attacked on, unstructured. It is like not going to fly. And on that unstructured data, we also have this opportunity to power on no an updated Anapurna that we talked about. So that whole area is a high potential area for us. Again, relatively new and under scale, but we believe we have tremendous opportunity ahead of us.
Matthew Martino
analystExcellent. Well, I think that's a great place to leave it. Bipul, thank you so much for joining us today.
Bipul Sinha
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Rubrik, Inc. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Rubrik, Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.